[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 84 (Tuesday, April 30, 1996)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 18962-18966]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-10563]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[CA 095-0006a; FRL-5454-9]
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; California
State Implementation Plan Revision, Placer County Air Pollution Control
District, El Dorado County Air Pollution Control District, Ventura
County Air Pollution Control District, Yolo-Solano Air Quality
Management District, and Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is taking direct final action on revisions to the
California State Implementation Plan (SIP). The revisions concern rules
from the following districts: Placer County Air Pollution Control
District (PLCAPCD), El Dorado County Air Pollution Control District
(EDCAPCD), Ventura County Air Pollution Control District (VTCAPCD),
Yolo-Solano Air Quality Management District (YSAQMD), and Mojave Desert
Air Quality Management District (MDAQMD). This approval action will
incorporate these rules into the federally approved SIP. The intended
effect of approving these rules is to regulate emissions of volatile
organic compounds (VOCs) in accordance with the requirements of the
Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). The revised rules
control VOC emissions from automotive refinishing, solvent cleaning and
degreasing, wood coating and graphic arts operations. Thus, EPA is
finalizing the approval of these revisions into the California SIP
under provisions of the CAA regarding EPA action on SIP submittal, SIPs
for national primary and secondary ambient air quality standards and
plan requirements for nonattainment areas.
DATES: This action is effective on July 1, 1996, unless adverse or
critical comments are received by May 30, 1996. If the effective date
is delayed, a timely notice will be published in the Federal Register.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the rule revisions and EPA's evaluation report for
each rule are available for public inspection at EPA's Region IX office
during normal business hours. Copies of the submitted
[[Page 18963]]
rule revisions are available for inspection at the following locations:
Rulemaking Section (A-5-3), Air and Toxics Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San
Francisco, CA 94105
Environmental Protection Agency, Air Docket (6102), 401 ``M''
Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20460
California Air Resources Board, Stationary Source Division, Rule
Evaluation Section, 2020 ``L'' Street, Sacramento, CA 95812-2815
Placer County Air Pollution Control District, 11464 B Avenue,
Auburn, CA 95603
El Dorado County Air Pollution Control District, 2850 Fairlane
Court, Placerville, CA 95667
Ventura County Air Pollution Control District, 669 County Square
Drive, Ventura, CA 93003
Yolo Solano Air Quality Management District, 1947 Galileo Court,
Suite 103, Davis, CA 95616
Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District, 15428 Civic Drive,
Suite 200, Victorville, CA 92392-2383
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Daniel A. Meer, Chief Rulemaking
Section (A-5-3), Air and Toxics Division, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Region 9, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105-3901,
Telephone: (415) 744-1185
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Applicability
The rules being approved into the California SIP include: PLCAPCD's
Rule 216, Organic Solvent Cleaning and Degreasing Operations, and Rule
236, Wood Products Coating Operations; EDCAPCD's Rule 225, Organic
Solvent Cleaning and Degreasing Operations, Rule 230, Motor Vehicle and
Mobile Equipment Coating Operations and Rule 235, Surface Preparation
and Cleanup; VTCAPCD's Rule 74.18 Motor Vehicle and Mobile Equipment
Coating Operations and Rule 74.30, Wood Products Coatings; YSAQMD's
Rule 2.13, Organic Solvents and Rule 2.26, Motor Vehicle and Mobile
Equipment Coating Operations; MDAQMD's Rule 1104, Organic Solvent
Degreasing Operations, Rule 1114, Wood Products Coating Operations and
Rule 1117, Graphic Arts. These rules were submitted by the California
Air Resources Board (CARB) to EPA on July 13, 1994 (Rules 74.30 and
1117), November 30, 1994 (Rules 225, 230, 1104, and 2.13), February 24,
1995 (Rule 74.18 and 2.26), March 31, 1995 (Rule 1114), May 24, 1995
(Rule 236) and October 13, 1995 (Rules 216 and 235).
Background
On March 3, 1978, EPA promulgated a list of ozone nonattainment
areas under the provisions of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1977
(1977 Act or pre-amended Act), that included Ventura County, part of
the Southeast Desert Air Basin, and the Sacramento Metro area, which
includes portions of Placer, Yolo, and El Dorado County. See 43 FR
8964, 40 CFR 81.305. On May 26, 1988, EPA notified the Governor of
California, pursuant to section 110(a)(2)(H) of the 1977 Act, that the
PLCAPCD, EDCAPCD, VTCAPCD, YSAQMD and the MDAQMD portions of the
California SIP were inadequate to attain and maintain the ozone
standard and requested that deficiencies in the existing SIP be
corrected (EPA's SIP-Call). On November 15, 1990, the Clean Air Act
Amendments of 1990 were enacted. Public Law 101-549, 104 Stat. 2399,
codified at 42 U.S.C. 7401-7671q. In amended section 182 of the CAA,
Congress statutorily adopted the requirements that nonattainment areas
both fix their deficient reasonably available control technology (RACT)
rules for ozone and submit RACT rules for other stationary sources of
VOCs (the RACT fix-up and catch-up requirements). Congress established
a deadline of May 15, 1991 for States to submit corrections to
deficient rules and a deadline of November 15, 1992 for States to
submit rules for other VOC source categories.
Section 182 applies to areas designated as nonattainment prior to
enactment of the amendments and classified as marginal or above as of
the date of enactment. It requires such areas to adopt and correct RACT
rules pursuant to pre-amended section 172 (b) as interpreted in pre-
amendment guidance.1 EPA's SIP-Call used that guidance to indicate
the necessary corrections for specific nonattainment areas. Ventura
County, a portion of the Southeast Desert Air Basin, the Sacramento
Metro area, which includes portions of Placer, Yolo and El Dorado
County are classified as severe;2 therefore, these areas were
subject to the RACT fix-up and catch-up requirements and the deadlines
cited above.3
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Among other things, the pre-amendment guidance consists of
those portions of the proposed post-1987 ozone and carbon monoxide
policy that concern RACT, 52 FR 45044 (November 24, 1987); ``Issues
Relating to VOC Regulation Cutpoints, Deficiencies, and Deviations,
Clarification to Appendix D of November 24, 1987 Federal Register
Notice'' (Blue Book) (notice of availability was published in the
Federal Register on May 25, 1988); and the existing control
technique guidelines (CTGs).
\2\ Ventura County and a portion of the Southeast Desert Air
Basin retained their designation of nonattainment and were
classified by operation of law pursuant to sections 107(d) and
181(a) upon the date of enactment of the CAA. See 55 FR 56694
(November 6, 1991). The Sacramento Metro Area was reclassified from
serious to severe on June 1, 1995. See 60 FR 20237 (April 25, 1995)
\3\ California did not make the required SIP submittal for
Mojave Desert AQMD's Rule 1104, Graphic Arts, by November 15, 1992.
On January 15, 1993, the EPA made a finding of failure to make a
submittal pursuant to section 179(a)(1), which started an 18 month
sanction clock. The rule being acted on in this direct final rule
was submitted in response to the EPA finding of failure to submit.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The State of California submitted many revised RACT rules for
incorporation into its SIP on July 13, 1994, November 30, 1994,
February 24, 1995, March 31, 1995, May 24, 1995, and October 13, 1995,
including the rules being acted on in this document. This document
addresses EPA's direct-final action for PLCAPCD's Rule 216, Organic
Solvent Cleaning and Degreasing Operations, and 236, Wood Products
Coating Operations; EDCAPCD's Rules 225, Organic Solvent Cleaning and
Degreasing Operations, 230, Motor Vehicle and Mobile Equipment Coating
Operations, and 235, Surface Preparation and Cleanup; VTCAPCD's Rules
74.18 Motor Vehicle and Mobile Equipment Coating Operations, and 74.30,
Wood Products Coatings; YSAQMD's Rules 2.13, Organic Solvents, and
2.26, Motor Vehicle and Mobile Equipment Coating Operations; MDAQMD's
Rules 1104, Organic Solvent Degreasing Operations, 1114, Wood Products
Coating Operations and 1117, Graphic Arts. These submitted rules were
found to be complete on July 22, 1994 (1117), September 12, 1994
(74.30), January 3, 1995 (1104), January 30, 1995 (2.13, 225, and 230),
March 10, 1995 (74.18, 2.26,), May 2, 1995 (1114), July 24, 1995 (236),
and November 28, 1995 (216, 235) pursuant to EPA's completeness
criteria that are set forth in 40 CFR part 51 Appendix V 4 and are
being finalized for approval into the SIP.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ EPA adopted the completeness criteria on February 16, 1990
(55 FR 5830) and, pursuant to section 110(k)(1)(A) of the CAA,
revised the criteria on August 26, 1991 (56 FR 42216).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
VTCAPCD's Rule 74.18, EDCAPCD's Rule 230, and YSAQMD's Rule 2.26
control emissions of VOCs from refinishing of motor vehicles and mobile
equipment, YSAQMD's Rule 2.13 controls emissions of VOCs from the usage
of organic solvents, EDCAPCD's Rule 235 controls emissions of VOCs from
surface preparation and cleanup using organic solvents, EDAPCD's Rule
225, PLCAPCD's Rule 216 and MDAQMD's Rule 1104 control emissions of
VOCs from organic solvent degreasing operations, PLCAPCD's Rule 236,
MDAQMD's Rule 1114 and VTCAPCD's Rule 74.30 control emissions of VOCs
from coating of wood products and MDAQMD's Rule 1117
[[Page 18964]]
controls emissions of VOCs from graphic arts operations. VOCs
contribute to the production of ground level ozone and smog. These
rules were originally adopted by the respective districts as part of
their effort to achieve the National Ambient Air Quality Standard
(NAAQS) for ozone and in response to EPA's SIP-Call and the section
182(a)(2)(A) CAA requirement. The following is EPA's evaluation and
final action for these rules.
EPA Evaluation and Action
In determining the approvability of a VOC rule, EPA must evaluate
the rule for consistency with the requirements of the CAA and EPA
regulations, as found in section 110 and part D of the CAA and 40 CFR
part 51 (Requirements for Preparation, Adoption, and Submittal of
Implementation Plans). The EPA interpretation of these requirements,
which forms the basis for today's action, appears in the various EPA
policy guidance documents listed in footnote 1. Among those provisions
is the requirement that a VOC rule must, at a minimum, provide for the
implementation of RACT for stationary sources of VOC emissions. This
requirement was carried forth from the pre-amended Act.
For the purpose of assisting state and local agencies in developing
RACT rules, EPA prepared a series of Control Technique Guideline (CTG)
documents. The CTGs are based on the underlying requirements of the Act
and specify the presumptive norms for what is RACT for specific source
categories. Under the CAA, Congress ratified EPA's use of these
documents, as well as other Agency policy, for requiring States to
``fix-up'' their RACT rules. See section 182(a)(2)(A). The CTG
applicable to EDCAPCD's Rule 225, PLCAPCD's Rule 216 and MDAQMD's Rule
1104 is entitled, Control of Volatile Organic Emissions From Solvent
Metal Cleaning. EPA-450/2-77-022, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, November 1977, and the
CTG applicable to MDAQMD's Rule 1117 is entitled, Control of Volatile
Organic Emissions from Stationary Sources--Volume VIII: Graphic Arts--
Rotogravure and Flexography, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Office of Air Quality And Standards, December 1978, EPA-450/2-78-033.
MDAQMD's Rule 1114 and VTCAPCD's Rule 74.30 limit emissions from a
source category for which EPA has published a draft CTG entitled,
Control Techniques Guideline Document; Wood Furniture Finishing and
Cleaning Operation, see 60 FR 46595, September 7, 1995, which was used
as guidance in the evaluation. VTCAPCD's Rule 74.18, EDCAPCD's Rules
230 and 235, and YSAQMD's Rule 2.26, and 2.13 are applicable to source
categories for which EPA has not published a CTG. Accordingly, these
rules were evaluated against the interpretation of EPA policy found in
the Blue Book, referred to in Footnote 1 and against other EPA policy
including the EPA Region 9/CARB document entitled: Guidance Document
for correcting VOC rule deficiencies, (April 1991). In general, these
guidance documents have been set forth to ensure that VOC rules are
fully enforceable and strengthen or maintain the SIP.
PLCAPCD's submitted Rule 216, Organic Solvent Cleaning and
Degreasing Operations, includes the following significant changes from
the current SIP:
Updated format of rule to be consistent with other
district rules, and to enhance clarity,
Expanded section 200, to include definitions of exempt
compounds, VOCs, leaks, wipe cleaning, stationary source and lip
exhaust,
Regrouped requirements and standards to enhance clarity
and enforceability of the rule,
Revised section 500, to cite test methods that have been
approved by the EPA.
PLCAPCD's submitted Rule 236, Wood Products Coating Operations, is
a new rule containing the following significant provisions:
Limits VOC emissions from coating and surface preparation
of wood products including furniture, cabinets and custom replica
furniture, but exempts application of coatings to wooden musical
instruments, and exempts facilities using less than 20 gallons of
coatings per year,
The rule applies only to facilities located in the
Sacramento Valley Air Basin portion of Placer County.
EDCAPCD'S submitted Rule 225, Organic Solvent Cleaning and
Degreasing Operations, includes the following significant changes from
the current SIP:
Corrected the deficiencies noted in EPA's SIP call of
September 7, 1988 (53 FR 34500)
Incorporates the provisions of the RACT/BARCT
determination developed by the California Air Resources Board (CARB).
EDCAPCD's submitted Rule 230, Automotive Refinishing Operations, is
a new rule containing the following significant provisions:
Limits the VOC contents of numerous coatings and solvents
utilized in the automotive refinishing industry,
Implements the provisions of RACT/BARCT developed by the
California Air Resources Board,
Requires the use of high efficiency transfer equipment for
the application of all coatings, such as High Volume Low Pressure
(HVLP), electrostatic or other coating application methods having a
transfer efficiency of 65% or greater,
Requires add-on abatement equipment when non-compliant
coatings are being used,
Specifies testmethods for analysis of samples,
determination of emissions, transfer efficiency, capture efficiency,
metallic particle content in metallic coatings and acid concentration
in pretreatment wash primer,
Defines recordkeeping requirements.
EDCAPCD's submitted Rule 235, Surface Preparation and Cleanup is a
new rule containing the following significant provisions:
Limits the emissions of VOCs from solvent cleaning
operations in production, repair, maintenance or servicing of parts,
products, tools, machinery, equipment, or general work areas,
Exempts facilities using less than 10 gallons of solvents
in any one calendar year, provided that the daily use does not exceed
one liter,
Defines cleaning devices and methods to be used when
performing solvent cleaning,
Defines recordkeeping requirements and test methods.
VTCAPCD's Rule 74.18, Motor Vehicles and Mobile Equipment Coatings
Operations, includes the following significant changes from the current
SIP:
Sets the standard for pretreatment wash primer at 780
grams of VOC per liter, and limits the use of this coating to 10% of
all undercoats used, averaged over one month,
Deletes the category of precoat,
Changes the implementation date of the primer sealer VOC
standard to January 1, 1997,
Changes the implementation date of the multistage topcoat
VOC limit to January 1, 1996,
Limits the use of specialty coatings to no more than 5% of
total coating usage.
VTCAPCD's Rule 74.30, Wood Products Coatings, is a new rule
containing the following significant provisions:
Limits the VOC content of coatings applied to wood
products,
Establishes two categories of wood coating operations: new
wood products and refinishing wood products,
[[Page 18965]]
Allows add-on control equipment as an alternative to using
low VOC coatings,
Requires operators of wood coating facilities to use
coating application methods yielding at least 65% transfer efficiency,
Defines the test methods to be used and specifies
recordkeeping provisions.
YSAQMD's Rule 2.13, Organic Solvents, includes the following
changes from the current SIP:
Reformatting of the entire rule,
Added section 101, Purpose
Added section 102, Applicability
Deleted the sections concerning asphalt paving and graphic
arts. These sources are now covered in Rule 2.28 and 2.29 respectively,
Added section 502, test methods.
YSAQMD's Rule 2.26, Motor Vehicle and Mobile Equipment Coating
Operations, is a new rule containing the following significant
provisions:
Limits the VOC content of coatings applied to group I and
group II vehicles,
Specifies the application method to be used to achieve a
transfer efficiency of 65% or greater,
Limits the VOC contents of surface preparation and clean-
up solvents,
Limits use of specialty coatings to no more than 5% of all
coatings applied, on a monthly basis,
Limits use of precoat to no more than 25%, by volume, of
the amount of primer surfacer used,
Includes a prohibition of specification and sale clause,
Defines test methods to be used and specifies records to
be kept.
MDAQMD's Rule 1104, Organic Solvent Degreasing Operations, is a new
rule containing the following significant provisions:
Limits emissions of VOCs from wipe cleaning and degreasing
operations using organic solvents,
Applies to any facility engaged in wipe cleaning, cold
solvent cleaning (degreasing) operations for metal/non metal parts/
products or electronic circuit boards, which utilize organic solvents,
Defines equipment requirements for remote reservoir
cleaners, cold solvent degreasers, conveyorized cold solvent
degreasers, batch loaded vapor degreasers, and conveyorized vapor
degreasers,
Defines operating requirements for all degreasers in
general, and batch loaded, conveyorized degreasers, and remote
reservoir degreasers specifically,
Provides recordkeeping requirements and specifies test
methods.
MDAQMD's Rule 1114, Wood Products Coating Operations, is a new rule
containing the following significant provisions:
Limits emissions of VOCs from the coating operations of
wood products,
Provides limits of VOC content for topcoats, fillers
stains, inks, mold-seal, multi-colored and pigmented coatings, sealers,
strippers and adhesives.
Defines application methods to be used when applying
coatings to achieve a transfer efficiency of 65% or more,
Defines the VOC limits of clean-up and equipment cleaning
solvents,
Allows the use of add-on control devices to comply with
the rule,
Exempts facilities using less than one gallon of coating
material in any one day, or have maximum actual emissions of 3 lbs of
VOCs per day and not more than 200 lbs of VOCs per calendar year,
Specifies test methods to be used and records to be kept.
MDAQMD's Rule 1117, Graphic Arts, is a new rule containing the
following significant provisions:
Applies to rotogravure and flexographic printing sources,
but exempts facilities that emit less than 2500 pounds of VOC per
month,
Requires sources to maintain daily records of coatings,
inks, and adhesives used by the facility. If an emission control system
is used, the facility must continuously monitor its operating
parameters,
Limits VOC content of inks, coatings, and adhesives to 300
grams per liter of coating as applied,
Defines capture and control efficiency requirements of 75%
by weight for publication rotogravure, of 65% by weight for packaging
rotogravure, and of 60% by weight for flexographic printing,
Defines test methods to be used and records to be kept.
EPA has evaluated the submitted rules and has determined that they
are consistent with the CAA, EPA regulations, and EPA policy.
Therefore, PLCAPCD's Rules 216, Organic Solvent Cleaning and Degreasing
Operations, and 236, Wood Products Coating Operations, EDCAPCD's Rules
225, Organic Solvent Cleaning and Degreasing Operations, 230, Motor
Vehicle and Mobile Equipment Coating Operations, and 235, Surface
Preparation and Cleanup, VTCAPCD's Rules 74.18, Motor Vehicle and
Mobile Equipment Coating Operations, and 74.30, Wood Products Coating,
YSAQMD's Rules 2.13, Organic Solvents, and 2.26, Motor Vehicles and
Mobile Equipment Coating Operations, and MDAQMD's Rules 1104, Organic
Solvent Degreasing Operations, 1114, Wood Products Coating, and 1114,
Graphic Arts, are being approved under section 110(k)(3) of the CAA as
meeting the requirements of section 110(a) and part D.
Nothing in this action should be construed as permitting or
allowing or establishing a precedent for any future implementation
plan. Each request for revision to the state implementation plan shall
be considered separately in light of specific technical, economic, and
environmental factors and in relation to relevant statutory and
regulatory requirements.
EPA is publishing this document without prior proposal because the
Agency views this as a noncontroversial amendment and anticipates no
adverse comments. However, in a separate document in this Federal
Register publication, the EPA is proposing to approve the SIP revision
should adverse or critical comments be filed. This action will be
effective July 1, 1996, unless, by May 30, 1996, adverse or critical
comments are received.
If the EPA receives such comments, this action will be withdrawn
before the effective date by publishing a subsequent document that will
withdraw the final action. All public comments received will then be
addressed in a subsequent final rule based on this action serving as a
proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second comment period on
this action. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should
do so at this time. If no such comments are received, the public is
advised that this action will be effective July 1, 1996.
Regulatory Process
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 600 et seq., EPA
must prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis assessing the impact of
any proposed or final rule on small entities. 5 U.S.C. 603 and 604.
Alternatively, EPA may certify that the rule will not have a
significant impact on a substantial number of small entities. Small
entities include small businesses, small not-for-profit enterprises and
government entities with jurisdiction over population of less than
50,000.
SIP approvals under sections 110 and 301(a) and subchapter I, Part
D of the CAA do not create any new requirements, but simply approve
requirements that the State is already imposing. Therefore, because the
Federal SIP-approval does not impose any new requirements, I certify
that it does not have a significant impact on any small entities
affected. Moreover, due to the nature of the Federal-state relationship
under the CAA, preparation of a regulatory flexibility analysis would
[[Page 18966]]
constitute Federal inquiry into the economic reasonableness of state
action. The CAA forbids EPA to base its actions concerning SIPs on such
grounds. Union Electric Co. v. U.S. E.P.A., 427 U.S. 246, 256-66 (S.
Ct. 1976); 42 U.S.C. 7410 (a)(2).
Unfunded Mandates
Under Sections 202, 203, and 205 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform
Act of 1995 (``Unfunded Mandates Act''), signed into law on March 22,
1995, EPA must undertake various actions in association with proposed
or final rules that include a Federal mandate that may result in
estimated costs of $100 million or more to the private sector or to
State, local, or tribal governments in the aggregate.
Through submission of this state implementation plan or plan
revision, the State and any affected local or tribal governments have
elected to adopt the program provided for under Part D of the Clean Air
Act. These rules may bind State, local, and tribal governments to
perform certain actions and also require the private sector to perform
certain duties. The rules being [proposed for approval/approved] by
this action will impose no new requirements because affected sources
are already subject to these regulations under State law. Therefore, no
additional costs to State, local, or tribal governments or to the
private sector result from this action. EPA has also determined that
this [proposed or final] action does not include a mandate that may
result in estimated costs of $100 million or more to State, local, or
tribal governments in the aggregate or to the private sector.
This action has been classified as a Table 3 action for signature
by the Regional Administrator under the procedures published in the
Federal Register on January 19, 1989 (54 FR 2214-2225), as revised by a
July 10, 1995 memorandum from Mary Nichols, Assistant Administrator for
Air and Radiation. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has
exempted this regulatory action from Executive Order 12866 review.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Hydrocarbons,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Ozone,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.
Note: Incorporation by reference of the State Implementation
Plan for the State of California was approved by the Director of the
Federal Register on July 1, 1982.
Dated: March 26, 1996.
Felicia Marcus,
Regional Administrator.
Subpart F of part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal
Regulations is amended as follows:
PART 52--[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401-7671q.
Subpart F--California
2. Section 52.220 is amended by adding paragraphs (c)(198)(i)(E)(2)
and (i)(J)(2), (207)(i)(B)(4), (i)(C)(4) and (i)(D)(2),(215)(i)(B)(3)
and (i)(D)(1), (216)(i)(A)(4), (220)(i)(B)(2) and (225)(i)(B)(5) and
(i)(C)(2) to read as follows:
Sec. 52.220 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(198) * * *
(i) * * *
(E) * * *
(2) Rule 1117 adopted June 22, 1994.
* * * * *
(J) * * *
(2) Rule 74.30 adopted May 17, 1994.
* * * * *
(207) * * *
(i) * * *
(B) * * *
(4) Rules 225 and 230 adopted September 27, 1994.
(C) * * *
(4) Rule 2.13 adopted May 25, 1994.
(D) * * *
(2) Rule 1104 adopted September 28, 1994.
* * * * *
(215) * * *
(i) * * *
(B) * * *
(3) Rule 74.18 adopted December 13, 1994.
* * * * *
(D) * * *
(1) Rule 2.26 adopted November 9, 1994.
* * * * *
(216) * * *
(i) * * *
(A) * * *
(4) Rule 1114 adopted February 22, 1995.
* * * * *
(220) * * *
(i) * * *
(B) * * *
(2) Rule 236 adopted on February 9, 1995.
* * * * *
(225) * * *
(i) * * *
(B) * * *
(5) Rule 216 adopted on June 8, 1995.
(C) * * *
(2) Rule 235 adopted on June 27, 1995.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 96-10563 Filed 4-29-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-W
