97-9038. Application by Association of Waste Hazardous Materials Transporters for a Preemption Determination as to Houston, Texas, Requirements on the Storage, Use, Dispensing and Handling of Hazardous Materials  

  • [Federal Register Volume 62, Number 68 (Wednesday, April 9, 1997)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 17281-17283]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 97-9038]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    
    Research and Special Programs Administration
    [Docket No. PDA-15(R)]
    
    
    Application by Association of Waste Hazardous Materials 
    Transporters for a Preemption Determination as to Houston, Texas, 
    Requirements on the Storage, Use, Dispensing and Handling of Hazardous 
    Materials
    
    AGENCY: Research and Special Programs Administration (RSPA), DOT.
    
    ACTION: Public Notice Reopening Comment Period.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: RSPA is reopening the comment period on the application by the 
    Association of Waste Hazardous Materials Transporters (AWHMT) for an 
    administrative determination that Federal hazardous material 
    transportation law preempts certain provisions of the Fire Code of the 
    City of Houston, Texas (Houston Fire Code), relating to the storage, 
    use, dispensing, and handling of hazardous materials. In November 1996, 
    the Houston City Council amended the Houston Fire Code, including 
    provisions challenged in AWHMT's application. The comment period is 
    being reopened to allow interested parties the opportunity to comment 
    upon the amended requirements in the Houston Fire Code and the manner 
    in which these requirements are presently being applied and enforced.
    
    DATES: Comments received on or before May 27, 1997, and rebuttal 
    comments received on or before July 8, 1997, will be considered before 
    an administrative ruling is issued by RSPA's Associate Administrator 
    for Hazardous Materials Safety. Rebuttal comments may discuss only 
    those issues raised by comments received during the initial comment 
    period and may not discuss new issues.
    
    ADDRESSES: The application and all comments received may be reviewed in 
    the Dockets Unit, Research and Special Programs Administration, Room 
    8421, Nassif Building, 400 Seventh Street, SW, Washington, DC 20590-
    0001 (Tel. No. 202-366-4453). Comments and rebuttal comments on the 
    application may be submitted to the Dockets Unit at the above address, 
    and should include the Docket Number (PDA-15(R)). Three copies of each 
    should be submitted. In addition, a copy of each comment and each 
    rebuttal comment must also be sent to (1) Mr. Charles Dickhut, 
    Chairman, Association of Waste Hazardous Materials Transporters, 2200 
    Mill Road, Alexandria, VA 22314, and (2) Mr. Gene
    
    [[Page 17282]]
    
    L. Locke, City Attorney, City of Houston Legal Department, P.O. Box 
    1562, Houston, TX 77251. A certification that a copy has been sent to 
    these persons must also be included with the comment. (The following 
    format is suggested: ``I hereby certify that copies of this comment 
    have been sent to Messrs. Dickhut and Locke at the addresses specified 
    in the Federal Register.'')
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Frazer C. Hilder, Office of the Chief 
    Counsel, Research and Special Programs Administration, U.S. Department 
    of Transportation, Washington, DC 20590-0001 (Tel. No. 202-366-4400).
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    I. Background
    
        On March 20, 1996, RSPA published in the Federal Register, and 
    invited comments on, an application by AWHMT for an administrative 
    determination that Federal hazardous material transportation law 
    preempts certain provisions of the Houston Fire Code, as adopted May 
    15, 1995, in Ordinance No. 95-279. Public Notice and Invitation to 
    Comment, 61 FR 11463. The Houston Fire Code adopted in Ordinance No. 
    95-279 consisted of the Uniform Fire Code (1991 edition), as modified 
    in a ``Conversion Document.'' The specific provisions challenged by 
    AWHMT concerned the storage, use, dispensing, and handling of hazardous 
    materials.
        AWHMT separately provided copies of citations issued to operators 
    of cargo tank motor vehicles for loading or unloading corrosive 
    materials without the permit required by the Houston Fire Code. In its 
    application, AWHMT noted the exception in Sec. 80.101 of the Houston 
    Fire Code for ``[o]ff-site hazardous materials transportation in 
    accordance with DOT requirements,'' but stated that the Houston Fire 
    Department did not consider ``off-site'' transportation to include 
    loading, unloading, or storage incidental to transportation.
        According to comments submitted by the Texas Tank Truck Carriers 
    Association, Inc. (TTTC), the Houston Fire Department was applying the 
    Houston Fire Code's permit requirements to any vehicle transporting 
    hazardous materials (above threshold quantities) that was not 
    transiting the City of Houston (City) on a designated ``hazardous 
    material route.'' TTTC also stated that, in adopting Ordinance No. 95-
    279, the City had eliminated previous exemptions for: (a) Tank trucks 
    that operated within the City for no more than 30 days per year and 
    were in compliance with U.S. Department of Transportation requirements, 
    and (b) liquid petroleum gas trucks that possessed a valid ``Form 4 
    Card'' issued by the Texas Railroad Commission.
        In its initial May 1996 comments, the City stated that the Houston 
    Fire Department did not construe the Houston Fire Code adopted in 
    Ordinance No. 95-279 as applying to ``over-the-road (or off-site) 
    transportation of flammable and combustible liquids or hazardous 
    materials,'' but acknowledged that the Fire Department's practice had 
    been to regulate and require a permit for ``any tank vehicle 
    transporting those materials inside the city limits for more than 
    thirty days.'' The City further stated that the Houston Fire Department 
    intended to submit the 1994 edition of the Uniform Fire Code to the 
    Houston City Council for adoption and would:
    
    --Make clear that permit requirements would not apply to over-the-
    road (off-site) transportation of hazardous materials;
    --Propose the deletion of Sec. 79.1203(n) which required a tank 
    vehicle used for flammable or combustible liquids to be marked with 
    a serial number issued by the fire chief, ``FLAMMABLE'' and ``NO 
    SMOKING'' signs, and the company name or corporate symbol; and
    --Propose the deletion of Houston's modification of Sec. 79.1207 
    which required two fire extinguishers (rather than one) on a tank 
    vehicle used for flammable or combustible liquids.
    
        In a February 13, 1997 ``supplementary comment,'' the City provided 
    a certified copy of Ordinance No. 96-1249, approved by the Houston City 
    Council on November 26, 1996, which (among other matters) amended 
    Ordinance No. 95-279 to adopt the 1994 edition of the Uniform Fire Code 
    together with certain ``City of Houston Amendments.'' The City also 
    provided a three-page excerpt from Article 1 of the revised Houston 
    Fire Code in which exceptions to Secs. 106.8(f) and (h) (concerning 
    permit requirements for the storage, use, dispensing, and handling of 
    flammable and combustible liquids and hazardous materials) state that 
    ``A permit is not required for any activity where the requirement of 
    local permits is preempted by federal or state law.'' The City did not 
    otherwise explain the current status of the provisions challenged in 
    the AWHMT application (including those requirements that the City's May 
    1996 comments stated would be proposed for deletion) or discuss the 
    manner in which those provisions are currently applied and enforced. 
    The City did not provide other excerpts from (or a complete copy of) 
    the current Houston Fire Code.
        On March 17, 1997, AWHMT provided RSPA with a copy of TTTC's 
    Circular Letter No. 1224, dated February 21, 1997, in which TTTC 
    expressed the opinion that, because ``federal preemption in this area 
    prevails * * * bulk carriers will not be required to get hazardous 
    materials permits for bulk equipment under the Uniform Fire Code for 
    the City of Houston.'' TTTC stated that it was attempting to obtain 
    information from ``the legal division of the Houston City Council'' 
    regarding the City's interpretation of Ordinance No. 96-1249, and that 
    it was still seeking deletion of the marking requirements in Sec. 
    79.1203(n) and the two-fire extinguisher requirement in Sec. 79.1207. 
    TTTC also indicated that it had not yet obtained any parts of the 
    revised Houston Fire Code other than the same three-page excerpt that 
    the City included with its supplementary comment.
    
    II. Reopening of Comment Period
    
        The comment period on AWHMT's application is being reopened so that 
    interested parties may provide further information on the current 
    status of the challenged provisions in the Houston Fire Code and how 
    those provisions are being applied or enforced. Interested parties are 
    invited to submit comments on all issues relevant to whether 49 U.S.C. 
    5125 preempts provisions of the Houston Fire Code, including:
    
        (1) The current text of the provisions that AHWMT's application 
    asserted to be preempted by Federal hazardous material 
    transportation law (see 49 CFR 107.203(b)(2)), and clarification as 
    to which provisions challenged in AWHMT's application have been 
    eliminated by Ordinance No. 96-1249;
        (2) The manner in which the challenged provisions of the Houston 
    Fire Code are applied and enforced, including examples of any recent 
    enforcement actions taken by the Houston Fire Department;
        (3) Whether the Houston Fire Code (including permit and 
    inspection requirements) are currently being applied to operators of 
    vehicles transporting hazardous materials that:
        (a) Pick-up or deliver hazardous materials within the City;
        (b) Depart from a designated ``hazardous material route'' for 
    rest, fuel, food, or other purposes; or
        (c) Are operated within the City for no more than 30 calendar 
    days per year;
        (4) The scope and meaning of the exceptions in Secs. 79.101(a) 
    and 80.101(a) of the Houston Fire Code, including the City's 
    construction of ``transportation * * * in accordance with DOT 
    regulations'' in Sec. 79.101(a) and ``off-site transportation'' in 
    Sec. 80.101(a), and whether the exceptions in Secs. 79.101(a) and 
    80.101(a) apply to permit requirements set forth in Article 4 (or 
    elsewhere) in the Houston Fire Code; and
    
    [[Page 17283]]
    
        (5) Whether AWHMT's application raises issues concerning the 
    applicability of the Hazardous Materials Regulations, 49 CFR parts 
    171-180, that should be considered by RSPA (in addition to or 
    instead of action on AWHMT's application) in the rulemaking under 
    Docket No. HM-223, ``Applicability of the Hazardous Materials 
    Regulations to Loading, Unloading and Storage.'' See Advance Notice 
    of Proposed Rulemaking, 61 FR 39522 (July 29, 1996), and Notices of 
    Meeting, 61 FR 49723 (Sept. 23, 1996), 61 FR 53483 (Oct. 11, 1996).
    
        Persons intending to comment should review the standards and 
    procedures governing applications for preemption determinations, set 
    forth at 49 CFR 107.201-107.211.
    
        Issued in Washington, DC, on April 3, 1997.
    Alan I. Roberts,
    Associate Administrator for Hazardous Materials Safety.
    [FR Doc. 97-9038 Filed 4-8-97; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-60-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
04/09/1997
Department:
Research and Special Programs Administration
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Public Notice Reopening Comment Period.
Document Number:
97-9038
Dates:
Comments received on or before May 27, 1997, and rebuttal comments received on or before July 8, 1997, will be considered before an administrative ruling is issued by RSPA's Associate Administrator for Hazardous Materials Safety. Rebuttal comments may discuss only those issues raised by comments received during the initial comment period and may not discuss new issues.
Pages:
17281-17283 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. PDA-15(R)
PDF File:
97-9038.pdf