97-10568. Airworthiness Directives; Raytheon Model BAe 125-800A, and Model Hawker 800 and Hawker 800XP Series Airplanes  

  • [Federal Register Volume 62, Number 79 (Thursday, April 24, 1997)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Pages 19950-19951]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 97-10568]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    
    Federal Aviation Administration
    
    14 CFR Part 39
    
    [Docket No. 96-NM-228-AD]
    RIN 2120-AA64
    
    
    Airworthiness Directives; Raytheon Model BAe 125-800A, and Model 
    Hawker 800 and Hawker 800XP Series Airplanes
    
    AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This document proposes the adoption of a new airworthiness 
    directive (AD) that is applicable to certain Raytheon Model BAe 125-
    800A and -800B series airplanes, and Model Hawker 800 and Hawker 800XP 
    series airplanes. This proposal would require modification of the 
    rudder. This proposal is prompted by a report indicating that, due to 
    the existing design of the rudder, overbias or overbalance of the 
    rudder occurs during single engine handling. The actions specified by 
    the proposed AD are intended to prevent overbias or overbalance of the 
    rudder, which could result in reduced controllability of the airplane.
    
    DATES: Comments must be received by June 2, 1997.
    
    ADDRESSES: Submit comments in triplicate to the Federal Aviation 
    Administration (FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, ANM-103, 
    Attention: Rules Docket No. 96-NM-228-AD, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., 
    Renton, Washington 98055-4056. Comments may be inspected at this 
    location between 9:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except 
    Federal holidays.
        The service information referenced in the proposed rule may be 
    obtained from Raytheon Aircraft Company, Manager Service Engineering, 
    Hawker Customer Support Department, P.O. Box 85, Wichita, Kansas 67201-
    0085. This information may be examined at the FAA, Transport Airplane 
    Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Larry Engler, Aerospace Engineer, 
    Airframe Branch, ACE-118W, FAA, Wichita Aircraft Certification Office, 
    Small Airplane Directorate, 1801 Airport Road, Room 100, Mid-Continent 
    Airport, Wichita, Kansas 67209; telephone (316) 946-4122; fax (316) 
    946-4407.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Comments Invited
    
        Interested persons are invited to participate in the making of the 
    proposed rule by submitting such written data, views, or arguments as 
    they may desire. Communications shall identify the Rules Docket number 
    and be submitted in triplicate to the address specified above. All 
    communications received on or before the closing date for comments, 
    specified above, will be considered before taking action on the 
    proposed rule. The proposals contained in this notice may be changed in 
    light of the comments received.
        Comments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory, 
    economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed rule. All 
    comments submitted will be available, both before and after the closing 
    date for comments, in the Rules Docket for examination by interested 
    persons. A report summarizing each FAA-public contact concerned with 
    the substance of this proposal will be filed in the Rules Docket.
        Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments 
    submitted in response to this notice must submit a self-addressed, 
    stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments 
    to Docket Number 96-NM-228-AD.'' The postcard will be date stamped and 
    returned to the commenter.
    
    Availability of NPRMs
    
        Any person may obtain a copy of this NPRM by submitting a request 
    to the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, ANM-103, Attention: Rules 
    Docket No. 96-NM-228-AD, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 
    98055-4056.
    
    Discussion
    
        The FAA has received a report indicating that, during flight 
    testing of a Raytheon (Beech) Model Hawker 800 series airplane, too 
    much rudder was being applied during single engine handling (i.e., 
    rudder overbias). The results of testing also revealed that, in certain 
    circumstances, the rudder did not naturally return to its trimmed state 
    after being moved away from that position (i.e., rudder overbalance), 
    which causes the pilot to use pedal force to restore the rudder to the 
    trimmed position.
        The existing design of the rudder allows, during single engine 
    operation, some flow separation on the ``out-of-wind'' side of the 
    rudder during critical combinations of rudder and sideslip angles. It 
    also causes control circuit friction of the rudder when the airplane is 
    accelerated during single engine operation. In addition, the centering 
    spring of the rudder does not produce consistent installation loads. 
    These conditions, if not corrected, could result in overbias or 
    overbalance of the rudder and consequent reduced controllability of the 
    airplane.
        The rudder of Model Hawker 800 series airplanes is similar in 
    design to that of Model BAe 125-800A, and Model Hawker 800XP series 
    airplanes. Therefore, the FAA has determined that all of these models 
    may be subject to the same unsafe condition.
    
    Explanation of Relevant Service Information
    
        The FAA has reviewed and approved Raytheon Service Bulletin SB.55-
    36-25F017A&B, dated April 15, 1996, which describes procedures for 
    modification of the rudder. The modification involves installation of 
    three separation triggers that are half-round in radius (0.375 inch) on 
    the left- and right-hand side of the rudder just ahead of the hinge 
    line. The modification also involves removal of the spring strut of the 
    rudder and adjustment and reinstallation of it. Accomplishment of the 
    modification will prevent too much rudder application during rudder 
    bias operation.
    
    Explanation of Requirements of Proposed Rule
    
        Since an unsafe condition has been identified that is likely to 
    exist or develop on other products of this same type design, the 
    proposed AD would require modification of the rudder. The actions would 
    be required to be accomplished in accordance with the service bulletin 
    described previously.
    
    Cost Impact
    
        There are approximately 295 Beech (Raytheon) Model BAe 125-800A, -
    800B series airplanes, and Model Hawker 800 and Hawker 800XP series 
    airplanes of the affected design in the worldwide fleet. The FAA 
    estimates that 190 airplanes of U.S. registry would be affected by this 
    proposed AD, that it would take approximately 8 work hours per airplane 
    to accomplish the proposed actions, and that the average labor rate is 
    $60 per work hour. Required parts
    
    [[Page 19951]]
    
    would cost approximately $300 per airplane. Based on these figures, the 
    cost impact of the proposed AD on U.S. operators is estimated to be 
    $148,200, or $780 per airplane.
        The cost impact figure discussed above is based on assumptions that 
    no operator has yet accomplished any of the proposed requirements of 
    this AD action, and that no operator would accomplish those actions in 
    the future if this AD were not adopted.
    
    Regulatory Impact
    
        The regulations proposed herein would not have substantial direct 
    effects on the States, on the relationship between the national 
    government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
    responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in 
    accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this 
    proposal would not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant 
    the preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
        For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this proposed 
    regulation (1) is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under 
    Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT 
    Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); 
    and (3) if promulgated, will not have a significant economic impact, 
    positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under 
    the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. A copy of the draft 
    regulatory evaluation prepared for this action is contained in the 
    Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained by contacting the Rules 
    Docket at the location provided under the caption ADDRESSES.
    
    List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
    
        Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
    
    The Proposed Amendment
    
        Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the 
    Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration proposes to amend 
    part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as 
    follows:
    
    PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
    
        1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
    
    Sec. 39.13    [Amended]
    
        2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new 
    airworthiness directive:
    
    Raytheon Aircraft Company (Formerly Beech, Raytheon Corporate Jets, 
    British Aerospace, Hawker Siddley, et al.): Docket 96-NM-228-AD.
    
        Applicability: Model BAe 125-800A, and Model Hawker 800 and 
    Hawker 800XP series airplanes; on which Raytheon Modification 
    25F017A&B (reference Raytheon Service Bulletin SB.55-36-25F017A&B) 
    has not been installed; certificated in any category.
    
        Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the 
    preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been 
    otherwise modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the 
    requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified, 
    altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of 
    this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an 
    alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (b) of 
    this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of 
    the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition 
    addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been 
    eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to 
    address it.
    
        Note 2: Raytheon Model BAe 125-800B series airplanes are similar 
    in design to the airplanes that are subject to the requirements of 
    this AD and, therefore, also may be subject to the unsafe condition 
    addressed by this AD. However, as of the effective date of this AD, 
    those models are not type certificated for operation in the United 
    States. Airworthiness authorities of countries in which the Model 
    BAe 125-800B series airplanes are approved for operation should 
    consider adopting corrective action, applicable to those models, 
    that is similar to the corrective action required by this AD.
    
        Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished 
    previously.
        To prevent overbias or overbalance of the rudder, which could 
    result in reduced controllability of the airplane, accomplish the 
    following:
        (a) Within 100 hours time-in-service, or within 6 months after 
    the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs first, modify the 
    rudder in accordance with Raytheon Service Bulletin SB.55-36-
    25F017A&B, dated April 15, 1996.
        (b) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the 
    compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be 
    used if approved by the Manager, Wichita Aircraft Certification 
    Office (ACO), FAA, Small Airplane Directorate.
        Operators shall submit their requests through an appropriate FAA 
    Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send 
    it to the Manager, Wichita ACO.
    
        Note 3: Information concerning the existence of approved 
    alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be 
    obtained from the Wichita ACO.
    
        (c) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with 
    sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 
    CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where 
    the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
    
        Issued in Renton, Washington, on April 17, 1997.
    Darrell M. Pederson,
    Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
    Service.
    [FR Doc. 97-10568 Filed 4-23-97; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
04/24/1997
Department:
Federal Aviation Administration
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
Document Number:
97-10568
Dates:
Comments must be received by June 2, 1997.
Pages:
19950-19951 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 96-NM-228-AD
RINs:
2120-AA64: Airworthiness Directives
RIN Links:
https://www.federalregister.gov/regulations/2120-AA64/airworthiness-directives
PDF File:
97-10568.pdf
CFR: (1)
14 CFR 39.13