99-10183. Airworthiness Directives; Lockheed Model L-1011-385 Series Airplanes  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 79 (Monday, April 26, 1999)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 20144-20146]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-10183]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    
    Federal Aviation Administration
    
    14 CFR Part 39
    
    [Docket No. 98-NM-199-AD; Amendment 39-11147; AD 99-09-14]
    RIN 2120-AA64
    
    
    Airworthiness Directives; Lockheed Model L-1011-385 Series 
    Airplanes
    
    AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This amendment supersedes an existing airworthiness directive 
    (AD), applicable to all Lockheed Model L-1011-385 series airplanes, 
    that currently requires inspections to detect cracking of fuselage 
    station (FS) 983 main frame (left and right sides), and repair, if 
    necessary. That AD was prompted by reports of cracks found in the left 
    and right sides of the FS 983 main frame, below the level of the cabin 
    floor. This amendment adds a new requirement to review the airplane 
    maintenance records to determine if a crack within the FS 983 main 
    frame web was detected previously, and if repair of any such crack was 
    deferred; and repetitive inspections, if necessary, until 
    accomplishment of a repair. This amendment also adds terminating action 
    for the repetitive inspections. The actions specified by this AD are 
    intended to prevent cracking of the FS 983 frame, which could result in 
    reduced structural integrity of the fuselage.
    
    DATES: Effective June 1, 1999.
        The incorporation by reference of Lockheed Tristar L-1011 Service 
    Bulletin 093-53-266, dated March 2, 1992; as revised by Change 
    Notification CN1, dated July 10, 1992, as listed in the regulations, is 
    approved by the Director of the Federal Register as of June 1, 1999.
        The incorporation by reference of Lockheed Service Bulletin 093-53-
    264, dated October 4, 1991, was approved previously by the Director of 
    the Federal Register as of December 18, 1991 (56 FR 61361, December 3, 
    1991).
    
    ADDRESSES: The service information referenced in this AD may be 
    obtained from Lockheed Martin Aircraft & Logistics Centers, 120 Orion 
    Street, Greenville, South Carolina 29605. This information may be 
    examined at the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Transport 
    Airplane Directorate, Rules Docket, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, 
    Washington; or at the FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, Atlanta
    
    [[Page 20145]]
    
    Aircraft Certification Office, One Crown Center, 1895 Phoenix 
    Boulevard, suite 450, Atlanta, Georgia; or at the Office of the Federal 
    Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas Peters, Aerospace Engineer, 
    Systems and Flight Test Branch, ACE-116A, FAA, Small Airplane 
    Directorate, Atlanta Aircraft Certification Office, One Crown Center, 
    1895 Phoenix Boulevard, suite 450, Atlanta, Georgia 30349; telephone 
    (770) 703-6063; fax (770) 703-6097.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal 
    Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) by superseding AD 91-21-51, 
    amendment 39-8099 (56 FR 61361, December 3, 1991), which is applicable 
    to all Lockheed Model L-1011-385 series airplanes, was published in the 
    Federal Register on August 19, 1998 (63 FR 44411). The action proposed 
    to require inspections to detect cracking of fuselage station (FS) 983 
    main frame (left and right sides), and repair, if necessary. The action 
    also proposed to add a new requirement to review the airplane 
    maintenance records to determine if a crack within the FS 983 main 
    frame web was detected previously, and if repair of any such crack was 
    deferred; and repair, prior to further flight, if necessary.
    
    Comments
    
        Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate 
    in the making of this amendment. Due consideration has been given to 
    the comments received.
    
    Support for the Proposed Rule
    
        One commenter supports the proposed rule.
    
    Request To Revise Certain Requirements of Proposed Rule
    
        One commenter requests that paragraph (f) of the proposed rule be 
    revised to read, ``For aircraft with previously deferred cracks, 
    continue the current repetitive inspection at the limits given in AD 
    91-21-51, paragraph (e). Repair of these cracks must be accomplished in 
    accordance with Lockheed Service Bulletin 093-53-266, dated March 2, 
    1992, within 18 months after the effective date of this AD.'' The 
    commenter states that, as paragraph (f) is worded in the proposed rule, 
    the operator would have to repair any cracks that were deferred in 
    accordance with the requirements in paragraph (e), prior to further 
    flight. This could result in airplanes being immediately out of 
    compliance as of the effective date of the final rule.
        The FAA concurs that paragraph (f) of the proposed rule could be 
    misinterpreted as suggested by the commenter. The FAA's intent was that 
    the repair be accomplished prior to further flight after the 
    determination that is required by the first sentence of paragraph (f). 
    To accommodate the commenter's concern, the FAA has revised paragraph 
    (f) of this AD to require the repetitive inspections to continue until 
    accomplishment of the repair. In addition, a new paragraph (g) has been 
    added to require accomplishment of the repair within 18 months after 
    the effective date of this AD.
    
    Conclusion
    
        After careful review of the available data, including the comments 
    noted above, the FAA has determined that air safety and the public 
    interest require the adoption of the rule with the changes described 
    previously. The FAA has determined that these changes will neither 
    increase the economic burden on any operator nor increase the scope of 
    the AD.
    
    Cost Impact
    
        There are approximately 235 airplanes of the affected design in the 
    worldwide fleet. The FAA estimates that 117 airplanes of U.S. registry 
    will be affected by this AD.
        The external eddy current inspection that currently is required by 
    AD 91-21-51, and is retained in this AD, takes approximately 1 work 
    hour per airplane to accomplish, at an average labor rate of $60 per 
    work hour. Based on these figures, the cost impact of the currently 
    required inspection on U.S. operators is estimated to be $7,020, or $60 
    per airplane.
        The internal visual and eddy current inspections that currently are 
    required by AD 91-21-51, and retained in this AD, take approximately 1 
    work hour per airplane to accomplish, at an average labor rate of $60 
    per work hour. Based on these figures, the cost impact of these 
    inspections on U.S. operators is estimated to be $7,020, or $60 per 
    airplane, per inspection cycle.
        The cost impact figures discussed above are based on assumptions 
    that no operator has yet accomplished any of the requirements of this 
    AD action, and that no operator would accomplish those actions in the 
    future if this AD were not adopted.
        Should an operator be required to accomplish the necessary repair 
    of cracking, it would take approximately 30 work hours per airplane to 
    accomplish, at an average labor rate of $60 per work hour. Based on 
    these figures, the cost impact of the repair required by this AD on 
    U.S. operators is estimated to be $1,800 per airplane.
    
    Regulatory Impact
    
        The regulations adopted herein will not have substantial direct 
    effects on the States, on the relationship between the national 
    government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
    responsibilities among the various levels of government.
        Therefore, in accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is 
    determined that this final rule does not have sufficient federalism 
    implications to warrant the preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
        For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is 
    not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866; 
    (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and 
    Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a 
    significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial 
    number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory 
    Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has been prepared for this action 
    and it is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained 
    from the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption 
    ADDRESSES.
    
    List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
    
        Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by 
    reference, Safety.
    
    Adoption of the Amendment
    
        Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the 
    Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of 
    the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
    
    PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
    
        1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
    
    Sec. 39.13  [Amended]
    
        2. Section 39.13 is amended by removing amendment 39-8099 (56 FR 
    61361, December 3, 1991), and by adding a new airworthiness directive 
    (AD), amendment 39-11147, to read as follows:
    
    99-09-14  Lockheed: Amendment 39-11147. Docket 98-NM-199-AD. 
    Supersedes AD 91-21-51, amendment 39-8099.
    
        Applicability: All Model L-1011-385 series airplanes, 
    certificated in any category.
    
    
    [[Page 20146]]
    
    
        Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the 
    preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been 
    modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the 
    requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified, 
    altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of 
    this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an 
    alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (h)(1) 
    of this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect 
    of the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition 
    addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been 
    eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to 
    address it.
    
        Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished 
    previously.
        To prevent cracking in the fuselage station (FS) 983 frame, 
    which could result in reduced structural integrity of the fuselage, 
    accomplish the following:
    
    Restatement of Requirements of AD 91-21-51, Amendment 39-8099
    
        (a) Within 20 days after December 18, 1991 (the effective date 
    of AD 91-21-51, amendment 39-8099), inspect the left and right sides 
    of FS 983 main frame from waterline (WL) 175 to WL 200 to detect 
    cracks using a high frequency eddy current procedure, in accordance 
    with paragraph A. of the Accomplishment Instructions of Lockheed 
    Service Bulletin 093-53-264, dated October 4, 1991. At the 
    operator's option, the internal inspection required by paragraph (d) 
    below may be used in lieu of the external inspection.
        (b) If cracks that extend into the main frame caps are found 
    during the inspection performed in accordance with paragraph (a) of 
    this AD, prior to further flight, repair in accordance with a method 
    approved by the Manager, Atlanta Aircraft Certification Office 
    (ACO), FAA, Small Airplane Directorate.
        (c) Within 60 days after December 18, 1991, perform an internal 
    visual and an eddy current inspection of the FS 983 main frame cap 
    and web in accordance with paragraph B. of the Accomplishment 
    Instructions of Lockheed Service Bulletin 093-53-264, dated October 
    4, 1991.
        (d) If cracks in the following locations are found during the 
    inspection required by paragraph (c) of this AD, prior to further 
    flight, repair in accordance with a method approved by the Manager, 
    Atlanta ACO.
        (1) Any crack extending into the main frame caps.
        (2) Any crack extending into the web-to-cap radius.
        (3) Any crack extending into a web area outside the shaded area 
    shown in Figure 1, Sheet 3, of Lockheed Service Bulletin 093-53-264, 
    dated October 4, 1991.
        (4) More than 1 crack within the main frame web area shown in 
    Figure 1, Sheet 3, of Lockheed Service Bulletin 093-53-264, dated 
    October 4, 1991.
        (e) If, during the inspection required by paragraph (c) of this 
    AD, a single crack is found that is completely contained within the 
    main frame web area shown in Figure 1, Sheet 3, of Lockheed Service 
    Bulletin 093-53-264, dated October 4, 1991: Prior to further flight, 
    treat the cracked section of the web with corrosion inhibitor in 
    accordance with the service bulletin. Thereafter, repeat the 
    inspections at intervals not to exceed 90 days, using the internal 
    inspection procedure required by paragraph (c) of this AD.
    
    New Requirements of This AD
    
        (f) Within 18 months after the effective date of this AD: Review 
    the airplane maintenance records to determine if a crack within the 
    main frame web area has been detected previously, and to determine 
    if repair of any such crack was deferred in accordance with 
    paragraph (e) of AD 91-21-51, amendment 39-8099. For airplanes 
    having cracks for which a repair has been deferred, continue the 
    repetitive inspections in accordance with the requirements of 
    paragraph (e) of this AD, until accomplishment of paragraph (g) of 
    this AD.
        (g) Within 18 months after the effective date of this AD: Repair 
    any crack for which repair has been deferred as specified in 
    paragraph (e) of this AD, in accordance with Lockheed Tristar L-1011 
    Service Bulletin 093-53-266, dated March 2, 1992; as revised by 
    Change Notification CN1, dated July 10, 1992. Accomplishment of such 
    repair constitutes terminating action for the repetitive inspections 
    required by paragraph (e) of this AD.
    
        Note 2: Lockheed Tristar L-1011 Service Bulletin 093-53-266, 
    dated March 2, 1992; as revised by Change Notification CN1, dated 
    July 10, 1992; references Lockheed Drawings LCC-7622-325, LCC-7622-
    326, and LCC-7622-327, as additional sources of service information 
    to accomplish repairs.
    
    Alternative Methods of Compliance
    
        (h)(1) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the 
    compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be 
    used if approved by the Manager, Atlanta ACO. Operators shall submit 
    their requests through an appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance 
    Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the Manager, 
    Atlanta ACO.
        (h)(2) Alternative methods of compliance, approved previously in 
    accordance with AD 91-21-51, amendment 39-8099, are approved as 
    alternative methods of compliance with the inspection requirements 
    of paragraphs (a) and (c) of this AD, and the repair/modification 
    requirements of paragraphs (b) and (d) of this AD.
    
        Note 3: Information concerning the existence of approved 
    alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be 
    obtained from the Atlanta ACO.
    
    Special Flight Permits
    
        (i) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with 
    sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 
    CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where 
    the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
    
    Incorporation by Reference
    
        (j) Except as provided by paragraphs (b) and (d) of this AD, the 
    actions shall be done in accordance with Lockheed Tristar L-1011 
    Service Bulletin 093-53-266, dated March 2, 1992; as revised by 
    Change Notification 093-53-266, CN1, dated July 10, 1992; and 
    Lockheed Service Bulletin 093-53-264, dated October 4, 1991.
        (1) The incorporation by reference of Lockheed Tristar L-1011 
    Service Bulletin 093-53-266, dated March 2, 1992; as revised by 
    Change Notification 093-53-266, CN1, dated July 10, 1992, is 
    approved by the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 
    5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
        (2) The incorporation by reference of Lockheed Service Bulletin 
    093-53-264, dated October 4, 1991, was approved previously by the 
    Director of the Federal Register as of December 18, 1991 (56 FR 
    61361, December 3, 1991).
        (3) Copies may be obtained from Lockheed Martin Aircraft & 
    Logistics Centers, 120 Orion Street, Greenville, South Carolina 
    29605. Copies may be inspected at the FAA, Transport Airplane 
    Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the 
    FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, Atlanta Aircraft Certification 
    Office, One Crown Center, 1895 Phoenix Boulevard, suite 450, 
    Atlanta, Georgia; or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800 
    North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.
        (k) This amendment becomes effective on June 1, 1999.
        Issued in Renton, Washington, on April 19, 1999.
    D. L. Riggin,
    Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
    Service.
    [FR Doc. 99-10183 Filed 4-23-99; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-13-U
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
6/1/1999
Published:
04/26/1999
Department:
Federal Aviation Administration
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
99-10183
Dates:
Effective June 1, 1999.
Pages:
20144-20146 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 98-NM-199-AD, Amendment 39-11147, AD 99-09-14
RINs:
2120-AA64: Airworthiness Directives
RIN Links:
https://www.federalregister.gov/regulations/2120-AA64/airworthiness-directives
PDF File:
99-10183.pdf
CFR: (1)
14 CFR 39.13