99-10181. Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 757-200 Series Airplanes  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 79 (Monday, April 26, 1999)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 20146-20148]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-10181]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    
    Federal Aviation Administration
    
    14 CFR Part 39
    
    [Docket No. 98-NM-37-AD; Amendment 39-11146; AD 99-09-13]
    RIN 2120-AA64
    
    
    Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 757-200 Series Airplanes
    
    AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), 
    applicable to certain Boeing Model 757-200 series airplanes, that 
    requires modifications to the attachment installation of the forward 
    lavatory. This amendment is prompted by a stress analysis report 
    indicating that the forward lavatory could break free from the upper 
    and/or lower attachments during an emergency landing. The actions 
    specified by this AD are intended to prevent failure of the attachment 
    installation of the forward lavatory during an emergency landing,
    
    [[Page 20147]]
    
    which could result in injury to the crew and passengers.
    
    DATES: Effective June 1, 1999.
        The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in 
    the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as 
    of June 1, 1999.
    
    ADDRESSES: The service information referenced in this AD may be 
    obtained from Boeing Commercial Airplane Group, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, 
    Washington 98124-2207. This information may be examined at the Federal 
    Aviation Administration (FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, Rules 
    Docket, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the Office of 
    the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, 
    Washington, DC.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Keith Ladderud, Aerospace Engineer, 
    Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, Seattle 
    Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, 
    Washington 98055-4056; telephone (425) 227-2780; fax (425) 227-1181.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal 
    Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to include an airworthiness 
    directive (AD) that is applicable to certain Boeing Model 757-200 
    series airplanes was published in the Federal Register on May 12, 1998 
    (63 FR 26104). That action proposed to require modifications to the 
    attachment installation of the forward lavatory.
    
    Comments
    
        Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate 
    in the making of this amendment. Due consideration has been given to 
    the comments received.
        One commenter supports the proposed rule, three commenters offer no 
    objection to the proposed rule, and one commenter states that the 
    proposed rule will not apply to it.
    
    Request to Extend Compliance Time
    
        One commenter requests that the compliance time for the 
    modification requirements be extended from 18 months after the 
    effective date of this AD to 24 months or 3,000 flight cycles, 
    whichever occurs later. The commenter states that such a schedule would 
    coincide with its normal maintenance interval of 24 months or 3,000 
    flight cycles. The commenter states that the 18-month compliance time 
    would be unnecessarily restrictive and would force it to schedule 
    special maintenance visits for some of its airplanes.
        The FAA concurs with the commenter's request to extend the 
    compliance time for the modification requirements. However, the FAA 
    finds that extending the compliance time for both passenger and 
    freighter airplanes from 18 months to 24 months or 3,000 flight cycles 
    after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs first, will not 
    adversely affect safety, and will allow the modification to be 
    performed at a base during regularly scheduled maintenance. Therefore, 
    paragraphs (a) and (b) of this final rule have been revised 
    accordingly.
    
    Request to Include A Note About Floor Panels on Freighters
    
        One of the commenters who expressed no objection to the proposed 
    rule requests that a note be inserted in the final rule to clarify that 
    the floor panels identified in paragraph (c) of the proposed rule are 
    applicable only for freighter airplanes.
        The FAA concurs with the commenter's request. The floor panels 
    specified in paragraph (c) of the final rule are not installed on 
    passenger airplanes. Therefore, a new NOTE 2 has been inserted into the 
    final rule to clarify that the floor panels specified in paragraph (c) 
    of the final rule are only installed on freighter airplanes and are not 
    used on passenger airplanes.
    
    Request to Revise the Service Bulletin
    
        One commenter maintains that it is impossible to accomplish the 
    instructions specified in Boeing Service Bulletin 757-25-0181, dated 
    June 26, 1997, and requests that the service bulletin be revised. The 
    commenter states that a certain doubler specified in the service 
    bulletin does not always have adequate edge margin on existing 
    fasteners. The commenter further states that it fabricated a new 
    doubler to accommodate the fastener spacing and, if this condition is 
    not addressed in rulemaking action, it will be required to request an 
    alternative method of compliance for each airplane that requires a new 
    doubler.
        The commenter makes no specific request for a change to the 
    proposal. However, Boeing has been advised of the commenter's 
    situation, and it will survey other operators to determine whether they 
    also have experienced the same short edge margin condition. Boeing will 
    revise the service bulletin if necessary.
        The FAA concurs that the commenter will require an alternative 
    method of compliance to allow use of a new doubler of its own 
    manufacture. Under the provisions of paragraph (d) of this final rule, 
    the FAA may consider requests for approval of an alternative method of 
    compliance if sufficient data are submitted to substantiate that the 
    new doubler would provide an acceptable level of safety. No change to 
    the final rule in this regard is necessary.
    
    Request To Increase the Strength of the Lavatory Attachments
    
        The commenter that supports the proposed rule also requests that 
    the strength of the subject lavatory attachments be increased beyond 
    the limit required by 14 CFR 25.561. The commenter states that 
    survivable accident impacts can exceed the 9g static limit before the 
    structure of the airplane breaks up; therefore, the attachments of all 
    structures in the cabin of the airplane should be designed to retain 
    the structure up to a level where the fuselage frames and skin 
    stringers are no longer able to hold together.
        The FAA acknowledges the commenter's concern. However, while there 
    may be merit to the commenter's suggestions, this AD is not the 
    appropriate context in which to evaluate those suggestions. As the 
    commenter states, such an increase in the strength of the lavatory 
    attachments would require a change to the 14 CFR 25.561. The FAA has 
    determined that an unsafe condition exists, and that the actions 
    required by this AD are adequate in order to ensure the continued 
    safety of the affected fleet. No change to the final rule in this 
    regard is necessary.
    
    Conclusion
    
        After careful review of the available data, including the comments 
    noted above, the FAA has determined that air safety and the public 
    interest require the adoption of the rule with the changes described 
    previously. The FAA has determined that these changes will neither 
    increase the economic burden on any operator nor increase the scope of 
    the AD.
    
    Cost Impact
    
        There are approximately 333 airplanes of the affected design in the 
    worldwide fleet. The FAA estimates that 225 airplanes of U.S. registry 
    will be affected by this AD: 164 passenger airplanes and 61 freighter 
    airplanes.
        It will take approximately 10 work hours per passenger airplane to 
    accomplish the required modification, at an average labor rate of $60 
    per work hour. Required parts will cost approximately $100 per 
    airplane. Based on these figures, the cost impact of the required 
    modification on U.S. operators is estimated to be $114,800, or $700 per 
    passenger airplane.
    
    [[Page 20148]]
    
        It will take approximately 42 work hours per freighter airplane to 
    accomplish the required modification, at an average labor rate of $60 
    per work hour. Required parts will be provided by the airplane 
    manufacturer at no cost to the operators. Based on these figures, the 
    cost impact of this required modification on U.S. operators is 
    estimated to be $153,720, or $2,520 per freighter airplane.
        The cost impact figures discussed above are based on assumptions 
    that no operator has yet accomplished any of the requirements of this 
    AD action, and that no operator would accomplish those actions in the 
    future if this AD were not adopted.
    
    Regulatory Impact
    
        The regulations adopted herein will not have substantial direct 
    effects on the States, on the relationship between the national 
    government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
    responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in 
    accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this final 
    rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the 
    preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
        For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is 
    not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866; 
    (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and 
    Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a 
    significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial 
    number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory 
    Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has been prepared for this action 
    and it is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained 
    from the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption 
    ADDRESSES.
    
    List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
    
        Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by 
    reference, Safety.
    
    Adoption of the Amendment
    
        Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the 
    Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of 
    the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
    
    PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
    
        1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
    
    
    Sec. 39.13  [Amended]
    
        2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new 
    airworthiness directive:
    
    99-09-13  Boeing: Amendment 39-11146. Docket 98-NM-37-AD.
    
        Applicability: Model 757-200 series airplanes; as listed in 
    Boeing Service Bulletin 757-25-0181, dated June 26, 1997, and Boeing 
    Alert Service Bulletin 757-25A0187, dated September 18, 1997; 
    certificated in any category.
    
        Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the 
    preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been 
    modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the 
    requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified, 
    altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of 
    this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an 
    alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (d) of 
    this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of 
    the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition 
    addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been 
    eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to 
    address it.
        Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished 
    previously.
        To prevent failure of the attachment installation of the forward 
    lavatory during an emergency landing, which could result in injury 
    to the crew and passengers, accomplish the following:
        (a) For passenger airplanes identified in Boeing Service 
    Bulletin 757-25-0181, dated June 26, 1997: Within 24 months or 3,000 
    flight cycles after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs 
    first, install a doubler to the upper attachment installation of the 
    forward lavatory in accordance with Boeing Service Bulletin 757-25-
    0181, dated June 26, 1997.
        (b) For freighter airplanes identified in Boeing Alert Service 
    Bulletin 757-25A0187, dated September 18, 1997: Within 24 months or 
    3,000 flight cycles after the effective date of this AD, whichever 
    occurs first, install floor panel inserts, a retention fitting 
    assembly, and a doubler assembly to the lower attachment 
    installation of the forward lavatory, in accordance with Boeing 
    Alert Service Bulletin 757-25A0187, dated September 18, 1997.
        (c) As of the effective date of this AD, no person shall install 
    a floor panel, part number 141N5410-12 or 141N5410-28, on any 
    airplane.
    
        Note 2: Floor panels having part numbers 141N5410-12 and 
    141N5410-28 are only installed on freighter airplanes and are not 
    used on passenger airplanes.
    
        (d) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the 
    compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be 
    used if approved by the Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification 
    Office (ACO), FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate. Operators shall 
    submit their requests through an appropriate FAA Principal 
    Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the 
    Manager, Seattle ACO.
    
        Note 3: Information concerning the existence of approved 
    alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be 
    obtained from the Seattle ACO.
    
        (e) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with 
    sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 
    CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where 
    the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
        (f) The actions shall be done in accordance with Boeing Service 
    Bulletin 757-25-0181, dated June 26, 1997, and Boeing Alert Service 
    Bulletin 757-25A0187, dated September 18, 1997, as applicable. This 
    incorporation by reference was approved by the Director of the 
    Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 
    51. Copies may be obtained from Boeing Commercial Airplane Group, 
    P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, Washington 98124-2207. Copies may be 
    inspected at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind 
    Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the Office of the Federal 
    Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.
        (g) This amendment becomes effective on June 1, 1999.
    
        Issued in Renton, Washington, on April 19, 1999.
    D. L. Riggin,
    Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
    Service.
    [FR Doc. 99-10181 Filed 4-23-99; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-13-U
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
6/1/1999
Published:
04/26/1999
Department:
Federal Aviation Administration
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
99-10181
Dates:
Effective June 1, 1999.
Pages:
20146-20148 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 98-NM-37-AD, Amendment 39-11146, AD 99-09-13
RINs:
2120-AA64: Airworthiness Directives
RIN Links:
https://www.federalregister.gov/regulations/2120-AA64/airworthiness-directives
PDF File:
99-10181.pdf
CFR: (1)
14 CFR 39.13