98-8900. Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A300-600 Series Airplanes  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 66 (Tuesday, April 7, 1998)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 16886-16888]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-8900]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    
    Federal Aviation Administration
    
    14 CFR Part 39
    
    [Docket No. 95-NM-92-AD; Amendment 39-10451; AD 98-08-02]
    RIN 2120-AA64
    
    
    Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A300-600 Series Airplanes
    
    AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), 
    applicable to all Airbus Model A300-600 series airplanes, that requires 
    repetitive replacement of the universal joints and steady bearings of 
    the flap transmission system with new parts at regular intervals, or 
    overhaul. This amendment is prompted by a report of a malfunction of a 
    universal joint in the flap transmission system on one wing due to 
    fatigue failure. The actions specified by this AD are intended to 
    ensure replacement or overhaul of certain universal joints and bearings 
    of the transmission system when they have reached their maximum life 
    limit. Failure of universal joints and bearings could lead to an 
    asymmetric condition of the flaps, which could adversely affect 
    controllability of the airplane.
    
    DATES: Effective May 12, 1998.
        The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in 
    the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as 
    of May 12, 1998.
    
    ADDRESSES: The service information referenced in this AD may be 
    obtained from Airbus Industrie, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 
    Blagnac Cedex, France. This information may be examined at the Federal 
    Aviation Administration (FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, Rules 
    Docket, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the Office of 
    the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, 
    Washington, DC.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Norman B. Martenson, Manager, 
    International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 
    1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98055-4056; telephone (425) 
    227-2110; fax (425) 227-1149.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal 
    Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to include an airworthiness 
    directive (AD) that is applicable to all Airbus Model A300-600 series 
    airplanes was published in the Federal Register on July 18, 1995 (60 FR 
    36748). That action proposed to require repetitive replacement of the 
    universal joints and steady bearings of the flap transmission system 
    with new parts at regular intervals.
        Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate 
    in the making of this amendment. Due consideration has been given to 
    the comments received.
    
    Support for the Proposal
    
        One commenter supports the proposed rule.
    
    Request to Withdraw the Proposal
    
        Three commenters request that the proposed AD be withdrawn because 
    overhauling is already mandatory under the Maintenance Review Board 
    (MRB) requirements. One commenter states that the maintenance program 
    already includes a certification maintenance requirement (CMR) 
    inspection of these gearboxes and bearings. The commenter states that 
    because CMR inspections are mandatory, the proposed rule is redundant.
        The FAA does not concur with the commenters' request to withdraw 
    the proposal. The inspections required by this AD are to be 
    accomplished in
    
    [[Page 16887]]
    
    accordance with the service bulletin, which provides additional 
    detailed information beyond the inspections described in the MRB or in 
    the CMR. Therefore, the FAA has determined that this AD is necessary to 
    address the unsafe condition.
        One commenter requests that the proposed AD not be adopted because 
    the AD is based on one incident. The commenter did not provide any 
    additional justification for its request. The FAA does not concur. An 
    assessment by the manufacturer and Direction Generale de l'Aviation 
    Civile (DGAC) of the incident determined that a similar disconnection 
    of the flap transmission system may occur on other airplanes of the 
    same design. Based on this assessment, the actions required by this AD 
    are necessary to address the identified unsafe condition.
    
    Overhaul Versus Replacement
    
        Three commenters request that the proposed AD allow overhaul rather 
    than replacement of the units. One commenter states that the 
    requirements of the proposed AD are not in line with the DGAC and the 
    manufacturer's positions that overhaul of the universal joints and 
    bearings is acceptable. The FAA concurs. However, this overhaul is only 
    acceptable for an additonal 16,000 landings on the affected parts. 
    These overhauled parts provide only a limited service life, at which 
    time the parts must be replaced. The FAA has determined that, in 
    addition to replacement of the units, overhaul, in accordance with 
    Airbus Service Bulletin A300-27-6028, dated December 19, 1994, is also 
    acceptable. Therefore, paragraph (a) of the final rule has been revised 
    accordingly.
    
    Requests to Revise Cost Impact Information
    
        Two commenters request revision of the cost estimate. Two 
    commenters provided additional cost information for overhauling or 
    replacing the bearings. Additionally, the commenters state that the 
    steady bearings are installed in numerous locations in the airplane 
    with two of those steady bearing positions being the subject of the AD.
        The FAA concurs with the commenters' request to revise the cost 
    estimate based on the new cost for overhaul of the bearings. The 
    commenters state that the cost of accomplishing the overhaul is 
    approximately $4,000 to $4,500 per bearing, rather than $5,660 per 
    airplane, as estimated in the proposed rule. After considering the data 
    presented by the commenters, the FAA concurs that the cost for 
    overhauling the parts may be higher than previously estimated in the 
    proposal. In consideration of this new information, the FAA has revised 
    the cost impact information, below, to indicate that required parts 
    will cost approximately $9,000 per airplane, ($4,500 per bearing, two 
    bearings per airplane). Based on these figures, the total cost impact 
    of the AD on U.S. operators is estimated to be $483,000, or $9,660 per 
    airplane.
        This AD only requires replacement or overhaul of two bearings. The 
    FAA recognizes that, in accomplishing the requirements of any AD, 
    operators may incur ``incidental'' costs in addition to ``direct'' 
    costs. The economic analysis in AD rulemaking actions, however, is 
    limited only to the cost of actions actually required by the AD.
    
    Conclusion
    
        After careful review of the available data, including the comments 
    noted above, the FAA has determined that air safety and the public 
    interest require the adoption of the rule with the changes previously 
    described. The FAA has determined that these changes will neither 
    increase the economic burden on any operator nor increase the scope of 
    the AD.
    
    Cost Impact
    
        The FAA estimates that 50 Model A300-600 series airplanes of U.S. 
    registry will be affected by this AD, that it will take approximately 
    11 work hours per airplane to accomplish the required actions, and that 
    the average labor rate is $60 per work hour. Required parts will cost 
    approximately $9,000 per airplane. Based on these figures, the cost 
    impact of the AD on U.S. operators is estimated to be $483,000, or 
    $9,660 per airplane.
        The cost impact figure discussed above is based on assumptions that 
    no operator has yet accomplished any of the requirements of this AD 
    action, and that no operator would accomplish those actions in the 
    future if this AD were not adopted.
    
    Regulatory Impact
    
        The regulations adopted herein will not have substantial direct 
    effects on the States, on the relationship between the national 
    government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
    responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in 
    accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this final 
    rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the 
    preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
        For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is 
    not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866; 
    (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and 
    Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a 
    significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial 
    number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory 
    Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has been prepared for this action 
    and it is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained 
    from the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption 
    ADDRESSES.
    
    List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
    
        Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by 
    reference, Safety.
    
    Adoption of the Amendment
    
        Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the 
    Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of 
    the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
    
    PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
    
        1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
    
    
    Sec. 39.13  [Amended]
    
        2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new 
    airworthiness directive:
    
    98-08-02 Airbus Industrie:  Amendment 39-10451. Docket 95-NM-92-AD.
    
        Applicability: All Model A300-600 series airplanes, certificated 
    in any category.
    
        Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the 
    preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been 
    modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the 
    requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified, 
    altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of 
    this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an 
    alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (b) of 
    this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of 
    the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition 
    addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been 
    eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to 
    address it.
    
        Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished 
    previously.
        To ensure replacement or overhaul of certain universal joints 
    and bearings of the flap transmission that have reached their 
    maximum life limit, accomplish the following:
        (a) Prior to the accumulation of 16,000 total landings on the 
    universal joints and bearings of the flap transmission system, or 
    within
    
    [[Page 16888]]
    
    500 landings after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs 
    later, accomplish paragraph (a)(1) or (a)(2) of this AD. Thereafter, 
    prior to the accumulation of 16,000 total landings on the universal 
    joints and bearings, repeat the actions required by either paragraph 
    (a)(1) or (a)(2) of this AD.
        (1) Replace affected bearings and universal joints of the flap 
    transmission system with new parts, in accordance with Airbus All 
    Operator Telex (AOT) 27-17, Revision 01, dated July 11, 1994, or 
    Airbus Service Bulletin A300-27-6028, dated December 19,1994; or
        (2) Overhaul the affected bearings and universal joints of the 
    flap transmission system in accordance with Airbus Service Bulletin 
    A300-27-6028, dated December 19, 994. Prior to the accumulation of 
    16,000 landings after accomplishing the overhaul, replace affected 
    bearing and universal joints with new parts in accordance with the 
    AOT or the service bulletin.
        (b) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the 
    compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be 
    used if approved by the Manager, International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, 
    Transport Airplane Directorate. Operators shall submit their 
    requests through an appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance Inspector, 
    who may add comments and then send it to the Manager, International 
    Branch, ANM-116.
    
        Note 2: Information concerning the existence of approved 
    alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be 
    obtained from the International Branch, ANM-116.
    
        (c) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with 
    sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 
    CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where 
    the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
        (d) The actions shall be done in accordance with Airbus All 
    Operator Telex (AOT) 27-17, Revision 01, dated July 11, 1994, or 
    Airbus Service Bulletin A300-27-6028, dated December 19, 1994. This 
    incorporation by reference was approved by the Director of the 
    Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 
    51. Copies may be obtained from Airbus Industrie, 1 Rond Point 
    Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France. Copies may be 
    inspected at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind 
    Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the Office of the Federal 
    Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.
    
        Note 3: The subject of this AD is addressed in French 
    airworthiness directive 94-206-167(B) R1, dated March 15, 1995.
    
        (e) This amendment becomes effective on May 12, 1998.
    
        Issued in Renton, Washington, on March 31, 1998.
    Darrell M. Pederson,
    Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
    Service.
    [FR Doc. 98-8900 Filed 4-6-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
5/12/1998
Published:
04/07/1998
Department:
Federal Aviation Administration
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
98-8900
Dates:
Effective May 12, 1998.
Pages:
16886-16888 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 95-NM-92-AD, Amendment 39-10451, AD 98-08-02
RINs:
2120-AA64: Airworthiness Directives
RIN Links:
https://www.federalregister.gov/regulations/2120-AA64/airworthiness-directives
PDF File:
98-8900.pdf
CFR: (1)
14 CFR 39.13