95-8454. Country of Origin Marking of Products From the West Bank and Gaza  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 66 (Thursday, April 6, 1995)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 17607-17609]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-8454]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
    [T.D. 95-25]
    
    
    Country of Origin Marking of Products From the West Bank and Gaza
    
    AGENCY: U.S. Customs Service, Department of Treasury.
    
    ACTION: Notice of Policy.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This document notifies the public that, for country of origin 
    marking purposes, goods which are produced in the West Bank and Gaza 
    Strip shall be properly marked as ``West Bank,'' ``Gaza'' or ``Gaza 
    Strip'' and shall not contain the words ``Israel,'' ``Made in Israel,'' 
    ``Occupied Territories-Israel,'' or words of similar meaning.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: For those persons whose ruling is revoked, the position 
    set forth in this document is effective for merchandise entered or 
    withdrawn from warehouse for consumption on or after June 19, 1995; for 
    all other persons, this document is effective on April 6, 1995.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Wende Schuster, Special Classification 
    and Marking Branch (202) 482-6980.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Background
    
        Section 304 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1304), 
    provides that, unless excepted, every article of foreign origin (or its 
    container) imported into the U.S. shall be marked in a conspicuous 
    place as legibly, indelibly, and permanently as the nature of the 
    article (or its container) will permit, in such a manner as to indicate 
    to the ultimate purchaser in the U.S. the English name of the country 
    of origin of the article. Failure to mark an article in accordance with 
    the requirements of 19 U.S.C. 1304 shall result in the levy of a duty 
    of ten percent ad valorem. Part 134, Customs Regulations (19 CFR Part 
    134), implements the country of origin marking requirements and 
    exceptions of 19 U.S.C. 1304.
    
    Past Policy
    
        In the past, Customs has taken the position that in order for the 
    country of origin marking of a good which is produced in the West Bank 
    or Gaza Strip to be considered acceptable, it must be marked with the 
    words ``Israel,'' ``Product of Israel,'' or ``Israeli-Occupied West 
    Bank (or Gaza),'' or words of similar meaning. In all such instances, 
    Customs required that the word ``Israel'' must appear in the marking 
    designation. For instance, in HRL 718329 dated December 21, 1981, 
    Customs held that it is acceptable to mark goods which were produced on 
    the West Bank of the Jordan River with the phrase ``Israeli-Occupied 
    West Bank,'' ``Made in Israel,'' or ``Israel'' and to indicate such 
    marking designation on the Certificate of Origin Form A for purposes of 
    the Generalized System of Preferences (GSP). In another case concerning 
    goods produced on the West Bank of the Jordan River (HRL 718125 dated 
    November 12, 1981), Customs held that these goods must be marked with 
    the designators ``Israeli-Occupied West Bank'', ``Made in Israel'', or 
    ``Israel'' for purposes of indicating the country of origin of the 
    merchandise pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1304. In addition, in HRL 730094 
    dated January 30, 1987, Customs held that the proper country of origin 
    marking designation for soap which is produced in the West Bank is 
    ``Israeli-occupied West Bank'' or simply ``Israel''. Finally, in HRL 
    734609 dated May 26, 1992, which concerned the [[Page 17608]] proper 
    country of origin marking of fruits and vegetables imported into the 
    U.S. from the Gaza Strip, Customs held that the designation ``West 
    Bank'' is not an acceptable country of origin marking because the 
    United States does not recognize the West Bank territory as an 
    independent political entity. Consequently, Customs stated in HRL 
    734609 that as the Gaza Strip has a similar status as the West Bank, 
    the country of origin markings, ``Israel-Occupied Gaza,'' ``Made in 
    Israel,'' or ``Israel'' but not simply the word ``Gaza'' can be used on 
    goods which are produced in Gaza.
    
    Recognition of West Bank and Gaza Strip
    
        The Department of State has advised that in accordance with the 
    Israeli-PLO Declaration of Principles on Interim Self-Government 
    Arrangements (``the DOP''), which was signed in Washington, D.C. on 
    September 13, 1993, Israel has agreed to transfer certain powers and 
    responsibilities to the Palestinian Authority. Under this Agreement, 
    Israel has also consented to make a similar transfer to a superseding, 
    elected Palestinian Council, as part of interim self-governing 
    arrangements in the West Bank and Gaza Strip. As part of this 
    Agreement, the Palestinian Authority has agreed to administer its own 
    tariff revenue collection and other customs matters. The Palestinian 
    Authority also acceded to set its own tax policy under the terms of an 
    implementing agreement which was concluded in Cairo on May 4, 1994. In 
    view of these recent developments, the U.S. Department of the State has 
    advised the U.S. Department of the Treasury by letter dated October 24, 
    1994, that, in their view, the primary purpose of 19 U.S.C. 1304 would 
    be best served if goods which are produced in the West Bank and Gaza 
    Strip are permitted to be marked ``West Bank'' or ``Gaza Strip.'' The 
    Department of State believes that labeling goods as coming from the 
    ``West Bank'' or ``Gaza'' will provide American purchasers with 
    important information indicating their origin, which is the primary 
    purpose of 19 U.S.C. 1304.
    
    Reliance Upon Advice From State Department
    
        Customs has previously relied upon advice received from the U.S. 
    Department of State in making determinations regarding the ``country of 
    origin'' of a good for marking purposes. In T.D. 49743 dated November 
    10, 1938, the question was whether products imported from German-
    occupied territories were regarded as products of Germany for the 
    purposes of the marking provisions of the Tariff Act of 1930, and for 
    determining applicable rates of duty. Based upon instructions given by 
    the U.S. Department of State, Customs held that as a result of a change 
    in jurisdiction from Czechoslovak to German in the Sudeten areas which 
    were under German occupation, products which were manufactured in those 
    areas and were exported on or after the date of German occupation were 
    considered products of Germany for purposes of country of origin 
    marking.
        In United States v. Friedlaender & Co., Inc., C.C.P.A. (February 
    26, 1940), the issue involved the proper country of origin marking of 
    imported merchandise which was wholly manufactured in Czechoslovakia, 
    except at the time the goods were exported, the territory in which the 
    goods were manufactured was under German occupation. Customs held that 
    marking the goods as products of Czechoslovakia was not acceptable, 
    based upon instructions set forth in T.D. 49743. The court agreed with 
    Customs and held that as the goods were exported at a time when that 
    part of Czechoslovakia in which the goods were manufactured was under 
    German occupation, the marking ``Czechoslovakia'' was not in compliance 
    with the requirements of the marking statute, and the goods should be 
    marked to indicate ``Germany'' as the country of origin. However, in a 
    later Treasury Decision (T.D. 51360 dated November 30, 1945), the 
    position taken by Customs in T.D. 49743 was rescinded. In T.D. 51360, 
    Customs stated that the U.S. Department of State advised that the 
    boundaries of Czechoslovakia had been reestablished as they existed 
    prior to the date of the occupation by Germany, and that the United 
    States recognized Czechoslovakia as an independent state. Based upon 
    this information, Customs reversed the position taken in T.D. 49743, 
    and concluded that articles which were manufactured or produced in 
    Czechoslovakia after May 8, 1945, should be regarded as products of 
    Czechoslovakia for purposes of the marking provisions of the Tariff Act 
    of 1930.
        Accordingly, consistent with prior Customs decisions, Customs is 
    relying upon advice from the Department of State for purposes of 
    defining the term ``Country'' within the meaning of section 134.1(a), 
    Customs Regulations (19 CFR 134.1(a)).
    
    Revocation of Prior Rulings
    
        On November 23, 1994, Customs issued telex 6327071, which stated 
    that Customs was proposing to change its position regarding the country 
    of origin marking requirements for goods made in the West Bank and Gaza 
    Strip. In the telex, Customs stated that effective immediately 
    merchandise which is produced in the West Bank or Gaza Strip may be 
    properly marked with the words ``West Bank,'' ``Gaza,'' or ``Gaza 
    Strip,'' without the words ``Israel,'' ``Product of Israel,'' or 
    ``Israeli-Occupied West Bank,'' or words of similar meaning, also 
    appearing in the marking designation. The telex further stated that 
    Customs would publish a notice in the Customs Bulletin requesting 
    public comment on the modification or revocation of prior rulings 
    concerning this matter. However, it was further noted in the telex that 
    until such modification or revocation is effected, the prior rulings 
    concerning the proper marking of goods made in the West Bank or Gaza 
    Strip would remain valid and goods may continue to be marked in 
    accordance with them.
        On February 8, 1995, Customs published a notice in the Customs 
    Bulletin (Volume 29, Number 6), proposing to revoke Headquarters Ruling 
    Letters (HRLs) 718329, 718125, 730094, and 734609, to reflect the 
    position that goods which are produced in the West Bank or Gaza Strip 
    shall be regarded as a product of the West Bank or Gaza Strip in 
    accordance with the requirements of 19 U.S.C. 1304 and 19 CFR Part 134, 
    and shall be marked as ``West Bank,'' ``Gaza'' or ``Gaza Strip,'' and 
    shall not contain the words ``Israel,'' ``Made in Israel,'' ``Occupied 
    Territories-Israel,'' or words of similar meaning.
        Two comments received in response to the February 8, 1995, Customs 
    Bulletin notice both of which were favorable to the Customs proposal. 
    One commenter, however, suggested that Customs expand the proposed 
    position by allowing goods which are produced in the West Bank or Gaza 
    Strip to be marked as ``West Bank,'' ``Gaza,'' ``Palestine,'' ``West 
    Bank, Palestine,'' or ``Gaza, Palestine.'' The U.S. Department of State 
    has not identified the area within the West Bank or Gaza Strip as one 
    that should be recognized as ``Palestine.'' Therefore, articles which 
    are produced in the West Bank or Gaza Strip may not be marked as 
    products of ``Palestine.''
    
    New Position
    
        This document notifies the public that unless excepted from 
    marking, goods [[Page 17609]] which are produced in the territorial 
    areas known as the West Bank or Gaza Strip shall be marked as ``West 
    Bank,'' ``Gaza,'' or ``Gaza Strip'' in accordance with the requirements 
    of 19 U.S.C. 1304 and 19 CFR Part 134, and shall not contain the words 
    ``Israel,'' ``Made in Israel,'' ``Occupied Territories-Israel,'' or 
    words of similar meaning. This document also revokes prior ruling 
    letters (HRL's 718329, 718125, 730094, and 734609) regarding the 
    country of origin marking requirements for goods which are produced in 
    the West Bank and Gaza Strip. For those persons whose ruling is 
    revoked, the position stated in this document is effective for 
    merchandise which is entered or withdrawn from warehouse for 
    consumption on or after 60 days from the date this document is 
    published in the Customs Bulletin; for all other persons, this document 
    is effective on the date of publication in the Federal Register.
    
    
        Dated: April 3, 1995.
    Stuart P. Seidel,
    Assistant Commissioner, Office of Regulations and Rulings.
    [FR Doc. 95-8454 Filed 4-5-95; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4820-02-P
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
6/19/1995
Published:
04/06/1995
Department:
Treasury Department
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Notice of Policy.
Document Number:
95-8454
Dates:
For those persons whose ruling is revoked, the position set forth in this document is effective for merchandise entered or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption on or after June 19, 1995; for all other persons, this document is effective on April 6, 1995.
Pages:
17607-17609 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
T.D. 95-25
PDF File:
95-8454.pdf