94-8295. Aluminum Company of America, Lafayette, IN; Negative Determination on Reconsideration  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 67 (Thursday, April 7, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page 0]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-8295]
    
    
    [[Page Unknown]]
    
    [Federal Register: April 7, 1994]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
    Employment and Training Administration
    [TA-W-29,210]
    
     
    
    Aluminum Company of America, Lafayette, IN; Negative 
    Determination on Reconsideration
    
        On March 22, 1994, the Department issued an Affirmative 
    Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration for workers and 
    former workers of the subject firm. This notice will soon be published 
    in the Federal Register.
        The application for reconsideration states that the Department's 
    survey was inadequate in that only the hard alloy customers were 
    surveyed, not the soft alloy customers. It was also stated that (1) the 
    Russians were dumping large amounts of aluminum in the open market and 
    that (2) workers at two other Alcoa locations were certified for TAA--
    Newburgh, Indiana and Wenatchee, Washington.
        Investigation findings show that the workers produce both hard and 
    soft aluminum extrusions and tubes.
        Other investigation findings show that in 1993 Lafayette exited the 
    commercial extrusion (soft alloy) business because of non-trade 
    reasons.
        The Department's denial was based on the fact that the 
    ``contributed importantly'' test of the Group Eligibility Requirements 
    of the Trade Act was not met. This test is generally demonstrated 
    through a survey of the workers; firm' major declining customers. The 
    Department's survey showed that none of the respondents reported 
    purchasing imports in the relevant period.
        On reconsideration, the Department obtained the major declining 
    customers of soft aluminum alloy extrusions. The customers accounted 
    for over half of the 1993 sales decline of all aluminum extrusions. The 
    Department survey on reconsideration found that the respondents did not 
    import soft alloy extrusion during the relevant period but transferred 
    their business from Alcoa to other domestic producers.
        Other findings on reconsideration show that Alcoa's Lafayette ingot 
    production was used internally for the production of extrusions and 
    tubes at Lafayette. Lafayette did not use imported aluminum ingots. 
    Lafayette's ingot production decreased in 1993 because the company 
    exited the soft alloy extrusion business.
        Workers at Alcoa's Newburgh, Indiana (TA-W-28,848) and Wenatchee, 
    Washington (TA-W-28,882) produced aluminum ingots as the finished 
    article and were certified for TAA because they met all the worker 
    group requirements in the period relevant to their petitions.
    
    Conclusion
    
        After reconsideration, I affirm the original notice of negative 
    determination of eligibility to apply for adjustment assistance to 
    workers and former workers of the Aluminum Company of America in 
    Lafayette, Indiana.
    
        Signed at Washington, DC, this 29th day of March 1994.
    Stephen A. Wandner,
    Deputy Director, Office of Legislation & Actuarial Service, 
    Unemployment Insurance Service.
    [FR Doc. 94-8295 Filed 4-6-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
04/07/1994
Department:
Employment and Training Administration
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Document Number:
94-8295
Pages:
0-0 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: April 7, 1994, TA-W-29,210