95-10594. Airworthiness Directives; AlliedSignal Engines LTS101 Series Turboshaft Engines Installed on Eurocopter France Model AS-350D and SA- 366G1 Helicopters  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 83 (Monday, May 1, 1995)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Pages 21053-21054]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-10594]
    
    
    
    ========================================================================
    Proposed Rules
                                                    Federal Register
    ________________________________________________________________________
    
    This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of 
    the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these 
    notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in 
    the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
    
    ========================================================================
    
    
    Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 83 / Monday, May 1, 1995 / Proposed 
    Rules
    [[Page 21053]]
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    
    Federal Aviation Administration
    
    14 CFR Part 39
    
    [Docket No. 95-ANE-21]
    
    
    Airworthiness Directives; AlliedSignal Engines LTS101 Series 
    Turboshaft Engines Installed on Eurocopter France Model AS-350D and SA-
    366G1 Helicopters
    
    AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This document proposes the adoption of a new airworthiness 
    directive (AD), applicable to AlliedSignal Engines (formerly Textron 
    Lycoming) LTS101 series turboshaft engines installed on Eurocopter 
    France (formerly Aerospatiale) Model AS-350D and SA-366G1 helicopters. 
    This proposal would require incorporation of design modifications to 
    the power turbine (PT) rotor. This proposal is prompted by reports of 
    PT disk failures after No. 3 bearing failures. The actions specified by 
    the proposed AD are intended to prevent an uncontained engine failure 
    due to a PT disk failure.
    
    DATES: Comments must be received by June 30, 1995.
    
    ADDRESSES: Submit comments in triplicate to the Federal Aviation 
    Administration (FAA), New England Region, Office of the Assistant Chief 
    Counsel, Attention: Rules Docket No. 95-ANE-21, 12 New England 
    Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803-5299. Comments may be inspected at 
    this location between 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, 
    except Federal holidays.
        The service information referenced in the proposed rule may be 
    obtained from AlliedSignal Engines, 550 Main Street, Stratford, CT 
    06497. This information may be examined at the FAA, New England Region, 
    Office of the Assistant Chief Counsel, 12 New England Executive Park, 
    Burlington, MA.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eugene Triozzi, Aerospace Engineer, 
    Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine and Propeller Directorate, 12 
    New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803-5299; telephone (617) 
    238-7148, fax (617) 238-7199.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Comments Invited
    
        Interested persons are invited to participate in the making of the 
    proposed rule by submitting such written data, views, or arguments as 
    they may desire. Communications should identify the Rules Docket number 
    and be submitted in triplicate to the address specified above. All 
    communications received on or before the closing date for comments, 
    specified above, will be considered before taking action on the 
    proposed rule. The proposals contained in this notice may be changed in 
    light of the comments received.
        Comments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory, 
    economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed rule. All 
    comments submitted will be available, both before and after the closing 
    date for comments, in the Rules Docket for examination by interested 
    persons. A report summarizing each FAA-public contact concerned with 
    the substance of this proposal will be filed in the Rules Docket.
        Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments 
    submitted in response to this notice must submit a self-addressed, 
    stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments 
    to Docket Number 95-ANE-21.'' The postcard will be date stamped and 
    returned to the commenter.
    
    Availability of NPRMs
    
        Any person may obtain a copy of this NPRM by submitting a request 
    to the FAA, New England Region, Office of the Assistant Chief Counsel, 
    Attention: Rules Docket No. 95-ANE-21, 12 New England Executive Park, 
    Burlington, MA 01803-5299.
    
    Discussion
    
        The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has received reports of 
    three uncontained power turbine (PT) disk failures on AlliedSignal 
    Engines (formerly Textron Lycoming) LTS101 series turboshaft engines. 
    These PT disk failures were caused by No. 3 bearing failures, resulting 
    in loss of rotor axial location, aft movement of the PT rotor, and PT 
    shaft disengagement from the gear train drive, subsequently unloading 
    the PT and causing rotor overspeed. The disengagement further rendered 
    the gear train drive overspeed control inoperative; therefore, the PT 
    overspeed progressed until disk failure. This condition, if not 
    corrected, could result in an uncontained engine failure due to a PT 
    disk failure.
        On October 28, 1994, AlliedSignal Inc. purchased the turbine engine 
    product line of Textron Lycoming.
        The FAA has reviewed and approved the technical contents of Textron 
    Lycoming Service Bulletin (SB) No. LTS101A-72-50-0134, Revision 1, 
    dated June 17, 1991, and SB No. LTS101B-72-50-0128, Revision 1, dated 
    June 17, 1991, that describe procedures for incorporation of design 
    modifications to the PT to enhance rotor retention in the event of No. 
    3 bearing failure.
        At the present time, this proposed airworthiness directive (AD) 
    would require only the PT rotor retention modifications for 
    AlliedSignal Engines Model LTS101-600A2, -600A3, and -750B2 engines. 
    AlliedSignal Engines and several airframe manufacturers have developed 
    electronic overspeed system (EOS) modifications for other models of the 
    AlliedSignal Engines LTS101 series turboshaft engines. These other 
    modifications address additional disk failures precipitated by No. 4 
    bearing failure, which in two cases led to power pinion gear failure 
    and PT shaft disengagement from the power train without loss of rotor 
    axial location, overspeed, and loss of PT overspeed protection. In 
    separate rulemaking, the FAA will require these EOS modifications for 
    these other models. Airworthiness directive 88-14-01, applicable to all 
    Textron Lycoming LTS101 engines, requires repetitive inspections and 
    monitoring of the lubrication system to prevent PT rotor disk failures 
    due to failure of either No. 3 or No. 4 bearings. Performing the PT 
    rotor and EOS modifications on these other models would constitute 
    terminating action for the inspections and monitoring required by AD 
    88-14- [[Page 21054]] 01. The FAA has requested that AlliedSignal 
    Engines and Eurocopter France develop EOS modifications for the 
    AlliedSignal Engines LTS101 models addressed in this proposed AD. When 
    these modifications are available, the FAA will require these 
    modifications in future rulemaking that would constitute terminating 
    action to the inspection and monitoring requirements of AD 88-14-01.
        Since an unsafe condition has been identified that is likely to 
    exist or develop on other products of this same type design, the 
    proposed AD would require incorporation of a modified PT rotor 
    retention system at the next shop visit after the effective date of 
    this AD, but not later than April 30, 1996. The FAA has determined that 
    by that date affected engines would have at least one scheduled shop 
    visit to incorporate modifications. The actions would be required to be 
    accomplished in accordance with the service bulletins described 
    previously.
        The FAA estimates that 20 engines installed on aircraft of U.S. 
    registry would be affected by this proposed AD, that it would take 
    approximately 10 work hours per engine to accomplish the proposed 
    actions, and that the average labor rate is $60 per work hour. Required 
    parts would cost approximately $44,400 engine. Based on these figures, 
    the total cost impact of the proposed AD on U.S. operators is estimated 
    to be $900,000.
        The regulations proposed herein would not have substantial direct 
    effects on the States, on the relationship between the national 
    government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
    responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in 
    accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this 
    proposal would not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant 
    the preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
        For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this proposed 
    regulation (1) Is not a ``major rule'' under Executive Order 12291; (2) 
    is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies and 
    Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) if promulgated, 
    will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a 
    substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the 
    Regulatory Flexibility Act. A copy of the draft regulatory evaluation 
    prepared for this action is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it 
    may be obtained by contacting the Rules Docket at the location provided 
    under the caption ADDRESSES.
    
    List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
    
        Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
    
    The Proposed Amendment
    
        Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the 
    Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration proposes to amend 
    part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as 
    follows:
    
    PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
    
        1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 49 U.S.C. App. 1354(a), 1421 and 1423; 49 U.S.C. 
    106(g); and 14 CFR 11.89.
    
    
    Sec. 39.13  [Amended]
    
        2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new 
    airworthiness directive:
    
    AlliedSignal Engines: Docket No. 95-ANE-21.
    
        Applicability: AlliedSignal Engines (formerly Textron Lycoming) 
    Models LTS101-600A2 and -600A3 turboshaft engines installed on 
    Eurocopter France (formerly Aerospatiale) Model AS-350D helicopters; 
    and LTS101-750B2 turboshaft engines installed on Eurocopter France 
    Model SA-366G1 helicopters.
    
        Note: This AD applies to each engine identified in the preceding 
    applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been modified, 
    altered, or repaired in the area subject to the requirements of this 
    AD. For engines that have been modified, altered, or repaired so 
    that the performance of the requirements of this AD is affected, the 
    owner/operator must use the authority provided in paragraph (b) to 
    request approval from the FAA. This approval may address either no 
    action, if the current configuration eliminates the unsafe 
    condition, or different actions necessary to address the unsafe 
    condition described in this AD. Such a request should include an 
    assessment of the effect of the changed configuration on the unsafe 
    condition addressed by this AD. In no case does the presence of any 
    modification, alteration, or repair remove any engine from the 
    applicability of this AD.
        Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished 
    previously.
        To prevent an uncontained engine failure due to power turbine 
    (PT) disk failure, accomplish the following:
        (a) Incorporate improved PT rotor retention system modifications 
    in accordance with Textron Lycoming Service Bulletin (SB) No. 
    LTS101A-72-50-0134, Revision 1, dated June 17, 1991, or SB No. 
    LTS101B-72-50-0128, Revision 1, dated June 17, 1991, as applicable, 
    at the next shop visit after the effective date of this 
    airworthiness directive (AD) when the PT rotor is removed, but not 
    later than April 30, 1996.
        (b) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the 
    compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be 
    used if approved by the Manager, Engine Certification Office. The 
    request should be forwarded through an appropriate FAA Maintenance 
    Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the Manager, 
    Engine Certification Office.
    
        Note: Information concerning the existence of approved 
    alternative methods of compliance with this airworthiness directive, 
    if any, may be obtained from the Engine Certification Office.
    
        (c) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with 
    Secs. 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 
    21.197 and 21.199) to operate the aircraft to a location where the 
    requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
    
        Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on April 17, 1995.
    James C. Jones,
    Acting Manager, Engine and Propeller Directorate, Aircraft 
    Certification Service.
    [FR Doc. 95-10594 Filed 4-28-95; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
    
    

Document Information

Published:
05/01/1995
Department:
Federal Aviation Administration
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
Document Number:
95-10594
Dates:
Comments must be received by June 30, 1995.
Pages:
21053-21054 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 95-ANE-21
PDF File:
95-10594.pdf
CFR: (1)
14 CFR 39.13