95-8629. Notice of Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Certain Carbon Steel Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings From Thailand  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 67 (Friday, April 7, 1995)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 17774-17775]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-8629]
    
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
    
    International Trade Administration
    [A-549-809]
    
    
    Notice of Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair 
    Value: Certain Carbon Steel Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings From Thailand
    
    AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
    Department of Commerce.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: April 7, 1995.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
    Vincent Kane or Julie Anne Osgood, Office of Countervailing 
    Investigations, Import Administration, International Trade 
    Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
    Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482-2815 
    or 482-0167, respectively.
    
    Amended Final Determination
    
        We are amending the final determination of sales at less than fair 
    value of certain carbon steel butt-weld pipe fittings (pipe fittings) 
    from Thailand to reflect the correction of ministerial errors made in 
    the margin calculation in the final determination.
    
    Case History
    
        In accordance with section 735(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 
    amended (19 U.S.C. 1673d(a)) (the Act), on February 27, 1995, the 
    Department of Commerce (the Department) published its final 
    determination that pipe fittings from Thailand were being sold at less 
    than fair value (60 FR 10552). On March 13, 1995, respondent, Awaji 
    Sangyo (Thailand) Co., Ltd. (AST), alleged that the Department made 
    several clerical errors in its final determination regarding the margin 
    calculations and requested that the Department correct these errors.
    
    Scope of the Investigation
    
        The products covered by this investigation are certain carbon steel 
    butt-weld pipe fittings having an inside diameter of less than fourteen 
    inches (355 millimeters), imported in either finished or unfinished 
    condition. Pipe fittings are formed of forged steel products used to 
    join pipe sections in piping systems where conditions require permanent 
    welded connections, as distinguished from fittings based on other 
    methods of fastening (e.g., threaded, grooved, or bolted fittings). 
    Butt-weld fittings come in a variety of shapes which include 
    ``elbows,'' ``tees,'' ``caps,'' and ``reducers.'' The edges of finished 
    pipe fittings are beveled, so that when a fitting is placed against the 
    end of a pipe (the ends of which have also been beveled), a shallow 
    channel is created to accommodate the ``bead'' of the weld which joins 
    the fitting to the pipe. These pipe fittings are currently classifiable 
    under subheading 7307.93.3000 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 
    United States (``HTSUS''). Although the HTSUS subheading is provided 
    for convenience and Customs purposes, our written description of the 
    scope of this investigation is dispositive.
    
    Amended Final Determination
    
        On March 13, 1995, respondent alleged that the Department had made 
    three ministerial errors in the final calculations performed to 
    determine the dumping margin for AST in accordance with section 353.28 
    of the Department's regulations. Each alleged error is discussed below.
    Comment 1
    
        Upon exportation of finished pipe fitting, AST received drawback of 
    import duties on imported pipe used to produce the pipe fittings. AST 
    alleges that the Department incorrectly added the drawback amount to 
    the foreign market value (FMV), rather than to the United States price 
    (USP).
    
    DOC Position
    
        We agree with respondent. Section 772(d)(1)(B) of the Act provides 
    that the U.S. price shall be increased by the amount of any import 
    duties imposed in the country of exportation which have been rebated, 
    or not collected, by reason of exportation of the merchandise to the 
    United States. In the final determination, we inadvertently added 
    drawback to FMV rather than to USP. We have recalculated FMV and USP to 
    correct this error.
    
    Comment 2
    
        AST alleges that in allocating indirect selling expenses to the 
    home market, the Department used an incorrect value for home market 
    shipments during the period of investigation (POI).
    
    DOC Position
    
        We agree with respondent. We have now reallocated home market 
    selling expenses using the correct value.
    
    Comment 3
    
        AST alleges the Department erroneously included a quantity of 
    seamless pipe in its calculation of total welded pipe consumed. AST 
    contends that this quantity of seamless pipe should be excluded from 
    the Department's welded pipe consumption calculation.
    
    DOC Position
    
        We agree with AST that the Department erroneously included some 
    seamless pipe quantities in its calculation of per unit welded pipe 
    consumed. We intended to include only welded pipe in our welded pipe 
    consumption calculation. Thus, we have recomputed per unit welded pipe 
    consumed based solely on AST's welded pipe consumption.
        Accordingly, pursuant to section 735(e) of the Act, we have 
    corrected the ministerial errors in the final determination of sales at 
    less than fair value. The final estimated margin [[Page 17775]] changes 
    from 38.41 percent to 17.13 percent.
    
    Suspension of Liquidation
    
        In accordance with section 733(d)(1) of the Act, we are directing 
    the U.S. Customs Service to continue to suspend liquidation of all 
    entries of butt-weld pipe fittings from Thailand, as defined in the 
    ``Scope of Investigation'' section of this notice, that are produced 
    and sold by AST and that are entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for 
    consumption on or after October 4, 1994.
        The Customs Service shall require a cash deposit or the posting of 
    a bond equal to the estimated weighted-average amount by which the 
    foreign market value of AST's subject merchandise exceeds the United 
    States price as shown below. The suspension of liquidation will remain 
    in effect until further notice. The amended weighted-average dumping 
    margin is as follows:
    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                             Margin  Deposit
                Manufacturer/producer/exporter              percent  percent
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Awaji Sangyo (Thailand) Co., Ltd......................    17.13    16.39
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        We did not determine an ``all others'' rate in this investigation, 
    because all other producers and exporters of butt-weld pipe fittings 
    from Thailand are already subject to an antidumping duty order on this 
    merchandise, which was published in the Federal Register on July 6, 
    1992 (57 FR 29702).
    
    Adjustment of Deposit Rate for Countervailing Duties
    
        Article VI, paragraph 5 of the General Agreement on Tariffs and 
    Trade provides that ``[no] product * * * shall be subject to both 
    antidumping and countervailing duties to compensate for the same 
    situation for dumping or export subsidization.'' This provision is 
    implemented by section 772(d)(1)(D) of the Act. Because antidumping 
    duties cannot be assessed on the portion of the margin attributable to 
    export subsidies, there is no basis to require a cash deposit or bond 
    for that amount.
        Accordingly, the level of export subsidies as determined in the 
    most recent administrative review of the countervailing duty order, 
    Carbon Steel Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings From Thailand; Final Results of 
    Countervailing Duty Administrative Review, (57 FR 5248, February 13, 
    1992), which was 0.74 percent, will be subtracted from the margin for 
    cash deposit or bonding purposes. This results in a deposit rate of 
    16.39 percent for AST.
        This amended final determination is published in accordance with 
    section 735(e) of the Act and 19 CFR 353.21.
    
        Dated: March 29, 1995.
    Susan G. Esserman,
    Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
    [FR Doc. 95-8629 Filed 4-6-95; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 3510-WS-M
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
4/7/1995
Published:
04/07/1995
Department:
International Trade Administration
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
95-8629
Dates:
April 7, 1995.
Pages:
17774-17775 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
A-549-809
PDF File:
95-8629.pdf