[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 69 (Tuesday, April 9, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15820-15825]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-8589]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Revised Procedures for Selecting and Funding Federal Aid in Sport
Fish and Wildlife Restoration Administrative Projects
AGENCY: Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Service is announcing procedures for obtaining funding for
Federal Aid administrative projects and availability of an estimated
$1,600,000 for Wildlife Restoration projects and $750,000 for Sport
Fish projects. This year's program eliminates several eligibility
requirements, updates focus areas, and clarifies documentation needs
from the previous year.
DATES: Applications/proposals must be received by June 1, 1996.
ADDRESSES: Proposals must be submitted to: U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, Chief, Division of Federal Aid, MS 140 ARLSQ, 4401 North
Fairfax Drive, Arlington, Virginia 22203.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Robert D. Lange, Jr., Chief,
Division of Federal Aid, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; (703) 358-
2156.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Service publishes a notice in the
Federal Register each year announcing the deadline for project
proposals, the amount of money available for Sport Fish and Wildlife
Restoration projects, and the focus areas identified for the year.
Focus areas are used to promote and encourage efforts that address
priority needs of the State fish and wildlife agencies.
The focus areas contained in this notice were developed in
cooperation with the Grants-in-Aid Committee of the International
Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies and represent that group's
assessment of priority projects. The focus areas are provided as a
guide so that applicants will know the types of projects that will
likely score higher in the rankings.
Several changes have been made since the last year's program.
Previously, both eligibility requirements and selection criteria were
specified. These have been combined this year to clarify requirements.
Also any limitation on the amount of funding that may be requested is
eliminated and extending a project longer than three years is possible.
Some documentation changes were made to be consistent with standard
documentation contained in 43 CFR Part 12. Advance notice is also given
that proposals will be required by May 1 in future selection processes
following this year.
States, local governments, charitable and educational institutions,
and other authorized recipients are authorized to apply for grants
according to these procedures. The Department of the Interior has
promulgated rules (43 CFR Part 12) adopting common rules developed by
the Office of Management and Budget as required by OMB Circulars A-102
and A-110 that contain administrative requirements that apply to these
grants. This annual grant program does not contain information
collection requirements for which approval by the Office of Management
and Budget under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, as specified in
43 CFR Part 12.4 are required. The information collection requirements
for this grant program are those necessary to comply with 43 CFR Part
12, which include (a) project narrative; and (b) compliance with
Federal laws, regulations, and policies.
Record keeping includes the tracking of costs and accomplishments,
monitoring progress and evaluating accomplishments, and reporting
requirements. The Standard Form 424 series prescribed by OMB Circulars
A-102 and A-110 have the OMB clearance number 0348-0043.
Dated: March 29, 1996.
John G. Rogers,
Deputy Director.
Procedures for Selecting and Funding Federal Aid in Sport Fish and
Wildlife Restoration Administrative Projects
A. Purpose
This statement establishes procedures for selecting administrative
projects to be funded by the Federal Aid in Sport Fish Restoration and
Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration programs. These projects are funded
by grants to States, local governments, charitable and educational
institutions, or other authorized recipients to accomplish public
purposes relating to administering the Sport Fish and Wildlife
Restoration Programs and to facilitate the efforts of the States in
implementing these programs.
[[Page 15821]]
B. Background
The mission of the two grant programs is to strengthen the ability
of State and Territorial fish and wildlife agencies to meet effectively
the consumptive and nonconsumptive needs of the public for fish and
wildlife resources. The Federal Aid in Sport Fish Restoration Act and
the Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration Act authorize the Secretary of
the Interior to cooperate with the States and to use administrative
funds for carrying out the purposes of the Acts. The Fish and Wildlife
Coordination Act (16 U.S.C. 661) provides the authority to provide
financial assistance to Federal, State, and public or private parties
to facilitate fish and wildlife programs.
Administrative funds are deducted each year from the total amounts
of funds available under the Federal Aid in Sport Fish Restoration Act
and the Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration Act. The statutory
provisions related to administrative deductions are as follows:
Federal Aid in Sport Fish Restoration (SFR)--Federal Aid
Administrative Funds for sport fish restoration may not exceed 6
percent of the deposits in the SFR Account of the Aquatic Resources
Trust Fund. These funds may be used for administrative projects for the
``conduct of necessary investigations, administration, and the
execution of this Act and for the aiding in the formulation, adoption,
or administration of any compact between two or more States for the
conservation and management of migratory fishes in marine or fresh
waters.'' (Section 4 of the Act as amended by Pub. L. 98-369, 16 U.S.C.
777c)
Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration (WR)--Federal Aid
Administrative Funds for wildlife restoration may not exceed 8 percent
of the excise tax receipts deposited in the WR Fund. These funds may be
used for the ``administration and execution of this Act and the
Migratory Bird Conservation Act.'' (Section 4 of the Act, 16 U.S.C.
669c)
After making administrative deductions as specified above, the
remainder of the funds will be apportioned to the States in accordance
with the formulas contained in the Acts. The Service will strive to
minimize administrative deductions in order to maximize apportionments
to the States.
C. Availability of Funds
In fiscal year 1997, the amounts of funds estimated to be available
for administrative projects are $750,000 for sport fish restoration and
$1,600,000 for wildlife restoration.
D. Interstate Compacts
The Service also will make available a total of $600,000 annually,
without competition, for funding The Atlantic States Marine Fisheries
Commission, Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission, and Pacific States
Marine Fisheries Commission, as authorized by law. Requests for
additional amounts that may be eligible, must compete with other
proposals for Administrative Funds. Proposals will be subject to all of
the requirements in Section E.
E. Eligibility Requirements
The Service's Division of Federal Aid will review each proposal to
determine if proposals are eligible for funding. To be eligible for
funding, proposals must meet the following:
1. Authority--The project being proposed must be consistent with
the missions of the programs authorized by the SFR/WR laws and
regulations.
2. Scope--The problem or need addressed in the proposal is of
direct concern to one-half or more of the States or of national
significance, but confined to a lesser geographic area. The scope of
marine resources proposals must also address a need that is of direct
concern to a majority of States on a specific coast.
3. Significance--The problem or need addressed it deserving of the
level of attention proposed.
4. Feasibility--The proposed objectives can be attained in the
amount of time and with the personnel and resources requested.
5. Cost-effectiveness--The expected results of accomplishing the
proposal are worth the costs to be expended.
6. Period--The maximum duration for any approved projects will be
three years. New proposals may be submitted to extend a project beyond
the original three-year period.
7. Documentation--Proposals must address each section of the
documentation as listed under Submission Requirements. Section G.
F. Application Process
1. All proposals including funding requests for administrative
projects must be submitted to the Chief, Division of Federal Aid, U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service. 4401 North Fairfax Drive. ARLSQ. 140,
Arlington, Virginia 22203. Proposals originating within the Service
must have prior approval by the appropriate Regional Director or
Assistant Director.
2. Each year, a Notice will be published in the Federal Register
announcing the deadline for submitting proposals. The Notice will also
announce total funds available for wildlife and sport fish restoration
projects. A table with the approximate dates for each step of the
process is provided in Appendix A.
G. Submission Requirements
An original and two copies of each proposal for Federal Aid
Administrative funds must be submitted in the following format:
1. Application of Federal Assistance Standard Form 424 is
prescribed by Office of Management and Budget Circular A-110 and the
common rule (Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and
Cooperative Agreements to States and Local Governments). The SF 424
consists of a cover sheet and the SF 424b consists of compliance
assurances. Proposals received without these forms will be accepted,
but the forms must be received before the proposal is considered for
award.
2. Title--A short descriptive name of the proposal.
3. Objective--What will this proposal do? State a concise statement
of the purpose of the proposal in quantified terms where possible.
4. Need--Why address this problem?
a. State the problem or need that this proposal is intended to
address. Make references to any focus areas that the proposal address.
b. Describe the number of states affected by the project, how they
will benefit, and expressed support for the proposal. If the proposal
is confined to a specific geographic area, describe the national
significance of the proposal.
c. Brief status report on the history of previous work conducted by
the proposer or others to address this need.
5. Expected Results or Benefits--What will be gained by funding
this proposal? Describe the significance of accomplishing the project
relative to the stated need. Relate benefits of satisfactorily
completing the project to the States' fish and wildlife programs. In
addition to stating how the results will be useful, describe provisions
for making the product or results available and usable to those
affected by the problem or need. Benefits should be expressed in
quantified terms, i.e., angler days, harvest per unit effort,
improvements to State administration, dollars saved, etc.
6. Approach--How will the proposed project be conducted? Describe
how the work will be conducted including a description of techniques
and methods to be used, milestones, and a schedule of accomplishments.
7. Resumes--What are the qualifications of key personnel? Include
resumes and names of key individuals
[[Page 15822]]
who will be involved in the project, stating their particular
qualifications for undertaking the project.
8. Project Costs--Submit cost estimates showing total project costs
and the Federal and non-Federal shares. Multi-year proposals must
include an itemized budget showing funds required for each severable
part of the proposal. A severable part is defined as that portion of a
proposal that results in a completed product or service. The following
are to be included as part of the itemized budget:
a. Personnel.
(1) Include salaries of employees (by position title), amount of
the salaries to be charged to the project and identify the percent of
each person's time to be spent on the project.
(2) Identify fringe benefits (amount only)--This entry should be
the proportionate cost of fringe benefits paid for time spent on the
project. For example, if an employee spends 20 percent of his/her time
on the project, 20 percent of his/her fringe benefits are charged to
the project.
b. Consultants--Identify specific tasks and work to be performed by
consultants, including the basis for the fee paid, e.g., hourly rate.
c. Contracts--Identify all work to be performed by contract. If a
commitment is made with a particular vendor, prior to applying for
funding, explain how the vendor was selected, type of contract,
deliverables expected, time frame, cost, and basis for the cost.
d. Travel and Per Diem--Identify number of trips to be taken,
purpose, and number of people to travel. Itemize estimated costs and
include transportation, per diem, and miscellaneous expenses. Travel
expenses shall be in accordance with rates specified by Federal travel
regulations. Registration fees may also be included.
e. Equipment--Identify equipment or items to be purchased or
rented.
f. Supplies--Identify supplies to be purchased specifically for use
by the project. Items used in common by several projects may be
included in indirect costs.
g. Indirect Costs--Identify those indirect costs that are based on
approved indirect costs rates with the Federal Government. Estimates
may be included pending approval of a negotiated Federal indirect cost
rate.
h. Other Costs--Identify any other costs not identified above that
are attributable to the project.
Appendix B contains a sample proposal along with explanations.
H. Focus Areas
Focus areas are those specific areas in which the States are
seeking information and assistance in administering or implementing the
Sport Fish and Wildlife Restoration programs. Focus areas will be
announced each year by the Service, based on recommendations from the
Grants-In-Aid Committee (GIAC) in accordance with the bylaws of the
International Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies (IAFW). Each
year, the GIAC will be asked to submit recommendations for focus areas
after its September meeting. Each year a Federal Register Notice will
announce the Focus Areas, along with the amount of funds available for
administrative projects.
The following focus areas were identified as priority needs of the
States and those proposals addressing these needs will likely be given
priority by the States during the ranking in 1996.
1. Management--Handling, directing, manipulating, and managing fish
and wildlife populations. These focus areas directly link to resource,
hands-on responsibilities of fish and wildlife management agencies.
a. Restore, create, enhance, and protect fish and wildlife.
b. Advance, understanding of population dynamics of fish and
wildlife populations.
c. Advance or facilitate ecosystem based habitat restoration.
d. Provide for advancement of collection and management of resource
data on a regional or national basis.
e. Facilitate river basin/watershed habitat enhancement or
restoration.
f. Advance understanding of the impact of harvest on fish and
wildlife populations.
g. Coordination on regional, State/Federal management programs,
policies, and procedures.
h. Develop alternatives for registering drugs used for fish
production.
i. Review or asses impacts of the 1990 Farm Bill on fish and
wildlife.
j. Provision of public access.
2. Education--Teaching or training people about fish and wildlife
resources and the wise use of the resources.
a. Promoting natural resources and environmental education of ``K
through 12'' students.
b. Advancing public understanding of the importance of biological
diversity in maintaining diverse hunting and fishing opportunities.
c. Better understanding of constituents and their needs.
d. Educating the public on the need for and appropriateness of
regulations in natural resource management.
e. New approaches for teaching hunting and fishing ethics.
f. Continuing education and training for State fish and wildlife
biologists.
g. Identification and enhancement of innovative training devices,
such as interactive video, for use in hunter and aquatic education.
3. Outreach--Public information on fishing, hunting, trapping, and
wildlife-associated recreation.
a. Innovative approaches to introducing people to hunting and
fishing including emphasis on families.
b. Focusing public attention on the value of SFR/WR funds.
c. Involvement in fish and wildlife conservation on private lands.
d. Promotional materials and opportunities advancing public
involvement in fish and wildlife resources.
e. Fact sheets and other information to license holders on fish and
wildlife status and activities.
4. Research--Investigations, inquiries, searches, examinations, and
experiments for the discovery and interpretation of facts.
a. Effectiveness of habitat restoration, creation, and enhancement
techniques.
b. Testing and evaluating alternative methodologies for management
and collection of resource data.
c. Accumulation and synthesis of existing databases.
d. Effects of man-induced activities on the environment.
5. Administration--Service, supervisory, and management
responsibilities supporting fish and wildlife agency affairs.
a. Measuring the changing social, economic, and political realms
within which fish and wildlife must be managed.
b. Evaluations and recommendations relating to future funding needs
and sources for wildlife agencies.
c. Identification and documentation of human dimension aspects of
fish and wildlife management.
d. Advancement of automated licensing and fiscal data collections
for fish and wildlife agencies.
I. Proposal Review and Selection Process
1. Each proposal will be reviewed for eligibility as defined in
section E. The review will be conducted by the Washington Office. The
final determination for eligibility will be made at a meeting that
includes staff from Washington, with the Chair of the GIAC as an
observer.
2. All applicants will be notified that their proposal has been
determined eligible or ineligible.
[[Page 15823]]
3. Copies of eligible proposals will be forwarded to the Chair,
GIAC, along with lists of ongoing grants and ineligible proposals. The
Chair, GIAC, will forward copies to the voting members of the GIAC.
4. Voting members of the GIAC will review and rate each eligible
proposal high, medium or low.
5. All ratings from GIAC voting members and comments from Service
Offices will be returned to the Division of Federal Aid in Washington.
6. The Division of Federal Aid will summarize the ratings and
comments.
7. A summary of the comments and ratings will be provided to the
Chair, GIAC, for review at the GIAC September meeting.
8. During the September meeting of the IAFWA, the GIAC will
evaluate and rank eligible proposals based on the needs of the States.
The GIAC will forward its rankings and recommendations to the Service
in accordance with IAFWA procedures.
9. The Division of Federal Aid will summarize and consolidate all
rankings and comments and develop recommendations for proposal
selections and awards. The recommendations may be for partial funding
of any proposal.
10. The Federal Aid Division's recommendations will be forwarded to
the Director of the Service. The Director will review the
recommendations and make the final decision on project selections and
funding.
11. The Service will notify each eligible applicant in writing of
the final disposition of their proposal.
12. The Director will notify the Regional Directors and the Chair,
GIAC, of the proposals selected for funding.
K. Lobbying Restrictions
During the review of proposals, grant applicants may not engage in
any activities that might be considered as attempts to influence
reviewers or approving officials. If the activities are determined to
be lobbying, the proposal will be disqualified for Federal Aid
Administrative Funds.
J. Awards and Funding
1. The Service's Division of Contracting and General Services will
prepare and sign the formal award agreements. The Federal Aid Office
may provide technical assistance to the Division of Contracting and
General Services in finalizing the award agreements. The formal award
agreements will be forwarded to the awardees for signature and must be
signed by the Service and authorized awardee officials before they
become valid agreements. This process may require up to 60 days to
complete. The Service is not responsible for costs incurred prior to
the effective date of a signed agreement; therefore, the starting date
for all projects should be planned accordingly.
2. All funding must comply with the bona fide need rule established
by 31 USC 1502a requiring that the entire amount of a project must be
obligated in the fiscal year the grant is approved unless the project
is severable. A project is severable only if it can be separated into
components that independently meet a separate need.
3. Non-profit grantees must maintain a financial management system
in accordance with the Office of Management and Budget Circular A-110.
State and local governments must maintain a financial management system
in accordance with OMB Circular A-102 and 43 CFR Part 12.
K. Project Administration
Proposals awarded funding will be assigned to a Project Officer.
Project Officers are those persons representing the Contracting Officer
on technical matters relating to the responsibilities of the grantee.
They provide assistance that includes:
1. Assisting Service contracting officials in completing the award
agreement;
2. Serving as the Service's point of contact after the award
agreement is signed;
3. Receiving and approving bills; and
4. Monitoring project performance and assuring that the awardee
adheres to the award agreement.
Summary of Events--Appendix A
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target date Event
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
April 1............................................. Federal Register Notice announcing availability of Federal
Aid Funds and focus areas for grant applications.
June 1.............................................. Washington Office receives proposals.
June 30............................................. Washington Office with assistance from the Regions
determines eligibility (Chair of the Grants-in-Aid
Committee (GIAC) participates as an observer.
July 15............................................. Service forwards copies of eligible proposals to voting
members of the GIAC (includes summary list of ongoing
grants and list of ineligible proposals).
July 15............................................. Service sends letters to all applicants informing them
that their proposal is eligible or ineligible.
August 15........................................... Voting members of the GIAC forward comments and rating to
Chief, FA (Ratings of High, Medium or Low).
September 1......................................... Chief, FA, summarizes comments and ratings and forwards to
Chair, GIAC, for review at the September meeting.
September 15........................................ GIAC reviews and ranks proposals and forwards rankings and
recommendations to Service, along with recommendations
for Focus Areas for the following year.
October 31.......................................... Federal Aid summarizes all rankings and recommendations
for consideration by the Director.
November 15......................................... Director selects proposals for funding.
November 30......................................... Federal Aid notifies applicants and Chair, GIAC, of the
final disposition of proposals.
March 1............................................. Contracting and General Services awards grants.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sample Proposal for Federal Aid Administrative Funds--Submitted by
Gwyilt Institute
I. Title: Economic Profiles. Data Analysis, and Survey Design for
Sport Fishing.
II. Objective: The Gywllt Institute (Institute) proposes to produce
State-specific reports on the retail sales, jobs, wages and salaries,
years of employment, output, and tax receipts generated by sport
fishing in each State.
III. Need: In the Fall of 1987 the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
(Service) released the data tapes of the 1985 National Survey of
Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. There is no other
comprehensive source of national information on the economic impact of
sport fishing on State economies. In their current form the data tapes
are not easy for the States to use.
All States can use this information to evaluate the benefits of
sport fishing to their economies, to support programs that enhance
sport fishing opportunities, and assess the effectiveness of their
programs. The
[[Page 15824]]
Grant-in-Aid Committee has identified a focus area entitled ``projects
that provide for standardized economic analysis of fish and/or wildlife
resource benefits at the national and State levels'' that this proposal
will address.
This data has not been analyzed previously and presented in a user-
friendly manner. However the Institute has demonstrated the ability to
accomplish the analysis as evidenced by a similar analysis of boating
recreation.
IV. Expected Results of Benefits: In 1985, 46.4 million anglers
spent 976.6 million days and $28.1 billion pursing their sport. It is
anticipated that providing economic profiles for each State will allow
State Commissioners of fish and game agencies to argue effectively for
the necessary dollars to manage the fishery resources from their
respective State legislature. We conservatively estimate that an
additional 5 percent of shared resources will be reallocated to
recreational anglers.
V. Approach: The Institute will provide each State with a specially
designed software package for State-specific economic impact analysis.
The differences between the results of the National Survey and State
data collection efforts pertaining to the economic impact of sport
fishing will be analyzed by the Institute. The results of this analysis
will be used to make recommendations for the design of future surveys,
as well as a standardized format for economic questions on State
surveys.
A. Description of Work/Objectives
1. The Grantee shall provide to each of the 50 States. Lotus 1-2-3
(or facsimile) spreadsheets that contain trade margins, location
quotients, economic multipliers, and tax rates specific to each of the
States. The Grantee shall provide a manual to accompany the
spreadsheets that will contain detailed instructions on how to use and
modify the spreadsheets to derive the economic impacts of sport
fishing, hunting, and wildlife-associated recreation.
2. The Grantee shall download all data from the National Survey
from the data tapes to State-specific diskettes. The fishing, hunting
and wildlife-associated data shall be on separate diskettes. The
diskettes must be accompanied by a software package that allows users
to download the data from the diskettes to a Lotus 1-2-3 (or facsimile)
spreadsheet.
3. The Grantee shall inform State Directors that workshops will be
held by the Institute in each of the Regions of the Service to train
State agency and Service personnel on how to use the spreadsheets to
analyze the economic impact of fishing or other natural resource uses,
using State data or Service data. These sessions will be held in
conjunction with the Regional Federal Aid meetings or the Regional
meetings of the International Association of Fish and Wildlife
Agencies. These sessions will be at no cost to the Government.
4. The Grantee shall assist States by compiling and analyzing
State-specific studies and work with States toward assembling data into
a format useful for economic impact analysis.
5. The Grantee shall develop recommendations for modifications, if
needed, to the design of the 1990 Survey and work with the Responsive
Management Project on their economic modules.
6. The following milestones are applicable to paragraphs 1 through
5 above.
a. On a monthly basis, the Grantee shall submit written progress
reports to the Service Project Officer. Each report shall contain a
summary of the Grantee's efforts and activities for the reporting
period, including problems encountered and efforts undertaken for their
resolution.
b. Within four months after the effective date of this Agreement,
the Grantee shall distribute to each of the 50 States the following
items:
(1) Data diskettes
(2) Software to access data diskettes
(3) Manual for diskettes and software
c. Within six months after the effective date of this Agreement,
the Grantee shall distribute to each of the 50 States the following
items:
(1) Economic Impact Spreadsheets
(2) Manual for Economic Impact Spreadsheets, and
(3) Existing State data and studies.
d. During months five through 12, the Grantee shall participate in
the planned training sessions. (See section A.3 Description of Work/
Objectives.)
e. Within eight months after the effective date of this Agreement,
the Grantee shall prepare the State data in the Impact format.
f. Within 10 months after the effective date of this Agreement, the
Grantee shall distribute copies of the Economic Impact Manual and
comments. One copy shall be submitted to the Service Project Officer.
g. Within 11 months after the effective date of this Agreement, the
Grantee shall submit to the Service Project Office an original and one
copy of recommendations for the 1990 Survey.
V. Resumes: See attached resumes for Mr. Jones, Project Manager;
Mr. Smith, Resource Economist; and Ms. Able, consultant.
VI. Project Cost:
A. Personnel:
Project Manager/Senior Economist (2
months).................................. =$8,000
Resource Economist (12 months)............ =$35,000
Secretary (six months).................... =$10,000
-------------
Subtotal................................ $53,000
Fringe benefits @ 20% Total............... $63,000 $63,000
B. Consultant:
Computer Programmer (one month)........... $5,000 $5,000
C. Travel and Per Diem (To consult with
Federal Aid--Seattle, WA, to Washington,
D.C.:
Size of staff--One
Duration (days)--Three
Air Fare.............................. =$385
Per Diem.............................. =$240
Rental Car............................ =$75
-------------
Total............................... $700 $700
D. Equipment:
Diskette Storage Cabinet.................. =$1,300
Mainframe Computer Time (100 hrs. @ $50).. =$5,000
-------------
Total................................... $6,300 $6,300
E. Supplies:
[[Page 15825]]
Diskettes (3,500 @ $1.00)................. =$3,500
Printing (50 Manuals @ $20)............... =$1,000
-------------
Subtotal................................ $4,500 $4,500
------------
$79,500
F. Indirect Costs @ 12% (rate as established
by previous Federal audit)................... =$9,540 $9,540
============
Grand Total............................. $89,040 $89,040
Note: Cost of training sessions is being funded by other than Federal
Government sources.
[FR Doc. 96-8589 Filed 4-8-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-M
