[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 68 (Wednesday, April 9, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17221-17223]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-9059]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. 50-269, 50-270, 50-287, 50-369, 50-370, 50-413 and 50-414]
Environmental Assessment and Finding of no Significant Impact;
Oconee Nuclear Station, Units 1, 2, and 3; Catawba Nuclear Station,
Units 1 and 2; McGuire Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) is
considering issuance of an exemption from certain requirements of its
regulations in Facility Operating Licenses issued to Duke Power
Company, et al. (the licensee). License Nos. DPR-38, DPR-47, and DPR-55
are for operation of the Oconee Nuclear Station, Units 1, 2, and 3,
located in Oconee County, South Carolina. License Nos. NPF-35 and NPF-
52 are for operation of the Catawba Nuclear Station located in York
County, South Carolina. License Nos. NPF-9 and NPF-17 are for operation
of the McGuire Nuclear Station located in Mecklenburg County, North
Carolina.
[[Page 17222]]
Environmental Assessment
Identification of Proposed Action
The proposed action is in accordance with the licensee's
application dated August 23, 1996, for exemption from certain
requirements of 10 CFR 73.55, ``Requirements for Physical Protection of
Licensed Activities in Nuclear Power Reactors Against Radiological
Sabotage.'' The exemption would allow implementation of a hand geometry
biometrics system to control site access at the Oconee, Catawba, and
McGuire nuclear stations so that photo identification badges may be
kept and taken offsite by individuals not employed by the licensee who
have been granted unescorted access into protected and vital areas.
The Need for the Proposed Action
Pursuant to 10 CFR 73.55, paragraph (a), Duke Power Company shall
establish and maintain an onsite physical protection system and
security organization. Regulation 10 CFR 73.55(d), ``Access
Requirements,'' paragraph (1), specifies that the ``licensee shall
control all points of personnel and vehicle access into a protected
area.'' Regulation 10 CFR 73.55(d)(5) specifies that, ``A numbered
picture badge identification system shall be used for all individuals
who are authorized access to protected areas without escort.''
Regulation 10 CFR 73.55(d)(5) also states that an individual not
employed by the licensee (i.e., contractors) may be authorized access
to protected areas without escort provided the individual ``receives a
picture badge upon entrance into the protected area which must be
returned upon exit from the protected area. * * * '' Currently,
unescorted access into protected areas at the Oconee, Catawba, and
McGuire nuclear stations is controlled through the use of a photograph
on a badge/keycard (hereafter referred to as a ``badge''), which is
stored at the access point when not in use. The security officers at
each entrance station use the photograph on the badge to visually
identify the individual requesting access. The badges for licensee
employees and contractor personnel who have been granted unescorted
access are given to the individuals at the entrance location upon entry
and are returned upon exit.
In accordance with 10 CFR 73.55(d)(5), contractor badges are not
allowed to be taken offsite.
The licensee proposes to implement an alternate unescorted access
control system that would eliminate the need to issue and retrieve
badges at the entry point and would allow all individuals with
unescorted access to keep their badges when departing the site.
An exemption from 10 CFR 73.55(d)(5) is required to permit
contractors to take their badges offsite instead of returning them when
exiting the site.
Environmental Impacts of the Proposed Action
The Commission has completed its evaluation of the licensee's
application. Under the proposed system, each individual who is
authorized unescorted access would have the physical characteristics of
his/her hand (i.e., hand geometry) registered with his/her badge number
in the access control system. When an individual enters the badge into
the card reader and places his/her hand on the measuring surface, the
system would record the individual's hand image. The unique
characteristics of the hand image would be compared with the previously
stored template to verify authorization for entry. Individuals,
including licensee employees and contractors, would be allowed to keep
their badges when departing the site.
A Sandia report, ``A Performance Evaluation of Biometric
Identification Devices,'' SAND91-0276-UC-906, Unlimited Release, June
1991, concluded that hand geometry equipment possesses strong
performance and high detection characteristics. Also, based on its own
experience with the current photo-identification system, the licensee
determined that the proposed hand geometry system would provide the
same level of assurance as the current system that access is only
granted to authorized individuals. Since both the badge and hand
geometry would be necessary for access into the protected areas, the
proposed system would provide a positive verification process.
Potential loss of a badge by an individual, as a result of taking the
badge offsite, would not enable unauthorized entry into protected
areas. The licensee has determined that the proposed hand geometry
access control process for identifying personnel will provide the same
high assurance objective regarding onsite physical protection as
provided by the photo-identification process now in use. The access
process will continue to be under the observation of security
personnel. A numbered picture badge identification system will continue
to be used for all individuals who are authorized access to protected
areas without escorts. Badges will continue to be displayed by all
individuals while inside the protected areas.
The licensee has stated it will implement a process for
periodically testing the proposed system to ensure continued overall
level of performance equivalent to that specified in the regulation.
The Physical Security Plan will be revised to include implementation
and testing of the hand geometry access control system and to allow
licensee employees and contractors to take their badges offsite.
Accordingly, the Commission concludes that this proposed action
would result in no significant radiological environmental impacts. With
regard to potential nonradiological impacts, the proposed action does
not affect non-radiological plant effluents and has no other
environmental impact. Therefore, the Commission concludes that there
are no significant nonradiological environmental impacts associated
with the proposed action.
Alternative to the Proposed Action
As an alternative to the proposed action, the staff considered
denial of the proposed action. Denial of the application would result
in no change in current environmental impacts. The environmental
impacts of the proposed action and the alternative action are similar.
Alternative Use of Resources
This action did not involve the use of any resources not previously
considered in the Final Environmental Statements related to operation
of the Oconee, Catawba, and McGuire nuclear stations.
Agencies and Persons Consulted
In accordance with its stated policy, on April 1 and April 4, 1997,
the staff consulted with the South Carolina and North Carolina State
officials, respectively, regarding the environmental impact of the
proposed action. The State officials had no comments.
Finding of No Significant Impact
The Commission has determined not to prepare an environmental
impact statement for the proposed exemption. Based upon the foregoing
environmental assessment, the Commission has concluded that the
proposed action will not have a significant effect on the quality of
the human environment.
For further details with respect to this action, see the request
for exemption dated August 23, 1996, which is available for public
inspection at the Commission's Public Document Room, The Gelman
Building, 2120 L Street, NW, Washington, DC and at the local public
document rooms located at the Oconee County Library, 501 West South
[[Page 17223]]
Broad Street, Walhalla, South Carolina for the Oconee Nuclear Station;
the York County Library, 138 East Black Street, Rock Hill, South
Carolina 29730 for the Catawba Nuclear Station; and the J. Murrey
Atkins Library, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, 9201
University City Boulevard, North Carolina 28223 for the McGuire Nuclear
Station.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 3rd day of April 1997.
For The Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Herbert N. Berkow,
Director, Project Directorate II-2, Division of Reactor Projects--I/II,
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 97-9059 Filed 4-8-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
