99-8328. Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier Model DHC-8-100, -200, and - 300 Series Airplanes  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 66 (Wednesday, April 7, 1999)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 16803-16805]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-8328]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    
    Federal Aviation Administration
    
    14 CFR Part 39
    
    [Docket No. 97-NM-04-AD; Amendment 39-11109; AD 99-08-04]
    RIN 2120-AA64
    
    
    Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier Model DHC-8-100, -200, and -
    300 Series Airplanes
    
    AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), 
    applicable to certain Bombardier Model DHC-8-100, -200, and -300 series 
    airplanes, that requires modification of the flight compartment door; 
    repetitive inspections for wear of the flight compartment door hinges 
    following modification; and repair or replacement of the hinges with 
    new hinges, if necessary. This amendment is prompted by a report that 
    the door lock mechanism of the flight compartment door jammed and could 
    not be opened using the alternate release mechanism. The actions 
    specified by this AD are intended to prevent failure of the alternate 
    release mechanism of the flight
    
    [[Page 16804]]
    
    compartment door, which could delay or impede the evacuation of the 
    flightcrew during an emergency. Such failure also could result in the 
    flightcrew not being able to assist passengers in the event of an 
    emergency.
    
    DATES: Effective May 12, 1999.
        The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in 
    the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as 
    of May 12, 1999.
    
    ADDRESSES: The service information referenced in this AD may be 
    obtained from Bombardier, Inc., Bombardier Regional Aircraft Division, 
    Garratt Boulevard, Downsview, Ontario M3K 1Y5, Canada. This information 
    may be examined at the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Transport 
    Airplane Directorate, Rules Docket, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, 
    Washington; or at the FAA, Engine and Propeller Directorate, New York 
    Aircraft Certification Office, 10 Fifth Street, Third Floor, Valley 
    Stream, New York; or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North 
    Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ezra Sasson, Aerospace Engineer, 
    Systems and Equipment Branch, ANE-172, FAA, New York Aircraft 
    Certification Office, Engine and Propeller Directorate, 10 Fifth 
    Street, Third Floor, Valley Stream, New York 11581; telephone (516) 
    256-7520; fax (516) 568-2716.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal 
    Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to include an airworthiness 
    directive (AD) that is applicable to certain Bombardier Model DHC-8-
    100, -200, and -300 series airplanes was published as a supplemental 
    notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) in the Federal Register on August 
    5, 1998 (63 FR 41741). That action proposed to require modification of 
    the flight compartment door; repetitive inspections for wear of the 
    flight compartment door hinges following modification; and repair or 
    replacement of the hinges with new hinges, if necessary.
    
    Comments Received
    
        Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate 
    in the making of this amendment. Due consideration has been given to 
    the comments received.
    
    Support for Proposed Rule
    
        One commenter supports the proposed rule.
    
    Request to Revise Applicability Statement
    
        One commenter requests that the applicability statement of the 
    proposed AD be revised to reflect the effectivity listing specified in 
    Bombardier Service Bulletin S.B. 8-52-39, Revision `D,' dated February 
    27, 1998 (i.e., Model DHC-8 series airplanes having serial numbers 003 
    through 433 inclusive, except serial numbers 269, 408, and 413). The 
    commenter points out that paragraph (a) of the proposed AD requires 
    accomplishment of the modification specified in the subject service 
    bulletin.
        The FAA does not concur with the commenter's request. The 
    applicability statement of the original NPRM [which was published in 
    the Federal Register on July 11, 1997 (62 FR 37170)] read, ``Model DHC-
    8-100, -200, and -300 series airplanes having serial numbers 3 through 
    433 inclusive, excluding serial numbers 269, 408, and 418; certificated 
    in any category.'' The FAA revised the applicability of the 
    supplemental NPRM in consonance with the Canadian airworthiness 
    directive CF-96-20R2, dated July 16, 1997. This revision was made 
    because the supplemental NPRM was revised to add repetitive inspections 
    for wear of the flight compartment door hinges following accomplishment 
    of the required modification. These new repetitive inspections must be 
    accomplished on all affected airplanes having serial numbers 3 and 
    subsequent, regardless of whether the airplane has been modified.
    
    Explanation of Changes Made to Supplemental NPRM
    
        The FAA has revised the final rule to reflect the corporate name 
    change of de Havilland, Inc. to Bombardier, Inc.
    
    Conclusion
    
        After careful review of the available data, including the comments 
    noted above, the FAA has determined that air safety and the public 
    interest require the adoption of the rule with the changes described 
    previously. The FAA has determined that these changes will neither 
    increase the economic burden on any operator nor increase the scope of 
    the AD.
    
    Interim Action
    
        This is considered to be interim action. The manufacturer has 
    advised the FAA that it currently is developing a modification that 
    will eliminate the need for the repetitive inspections for wear of the 
    flight compartment door hinges. Once this modification is developed, 
    approved, and available, the FAA may consider additional rulemaking.
    
    Cost Impact
    
        The FAA estimates that 133 Bombardier Model DHC-8-100, -200, and -
    300 series airplanes of U.S. registry will be affected by this AD.
        It will take approximately 4 work hours per airplane to accomplish 
    the required modification, at an average labor rate of $60 per work 
    hour. Required parts will be provided by the manufacturer at no cost to 
    operators. Based on these figures, the cost impact of the modification 
    required by this AD on U.S. operators is estimated to be $31,920, or 
    $240 per airplane.
        It will take approximately 2 work hours per airplane to accomplish 
    the required inspection, at an average labor rate of $60 per work hour. 
    Based on these figures, the cost impact of the inspection required by 
    this AD on U.S. operators is estimated to be $15,960, or $120 per 
    airplane, per inspection cycle.
        The cost impact figures discussed above are based on assumptions 
    that no operator has yet accomplished any of the requirements of this 
    AD action, and that no operator would accomplish those actions in the 
    future if this AD were not adopted.
    
    Regulatory Impact
    
        The regulations adopted herein will not have substantial direct 
    effects on the States, on the relationship between the national 
    government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
    responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in 
    accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this final 
    rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the 
    preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
        For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is 
    not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866; 
    (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and 
    Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a 
    significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial 
    number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory 
    Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has been prepared for this action 
    and it is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained 
    from the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption 
    ADDRESSES.
    
    List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
    
        Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by 
    reference, Safety.
    
    [[Page 16805]]
    
    Adoption of the Amendment
    
        Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the 
    Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of 
    the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
    
    PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
    
        1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
    
    Sec. 39.13  [Amended]
    
        2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new 
    airworthiness directive:
    
    99-08-04  Bombardier, Inc. (Formerly de Havilland, Inc.): Amendment 
    39-11109. Docket 97-NM-04-AD.
    
        Applicability: Model DHC-8-100, -200, and -300 series airplanes 
    having serial numbers 3 and subsequent; certificated in any 
    category.
        Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the 
    preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been 
    modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the 
    requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified, 
    altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of 
    this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an 
    alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (c) of 
    this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of 
    the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition 
    addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been 
    eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to 
    address it.
    
        Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished 
    previously.
        To prevent failure of the alternate release mechanism of the 
    flight compartment door, which could delay or impede the evacuation 
    of the flightcrew and passengers during an emergency, accomplish the 
    following:
        (a) Within 90 days after the effective date of this AD, modify 
    the lower hinge assembly and main door latch (Modification 8/2337) 
    of the flight compartment door, in accordance with Bombardier 
    Service Bulletin S.B. 8-52-39, Revision `D,' dated February 27, 
    1998.
    
        Note 2: Modification of the flight compartment door accomplished 
    prior to the effective date of this AD in accordance with Bombardier 
    Service Bulletin S.B. 8-52-39, dated August 30, 1996; Revision `A,' 
    dated October 31, 1996; Revision `B,' dated July 4, 1997; or 
    Revision `C,' dated September 1, 1997; is considered acceptable for 
    compliance with the modification required by paragraph (a) of this 
    AD.
    
        (b) Within 800 flight hours after accomplishment of the 
    modification required by paragraph (a) of this AD, inspect the hinge 
    areas around the hinge pin holes of the flight compartment door for 
    wear, in accordance with Bombardier Service Bulletin S.B. 8-52-39, 
    Revision `C,' dated September 1, 1997, or Revision `D,' dated 
    February 27, 1998.
        (1) If no wear is detected, or if the wear is less than or equal 
    to 0.020 inch in depth, repeat the inspection thereafter at 
    intervals not to exceed 800 flight hours.
        (2) If any wear is detected and its dimension around the hinge 
    pin holes is less than 0.050 inch and greater than 0.020 inch in 
    depth, prior to further flight, perform the applicable corrective 
    actions specified in the service bulletin. Repeat the inspection 
    thereafter at intervals not to exceed 800 flight hours.
        (3) If any wear is detected and its dimension around the hinge 
    pin holes is greater than or equal to 0.050 inch in depth, prior to 
    further flight, replace the worn hinges with new hinges in 
    accordance with the service bulletin. Repeat the inspection 
    thereafter at intervals not to exceed 800 flight hours.
    
    Alternative Methods of Compliance
    
        (c) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the 
    compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be 
    used if approved by the Manager, New York Aircraft Certification 
    Office (ACO), FAA, Engine and Propeller Directorate. Operators shall 
    submit their requests through an appropriate FAA Principal 
    Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the 
    Manager, New York ACO.
        Note 3: Information concerning the existence of approved 
    alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be 
    obtained from the New York ACO.
    
    Special Flight Permits
    
        (d) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with 
    sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 
    CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where 
    the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
    
    Incorporation by Reference
    
        (e) The actions shall be done in accordance with Bombardier 
    Service Bulletin S.B. 8-52-39, Revision `C,' dated September 1, 
    1997, and Bombardier Service Bulletin S.B. 8-52-39, Revision `D,' 
    dated February 27, 1998; as applicable. This incorporation by 
    reference was approved by the Director of the Federal Register in 
    accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Copies may be 
    obtained from Bombardier, Inc., Bombardier Regional Aircraft 
    Division, Garratt Boulevard, Downsview, Ontario M3K 1Y5, Canada. 
    Copies may be inspected at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 
    1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the FAA, Engine and 
    Propeller Directorate, New York Aircraft Certification Office, 10 
    Fifth Street, Third Floor, Valley Stream, New York; or at the Office 
    of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, 
    Washington, DC.
        Note 4: The subject of this AD is addressed in Canadian 
    airworthiness directive CF-96-20R2, dated July 16, 1997.
    
        (f) This amendment becomes effective on May 12, 1999.
    
        Issued in Renton, Washington, on March 30, 1999.
    Darrell M. Pederson,
    Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
    Service.
    [FR Doc. 99-8328 Filed 4-6-99; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
5/12/1999
Published:
04/07/1999
Department:
Federal Aviation Administration
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
99-8328
Dates:
Effective May 12, 1999.
Pages:
16803-16805 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 97-NM-04-AD, Amendment 39-11109, AD 99-08-04
RINs:
2120-AA64: Airworthiness Directives
RIN Links:
https://www.federalregister.gov/regulations/2120-AA64/airworthiness-directives
PDF File:
99-8328.pdf
CFR: (1)
14 CFR 39.13