98-11281. Ohio Regulatory Program  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 82 (Wednesday, April 29, 1998)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Pages 23405-23407]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-11281]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
    
    Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement
    
    30 CFR Part 935
    
    [OH-218-FOR; Amendment Number 61R]
    
    
    Ohio Regulatory Program
    
    AGENCY: Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (OSM), 
    Interior.
    
    ACTION: Proposed rule; reopening of public comment period.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: OSM is reopening the public comment period on a proposed 
    amendment to the Ohio regulatory program (hereinafter referred to as 
    the ``Ohio program'') under the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation 
    Act of 1977 (SMCRA). This amendment provides that areas reclaimed 
    following the removal of temporary structures that are part of the 
    sediment control system, such as sedimentation ponds, roads, and small 
    diversions, are not subject to a revegetation responsibility period and 
    bond liability period separate from that of the permit area or 
    increment thereof served by such facilities. The amendment also 
    authorizes as a husbandry practice that not restart the revegetation 
    responsibility period, the repair of damage to land and/or established 
    permanent vegetation that has been unavoidably disturbed. The amendment 
    is intended to improve operational efficiency of the Ohio program.
    
    DATES: Written comments must be received on or before 4:00 p.m. on May 
    29, 1998. If requested, a public hearing on the proposed amendments 
    will be held on May 26, 1998. Requests to present oral testimony at the 
    hearing must be received on or before 4:00 p.m. on May 14, 1998.
    
    ADDRESSES: Written comments and requests to speak at the hearing should 
    be mailed or delivered to George Rieger, Field Branch Chief, 
    Appalachian Regional Coordinating Center, at the address listed below.
        Copies of the Ohio program, the proposed amendment, a listing of 
    any scheduled public hearings, and all written comments received in 
    response to this document will be available for public review at the 
    addresses listed below during normal business hours, Monday through 
    Friday, excluding holidays. Each requester may receive one free copy of 
    the proposed amendment by contacting the OSM Field Branch, Appalachian 
    Regional Coordinating Center.
    
    George Rieger, Field Branch Chief, Appalachian Regional Coordinating 
    Center, Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, 3 Parkway 
    Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15220 Telephone: (412) 937-2153.
    Ohio Division of Mines and Reclamation, 1855 Fountain Square Court, 
    Columbus, Ohio 43224, Telephone: (614) 265-1076.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
    George Rieger, Field Branch Chief, Appalachian Regional Coordinating 
    Center, Telephone: (412) 937-2153.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    
    I. Background on the Ohio Program
    
        On August 16, 1982, the Secretary of the Interior conditionally 
    approved the Ohio program. Background information on the Ohio program, 
    including the Secretary's findings, the disposition of comments, and 
    the conditions of approval can be found in the August 10, 1982, Federal 
    Register (47 FR 34688). Subsequent actions concerning conditions of 
    approval and program amendments can be found at 30 CFR 935.11, 935.15, 
    and 935.16.
    
    II. Description of the Proposed Amendment
    
        By letter dated February 11, 1993 (Administrative Record No. OH-
    1831), Ohio submitted proposed Program Amendment Number 61 concerning 
    augmentative practices. OSM announced receipt of this amendment in the 
    April 1, 1993, Federal Register (58 FR 17173) and, in the same notice, 
    opened the public comment period and provided opportunity for a public 
    hearing on the adequacy of the proposed amendment. The public comment 
    period closed on May 3, 1993. Since no one requested an opportunity to 
    provide testimony at a public hearing, the scheduled hearing was 
    canceled.
        By letter dated June 11, 1993 (administrative Record No. OH-1888), 
    Ohio submitted additional revisions to this proposed amendment. OSM 
    announced receipt of the revised amendment in the July 6, 1993, Federal 
    Register (58 FR 36177), and, in the same notice, reopened the public 
    comment period and again provided an opportunity for a public hearing. 
    The public comment period closed on July 21, 1993. On August 16, 1993 
    (58 FR 43261), OSM approved most of the proposed amendment, but 
    deferred decision on Ohio Administrative Code (OAC) 1501:13-9-15(F) 
    (5), (6), and (7) concerning nonaugmentative practices.
        OSM reopened a public comment period on September 15, 1993 (58 FR 
    48333) for the provisions OAC 1501:13-9-15(F) (6) and (7) as originally 
    submitted on February 11, 1993, and revised on June 11, 1993, with 
    regard to removal of sedimentation ponds and associated areas. The 
    comment period closed on October 15, 1993. This notice also included 
    similar proposed revisions to the Kentucky and Illinois regulations as 
    well as a discussion of OSM's proposed policy concerning restart of the 
    revegetation responsibility
    
    [[Page 23406]]
    
    period upon the removal of required sedimentary control structures.
        By letter dated April 14, 1998 (Administrative Record Number OH-
    2175-00), Ohio submitted revised language of the Program Amendment # 
    61R. Subsection (f)(4) provides for practices that will not be 
    considered augmentative when the practice and the rate of applecation 
    is an accepted local practice for comparable unmined lands that can be 
    expected to continue as a postmining practice. Subsection (F)(5) 
    provides for the nonaugmentative repair of areas that held required 
    sediment control structures. Subsection (F)(6) provides the minimum 
    time that vegetation established or reestablished under subsections 
    (F)(4)(c) and (F)(5) must have been seeded prior to a request for Phase 
    III bond release. The proposed language is as follows.
    
    OAC 1501:13-9-15(F)(4)
    
        (c) Reseeding and adding soil amendments when necessary to repair 
    damage to land and/or established permanent vegetation, that is 
    unavoidably disturbed in order to meet the reclamation standards of 
    this chapter, provided that:
        (I) The damage is not caused by a lack of planning, design, or 
    implemention of the mining and reclamation plan, inappropriate 
    reclamation practices on the part of the permittee, or the lack of 
    established permanent vegetation; and
        (II) The total acreage of repaired areas under paragraphs (F)(4) 
    (b) & (c) of this rule does not exceed ten percent of the total land 
    affected, with no individual area exceeding three acres.
    
    OAC 1501:13-9-15(F)(5)
    
        Reseeding of areas that have been unavoidably disturbed in the 
    course of gaining access for removal of structures that are part of the 
    sediment control system or initial seeding of areas upon which the 
    sediment control system was located and subsequently removed will not 
    restart the period of extended responsibility for revegetation success.
    
    OAC 1501:13-9-15(F)(6)
    
        For the purposes of paragraphs (F)(4)(c) and (F)(5) of this rule, 
    permanent vegetation that is established or reestablished on these 
    areas must have been seeded a minimum of twelve months prior to the 
    request for Phase III bond release.
    
    III. Public Comment Procedures
    
        In accordance with the provisions of 30 CFR 732.17(h), OSM is now 
    seeking comments on the proposed amendments. Comments should address 
    whether the amendments satisfy the applicable program approval criteria 
    of 30 CFR 732.15. If the amendments are deemed adequate, they will 
    become part of the Ohio program.
    
    Written Comments
    
        Written comments should be specific, pertain only to the issues 
    proposed in this notice and include explanations in support of the 
    commenter's recommendations. Comments received after the time indicated 
    under DATES or at locations other than the Appalachian Regional 
    Coordinating Center will not necessarily be considered in the final 
    rulemaking or included in the Administrative Record.
    
    Public Hearing
    
        Persons wishing to testify at the public hearing should contact the 
    person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT by the close of 
    business on May 14, 1998. If no one requests an opportunity to testify 
    at the public hearing by that date, the hearing will not be held.
        Filing of a written statement at the time of the hearing is 
    requested as it will greatly assist the transcriber. Submission of 
    written statements in advance of the hearing will allow OSM officials 
    to prepare adequate remarks and appropriate questions.
        The public hearing will continue on the specified date until all 
    persons scheduled to testify have been heard. Persons in the audience 
    who have not been scheduled to testify, and who wish to do so, will be 
    heard following those scheduled. The hearing will end after all persons 
    scheduled to testify and persons present in the audience who wish to 
    testify have been heard.
    
    Public Meeting
    
        If only one person or group requests to testify at a hearing, a 
    public meeting, rather than a public hearing, may be held. Persons 
    wishing to meet with OSM representatives to discuss the amendments may 
    request a meeting by contacting the person listed under FOR FURTHER 
    INFORMATION CONTACT.
        All such meetings will be open to the public and, if possible, 
    notices of meetings will be posted in advance at the locations listed 
    under ADDRESSES. A written summary of each public meeting will be made 
    a part of the Administrative Record.
    
    IV. Procedural Determinations
    
    Executive Order 12866
    
        This rule is exempted from review by the Office of Management and 
    Budget (OMB) under Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and 
    Review).
    
    Executive Order 12988
    
        The Department of the Interior has conducted the reviews required 
    by section 3 of Executive Order 12778 (Civil Justice Reform) and has 
    determined that, to the extent allowed by law, this rule meets the 
    applicable standards of subsections (a) and (b) of that section. 
    However, these standards are not applicable to the actual language of 
    State regulatory programs and program amendments since each such 
    program is drafted and promulgated by a specific State, not by OSM. 
    Under sections 503 and 505 of SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1253 and 1255) and 30 
    CFR 730.11, 732.15, and 732.17(h)(10), decisions on proposed State 
    regulatory programs and program amendments submitted by the States must 
    be based solely on a determination of whether the submittal is 
    consistent with SMCRA and its implementing Federal regulations and 
    whether the other requirements of 30 CFR Parts 730, 731, and 732 have 
    been met.
    
    National Environmental Policy Act
    
        No environmental impact statement is required for this rule since 
    section 702(d) of SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1292(d)) provides that agency 
    decisions on proposed State regulatory program provisions do not 
    constitute major Federal actions within the meaning of section 
    102(2)(C) of the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 
    4332(2)(C)).
    
    Paperwork Reduction Act
    
        This rule does not contain information collection requirements that 
    require approval by OMB under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 
    3507 et seq.).
    
    Regulatory Flexibility Act
    
        The Department of the Interior has determined that this rule will 
    not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small 
    entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). 
    The State submittal which is the subject of this rule is based upon 
    corresponding Federal regulations for which an economic analysis was 
    prepared and certification made that such regulations would not have a 
    significant economic effect upon a substantial number of small 
    entities. Accordingly, this rule will ensure that existing requirements 
    previously promulgated by OSM will be implemented by the State. In 
    making the determination as to whether this rule would have a 
    significant economic impact, the Department relied upon the data and 
    assumptions for the corresponding Federal regulations.
    
    [[Page 23407]]
    
    Unfunded Mandates
    
        This rule will not impose a cost of $100 million or more in any 
    given year on any governmental entity or the private sector.
    
    List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 935
    
        Intergovernmental relations, Surface mining, Underground mining.
    
        Dated: April 21, 1998.
    Michael K. Robinson,
    Acting Regional Director, Appalachian Regional Coordinating Center.
    [FR Doc. 98-11281 Filed 4-28-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4310-05-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
04/29/1998
Department:
Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement Office
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Proposed rule; reopening of public comment period.
Document Number:
98-11281
Dates:
Written comments must be received on or before 4:00 p.m. on May 29, 1998. If requested, a public hearing on the proposed amendments will be held on May 26, 1998. Requests to present oral testimony at the hearing must be received on or before 4:00 p.m. on May 14, 1998.
Pages:
23405-23407 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
OH-218-FOR, Amendment Number 61R
PDF File:
98-11281.pdf
CFR: (1)
30 CFR 935