[Federal Register Volume 59, Number 81 (Thursday, April 28, 1994)]
[Unknown Section]
[Page ]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 94-10165]
[Federal Register: April 28, 1994]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
[A-580-008]
Color Television Receivers From the Republic of Korea Amendment
to Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review
AGENCY: International Trade Administration/Import Administration/
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of Amendment to final results of antidumping duty
administrative review.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: On March 23, 1994, the Department of Commerce published in the
Federal Register the final results of its administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on color television receivers from the Republic
of Korea (59 FR 13700) covering seven manufacturers/exporters and the
period April 1, 1991, through March 31, 1992.
Based on the correction of ministerial errors, we are amending the
final results with respect to color television receivers sold by one
company, Daewoo Electronics Co., Ltd.
EFFECTIVE DATE: April 28, 1994.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Zev Primor or Wendy Frankel, Office of
Antidumping Compliance, Import Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
5253.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On March 23, 1994, the Department of Commerce (the Department)
published in the Federal Register (59 FR 13700) the final results of
its administrative review of the antidumping duty order on color
television receivers (CTVs) from the Republic of Korea (ROK) (49 FR
18336, April 30, 1984). The review covers seven manufacturers/exporters
and the period April 1, 1991, through March 31, 1992.
After publication of our final results, we received timely
allegations of ministerial errors, pursuant to Sec. 353.28 of the
Department's regulations, from the petitioners (the Independent
Radionic Workers of America, the United Electrical Workers of America,
the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, the International
Union of Electronic, Electrical, Salaried, Machine and Furniture
Workers, AFL-CIO, and Industrial Union Department, AFL-CIO), and one
respondent, Daewoo Electronics Co., Ltd. (Daewoo). We have corrected
the ministerial errors, as discussed below, and we have amended the
final results of review for Daewoo to reflect those corrections
pursuant to Sec. 353.28(c) of the Department's regulations.
Ministerial Errors
We have corrected the following ministerial errors:
1. In the computer program instructions for Daewoo's purchase price
(PP) calculations, we had used an incorrect model designation (``DTV-
9234N''). We have changed this to the correct designation
(``DTV9234N'').
2. In the exporter's sales price (ESP) final results computer
program, we included the commission offset in the home market tax
adjustment calculation. However, in the PP final results computer
program, we inadvertently failed to include the commission offset in
the home market tax adjustment calculation. We have corrected the
equation by including that offset in the PP final results computer
program.
3. When comparing home market price, based on constructed value
(CV), to United States Price (USP), we removed the tax adjustment on
the home market side. However, in both the PP and ESP computer
programs, we inadvertently retained the tax adjustment component in
USP. We have corrected the calculated by removing the tax adjustment
component from USP.
4. The Department intended to treat all pre-sale freight expenses
as indirect selling expenses and did so in the PP and ESP computer
programs. However, in the CV calculation, we inadvertently omitted
those pre-sale freight expenses. We have corrected the computer
instructions to reflect that change.
We do not agree with Daewoo's claim that the Department's treatment
of all of its pre-sale movement expenses as indirect expenses
constitutes a clerical error as described in section 353.28(d). We
believe this to be a methodological issue and refer Daewoo to Ad Hoc
Committee of AZ-NM-TX-FL Producers of Gray Portland Cement v. United
States, Slip Op. 93-1239 (Fed. Cir., January 5, 1994), which discusses
the methodological treatment of these pre-sale expenses.
Amended Final Results of Review
As a result of our corrections of ministerial errors, we have
determined that a weighted-average margin of 0.90 percent exists for
Daewoo for the period April 1, 1991, through March 31, 1992.
The Department will issue appraisement and revised cash deposit
instructions with regard to Daewoo directly to the U.S. Customs
Service. All other results of this administrative review remain the
same as published in the Federal Register on March 23, 1994 (59 FR
13700).
These amended final results of administrative review and notice are
in accordance with section 751(f) of the Tariff Act and 19 CFR
353.28(c).
Dated: April 21, 1994.
Susan G. Esserman,
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. 94-10165 Filed 4-26-94; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-M
