94-8102. Receipt of Application for Emergency Exemption To Use Imidacloprid; Solicitation of Public Comment  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 66 (Wednesday, April 6, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page 0]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-8102]
    
    
    [[Page Unknown]]
    
    [Federal Register: April 6, 1994]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    [OPP-180929; FRL 4771-2]
    
     
    
    Receipt of Application for Emergency Exemption To Use 
    Imidacloprid; Solicitation of Public Comment
    
    AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
    
    ACTION: Notice.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: EPA has received specific exemption requests from the Oregon 
    and Utah Departments of Agriculture (hereafter referred to as the 
    ``Applicants'') to use the pesticide Imidacloprid (CAS 105827-78-9) to 
    treat up to 13,000 acres of apples to control aphids. The Applicants 
    propose the use of a new chemical; therefore, in accordance with 40 CFR 
    166.24, EPA is soliciting public comment before making the decision 
    whether or not to grant the exemption.
    
    DATES: Comments must be received on or before April 21, 1994.
    
    ADDRESSES: Three copies of written comments, bearing the identification 
    notation ``OPP-180929,'' should be submitted by mail to: Public 
    Response and Program Resource Branch, Field Operations Division 
    (7506C), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 
    401 M St., SW., Washington, D.C. 20460. In person, bring comments to: 
    Rm. 1132, Crystal Mall #2, 1921 Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, VA.
        Information submitted in any comment concerning this notice may be 
    claimed confidential by marking any part or all of that information as 
    ``Confidential Business Information.'' Information so marked will not 
    be disclosed except in accordance with procedures set forth in 40 CFR 
    part 2. A copy of the comment that does not contain Confidential 
    Business Information must be provided by the submitter for inclusion in 
    the public record. Information not marked confidential may be disclosed 
    publicly by EPA without prior notice. All written comments filed 
    pursuant to this notice will be available for public inspection in Rm. 
    1132, Crystal Mall No. 2, 1921 Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, VA, 
    from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, except legal holidays.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: By mail: Andrea Beard, Registration 
    Division (7505W), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental 
    Protection Agency, 401 M St., SW., Washington, D.C. 20460. Office 
    location and telephone number: Floor 6, Crystal Station #1, 2800 
    Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, VA, (703) 308-8791.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 18 of the Federal 
    Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) (7 U.S.C. 136p), 
    the Administrator may, at her discretion, exempt a State agency from 
    any registration provision of FIFRA if she determines that emergency 
    conditions exist which require such exemption. The Applicants have 
    requested the Administrator to issue specific exemptions for the use of 
    imidacloprid on apples to control aphids. Information in accordance 
    with 40 CFR part 166 was submitted as part of this request.
        The Applicants state that aphids have been a chronic pest of apples 
    in Oregon and Utah. Aphids feed on the plant tissues of young trees, 
    which can stunt growth and affect future tree productivity. On large, 
    vigorous trees, the primary concern is fruit damage. Aphids excrete 
    such large amounts of honeydew that it drips on the fruit, causing 
    russetting or providing a substrate for the growth of sooty mold. The 
    value of such damaged fruit is considerably reduced, as it is diverted 
    to a processing market. The Applicants state that some of the 
    registered alternative pesticides, while once effective, have lost much 
    of their effectiveness due to build-up of resistant aphid populations. 
    Others are said to only provide suppression, and not adequately control 
    aphids. One of the registered alternatives (phosphamidon) that is still 
    somewhat effective for this pest problem was withdrawn from the market 
    in 1991, due to non-support for re-registration, and existing stocks 
    have been mostly depleted. Another chemical (mevinphos) was previously 
    used for this pest, but because of human risk concerns the manufacturer 
    removed all labeled uses of mevinphos on apples and pears from the 
    label in 1993. Therefore, the Applicants claim that Oregon and Utah 
    apple growers are left without adequate means to control aphids. The 
    Applicants anticipate crop value losses of approximately 10 percent 
    without the availability of imidacloprid this growing season.
        The Oregon and Utah Departments of Agriculture propose that 
    imidacloprid be used at a maximum rate of 0.1 lb. active ingredient 
    (a.i.), or 6.4 fluid oz. of product, per acre with a maximum of 5 
    applications. No more than 0.5 lb. a.i. (32 fluid oz. of product) 
    applied per year. Oregon proposes treatment on up to 9,500 acres of 
    apples. This would total approximately 4,750 lbs. of a.i, or 2,375 gal. 
    of product. Utah proposes treatment on up to 3,363 acres of apples. 
    This would total approximately 1,682 lbs. of a.i., or 841 gal. of 
    product. This is the first time the Applicants have applied for the use 
    of imidacloprid on apples. A section 18 for this use of imidacloprid 
    was issued by the Agency to Washington State on March 7, 1994 for up to 
    160,980 acres.
        This notice does not constitute a decision by EPA on the 
    applications themselves. The regulations governing section 18 require 
    publication of a notice of receipt of an application for a specific 
    exemption proposing use of a new chemical (i.e., an active ingredient 
    not contained in any currently registered pesticide). Such notice 
    provides for opportunity for public comment on the application. 
    Accordingly, interested persons may submit written views on this 
    subject to the Field Operations Division at the address above.
        The Agency, accordingly, will review and consider all comments 
    received during the comment period in determining whether to issue the 
    emergency exemption requested by the Oregon and Utah Departments of 
    Agriculture.
    
    List of Subjects
    
        Environmental protection, Pesticide and pests, Crisis exemptions.
    
        Dated: March 25, 1994.
    
    Stephen L. Johnson,
    Acting Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.
    
    [FR Doc. 94-8102 Filed 4-5-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6560-50-F
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
04/06/1994
Department:
Environmental Protection Agency
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Action:
Notice.
Document Number:
94-8102
Dates:
Comments must be received on or before April 21, 1994.
Pages:
0-0 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: April 6, 1994, OPP-180929, FRL 4771-2