94-10103. Sarnia Cogeneration Joint Venture et al.  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 81 (Thursday, April 28, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page ]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-10103]
    
    
    [Federal Register: April 28, 1994]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
    [Docket No. EG94-42-000 et al.]
    
    
    Sarnia Cogeneration Joint Venture et al.
    
    Electric Rate and Corporate Regulation Filings
    
    April 14, 1994.
        Take notice that the following filings have been made with the 
    Commission:
    
    1. Sarnia Cogeneration Joint Venture
    
    [Docket No. EG94-42-000]
    
        On March 31, 1994, Sarnia Cogeneration Joint Venture (the 
    ``Applicant'') whose address is c/o Mark Bradley, Dow Chemical Canada 
    Inc., 1086 Modeland Road, P.O. Box 1012, Sarnia, Ontario, Canada 
    N7T7K7, filed with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission an 
    application for determination of exempt wholesale generator status 
    pursuant to part 365 of the Commission's regulations.
        The Applicant states that it will be engaged directly and 
    exclusively in the business of owning and operating one gas turbine and 
    associated electric generator, a heat recovery steam generator, five 
    fired steam boilers and five steam turbine generators, located at 
    Sarnia, Province of Ontario, Canada, with an aggregate rated electric 
    generating capacity of approximately 120 megawatts, and selling 
    electric energy exclusively at wholesale. The Applicant requests a 
    determination that the Applicant will be an exempt wholesale generator 
    under section 32(a)(1) of the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 
    1935.
        Comment date: April 25, 1994, in accordance with Standard Paragraph 
    E at the end of this notice.
    
    2. SEI Bahamas Argentina I, Inc.
    
    [Docket No. EG94-44-000]
    
        On April 6, 1994, SEI Bahamas Argentina I, Inc. (the ``Applicant'') 
    filed with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission an application for 
    determination of exempt wholesale generator (``EWG'') status pursuant 
    to part 365 of the Commission's regulations.
        The Applicant is a wholly-owned subsidiary of SEI Holdings VI, 
    Inc., which, in turn, is a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Southern 
    Company. The Applicant is participating in several bids for the purpose 
    of owning and/or operating ``eligible facilities'' as defined in 
    section 32(a)(2) of PUHCA. The currently identified facilities consist 
    of several hydroelectric generating stations with a total combined 
    installed capacity of approximately 650 MW produced by several 
    generating units and associated interconnection facilities. The 
    facilities are located on the Atuel and Diamante River Systems in the 
    Province of Mendoza and other provinces in the Republic of Argentina.
        In addition, the Applicant intends to engage in project development 
    activities on its own behalf associated with the acquisition of 
    ownership interests in additional as-yet unidentified eligible 
    facilities and/or EWGs. These development activities will be limited to 
    activities associated with the acquisition of ownership interests in 
    additional facilities or entities that meet the criteria for eligible 
    facilities and/or EWGs set out in section 32 of the Public Utility 
    Holding Act of 1935.
        Comment date: April 29, 1994, in accordance with Standard Paragraph 
    E at the end of this notice.
    
    3. COE Argentina I Corp.
    
    [Docket No. EG94-46-000]
    
        On April 6, 1994, COE Argentina I Corp. (the ``Applicant'') filed 
    with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission an application for 
    determination of exempt wholesale generator (``EWG'') status pursuant 
    to part 365 of the Commission's regulations.
        The Applicant is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Charter Oak Energy, 
    Inc., which, in turn, is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Northeast 
    Utilities. The Applicant is participating in several bids for the 
    purpose of owning and/or operating ``eligible facilities'' as defined 
    in section 32(a)(2) of the 1935 Act. The currently identified 
    facilities consist of several hydroelectric generating stations with a 
    total combined installed capacity of approximately 650 MW produced by 
    several generating units and associated interconnection facilities. The 
    facilities are located on the Atuel and Diamante River Systems in the 
    Province of Mendoza and other provinces in the Republic of Argentina.
        In addition, COE Argentina intends to engage in project development 
    activities associated with the acquisition of ownership interests in 
    additional as-yet unidentified eligible facilities and/or EWGs. These 
    development activities will be limited to activities on its own behalf 
    associated with the acquisition of ownership interests in additional 
    facilities or entities that meet the criteria for eligible facilities 
    and/or EWGs set out in Section 32 of the Public Utility Holding Act of 
    1935.
        Comment date: April 29, 1994, in accordance with Standard Paragraph 
    E at the end of this notice.
    
    4. L'Energia, Limited Partnership
    
    [Docket Nos. EL94-58-000 and QF87-249-004]
    
        Take notice that on April 6, 1994, L'Energia, Limited Partnership, 
    a Delaware limited partnership (Applicant), filed a petition with the 
    Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (the Commission) requesting a 
    temporary waiver of the operating standard set forth in 18 CFR 
    292.205(a)(1) for calendar years 1992 and 1993 and the efficiency 
    standard set forth in 18 CFR 292.205(a)(2)(i)(B) for calendar year 
    1992, as those standards apply to Applicant's cogeneration facility 
    located in Lowell, Massachusetts.
        Comment date: April 28, 1994, in accordance with Standard Paragraph 
    E at the end of this notice.
    
    5. Portland General Electric Company
    
    [Docket No. ER94-924-000]
    
        Take notice that on April 8, 1994, Portland General Electric 
    Company (PGE) tendered for filing a request for deferral of Commission 
    action for fourteen (14) days in the above Docket, to allow time for 
    PGE to supplement its original filing in Docket No. ER94-924-000.
        Comment date: April 28, 1994, in accordance with Standard Paragraph 
    E at the end of this notice.
    
    6. Pacific Gas and Electric Company
    
    [Docket No. ER94-1133-000]
    
        Take notice that on April 4, 1994, Pacific Gas and Electric Company 
    (PG&E) tendered for filing as a supplement to an agreement dated May 
    21, 1993 between the Trinity Public Utilities District (Trinity) and 
    PG&E, an amendment associated with the installation of three 60 Kv 
    switches. Under this arrangement, Trinity and PG&E are sharing the cost 
    of the switches, with PG&E performing the work.
        PG&E has requested that the rate schedule change be effective on 
    the date accepted for filing by the Commission.
        Copies of this filing were served on Western Area Power 
    Administration, Trinity, and the California Public Utilities 
    Commission.
        Comment date: April 28, 1994, in accordance with Standard Paragraph 
    E at the end of this notice.
    
    7. Entergy Services, Inc.
    
    [Docket No. ER94-1138-000]
    
        Take notice that on April 5, 1994, Entergy Services, Inc. (Entergy 
    Services), as agent for Arkansas Power & Light Company, Gulf States 
    Utilities Company, Louisiana Power & Light Company, Mississippi Power & 
    Light Company, and New Orleans Public Service Inc. (collectively the 
    Entergy Operating Companies) tendered for filing the Fourth 
    Transmission Service Agreement (Fourth TSA) between Entergy Services, 
    Inc. and Entergy Power, Inc. The Fourth TSA sets out the terms and 
    conditions of firm transmission service under the Entergy Operating 
    Companies' Transmission Service Tariff for a sale of unit capacity to 
    East Texas Electric Cooperative, Inc.
        Comment date: April 28, 1994, in accordance with Standard Paragraph 
    E at the end of this notice.
    
    8. Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc.
    
    [Docket No. ER94-1140-000]
    
        Take notice that on April 5, 1994, Orange and Rockland Utilities, 
    Inc. (Orange and Rockland) tendered for filing pursuant to the Federal 
    Energy Regulatory Commission's order issued January 15, 1988, in Docket 
    No. ER88-112-000, an executed Service Agreement between Orange and 
    Rockland and Wakefern Food Corporation.
        Comment date: April 28, 1994, in accordance with Standard Paragraph 
    E at the end of this notice.
    
    9. Northeast Utilities Service Company
    
    [Docket No. ER94-1141-000]
    
        Take notice that on April 6, 1994, Northeast Utilities Service 
    Company (NUSCO) tendered for filing a Service Agreement to provide non-
    firm transmission service to Central Maine Power Company (CMP) under 
    the NU System Companies' Transmission Service Tariff No. 2. NUSCO 
    requests that the Service Agreement become effective April 1, 1994 in 
    order to accommodate transmission for CMP's transaction which begins on 
    that date.
        NUSCO states that a copy of the filing has been mailed to CMP.
        Comment date: April 28, 1994, in accordance with Standard Paragraph 
    E at the end of this notice.
    
    10. Great Bay Power Corporation
    
    [Docket No. ER94-1142-000]
    
        Take notice that on April 6, 1994, Great Bay Power Corporation 
    (Great Bay) tendered for filing two executed service agreements, one 
    between the Vermont Public Power Supply Authority and Great Bay, and 
    the other between Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. and 
    Great Bay; both service agreements are for service under Great Bay's 
    Tariff for Short-Term Sales. This Tariff was accepted for filing by the 
    Commission on November 11, 1993, in Docket No. ER93-924-000. The 
    service agreements are proposed to be effective April 1, 1994.
        Comment date: April 28, 1994, in accordance with Standard Paragraph 
    E at the end of this notice.
    
    11. Alabama Power Company
    
    [Docket No. ER94-1145-000]
    
        Take notice that on April 11, 1994, Alabama Power Company tendered 
    for filing a Delivery Point Specification Sheet dated as of May 15, 
    1994, which reflect the addition of a delivery point to the City of 
    Opelika. This delivery point will be served under the terms and 
    conditions of the Agreement for Partial Requirements Service and 
    Complementary Services between Alabama Power Company and the Alabama 
    Municipal Electric Authority dated February 24, 1986, being designated 
    as FERC Rate Schedule No. 165. The parties request an effective date of 
    May 15, 1994, for the addition of said delivery point.
        Comment date: April 28, 1994, in accordance with Standard Paragraph 
    E at the end of this notice.
    
    12. New England Power Company
    
    [Docket No. ER94-1146-000]
    
        Take notice that on April 11, 1994, New England Power Company 
    (NEP), tendered for filing executed Service Agreements and Certificates 
    of Concurrence by the Taunton Municipal Lighting Plant under NEP's FERC 
    Electric Service Tariffs, Original Volume Nos. 5 and 6.
        Comment date: April 28, 1994, in accordance with Standard Paragraph 
    E at the end of this notice.
    
    13. Madison Gas and Electric Company
    
    [Docket No. ER94-1147-000]
    
        Take notice that on April 11, 1994, Madison Gas and Electric 
    Company (MGE) tendered for filing with the Federal Energy Regulatory 
    Commission an Interchange Agreement between it and Otter Tail Power 
    Company (OTP) for Negotiated Capacity and General Purpose Energy. MGE 
    and OTP respectfully request an effective date of April 8, 1994.
        MGE states that a copy of the filing has been provided to OTP and 
    also to the Public Service Commission of Wisconsin.
        Comment date: April 28, 1994, in accordance with Standard Paragraph 
    E at the end of this notice.
    
    14. Pacific Gas and Electric Company
    
    [Docket No. ER94-1150-000]
    
        Take notice that on April 12, 1994, Pacific Gas and Electric 
    Company (PG&E) tendered for filing a Control Area Rate Schedule for the 
    City of Redding (Redding) provided by PG&E.
        PG&E states that the Control Area Rate Schedule specifies the 
    control area standards and requirements Redding will need to meet to 
    operate independently within PG&E's Control Area. PG&E states that this 
    rate schedule replaces and supersedes the present partial-requirements 
    agreement on file with the Commission. PG&E states that copies of the 
    filing were served upon Redding, the Western Area Power Administration 
    and the California Public Utilities Commission.
        Comment date: April 28, 1994, in accordance with Standard Paragraph 
    E at the end of this notice.
    
    15. LG&E-Westmoreland Southampton
    
    [Docket Nos. QF88-84-005 and EL94-45-000]
    
        On April 6, 1994, LG&E-Westmoreland Southampton (Applicant) 
    tendered for filing a supplement to its filing in this docket. No 
    determination has been made that the submittal constitutes a complete 
    filing.
        The supplement provides additional information pertaining primarily 
    to the technical data and operating procedure of the cogeneration 
    facility.
        Comment date: May 6, 1994, in accordance with Standard Paragraph E 
    at the end of this notice.
    
    Standard Paragraphs
    
        E. Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
    file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
    Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol Street, NE., Washington, DC 
    20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules 
    of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such 
    motions or protests should be filed on or before the comment date. 
    Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
    appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
    parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
    file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
    Commission and are available for public inspection.
    Lois D. Cashell,
    Secretary.
    [FR Doc. 94-10103 Filed 4-26-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
04/28/1994
Department:
Energy Department
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Document Number:
94-10103
Dates:
April 25, 1994, in accordance with Standard Paragraph E at the end of this notice.
Pages:
0-0 (None pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: April 28, 1994, Docket No. EG94-42-000 et al.