99-10460. Medicare Program; Procedures for Making National Coverage Decisions  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 80 (Tuesday, April 27, 1999)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 22619-22625]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-10460]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
    
    Health Care Financing Administration
    [HCFA-3432-GN]
    RIN 0938-AJ31
    
    
    Medicare Program; Procedures for Making National Coverage 
    Decisions
    
    AGENCY: Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA), HHS.
    
    ACTION: General notice.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This notice announces the process we will use to make a 
    national coverage decision for a specific item or service under 
    sections 1862 and 1871 of the Social Security Act. This notice will 
    streamline our decisionmaking process and will increase the 
    opportunities for public participation in making national coverage 
    decisions.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATES: This notice is effective June 28, 1999.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ron Milhorn, (410) 786-5663; Maria 
    Ellis, (410) 786-0309, for a graphical representation of the process.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Availability of Copies and Electronic Access
    
        Copies: To order copies of the Federal Register containing this 
    document, send your request to: New Orders, Superintendent of 
    Documents, P.O. Box 371954, Pittsburgh, PA 15250-7954. Specify the date 
    of the issue requested and enclose a check or money order payable to 
    the Superintendent of Documents, or enclose your Visa or Master Card 
    number and expiration date. Credit card orders can also be placed by 
    calling the order desk at (202) 512-1800 or by faxing to (202) 512-
    2250. The cost for each copy is $8. As an alternative, you can view and 
    photocopy the Federal Register document at most libraries designated as 
    Federal Depository Libraries and at many other public and academic 
    libraries throughout the country that receive the Federal Register.
        This Federal Register document is also available from the Federal 
    Register online database through GPO Access, a service of the U.S. 
    Government Printing Office. Free public access is available on a Wide 
    Area Information Server (WAIS) through the Internet and via 
    asynchronous dial-in. Internet users can access the database by using 
    the World Wide Web; the Superintendent of Documents home page address 
    is http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara__docs/, by
    
    [[Page 22620]]
    
    using local WAIS client software, or by telnet to swais.access.gpo.gov, 
    then log in as guest (no password required). Dial-in users should use 
    communications software and modem to call 202-512-1661; type swais, 
    then log in as guest (no password required).
    
    I. Background
    
        We published a notice on April 29, 1987 (52 FR 15560), that 
    described the process we used to make Medicare coverage decisions, 
    including decisions regarding whether new technology and services can 
    be covered. We invited the public to comment on the procedures, and 
    specifically on procedures for allowing greater public input into the 
    coverage decisionmaking process when appropriate.
        In response to the comments we received on that notice, we 
    developed a proposed rule. That proposed rule set forth our process and 
    criteria for making coverage decisions under the Social Security Act 
    (the Act). In addition, the proposed rule described the relationship 
    between our coverage decisions and the roles played by the Food and 
    Drug Administration (FDA) and other parties, including Medicare 
    contractors. We published the proposed rule on January 30, 1989 (54 FR 
    4302).
        We have made changes to our internal procedures in response to the 
    comments we received following publication of the 1987 notice and the 
    January 1989 proposed rule. In addition, over the past year, we have 
    received numerous requests to revise our process to make it more open, 
    responsive, and understandable to the public. We share the goal of 
    increasing public participation in the development of Medicare coverage 
    issues. This will assist us in obtaining the information we require to 
    make a national coverage decision in a timely manner and ensuring that 
    the Medicare program continues to meet the needs of its beneficiaries.
    
    II. Purpose of This Notice
    
        We have decided not to adopt the January 29, 1989 proposed rule. 
    This notice announces the process we will use to make a national 
    coverage decision under the Medicare program. It sets forth the steps 
    we are taking to make our national coverage decisionmaking process more 
    open and understandable to the public. We intend to take the following 
    steps:
         Explain why and how we make a national coverage decision 
    and how we reconsider a previously-made decision. This notice outlines 
    the review process and the steps involved. By offering this 
    explanation, we hope to increase public awareness of the process we 
    use, and to provide information about when and how the public may most 
    effectively contact us to offer information on issues under 
    consideration.
         Maintain a current list of issues we are considering for 
    national coverage decisions. This list identifies our staff person 
    responsible for reviewing each issue, the stage at which an issue is in 
    the review process, and the materials we are reviewing to reach a 
    decision on the issue.
         Make all of the above public and accessible using our Home 
    Page (http://www.hcfa.gov) on the Internet as a primary tool for 
    publicizing these matters. We believe use of our Home Page will offer 
    quick and easy access that will enable the public to determine the 
    status of any issue under review.
         Prepare and maintain a complete and indexed record for all 
    issues that we review for national coverage decisions. This record, a 
    summary of which will also be available on our Home Page as part of the 
    record of the issue, will form the basis for any subsequent requests 
    for reconsideration of the issue, as well as the formal record of 
    review for any challenge to our coverage decision under section 
    1869(b)(3) of the Act.
         Continue to review new medical and scientific information 
    in order to modify a national coverage decision when appropriate.
        We are also announcing our intent to work with various sectors of 
    the medical community to develop and publish guidance documents 
    specific to their needs and interests. These ``sector-specific'' 
    guidance documents will offer a more detailed explanation of how we 
    would apply the general national coverage criteria to a new item or 
    service proposed for coverage eligibility in the particular sector 
    involved. Guidance documents will provide a vehicle for us to explain 
    how the general criteria apply to the special circumstances unique to a 
    particular sector of the health care industry. We will develop the 
    guidance documents after we publish the proposed and final rules for 
    the criteria we will use to make a national coverage decision.
        This notice is intended to provide clearer information on our 
    national coverage decisionmaking process, and to ensure that it is open 
    and understandable to the public. We would welcome comments from the 
    public on our process. Comments may be submitted to us in writing 
    through the traditional mail service, or through our Home Page 
    identified in section IV.K. of this notice.
    
    III. Medicare Coverage--General Principles
    
    A. Statutory Authority
    
        Administration of the Medicare program is governed by title XVIII 
    of the Act. Under the Medicare program, the benefits available to 
    eligible beneficiaries are called ``covered'' services.
        Medicare is a defined benefit program--the services covered are 
    broadly defined in the Act, in what we call benefit categories. There 
    are currently about 55 benefit categories in the Act, some broadly 
    defined, others more narrowly defined. Specific health care services 
    must fit into one of these benefit categories to be eligible for 
    coverage under Medicare.
        The Act does not list the specific items and services eligible for 
    coverage under the Medicare program. Rather, it lists categories of 
    items and services, and vests in the Secretary the authority to make 
    decisions about which specific items and services within these 
    categories can be covered by the Medicare program. That is, the Act 
    allows Medicare to cover medical devices, surgical procedures, and 
    diagnostic services, but generally does not specify which particular 
    medical devices, surgical procedures, or diagnostic services can be 
    covered, or, conversely, are excluded from coverage. The Congress 
    vested in the Secretary the authority to make these more specific 
    decisions regarding the items and services eligible for coverage under 
    Medicare. Section 1862(a)(1)(A) of the Act states, in part, that no 
    payment may be made for any expenses for services that are not 
    ``reasonable'' and ``necessary'' for the diagnosis and treatment of 
    illness or injury. For over 30 years, the Medicare program has 
    exercised this authority to make coverage decisions regarding whether 
    specific services that meet one of the broadly-defined benefit 
    categories can be covered under the program.
        We previously proposed that we would establish the procedures we 
    would follow for making national coverage decisions by issuing 
    regulations. The Administrative Procedure Act (APA), however, exempts 
    ``rules of agency organization, procedure, or practice'' from the 
    notice-and-comment rulemaking procedures (5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(A)). The 
    primary purpose of the procedural rules exemption in the APA is to 
    ensure that an agency retains latitude in organizing its internal 
    operations. Additional flexibility is particularly important given the 
    dynamic changes in the health care industry that may have a profound
    
    [[Page 22621]]
    
    effect on the health of Medicare beneficiaries.
        The Congress has provided that national coverage decisions may be 
    issued without requiring us to engage in notice-and-comment rulemaking 
    procedures (sections 1871(a)(2) and 1869(b)(3)(B) of the Act). National 
    coverage decisions are our national policy statements granting, 
    limiting, or excluding Medicare coverage for a specific medical 
    service, procedure, or device. A national coverage decision is binding 
    on all Medicare carriers, fiscal intermediaries, peer review 
    organizations (PROs), health maintenance organizations (HMOs), 
    competitive medical plans (CMPs), health care prepayment plans (HCPPs) 
    and, in the future, program safeguard contractors (PSCs) when published 
    in HCFA program instructions or in the Federal Register. In addition, 
    national coverage decisions made under section 1862(a)(1) of the Act 
    may not be disregarded, set aside, or otherwise reviewed by an 
    administrative law judge during the administrative appeals process (42 
    CFR 405.732 and 405.860).
        By establishing the process we will use in making a national 
    coverage decision by procedural rules rather than notice-and-comment 
    rulemaking, we believe we will better be able to serve Medicare 
    beneficiaries. Using a procedural rule does not mean that the process 
    that we will use will be changed frequently or in an arbitrary manner. 
    Before implementing any changes to the national coverage decision 
    process, we will provide advance public notice about those changes. In 
    addition, we will separately provide notice and an opportunity for 
    public comment on the substantive criteria we would use in making a 
    national coverage decision.
    
    B. Medicare Contractors and Coverage Policies
    
        We contract with private insurance companies, referred to as 
    carriers and intermediaries to process Medicare claims (that is, 
    claims-payment contractors). Local PROs (and, in the future, PSCs) are 
    also involved in claims adjudication processes. We call all of these 
    entities ``Medicare contractors.''
        Medicare contractors review and adjudicate claims for services to 
    assure that Medicare payments are made only for services that are 
    covered under Medicare Part A or Part B. In the absence of a specific 
    national coverage decision, coverage decisions are made at the 
    discretion of the local contractors.
        Contractors may also publish local medical review policies (LMRPs) 
    to provide guidance to the public and medical community within a 
    specified geographic area. These LMRPs explain when an item or service 
    will be considered ``reasonable and necessary'' and thus eligible for 
    coverage under the Medicare statute. If a contractor develops an LMRP, 
    its LMRP applies only within the area it serves. While another 
    contractor may come to a similar decision, we do not require it to do 
    so. An LMRP may not conflict with a national coverage decision once the 
    national coverage decision is effective. If a national coverage 
    decision conflicts with a previously made LMRP, the contractor must 
    change its LMRP to conform it to the national coverage decision. A 
    contractor may, however, make an LMRP that supplements a national 
    coverage decision.
    
    IV. HCFA's Process for Making National Coverage Decisions
    
    A. Initiation of Coverage Review Process
    
        We will initiate our review process for making a national coverage 
    decision when we identify issues internally that we wish to consider 
    for a national coverage decision or when we receive a formal request 
    for us to review an issue and make a national coverage decision.
    1. Initiation Based on Internal Decisions
        We will initiate our review process if we determine that a service 
    requires a national coverage decision. Examples of when we may do this 
    include, but are not limited to, the following:
         There are conflicting carrier or intermediary policies.
         The service represents a significant medical advance, and 
    no similar service is currently covered under Medicare.
         The service is the subject of substantial controversy 
    among medical experts as to its medical effectiveness.
         The service is currently covered, but is widely considered 
    ineffective or obsolete.
         There are program integrity issues surrounding significant 
    underutilization or overutilization of the service.
    2. Initiation Based on External Formal Request
        We will also initiate our review process if we accept an external 
    formal request for a national coverage decision. The rules for a formal 
    request are outlined in section B.2.
    
    B. Informal Contacts and Formal Requests for HCFA Review
    
        We will treat any communication we may receive from an individual 
    or organization inquiring about a national coverage decision as either 
    an informal contact or a formal request.
    1. Informal Contacts
        We currently receive public contacts by telephone or in writing 
    that raise general questions about the coverage of services. We 
    consider these to be informal contacts. These include questions asking 
    us to explain the current coverage of a particular service, or to 
    assist and advise the requestor about how to formally request that we 
    make a national coverage decision.
        If the contact leads to questions about how to request a national 
    coverage decision, we will advise the requestor of the information we 
    need to have submitted with a formal request. We will offer assistance 
    to the requestor to clarify the amount and kind of information 
    necessary for us to evaluate whether an item or service meets the 
    statutory requirement that the item or service is ``reasonable'' and 
    ``necessary.''
        In some cases, we will assume the task of gathering and preparing 
    the information necessary to proceed to a formal request. This may 
    occur when the request is made by a Medicare beneficiary or another 
    member of the public who we could not reasonably expect to have access 
    to scientific data that may be necessary to support a formal request. 
    Because we expect a considerable amount of contact and discussion with 
    the requestor and because some flexibility is needed, we do not believe 
    that strict timeframes are warranted following this informal contact.
        Although informal contacts are not confidential, we will not 
    announce an informal contact that may lead to a request on our Home 
    Page. We will not release, to the extent permitted by law, company 
    proprietary material, trade secrets, or other information shared with 
    us on a confidential basis before the contact makes a formal request.
    2. Formal Requests
        We will require a requestor to make a formal request for a national 
    coverage decision in the following manner:
         The request must be in writing.
         The requestor must identify the request as a ``formal 
    request for a national coverage decision.''
         The requestor must submit supporting documentation that we 
    will specify. At a minimum, the requestor must submit the following 
    information:
        + A full and complete description of the service in question, 
    including the benefit category or categories of the Medicare program to 
    which it applies.
        + A compilation of the medical and scientific information currently 
    available.
        + A description of any clinical trials or studies currently 
    underway, which
    
    [[Page 22622]]
    
    might be relevant to a decision regarding the coverage of the service. 
    This description should be as complete as possible without disclosing 
    confidential information.
        + In the case of a drug, device, or a service using a drug or 
    device subject to regulation by the FDA, the status of current FDA 
    administrative proceedings concerning the drug or device involved. In 
    the case of any item regulated by the FDA, the FDA labeling for the 
    item, together with an indication of whether the service for which a 
    review is being requested is covered under the labeled indication(s). 
    We recognize that FDA changes the labeling of drugs and 510(k) devices 
    and devices with premarket approvals (PMAs). For the purposes of our 
    review, we are interested in the labeled indications at the time of the 
    submission of the formal request. If, during our review, the labeled 
    indications change, we expect the requestor to notify us.
        + In the case of a request for reconsideration, new evidence 
    supporting the request or an analysis of our earlier decision 
    demonstrating that we materially misinterpreted the evidence submitted 
    with the earlier request.
        Upon receipt of a formal request, we will quickly review the 
    request to determine if the requestor submitted adequate supporting 
    documentation to enable us to review the service. If we determine that 
    the request lacks adequate supporting documentation to enable us to 
    review the service to make a national coverage decision, we will notify 
    the requestor and identify the information that we require to enable us 
    to review the service. We will not post the request on our list of 
    pending coverage issues on our Home Page until we receive adequate 
    supporting documentation.
    
    C. Acceptance of Formal Request, Initiation of Timeframes
    
        If we determine the request is adequately supported, we will accept 
    the request and begin our review process. Acceptance of a formal 
    request starts a series of internal timeframes that we are establishing 
    for ourselves in this notice to ensure that requests are processed in a 
    timely manner. The discussion, negotiations, and other work done before 
    that point do not count toward meeting these timeframes. If we initiate 
    review of a service for purposes of making a national coverage 
    decision, we will follow this same review process, post these issues on 
    our Home Page, and generally follow our timeframes and maintain the 
    same openness we provide for issues that have been raised by formal 
    requests.
        We expect the timeframes we are establishing in this notice for 
    ourselves generally will be the timeframes that we believe we will need 
    to respond to a complex coverage issue. Generally, we would be likely 
    respond in a shorter amount of time if the issue is not as complex, is 
    not controversial, or is supported by clear medical and scientific 
    evidence that establishes that the item or service is ``reasonable'' 
    and ``necessary.'' Likewise, a significantly more complex and 
    controversial coverage issue may result in longer processing 
    timeframes. We understand the importance of making timely coverage 
    decisions and the benefits that may be afforded Medicare beneficiaries. 
    Therefore, we will expedite the processing of all formal requests for a 
    coverage decision.
        We will post the acceptance of a request by adding the item or 
    service to the list of pending coverage issues on our Home Page. We 
    will identify all subsequent actions, such as meetings and requests for 
    assessments. This will permit interested individuals to track an issue 
    through our entire review process. Interested individuals could contact 
    us at optimal times to offer comments, furnish information 
    (particularly scientific data), or meet to discuss the issue. This 
    public tracking system will be a key element in making our national 
    coverage decision process more efficient as well as more open and 
    accessible to the public.
        We will ordinarily respond in writing to the requestor within 90 
    calendar days of receiving the complete request. If the requestor 
    submits additional medical and scientific information during this 90-
    day period, however, we will ordinarily respond to the requestor within 
    90 calendar days of receiving the additional information.
        Because the FDA is charged with regulating whether devices or 
    pharmaceuticals are safe and effective for use by consumers, we will 
    generally accept a formal request for a device or a pharmaceutical only 
    after it is officially approved or cleared for marketing by the FDA. 
    One exception is if the FDA has granted a device a Category B 
    investigational device exemption (IDE) or it has been approved as a 
    nonsignificant risk IDE by an institutional review board. Our process 
    for making a national coverage decision for Category B IDE devices is 
    described in our regulations at 42 CFR 405.205. Parties interested in 
    the coverage of a drug or device (other than a Category B IDE device), 
    however, may contact us with an informal request while the drug or 
    device is proceeding through the FDA approval process. We are willing 
    to meet and discuss these situations. We will monitor the progress of 
    the drug or device through the FDA process so that we may make a rapid 
    coverage decision if FDA approval or clearance for marketing is 
    obtained. The general timeframes we have set for formal requests will 
    not begin, however, until we learn that the FDA has approved or cleared 
    the device for marketing.
        In general, within 90 days of receiving a formal request, we will 
    respond in writing to the requestor and post this information on our 
    Home Page. Our formal response to a formal request or an internally-
    initiated review will include, at a minimum, one of the following:
         A decision that the request duplicates another pending 
    request and we will combine the requests and respond with a single 
    decision.
         A decision that the request duplicates an earlier request 
    for which we have already made a national coverage decision (and that 
    there is insufficient new evidence to begin the process again).
         A referral for a technology assessment.
         A referral to the Medicare Coverage Advisory Committee 
    (MCAC) for consideration.
         A national noncoverage decision (which precludes 
    contractors from making Medicare payment).
         No national coverage decision (which allows for local 
    contractor discretion).
         A national coverage decision with limitations on coverage.
         A national coverage decision without limitations on 
    coverage.
        If our decision is a national noncoverage decision or we decide not 
    to make a national coverage decision, our response will also identify 
    deficiencies in the evidence and the types of information that we will 
    require to reach a national coverage decision or evidence we would need 
    for us to withdraw a national noncoverage decision.
    
    D. HCFA Processing of a Formal Request
    
        We may process a formal request in one of the following ways:
        1. Our review requires little or no outside input.
        Issues that fall into this category are usually those for which the 
    medical and scientific information submitted by the requestor (as well 
    as any additional information available to us) is overwhelmingly in 
    favor of, or against, coverage. We will usually complete our
    
    [[Page 22623]]
    
    review and issue our decision within 90 days of receiving the formal 
    request.
        2. Our review requires a referral to the MCAC or an outside 
    assessment of the service.
        Most national coverage issues fall into this category. These issues 
    will generally be complex and controversial and often involve broad 
    health policy concerns. Usually these issues also may require extensive 
    consultation with specialty societies, medical researchers, and others 
    familiar with the service and the evidence presented to support its 
    coverage.
        We will notify the requestor, usually well within 90 days from 
    receiving the requestor's formal request, that the request will require 
    a referral to the MCAC and the anticipated due date for our response. 
    We will consider the need and amount of time for receiving a 
    recommendation from the MCAC. If applicable, we will consider the need 
    for, and amount of time that will be required to perform, a technology 
    assessment and to review these findings. We will make every effort to 
    assure that we obtain timely assessments.
        We will inform the requestor that, although we will make every 
    effort to meet the general timeframes, the use of assessments and/or a 
    referral to the MCAC, together with the possibility of emerging new 
    medical and scientific information, may sometimes result in revising 
    our timeframe for responding to the request. We will post any changes 
    for all timeframes on our Home Page to keep the public informed.
    
    E. Additional Factors Affecting Our 90-Day Timeframe for Responding to 
    Formal Requests
    
        It is our intention to respond to a formal request for a national 
    coverage decision within 90 days of receiving a request. In general, we 
    expect to be able to meet our self-imposed timeframes. There may be 
    circumstances, however, that would prevent us from meeting the 
    timeframes. For instance, if the requestor subsequently submits 
    additional information, or requests that our national coverage review 
    be expanded or narrowed, we may decide that we are unable to respond 
    until 90 days after receipt of the additional information or request. 
    We would post the revised due date for our response on our Home Page. 
    Also, if another interested individual submits additional information 
    that materially affects our consideration of the issue, we may notify 
    the requestor of the need to reset our due date for responding to the 
    initial request.
        In addition, if we discover additional information not submitted as 
    part of the formal request (for example, reports of clinical trials, 
    and assessments either completed or close to completion), we may notify 
    the requestor and the public about the newly-discovered information and 
    the need to reset our due date for responding to the initial national 
    coverage decision request. For example, an assessment related to an 
    issue we are considering may be scheduled to be issued shortly after 
    our 90-day due date for responding to a formal request. We would 
    normally wish to review the assessment because it may contain useful 
    scientific and timely data before responding to the request. Also, 
    changes or modifications in the FDA approval or clearance for marketing 
    of a drug or device used in furnishing a service may affect the timing 
    of our response to a formal request.
    
    F. Medicare Coverage Advisory Committee
    
        On December 14, 1998, we published a notice in the Federal Register 
    (63 FR 68780) that announces the establishment of the MCAC. The MCAC 
    will make recommendations to us about whether services can be 
    considered ``reasonable'' and ``necessary'' under title XVIII of the 
    Act. We expect the MCAC will meet approximately twice a year. The 
    notice requested, by January 29, 1999, nominations for members for the 
    Committee. (We have received more than 400 nominations.) The notice 
    also announces the signing by the Secretary on November 24, 1998 of the 
    charter establishing the Committee. This charter ends at close of 
    business on November 23, 2000 unless renewed by the Secretary. The MCAC 
    Charter is available on our Home Page.
        In general, we may refer an issue to the MCAC if the service meets 
    any of the following conditions:
         It is the subject of significant scientific or medical 
    controversy--Is there a major split in opinion among researchers and 
    clinicians regarding the medical effectiveness of the service, the 
    appropriateness of staff or setting, or some other significant 
    controversy that would affect whether the service is ``reasonable'' and 
    ``necessary'' under the Act?
         It has the potential to have a major impact on the 
    Medicare program.
         It is subject to broad public controversy.
        If we refer a formal request to the MCAC, the discussion of the 
    request at the MCAC meeting will be subject to the requirements of the 
    Federal Advisory Committee Act. Therefore, we will publish a notice in 
    the Federal Register generally 30 days before the meeting. It will 
    announce the agenda and the time and place of the meeting so that all 
    interested individuals will have the opportunity to attend the meeting 
    and present their views. We will request that all evidentiary 
    presentations be submitted to us in writing at least 20 days before the 
    meeting. At the end of each meeting, there will be an additional period 
    for the public to present comments. After considering all presentations 
    and comments, the MCAC will create its recommendation to us concerning 
    national coverage, which it must adopt by majority vote.
        We expect the MCAC will make its recommendations to us as 
    expeditiously as possible. We will provide an estimate of when we 
    believe we will receive the MCAC referral; however, we cannot predict 
    when the MCAC may decide, during its deliberations, that additional 
    information is needed for it to make a recommendation to us.
        Once the MCAC makes a formal recommendation to us, we will post it 
    on our Home Page. Within 60 calendar days of receiving the 
    recommendation, we will either adopt the MCAC recommendation (or adopt 
    it with modifications) or notify the requestor and the public why we 
    disagree with the MCAC recommendation. If we choose not to adopt the 
    recommendation, our notification will explain the reasons why we have 
    decided not to adopt the MCAC recommendation. We will also identify 
    further evidence we will require be submitted to us. Again, we will 
    post our decision on our Home Page.
    
    G. Technology Assessments
    
        During our review of a request, we may find that we will require a 
    technology assessment to complete our review. Generally, a technology 
    assessment provides a systematic analysis of the safety, efficacy, and 
    effectiveness of a health care technology.
        Two of the reasons we may request a technology assessment include 
    the following:
         There is sufficient medical and scientific literature 
    available to provide a basis for an assessment, but the complexity of 
    the subject and/or complexity of the issue exceed our staff expertise 
    or capability.
         The MCAC requests a technology assessment.
        A key element of the assessment process is the need for the 
    assessor to be impartial. If we require an assessment, we will obtain 
    it from an impartial third party, such as the Agency for Health Care 
    Policy and Research. Under agreement with us, the assessor will conduct 
    or arrange for preparation or
    
    [[Page 22624]]
    
    purchase of the assessment, as appropriate.
        If we receive a request for coverage on an item or service for 
    which an assessment is already underway, we will immediately inform the 
    requestor of the status and estimated timing of the assessment. If we 
    initiate an assessment in response to a request, we will, within 45 
    days of requesting an assessment, inform the requestor of the estimated 
    time for receiving the assessment.
        We anticipate that a few technology assessments will be completed 
    within 90 days of their initiation. Complex assessments will, of 
    course, require additional time but will not normally take longer than 
    12 months from the time the assessment was begun. We will post 
    completed technology assessments on our Home Page.
    
    H. HCFA Announcement of National Coverage Decisions
    
        Before we issue a national coverage decision as a ruling, program 
    instruction to our contractors, or Federal Register document, we will 
    announce our intention to make the national coverage decision in the 
    form of a decision memorandum. The decision memorandum will merely 
    announce our intention to make a national coverage decision. It will 
    not be binding on our contractors until we publish the national 
    coverage decision in the Federal Register or issue it as a program 
    instruction or HCFA ruling.
        If we do not refer an issue to the MCAC or for a technology 
    assessment, we will forward the decision memorandum to the requestor 
    and post it on our Home Page no later than 90 calendar days after we 
    accept the formal request (or after we accept additional medical and 
    scientific information supporting the request). In situations involving 
    a referral to the MCAC or that require a technology assessment, we will 
    forward the decision memorandum to the requestor and post it on our 
    Home Page generally no later than 60 calendar days after receiving the 
    MCAC recommendation or the technology assessment or the technical 
    assessment followed by an MCAC recommendation.
        The memorandum may contain remarks regarding the level and content 
    of evidence presented and reviewed. Moreover, if significant, we will 
    include the conclusions and recommendations of any assessments or the 
    MCAC recommendations received. Finally, the memorandum may include any 
    other factors that had a major influence on our decision, and will 
    contain our rationale for the decision we made.
        If we announce our intention to not cover or to reduce coverage of 
    a service, the decision memorandum will include the reasons for 
    noncoverage and identify the information we will require for a 
    different coverage decision. The memorandum will not be effective 
    immediately, but will become effective on the date specified in the 
    national coverage decision.
    
    I. Implementation of National Coverage Decisions
    
        Within 60 calendar days of forwarding the decision memorandum to 
    the requestor and posting the memorandum on our Home Page, we will 
    issue a national coverage decision. As explained previously, we may 
    publish a national coverage decision in a variety of forms such as 
    program memorandum, manual instruction, HCFA ruling, or Federal 
    Register notice. We will also publish a reference to each national 
    coverage decision in the Federal Register as part of our quarterly 
    listing of program issuances. We could also choose to publish a general 
    notice in the Federal Register. If we withdraw or reduce coverage for a 
    service, we will publish a general notice in the Federal Register.
        The program instruction, Federal Register notice, or HCFA ruling 
    will include the date on which our claims-payment contractors will 
    implement any change in payment that may result from the national 
    coverage decision. Generally, we expect to make a payment change 
    effective within 180 calendar days of the first day of the next full 
    calendar quarter that follows the date we issue the national coverage 
    decision.
        If we make a positive decision to cover an item or service, 
    numerous complex and related steps remain before a payment change is 
    made. We must determine which codes the providers, suppliers, and our 
    contractors will use for submission and payment of claims consistent 
    with our coverage decision and issue appropriate instructions. We must 
    also determine the appropriate Medicare payment level. Finally, we must 
    develop and issue claims processing instructions to our systems 
    maintainers and claims-payment contractors to ensure accurate payment 
    and to include the necessary program integrity safeguards and edits. 
    Our contractors now implement systems changes at the start of a 
    calendar quarter, and instructions are required well in advance in 
    order to install and test the systems changes.
        As stated previously, a national coverage decision is binding on 
    all Medicare carriers, fiscal intermediaries, PSCs, PROs, HMOs, CMPs, 
    and HCPPs when issued as a HCFA program instruction or HCFA ruling, or 
    published in the Federal Register. Moreover, national coverage 
    decisions made under section 1862(a)(1) of the Act are subject to 
    limited administrative and judicial review (See 42 CFR 405.860.).
    
    J. Revisiting National Coverage Decisions
    
        After we implement a decision or if there is an existing national 
    coverage decision, we will consider new requests to revise a national 
    coverage decision concerning the service at any time. These requests 
    should include additional medical and scientific information that we 
    have not considered to make our original national coverage decision or 
    an analysis of how we materially misinterpreted original information 
    submitted by the requestor. We will not accept any new request that 
    does not include this additional information.
        If we receive the additional information as part of a request for 
    reconsideration, we will consider this a new formal request and start 
    our review process. The timeframes for our formal review process will 
    apply to a new formal request. Our original national coverage decision 
    will remain in effect until we withdraw that decision and make another 
    national coverage decision.
    
    K. How To Access HCFA's Home Page
    
        Our Home Page can be accessed by entering ``http://www.hcfa.gov.'' 
    To access information about our coverage process, select ``Development 
    of coverage policies'' and then ``Medicare Coverage Process.''
    
    V. Collection of Information Requirements
    
        Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, we are required to 
    provide 60-day notice in the Federal Register and solicit public 
    comment before a collection of information requirement is submitted to 
    the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval. In 
    order to fairly evaluate whether an information collection should be 
    approved by OMB, section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork Reduction Act 
    of 1995 requires that we solicit comment on the following issues:
         The need for the information collection and its usefulness 
    in carrying out the proper functions of our agency.
         The accuracy of our estimate of the information collection 
    burden.
         The quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be 
    collected.
         Recommendations to minimize the information collection 
    burden on the
    
    [[Page 22625]]
    
    affected public, including automated collection techniques.
        We are soliciting public comment on each of these issues for 
    section IV, HCFA's Process for Making National Coverage Decisions.
        In accordance with that section, HCFA will accept an external 
    formal request for a national coverage decision if the information 
    collection requirements outlined above in section IV.B.2 are met. These 
    requirements include:
         The request must be in writing.
         The requestor must identify the request as a ``formal 
    request for a national coverage decision.''
         The requestor must submit supporting documentation that we 
    will specify. At a minimum, the requestor must submit the following 
    information:
         A full and complete description of the service in 
    question, including the benefit category or categories of the Medicare 
    program to which it applies.
         A compilation of the medical and scientific information 
    currently available.
         A description of any clinical trials or studies currently 
    underway, which might be relevant to a decision regarding the coverage 
    of the service. This description should be as complete as possible 
    without disclosing confidential information.
         In the case of a drug, device, or a service using a drug 
    or device subject to regulation by the FDA, the status of current FDA 
    administrative proceedings concerning the drug or device involved. In 
    the case of any item regulated by the FDA, the FDA labeling for the 
    item, together with an indication of whether the service for which a 
    review is being requested is covered under the labeled indication(s). 
    We recognize that FDA changes the labeling of drugs and 510(k) devices 
    and devices with premarket approvals (PMAs). For the purposes of our 
    review, we are interested in the labeled indications at the time of the 
    submission of the formal request. If, during our review, the labeled 
    indications change, we expect the requestor to notify us.
         In the case of a request for reconsideration, new evidence 
    supporting the request or an analysis of our earlier decision 
    demonstrating that we materially misinterpreted the evidence submitted 
    with the earlier request.
        The burden associated with this requirement is the time and effort 
    necessary to disclose the materials referenced above to HCFA. We 
    estimate that on average it will take each entity 40 hours to provide 
    the materials and that there will be 200 requests on an annual basis. 
    Therefore, the total annual burden associated with these requirements 
    is 8,000 hours. While an estimate of 40 hours may appear low, given 
    that entities will most likely have already compiled these data to meet 
    the FDA approval process, we believe it to be accurate.
        If you have any comments on any of these information collection and 
    record keeping requirements, please mail the original and 3 copies 
    directly to the following:
        Health Care Financing Administration, Office of Information 
    Services, Standards and Security Group, Division of HCFA Enterprise 
    Standards, Room N2-14-26, 7500 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21244-
    1850. Attn: John Burke HCFA-3432-GN
    
          and
    
    Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and 
    Budget, Room 10235, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 
    20503, Attn: Allison Eydt, HCFA Desk Officer.
    
        In accordance with the provision of Executive Order 12866, this 
    notice was reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget.
    
        Authority: Sections 1862, 1869(b)(3), and 1871 of the Social 
    Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395y, 1395ff(b)(3), and 1395hh).
    
    (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.773, 
    Medicare--Hospital Insurance; Program No. 93.774, Medicare--
    Supplementary Medical Insurance Program)
    
        Dated: April 21, 1999.
    Nancy-Ann Min DeParle,
    Administrator,
    Health Care Financing Administration.
    
        Dated: April 21, 1999.
    Donna E. Shalala,
    Secretary.
    [FR Doc. 99-10460 Filed 4-22-99; 10:36 a.m.]
    BILLING CODE 4120-01-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
6/28/1999
Published:
04/27/1999
Department:
Health Care Finance Administration
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
General notice.
Document Number:
99-10460
Dates:
This notice is effective June 28, 1999.
Pages:
22619-22625 (7 pages)
Docket Numbers:
HCFA-3432-GN
RINs:
0938-AJ31
PDF File:
99-10460.pdf