95-8091. Consolidated Tape Association; Notice of Filing of Seventeenth Substantive Amendment to the Restated Consolidated Tape Association Plan and Twenty-First Substantive Amendment to the Consolidated Quotation Plan  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 63 (Monday, April 3, 1995)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 16901-16902]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-8091]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
    [Release No. 34-35543; File No. S7-27-93]
    
    
    Consolidated Tape Association; Notice of Filing of Seventeenth 
    Substantive Amendment to the Restated Consolidated Tape Association 
    Plan and Twenty-First Substantive Amendment to the Consolidated 
    Quotation Plan
    
    March 28, 1995.
        Pursuant to Rule 11Aa3-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
    (``Act''), notice is hereby given that on March 9, 1995, the 
    Consolidated Tape Association (``CTA'') and Consolidated Quotation 
    (``CQ'') Plan Participants filed with the Securities and Exchange 
    Commission (``Commission'' or ``SEC'') amendments to the Restated CTA 
    Plan and CQ Plan. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit 
    comments from interested persons on the amendments.
    
    I. Description and Purpose of the Amendments
    
        The amendments seek to change a procedure for allocating high speed 
    line access fee revenues between ``Network A'' and ``Network B'' under 
    each plan. The participants propose to apply ``relative message usage 
    percentages'' to the allocation of high speed line revenues between 
    networks retroactively, beginning with the period commencing January 1, 
    1994.
        The amendments would also eliminate the requirements that the 
    participants set the high speed line access fee at a level designed to 
    recover the costs of making the high speed line available, and set 
    indirect high speed line access fees at a level that equals one-half of 
    the direct access fees. The actual fees, however, would not be changed 
    at this time.
    
    A. Allocation of High Speed Line Revenue
    
        Currently, under each plan, the participants impose on subscribers, 
    vendors, computer input users and others one combined high speed line 
    access fee for access to both Network A and Network B market data. 
    Under the proposed amendments, the participants wish to change the 
    current methods set forth in the plans for allocating each plan's high 
    speed line access revenues between the two networks. The participants 
    feel that a more appropriate and equitable way to achieve that 
    allocation would be to apply a measure that reflects each network's 
    relative usage of the plans' systems.
        To that end, the participants have selected each network's 
    ``relative message usage percentage''. These percentages, in the 
    participants' view, reflect a network's relative portion of the total 
    number of messages\1\ that the participants disseminate over the high 
    speed line for a given period. Under the proposed amendments, a 
    ``relative message usage percentage'' would equal the number of a 
    network's messages reported over the high speed line divided by the sum 
    of the numbers of both networks' messages that both networks report 
    over the high speed line.\2\ The participants have proposed to 
    retroactively apply the ``relative message usage percentage'' to the 
    allocation of high speed line revenues between networks commencing 
    January 1, 1994.
    
        \1\For purposes of such calculations, a message includes any 
    message that a participant disseminates over the Consolidated Tape 
    System, including, but not limited to, prices relating to Eligible 
    Securities or concurrent use securities, administrative messages, 
    index messages, corrections, cancellations, and error messages.
        \2\For example, a month's relative message usage for CTA network 
    a would be calculated as follows:
        Where:
        ``A'' represents the number of messages that CTA Network A 
    participants disseminate over the CTA network A pursuant to the CTA 
    plan during that month; and
        ``B'' represents the number of messages that CTA Network B 
    participants disseminate over the CTA Network B pursuant to the CTA 
    plan during the month.
        To determine a month's relative message usage for CQ Network A, 
    substitute ``CQ'' where ``CTA'' appears in this footnote.
    
                                                                            
                                                             A              
         CTA Network A Relative Message      -------------------------------
                                                           A+B,             
                                                                            
    
        If the instant amendments are approved, the participants will 
    direct the Processor to calculate the allocation percentages on a 
    monthly basis. Under the proposed amendments, the New York Stock 
    Exchange (``NYSE'') shall distribute to the Network B
    [[Page 16902]] administrator under each plan, a calendar quarter's high 
    speed line revenues allocated to Network B under the plan as soon as 
    the calculation becomes available for that quarter.
    B. Determination of High Speed Line Access Fees
    
        Both plans currently require participants: (a) to set high speed 
    line access fees at levels that allow the participants to recover the 
    operating expenses that the Processor incurs in making the high speed 
    line available, and (b) to set indirect high speed line access fees at 
    a level that equals one-half of the direct access fees. The proposed 
    amendments would eliminate these two requirements and thereby alter the 
    manner in which participants determine high speed line access fees.\3\ 
    The participants, however, are not proposing to amend the actual fees 
    at this time.
    
        \3\The participants' reasons for requesting this amendment is 
    that the above requirements were established over twenty years ago. 
    Today's digital data feed and other technologies make high speed 
    lines cheaper and easier to access.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    II. Solicitation of Comments
    
        Rule 11Aa3-2(c)(2) under the Act provides that the proposed 
    amendment shall be approved by the Commission with such changes or 
    subject to such conditions as the Commission may deem necessary or 
    appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors and 
    maintenance of fair and orderly markets, to remove impediments to and 
    perfect the mechanisms of a National Market System, or otherwise in 
    furtherance of the purposes of the Act within 120 days of the date of 
    publication of notice of filing, or within such longer period as the 
    Commission may designate up to 180 days of such date pursuant to Rule 
    11Aa3-2(c)(2).
        Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and 
    arguments concerning the foregoing. Persons making written submissions 
    should file six copies thereof with the Secretary, Securities and 
    Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549. 
    Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written 
    statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with 
    the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed 
    rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those 
    that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions 
    of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and copying in the 
    Commission's Public Reference Room. Copies of such filing will also be 
    available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the 
    CTA/CQ. All submissions should refer to the file number in the caption 
    above and should be submitted by April 24, 1995.
    
        For the Commission by the Division of Market Regulation, 
    pursuant to delegated authority.\4\
    
        \4\17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(27) (1989).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Margaret H. McFarland,
    Deputy Secretary.
    [FR Doc. 95-8091 Filed 3-31-95; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
    
    

Document Information

Published:
04/03/1995
Department:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
95-8091
Pages:
16901-16902 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Release No. 34-35543, File No. S7-27-93
PDF File:
95-8091.pdf