[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 69 (Tuesday, April 9, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15769-15770]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-8684]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
[A-428-801]
Ball Bearings (Other Than Tapered Roller Bearings) and Parts
Thereof, From Germany; Final Results of New Shipper Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of final results of New Shipper Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: On February 8, 1996, the Department of Commerce (the
Department) issued preliminary results in the 1994-1995 new shipper
administrative review of the antidumping duty order on ball bearings
(other than tapered roller bearings) and parts thereof, from Germany
(ball bearings) (61 FR 4763). The review covers one manufacturer/
exporter of the subject merchandise to the United States. The period of
review is December 1, 1994 through May 31, 1995 (the POR).
We gave interested parties an opportunity to comment on our
preliminary results and no comments were received. Therefore, the final
results remain unchanged from the preliminary results. The final
weighted-average dumping margin for the reviewed firm is listed below
in the section entitled ``Final Results of Review.''
EFFECTIVE DATE: April 9, 1996.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas O. Barlow or Michael Rill,
Office of Antidumping Compliance, Import Administration, International
Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
4733.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The Applicable Statute and Regulations
Unless otherwise indicated, all citations to the statute are
references to the provisions effective January 1, 1995, the effective
date of the amendments made to the Tariff Act of 1930 (the Act) by the
Uruguay Round Agreements Act (URAA). In addition, unless otherwise
indicated, all citations to the Department's regulations are to the
current regulations, as amended by the interim regulations published in
the Federal Register on May 11, 1995 (60 FR 25130).
Background
On February 8, 1996, the Department issued preliminary results (61
FR 4763) of its new shipper review of the antidumping duty order on
ball bearings from Germany (54 FR 20900, May 15, 1989). The preliminary
results indicated that Miniaturkugellager GmbH (MKL) sold subject
merchandise at not less than normal value during the POR. We invited
parties to comment on the preliminary results.
The Department has now conducted this review in accordance with
section 751 of the Act and section 353.22 of its regulations.
Scope of the Review
Imports covered by this review are shipments of ball bearings and
parts thereof. These products include all antifriction bearings that
employ balls as the rolling element. Imports of these products are
classified under the following categories: antifriction balls, ball
bearings with integral shafts, ball bearings (including radial ball
bearings) and parts thereof, and housed or mounted ball bearing units
and parts thereof.
Imports of these products are classified under the following
Harmonized Tariff Schedules (HTS) subheadings: 3926.90.45, 4016.93.00,
4016.93.10, 4016.93.50, 6909.19.5010, 8431.20.00, 8431.39.0010,
8482.10.10,
[[Page 15770]]
8482.10.50, 8482.80.00, 8482.91.00, 8482.99.05, 8482.99.10, 8482.99.35,
8482.99.6590, 8482.99.70, 8483.20.40, 8483.20.80, 8483.50.8040,
8483.50.90, 8483.90.20, 8483.90.30, 8483.90.70, 8708.50.50, 8708.60.50,
8708.60.80, 8708.70.6060, 8708.70.8050, 8708.93.30, 8708.93.5000,
8708.93.6000, 8708.93.75, 8708.99.06, 8708.99.31, 8708.99.4960,
8708.99.50, 8708.99.5800, 8708.99.8080, 8803.10.00, 8803.20.00,
8803.30.00, 8803.90.30, 8803.90.90.
The size or precision grade of a bearing does not influence whether
the bearing is covered by the order. For a further discussion of the
scope of the order being reviewed, including recent scope
determinations, see Antifriction Bearings (Other Than Tapered Roller
Bearings) and Parts Thereof from France, et al.; Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Reviews, Partial Termination of
Administrative Reviews, and Revocation in Part of Antidumping Duty
Orders, 60 FR 10900 (February 28, 1995). The HTS item numbers are
provided for convenience and Customs purposes. The written descriptions
remain dispositive.
This review covers one producer/exporter. The POR is December 1,
1994 through May 31, 1995.
Final Results of the Review
We gave interested parties an opportunity to comment on our
preliminary results. We received no comments. The final results remain
unchanged from the preliminary results as the Department used the same
methodology described in the preliminary results. As a result of our
comparison of constructed export price (CEP) and normal value (NV), we
determine that the following weighted-average dumping margin exists:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Manufacturer/exporter Period Margin
------------------------------------------------------------------------
MKL...................................... 12/01/94-5/31/95 0.00
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The results of this review shall be the basis for the assessment of
antidumping duties on entries of merchandise covered by the
determination and for future deposits of estimated duties. The posting
of a bond or security in lieu of a cash deposit, pursuant to section
751(a)(2)(B)(iii) of the Act and section 353.22(h)(4) of the
Department's regulations, will no longer be permitted for this firm.
The Department will issue appraisement instructions directly to the
Customs Service.
Furthermore, the following deposit requirements will be effective
for all shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of these
final results of this administrative review, as provided by section
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for the reviewed
company will be zero percent; (2) for exporters not covered in this
review, but covered in previous reviews or the original less-than-fair-
value (LTFV) investigation, the cash deposit rate will continue to be
the company-specific rate published for the most recent period; (3) if
the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, previous reviews, or
the original LTFV investigation, but the manufacturer is, the cash
deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recent period
for the manufacturer of the merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate
for all other manufacturers or exporters will continue to be 68.89
percent, the ``All Others'' rate made effective by the final results of
review published on July 26, 1993 (see Final Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Reviews and Revocation in Part of an Antidumping
Duty Order, 58 FR 39729 (July 26, 1993)). This rate is the ``All
Others'' rate from the LTFV investigation.
These deposit requirements shall remain in effect until publication
of the final results of the next administrative review.
This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 353.26 to file a certificate regarding the
reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the
relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this
requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping duties.
This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective orders (APOs) of their responsibility
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 353.34(d)(1). Timely written notification
of the return/destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial
protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the
regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation.
This new shipper administrative review and notice are in accordance
with section 751(a)(2)(B) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(a)(2)(B)) and 19
CFR 353.22(h).
Dated: March 20, 1996.
Susan G. Esserman,
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. 96-8684 Filed 4-8-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P