95-10501. Revision of Affidavits Under 37 CFR 1.131  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 83 (Monday, May 1, 1995)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 21043-21045]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-10501]
    
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
    
    Patent and Trademark Office
    
    37 CFR Part 1
    
    [Docket No. 950328079-5079-01]
    RIN 0651-AA67
    
    
    Revision of Affidavits Under 37 CFR 1.131
    
    AGENCY: Patent and Trademark Office, Commerce.
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The Patent and Trademark Office (Office) is amending the rules 
    of practice relating to submission of affidavits or declaration under 
    37 CFR 1.131(a) to implement the relevant provisions of the North 
    American Free Trade Agreement Act and the Uruguay Round Agreements Act, 
    respectively. The change will allow an inventor to show a completion of 
    the invention in this country or a NAFTA or WTO member country before 
    the filing of the application on which the U.S. patent issued or before 
    the date of the foreign patent, or before the date of the printed 
    publication.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: This final rule is effective May 31, 1995.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
    Hiram Bernstein by telephone at (703) 305-9285 or by mail addressed to 
    the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks, Washington, DC 20231 marked 
    to the attention of Mr. Bernstein, Office of the Deputy Assistant 
    Commissioner for Patent Policy and Programs, or by FAX to (703) 308-
    6916.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 331 of Public Law 103-182, 107 Stat. 
    2057 (1993), the North American Free Trade Agreement Act, implementing 
    the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), amended 35 U.S.C. 104 
    to provide that for the purpose of obtaining a patent, an applicant may 
    establish a date of invention in the United States, or in a NAFTA 
    member country (Canada and Mexico), which occurred after the date of 
    implementation (i.e., December 8, 1993). Section 531 of Public Law No. 
    103-465, 108 Stat. 4809 (1994), the Uruguay Round Agreements Act, 
    implementing the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), further 
    amended 35 U.S.C. 104 to provide that for purposes of obtaining a 
    patent, an applicant may establish a date of invention in the United 
    States, or in a World Trade Organization (WTO) member country other 
    than a NAFTA member country, that is no earlier than 12 months after 
    the date of entry into force of the WTO agreement (i.e., January 1, 
    1996).
        A notice of proposed rulemaking relating to Revision of Affidavits 
    Under 37 CFR 1.131 was published in the Federal Register, 59 FR 49876 
    (September 30, 1994), and in the Official Gazette, 1167 Off. Gaz. Pat. 
    Office 96 (October 25, 1994). No written comments were received in 
    response to this notice.
        The Office is amending 37 CFR 1.131(a), which is currently limited 
    to facts showing a completion of the invention in the United States, to 
    allow for a submission of facts in an affidavit or in a declaration 
    that shows a completion of the invention in a NAFTA or in a WTO member 
    country. The WTO is established under the GATT agreement to resolve 
    disputes between signatories to the agreement. The facts presented must 
    demonstrate a completion of the invention prior to the effective date 
    of a reference thought to prevent the grant of a patent or overturn the 
    patentability of a claim in a patent under reexamination.
        No substantive change has been made in 37 CFR 1.131(a)(1) relating 
    to a NAFTA or a WTO member country.
        After further review and consideration of the proposed rule, the 
    following modifications are made. [[Page 21044]] 
        First, ``person'' recited in 37 CFR 1.131(a)(1) in regard to 37 CFR 
    1.42, 1.43 and 1.47 is being changed to ``party'' as 37 CFR 1.47(b) 
    provides for corporate assignees to petition thereunder.
        Second, reference to 35 U.S.C. 102 (a) or (e) and 35 U.S.C. 103 has 
    been added to more clearly identify the rejections that can be overcome 
    (35 U.S.C. 102 (a), (b), (d) and (e) are the only sections that recite 
    the use of a domestic or foreign patent and a printed publication 
    referred to in 37 CFR 1.131 as capable of being overcome as 
    references--section (b) (35 U.S.C. 102(b)) is precluded by the terms of 
    37 CFR 1.131(a) and section (d) (35 U.S.C. 102(d) is applicant's own 
    invention, MPEP 715).
        Additionally, the Office recognizes that there is a potential 
    conflict between existing 37 CFR 1.131(a) and 37 CFR 1.602(a). Section 
    1.131(a) prohibits affidavits or declarations thereunder when the same 
    patentable invention, as defined in 37 CFR 1.601(n) (i.e., patentable 
    indistinct inventions), is claimed. An interference under 35 U.S.C. 
    135(a), rather than antedating under 37 CFR 1.131(a), is generally the 
    available remedy. However, 37 CFR 1.602(a) provides that when the 
    applications or the application and the patent are owned by a single 
    party, interferences are not declared or continued unless ``good 
    cause'' is shown. This can result in a hardship where there is an 
    issued patent that can no longer be amended as by filing a 
    continuation-in-part application. Where there are two or more pending 
    applications, the conflict can be avoided by filing a continuation-in-
    part application merging the conflicting inventions into a single 
    application.
        The Office proposed amending 37 CFR 1.131 to broaden its 
    application to a single party where claimed inventions in a pending 
    application or in a patent undergoing reexamination and a patent owned 
    by the party are patentably indistinct but not identical. Under the 
    proposed addition to 37 CFR 1.131, an affidavit or declaration could be 
    filed by a party to overcome a 35 U.S.C. 103 rejection based on a 35 
    U.S.C. 102 (a) or (e) patent owned by that party, where the patent 
    claimed an invention that was patentably indistinct, but not identical 
    to an invention claimed in an application or patent undergoing 
    reexamination.
        The proposed addition to 37 CFR 1.131 would not affect the use of 
    the issued patent in a rejection of the pending application or the 
    patent undergoing reexamination based on double patenting. A Rule 1.131 
    affidavit or declaration would continue to be inappropriate where a 
    claim in a pending application or a patent undergoing reexamination is 
    subject to a double patenting rejection under 35 U.S.C. 101 because the 
    pending application or the patent undergoing reexamination claims the 
    identical invention in the issued patent. However, where patentably 
    indistinct but not identical inventions are claimed, an obvious type 
    double patenting rejection can be avoided by filing an appropriate 
    terminal disclaimer. In addition, petitions under 37 CFR 1.183 would be 
    entertained for waiver of 37 CFR 1.131 requirements in appropriate 
    instances where two pending applications claiming patentable indistinct 
    but not identical inventions are held by a single party.
        Third, the basis for requiring under proposed 37 CFR 1.131(a)(3) 
    common ownership of the pending application or patent undergoing 
    reexamination and the patent at the time the later invention was made 
    rather than simply ownership by a single party as is used in 37 CFR 
    1.602(a). Also it is questioned whether the proposed 37 CFR 1.131(a)(3) 
    and existing 37 CFR 1.78 (c) and (d) were consistent or in-part 
    duplicative.
        In view of the third consideration regarding the proposed 37 CFR 
    1.131(a)(3) relating to the date of common ownership between a pending 
    application or a patent undergoing reexamination and an issued patent, 
    further study of the proposal is deemed warranted and the proposed 37 
    CFR 1.131(a)(3) is not being adopted at this time.
    
    Discussion of Specific Rules
    
        Section 1.131(a) as amended, contains paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2). 
    Previous paragraph (a) is now designated as (a)(1) and amended to allow 
    a 37 CFR 1.131 affiant or declarant to rely upon facts occurring in a 
    NAFTA member country or a WTO member country to show completion of the 
    invention. The term ``domestic'' is being changed to ``U.S.'' 
    References to 35 U.S.C. 102 (a) and (e) and 35 U.S.C. 103 as the 
    rejections to be overcome by the section have been added. The paragraph 
    is being amended from a single sentence to three sentences.
        Section 1.131(a)(2) is being added, as proposed, to provide that a 
    date of completion of the invention may not be established before 
    December 8, 1993, in a NAFTA country, or before January 1, 1996, in a 
    WTO Member country other than a NAFTA country.
    
    Other Considerations
    
        This rule change is in conformity with the requirements of the 
    Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq., Executive Order 
    12612, and the Paperwork Reduction Act at 1980, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. 
    It has been determined that the rule changes are not significant for 
    the purposes of Executive Order 12866.
        The Assistant General Counsel for Legislation and Regulation of the 
    Department of Commerce has certified to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy, 
    Small Business Administration, that this rule change will not have a 
    significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities, 
    Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 605(b), because the rule would 
    affect only a small number of applications and would provide a 
    streamlined and simplified procedure, eliminating the need for 
    requesting waiver of the rules.
        The Patent and Trademark Office has also determined that this 
    notice has no Federalism implications affecting the relationship 
    between the National Government and the States outlined in Executive 
    Order 12612.
        This rule change will not impose any additional burden under the 
    Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., since no 
    record keeping or reporting requirements within the coverage of the Act 
    are placed upon the public.
    
    List of Subjects in 37 CFR Part 1
    
        Administrative practice and procedure, Inventions and patents, 
    Lawyers, Reporting and record keeping requirements.
    
        For the reasons set forth in the preamble, and pursuant to the 
    authority granted to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks by 35 
    U.S.C. 6, Part 1 of Title 37 of the Code of Federal Regulations is 
    amended as set forth below:
    
    PART 1--RULES OF PRACTICE IN PATENT CASES
    
        1. The authority citation for 37 CFR Part 1, continues to read as 
    follows:
    
        Authority: 35 U.S.C. 6, unless otherwise noted.
    
        2. Section 1.131 is amended by revising paragraph (a) to read as 
    follows:
    
    
    Sec. 1.131  Affidavit or declaration of prior invention to overcome 
    cited patent or publication.
    
        (a)(1) When any claim of an application or a patent under 
    reexamination is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102 (a) or (e), or 35 U.S.C. 
    103 based on a U.S. patent to another which [[Page 21045]] is prior art 
    under 35 U.S.C. 102 (a) or (e) and which substantially shows or 
    describes but does not claim the same patentable invention, as defined 
    in 37 CFR 1.601(n), or on reference to a foreign patent or to a printed 
    publication, the inventor of the subject matter of the rejected claim, 
    the owner of the patent under reexamination, or the party qualified 
    under 37 CFR 1.42, 1.43 or 1.47, may submit an appropriate oath or 
    declaration to overcome the patent or publication. The oath or 
    declaration must include facts showing a completion of the invention in 
    this country or in a NAFTA or WTO member country before the filing date 
    of the application on which the U.S. patent issued, or before the date 
    of the foreign patent, or before the date of the printed publication. 
    When an appropriate oath or declaration is made, the patent or 
    publication cited shall not bar the grant of a patent to the inventor 
    or the confirmation of the patentability of the claims of the patent, 
    unless the date of such patent or printed publication is more than one 
    year prior to the date on which the inventor's or patent owner's 
    application was filed in this country.
        (2) A date of completion of the invention may not be established 
    under this section before December 8, 1993, in a NAFTA country, or 
    before January 1, 1996, in a WTO Member country other than a NAFTA 
    country.
    * * * * *
        Dated: March 21, 1995.
    Bruce A. Lehman,
    Assistant Secretary of Commerce and Commissioner of Patents and 
    Trademarks.
    [FR Doc. 95-10501 Filed 4-28-95; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 3510-16-M
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
5/31/1995
Published:
05/01/1995
Department:
Patent and Trademark Office
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
95-10501
Dates:
This final rule is effective May 31, 1995.
Pages:
21043-21045 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 950328079-5079-01
RINs:
0651-AA67
PDF File:
95-10501.pdf
CFR: (1)
37 CFR 1.131