99-10686. Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation; Wolf Creek Generating Station Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 82 (Thursday, April 29, 1999)]
    [Notices]
    [Page 23136]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-10686]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
    
    [Docket No. 50-482]
    
    
    Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation; Wolf Creek Generating 
    Station Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact
    
        The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) is 
    considering issuance of an exemption to Facility Operating License No. 
    NPF-42, issued to Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation (WCNOC), for 
    operation of the Wolf Creek Generating Station, located in Coffey 
    County, Kansas.
    
    Environmental Assessment
    
    Identification of the Proposed Action
    
        The proposed action would exempt WCNOC from certain requirements of 
    10 CFR 50.60 and 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix G. The proposed exemption 
    would allow WCNOC to apply American Society for Mechanical Engineers 
    (ASME) Code Case N-514 for determining Wolf Creek Generating Station's 
    cold overpressurization mitigation system (COMS) pressure setpoint.
        The proposed action is in accordance with the licensee's 
    application for exemption dated December 29, 1998.
    
    The Need for the Proposed Action
    
        The proposed exemption is needed to support an amendment to the 
    Wolf Creek Technical Specifications which will revise the heatup, 
    cooldown and COMS curves. The use of ASME Code Case N-514 would allow 
    an increased operating band for system makeup and pressure control to 
    allow operational flexibility.
    
    Environmental Impacts of the Proposed Action
    
        The Commission has completed its evaluation of the proposed action 
    and concludes that application of Code Case N-514 represents a special 
    circumstance in accordance with 10 CFR 50.12(a)(2)(ii) on specific 
    exemptions, such that the specific requirements of 10 CFR 50.60 and 
    Appendix G are ``* * * not necessary to achieve the underlying purpose 
    of the rule,'' which in this case is to protect the reactor vessel from 
    brittle fracture.
        The proposed action will not increase the probability or 
    consequences of accidents, no changes are being made in the types of 
    any effluents that may be released off site, and there is no 
    significant increase in occupational or public radiation exposure. 
    Therefore, there are no significant radiological environmental impacts 
    associated with the proposed action.
        With regard to potential non-radiological impacts, the proposed 
    action does not involve any historic sites. It does not affect non-
    radiological plant effluents and has no other environmental impact. 
    Therefore, there are no significant non-radiological environmental 
    impacts associated with the proposed action.
        Accordingly, the Commission concludes that there are no significant 
    environmental impacts associated with the proposed action.
    
    Alternatives to the Proposed Action
    
        As an alternative to the proposed action, the staff considered 
    denial of the proposed action (i.e., the ``no-action'' alternative). 
    Denial of the application would result in no change in current 
    environmental impacts. The environmental impacts of the proposed action 
    and the alternative action are similar.
    
    Alternative Use of Resources
    
        This action does not involve the use of any resources not 
    previously considered in the Final Environmental Statement for the Wolf 
    Creek Generating Station dated June 1982.
    
    Agencies and Persons Consulted
    
        In accordance with its stated policy, on March 5, 1999, the staff 
    consulted with the Kansas State official, Mr. Vick Cooper, of the 
    Kansas Department of Health and Environment, regarding the 
    environmental impact of the proposed action. The State official had no 
    comments.
    
    Finding of No Significant Impact
    
        On the basis of the environmental assessment, the Commission 
    concludes that the proposed action will not have a significant effect 
    on the quality of the human environment. Accordingly, the Commission 
    has determined not to prepare an environmental impact statement for the 
    proposed action.
        For further details with respect to the proposed action, see the 
    licensee's letter dated December 29, 1998, which is available for 
    public inspection at the Commission's Public Document Room, The Gelman 
    Building, 2120 L Street, NW., Washington, DC, and at the local public 
    document room located at the Emporia State University, William Allen 
    White Library, 1200 Commercial Street, Emporia, Kansas 66801 and 
    Washburn University School of Law Library, Topeka, Kansas 66621.
    
        Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 22nd day of April 1999.
    
        For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
    Kristine M. Thomas,
    Project Manager, Section 2, Project Directorate IV & Decommissioning, 
    Division of Licensing Project Management, Office of Nuclear Reactor 
    Regulation.
    [FR Doc. 99-10686 Filed 4-28-99; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
04/29/1999
Department:
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
99-10686
Pages:
23136-23136 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 50-482
PDF File:
99-10686.pdf