95-9980. Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Stock Exchange, Incorporated; Order Granting Approval to Proposed Rule Change Relating to the Authority of the Committee on Floor Procedure  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 78 (Monday, April 24, 1995)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 20132-20133]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-9980]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
    [Release No. 34-35614; File No. SR-CHX-95-05]
    
    
    Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Stock Exchange, 
    Incorporated; Order Granting Approval to Proposed Rule Change Relating 
    to the Authority of the Committee on Floor Procedure
    
    April 17, 1995.
        On February 10, 1995, the Chicago Stock Exchange, Incorporated 
    (``CHX'' or ``Exchange'') submitted to the Securities and Exchange 
    Commission (``SEC'' or ``Commission''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of 
    the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'')\1\ and Rule 19b-4 
    thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change to amend CHX Rule 3 of Article 
    XII to provide the Committee on Floor Procedure with the same authority 
    over persons associated with a member as it currently has over members. 
    On March 1, 1995, the Exchange submitted to the Commission Amendment 
    No. 1 to the proposed rule change.\3\
    
        \1\15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1) (1988).
        \2\17 CFR 240.19b-4 (1994).
        \3\See letter from David Rusoff, Foley & Lardner, to Jennifer 
    Choi, SEC, dated February 27, 1995. The original filing incorrectly 
    referenced Rule 3 of Article IV of the Exchange Rules as the rule to 
    be amended. Amendment No. 1 altered the proposed rule change to 
    reference Rule 3 of Article XII as the correct rule to be 
    amended. [[Page 20133]] 
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        The proposed rule change, including Amendment No. 1 thereto, was 
    published for comment in Securities Exchange Act Release No. 35449 
    (Mar. 7, 1995), 60 FR 13492 (Mar. 13, 1995). No comments were received 
    on the proposal.
        At present, Rule 3 of Article XII provides the Committee on Floor 
    Procedure with the authority to summarily fine members and exclude them 
    from the Exchange premises under certain circumstances. The Rule 
    provides that the Committee on Floor Procedure or an appropriately 
    designated subcommittee has the authority to summarily fine and exclude 
    from the Exchange a member whose conduct is deemed to be improper and 
    to recommend investigations pursuant to Rule 1 of Article XII\4\ 
    regarding any conduct on the floor of the Exchange. Specifically, any 
    member of the Floor Committee or a member of its appropriately 
    designated subcommittee may summarily fine any member for conduct 
    classified as Class B\5\ in an amount not to exceed $100. For conduct 
    classified as Class A offenses,\6\ any member of the Floor Committee or 
    a member of its appropriately designated subcommittee with the 
    concurrence of two other floor officials (floor governors if 
    immediately available) may summarily fine a member in an amount not to 
    exceed $2,500 and summarily exclude a member from the Exchange for no 
    longer than the remainder of the trading day.
    
        \4\Under Rule 1 of Article XII, any default, misconduct or other 
    offense alleged to have been committed by a member, member 
    organization or any other person or organization subject to the 
    Exchange's jurisdiction that comes to the attention of the president 
    shall be investigated by the staff and a written report of such 
    investigation shall be made to the president. In addition, if the 
    president decides from such a report that such member, member 
    organization, or other person or organization has committed a 
    default or other offense in violation of the Constitution or Rules 
    of the Exchange, the president shall direct the staff to prefer 
    written charges against the accused, a copy of which will be served 
    upon the accused.
        \5\Class B violations involve minor offenses such as dress code 
    and smoking violations. See .01 of the Interpretations and Policies 
    to Rule 3 of Article XII.
        \6\Class A represents more serious violations than Class B and 
    includes such conduct as fighting, threatening speech, and other 
    conduct that is detrimental to the interest or welfare of the 
    Exchange. See .01 of the Interpretations and Policies to Rule 3 of 
    Article XII.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        For either class of offenses, a member, who has been adversely 
    affected by any action taken under Rule 3, except for a summary 
    exclusion,\7\ by any person or body, other than the full Floor 
    Procedure Committee, may appeal to the full Floor Procedure Committee 
    within five days of receiving notice of the action by making a written 
    request. Upon appeal, the full Floor Procedure Committee may increase 
    or decrease the amount of a summary fine or the length of an exclusion 
    from the Exchange. The Floor Procedure Committee, however, may not fine 
    a member in an amount in excess of $2,500 or exclude a member from the 
    Exchange in excess of five full business days. The decision of the 
    Floor Procedure Committee is deemed final with respect to any action 
    involving no more than a $100 fine.
    
        \7\A member summarily excluded has the right to petition for 
    reinstatement after a sufficient ``cooling-off'' period has elapsed. 
    See .02 of the Interpretations and Policies to Rule 3 of Article 
    XII.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        By written request, a member may appeal a determination of the full 
    Floor Procedure Committee involving more than a $100 fine to the 
    Executive Committee. The Executive Committee will review the report of 
    the action as certified by the Secretary unless it decides to open the 
    record for additional evidence. Upon review, the Executive Committee 
    may increase or decrease the amount of a summary fine or the length of 
    an exclusion. The Executive Committee, however, may not fine a member 
    in an amount in excess of $2,500 or exclude a member from the Exchange 
    in excess of five full business days.
        The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 3 and interpretation .02 
    thereunder to extend the application of the rule to persons associated 
    with a member.\8\ Therefore, under the proposed rule change, the 
    Committee on Floor Procedure would exercise the same authority over 
    members and persons associated with a member.
    
        \8\The Exchange does not specifically define the term 
    ``associated person'' in its Rules. For purposes of Rule 3, Article 
    XII, the Exchange refers to an associated person as defined in 
    Section 3(a)(21) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Telephone 
    conversation with David Rusoff, Foley & Lardner, and Jennifer Choi, 
    Attorney, SEC, dated February 27, 1995. Section 3(a)(21) defines an 
    ``associated person of a member'' as any ``partner, officer, 
    director, or branch manager of such member (or any person occupying 
    a similar status or performing similar functions), any person 
    directly or indirectly controlling, controlled by, or under common 
    control with such member, or any employee of such member.''
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        The Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent 
    with the requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations 
    thereunder applicable to a national securities exchange, and, in 
    particular, with the requirements of Section 6(b).\9\ The Commission 
    believes the proposal is consistent with the Section 6(b)(6) 
    requirements that the rules of an exchange provide for the appropriate 
    discipline of its members and persons associated with its members for 
    violation of the Act, the rules promulgated thereunder, or the rules of 
    the exchange because the rule change provides that members and persons 
    associated with a member may be summarily fined or excluded from the 
    Exchange premises for conduct that the Exchange deems improper. 
    Moreover, the Commission believes the proposal is consistent with the 
    Section 6(b)(1) requirements that an exchange have the capacity to 
    enforce compliance by its members and persons associated with its 
    members, with the provisions of the Act, the rules promulgated 
    thereunder, and the rules of the exchange because under the proposed 
    rule change, the Exchange's Committee on Floor Procedure would have the 
    authority to enforce compliance by members and persons associated with 
    a member, with the rules that it deems important in the fair 
    administration of the Exchange.
    
        \9\15 U.S.C. 78f(b) (1988 & Supp. v 1993).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the 
    Act,\10\ that the proposed rule change (SR-CHX-95-05) is approved.
    
        \10\15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2) (1988).
    
        For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, 
    pursuant to delegated authority.\11\
    
        \11\17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12) (1994).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Margaret H. McFarland,
    Deputy Secretary.
    [FR Doc. 95-9980 Filed 4-21-95; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
    
    

Document Information

Published:
04/24/1995
Department:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
95-9980
Pages:
20132-20133 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Release No. 34-35614, File No. SR-CHX-95-05
PDF File:
95-9980.pdf