99-10669. Airworthiness Directives; Bell Helicopter Textron Canada (BHTC) Model 222, 222B, and 222U Helicopters  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 82 (Thursday, April 29, 1999)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 23016-23017]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-10669]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    
    Federal Aviation Administration
    
    14 CFR Part 39
    
    [Docket No. 98-SW-49-AD; Amendment 39-11153; AD 99-09-20]
    RIN 2120-AA64
    
    
    Airworthiness Directives; Bell Helicopter Textron Canada (BHTC) 
    Model 222, 222B, and 222U Helicopters
    
    AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Final rule; request for comments.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD) that 
    is applicable to BHTC Model 222, 222B, and 222U helicopters. This 
    action requires initial and repetitive visual inspections and 
    verification of the torque of the bolts on the main rotor hub. This 
    amendment is prompted by a report of fatigue cracks around the bolt 
    holes of the main rotor pitch horn (pitch horn) and a cracked main 
    rotor flapping bearing assembly (flapping bearing assembly) on a BHTC 
    Model 222 helicopter. This condition, if not corrected, could result in 
    fretting-induced fatigue cracking of the flapping bearing assembly and 
    around the bolt holes of the pitch horn, loss of the rotor system, and 
    subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.
    
    DATES: Effective May 14, 1999.
        Comments for inclusion in the Rules Docket must be received on or 
    before June 28, 1999.
    
    ADDRESSES: Submit comments in triplicate to the Federal Aviation 
    Administration (FAA), Office of the Regional Counsel, Southwest Region, 
    Attention: Rules Docket No. 98-SW-49-AD, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663, 
    Fort Worth, Texas 76137.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Harry Edmiston, Aerospace Engineer, 
    Rotorcraft Certification Office, Rotorcraft Directorate, FAA, 2601 
    Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, Texas 76137, telephone (817) 222-5158, fax 
    (817) 222-5783.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Transport Canada, which is the airworthiness 
    authority for Canada, has notified the FAA that an unsafe condition may 
    exist on BHTC Model 222, 222B, and 222U helicopters. Transport Canada 
    advises that fatigue cracks at the bolt holes of the pitch horn and in 
    the flapping bearing assembly can lead to loss of control of the 
    helicopter.
        BHTC issued Alert Service Bulletin Nos. 222-98-81 and 222U-98-52, 
    both dated April 23, 1998 (ASB), which specify inspecting the main 
    rotor hub in the areas between the pitch horn and main rotor grip tangs 
    (grip tangs) and between the flapping bearing assembly and the main 
    rotor yoke assembly for fretting. The ASB's also specify torque 
    verification procedures for the main rotor grip retaining bolts and the 
    flapping bearing assembly. Transport Canada classified these ASB's as 
    mandatory and issued Transport Canada AD CF-98-16, dated July 15, 1998, 
    in order to assure the continued airworthiness of these helicopters in 
    Canada.
        These helicopter models are manufactured in Canada and are type 
    certificated for operation in the United States under the provisions of 
    Sec. 21.29 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.29) and the 
    applicable bilateral airworthiness agreement. Pursuant to this 
    bilateral airworthiness agreement, Transport Canada has kept the FAA 
    informed of the situation described above. The FAA has examined the 
    findings of Transport Canada, reviewed all available information, and 
    determined that AD action is necessary for products of these type 
    designs that are certificated for operation in the United States.
        The FAA estimates that 88 helicopters will be affected by this 
    proposed AD, that it will take approximately 1 work hour to accomplish 
    the inspection and retorque of bolts, if necessary, and that the 
    average labor rate is $60 per work hour. Based on these figures, the 
    total cost impact of the AD on U.S. operators is estimated to be 
    $15,840 per year, assuming three inspections and retorques per year and 
    assuming that no parts will need to be replaced.
        Since an unsafe condition has been identified that is likely to 
    exist or develop on other BHTC Model 222, 222B, and 222U helicopters of 
    the same type design registered in the United States, this AD is being 
    issued to prevent fretting induced fatigue cracking of the flapping 
    bearing assembly and around the bolt holes of the pitch horn, loss of 
    the rotor system, and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter. 
    This AD requires recurring inspections of the main rotor hub in the 
    areas between the pitch horn and grip tangs and between the flapping 
    bearing assembly and the main rotor yoke assembly for fretting. If 
    fretting is found on any part, replacing that part with an airworthy 
    part is required. This AD also requires verifying the torque on the 
    main rotor grip retaining bolts and the flapping bearing assembly 
    retaining bolts. The short compliance time involved is required because 
    the previously described critical unsafe condition can adversely affect 
    the controllability of the helicopter. Therefore, a visual inspection 
    of the main rotor hub between the pitch horn and grip tangs and the 
    flapping bearing assembly and the main rotor yoke assembly for fretting 
    is required. A torque check of the main rotor grip retaining bolts and 
    the flapping bearing assembly retaining bolts is also required. These 
    actions are required within 10 hours TIS and this AD must be issued 
    immediately.
        Since a situation exists that requires the immediate adoption of 
    this regulation, it is found that notice and opportunity for prior 
    public comment hereon are impracticable, and that good cause exists for 
    making this amendment effective in less than 30 days.
    Comments Invited
        Although this action is in the form of a final rule that involves 
    requirements affecting flight safety and, thus, was not preceded by 
    notice and an opportunity for public comment, comments are
    
    [[Page 23017]]
    
    invited on this rule. Interested persons are invited to comment on this 
    rule by submitting such written data, views, or arguments as they may 
    desire. Communications should identify the Rules Docket number and be 
    submitted in triplicate to the address specified under the caption 
    ADDRESSES. All communications received on or before the closing date 
    for comments will be considered, and this rule may be amended in light 
    of the comments received. Factual information that supports the 
    commenter's ideas and suggestions is extremely helpful in evaluating 
    the effectiveness of the AD action and determining whether additional 
    rulemaking action would be needed.
        Comments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory, 
    economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the rule that might 
    suggest a need to modify the rule. All comments submitted will be 
    available, both before and after the closing date for comments, in the 
    Rules Docket for examination by interested persons. A report that 
    summarizes each FAA-public contact concerned with the substance of this 
    AD will be filed in the Rules Docket.
        Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments 
    submitted in response to this rule must submit a self-addressed, 
    stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments 
    to Docket No. 98-SW-49-AD.'' The postcard will be date stamped and 
    returned to the commenter.
        The regulations adopted herein will not have substantial direct 
    effects on the States, on the relationship between the national 
    government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
    responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in 
    accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this final 
    rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the 
    preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
        The FAA has determined that this regulation is an emergency 
    regulation that must be issued immediately to correct an unsafe 
    condition in aircraft and that it is not a ``significant regulatory 
    action'' under Executive Order 12866. It has been determined further 
    that this action involves an emergency regulation under DOT Regulatory 
    Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979). If it is 
    determined that this emergency regulation otherwise would be 
    significant under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures, a final 
    regulatory evaluation will be prepared and placed in the Rules Docket. 
    A copy of it, if filed, may be obtained from the Rules Docket at the 
    location provided under the caption ADDRESSES.
    
    List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
    
        Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
    
    Adoption of the Amendment
    
        Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the 
    Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of 
    the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
    
    PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
    
        1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
    
    Sec. 39.13  [Amended]
    
        2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding a new airworthiness directive 
    to read as follows:
    
    99-09-20  Bell Helicopter Textron Canada: Amendment 39-11153. Docket 
    No. 98-SW-49-AD.
    
        Applicability: Model 222 helicopters, serial numbers (S/N) 47006 
    through 47089, Model 222B helicopters, S/N's 47131 through 47156, 
    and Model 222U helicopters, S/N's 47501 through 47574, certificated 
    in any category.
    
        Note 1: This AD applies to each helicopter identified in the 
    preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been 
    otherwise modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the 
    requirements of this AD. For helicopters that have been modified, 
    altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of 
    this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an 
    alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (b) of 
    this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of 
    the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition 
    addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been 
    eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to 
    address it.
    
        Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished 
    previously.
        To prevent fretting induced fatigue cracking of the main rotor 
    flapping bearing assembly (flapping bearing assembly) and around the 
    bolt holes of the main rotor pitch horn (pitch horn), loss of the 
    rotor system, and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter, 
    accomplish the following:
        (a) Within 10 hours time-in-service (TIS), and thereafter at 
    intervals not to exceed 150 hours TIS:
        (1) Perform a visual inspection of the main rotor hub for 
    fretting between the pitch horn and main rotor grip tangs (grip 
    tangs) and between the flapping bearing assembly and the main rotor 
    yoke assembly. If fretting is found on any part, replace it with an 
    airworthy part.
        (2) Verify the torque of the main rotor grip retaining bolts and 
    the flapping bearing assembly bolts in the tightening direction, 
    minimum 100 foot-pounds. If 100 foot-pounds torque is reached 
    without movement of the bolts, torque bolts to 125 foot-pounds.
        (3) If any bolt moves before 100 foot-pounds torque is reached, 
    remove the pitch horn or the flapping bearing assembly, as 
    applicable, from the main rotor hub assembly for further inspection. 
    Inspect the pitch horn or flapping bearing assembly, as applicable, 
    and all faying surfaces of the pitch horn, flapping bearing 
    assembly, buffers, main rotor yoke assembly, and the grip tangs for 
    fretting. If fretting is found on any part, replace it with an 
    airworthy part.
        (4) Apply corrosion preventive compound to the exposed portions 
    of the bolts and nuts.
    
        Note 2: Bell Helicopter Textron Alert Service Bulletin Nos. 222-
    98-81 and 222U-98-52, both dated April 23, 1998, pertain to the 
    subject of this AD.
    
        (b) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the 
    compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be 
    used if approved by the Manager, Rotorcraft Certification Office, 
    FAA, Rotorcraft Directorate. Operators shall submit their requests 
    through an FAA Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may concur or 
    comment and then send it to the Manager, Rotorcraft Certification 
    Office.
    
        Note 3: Information concerning the existence of approved 
    alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be 
    obtained from the Rotorcraft Certification Office.
    
        (c) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with 
    sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 
    CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the helicopter to a location where 
    the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
        (d) This amendment becomes effective on May 14, 1999.
    
        Note 3: The subject of this AD is addressed in Transport Canada 
    (Canada) AD CF-98-16, dated July 15, 1998.
    
        Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on April 22, 1999.
    Henry A. Armstrong,
    Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
    [FR Doc. 99-10669 Filed 4-28-99; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
5/14/1999
Published:
04/29/1999
Department:
Federal Aviation Administration
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule; request for comments.
Document Number:
99-10669
Dates:
Effective May 14, 1999.
Pages:
23016-23017 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 98-SW-49-AD, Amendment 39-11153, AD 99-09-20
RINs:
2120-AA64: Airworthiness Directives
RIN Links:
https://www.federalregister.gov/regulations/2120-AA64/airworthiness-directives
PDF File:
99-10669.pdf
CFR: (2)
14 CFR 21.29
14 CFR 39.13