95-10641. Receipt of Petition for Decision That Nonconforming 1984 and 1985 Rolls Royce Camargue Passenger Cars Are Eligible for Importation  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 83 (Monday, May 1, 1995)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 21236-21238]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-10641]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    [Docket No. 95-29; Notice 1]
    
    
    Receipt of Petition for Decision That Nonconforming 1984 and 1985 
    Rolls Royce Camargue Passenger Cars Are Eligible for Importation
    
    AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, DOT
    
    ACTION: Notice of receipt of petition for decision that nonconforming 
    1984 and 1985 Rolls Royce Camargue passenger cars are eligible for 
    importation.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This notice announces receipt by the National Highway Traffic 
    Safety Administration (NHTSA) of a petition for a decision that 1984 
    and 1985 Rolls Royce Camargues that were not originally manufactured to 
    comply with all applicable Federal motor vehicle safety standards are 
    eligible for importation into the United States because (1) They are 
    substantially similar to vehicles that were originally manufactured for 
    importation into and sale in the United States and that were certified 
    by their manufacturer as complying with the safety standards, and (2) 
    they are capable of being readily altered to conform to the standards.
    
    [[Page 21237]] DATES: The closing date for comments on the petition is 
    May 31, 1995.
    
    ADDRESSES: Comments should refer to the docket number and notice 
    number, and be submitted to: Docket Section, Room 5109, National 
    Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 400 Seventh St., SW., 
    Washington, DC 20590. [Docket hours are from 9:30 am to 4 pm].
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: George Entwistle, Office of Vehicle 
    Safety Compliance, NHTSA (202-366-5306).
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Background
    
        Under 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(A) (formerly section 108(c)(3)(A)(i)(I) 
    of the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act (the Act)), a 
    motor vehicle that was not originally manufactured to conform to all 
    applicable Federal motor vehicle safety standards shall be refused 
    admission into the United States unless NHTSA has decided that the 
    motor vehicle is substantially similar to a motor vehicle originally 
    manufactured for importation into and sale in the United States, 
    certified under 49 U.S.C. 30115 (formerly section 114 of the Act), and 
    of the same model year as the model of the motor vehicle to be 
    compared, and is capable of being readily altered to conform to all 
    applicable Federal motor vehicle safety standards.
        Petitions for eligibility decisions may be submitted by either 
    manufacturers or importers who have registered with NHTSA pursuant to 
    49 CFR part 592. As specified in 49 CFR 593.7, NHTSA publishes notice 
    in the Federal Register of each petition that it receives, and affords 
    interested persons an opportunity to comment on the petition. At the 
    close of the comment period, NHTSA decides, on the basis of the 
    petition and any comments that it has received, whether the vehicle is 
    eligible for importation. The agency then publishes this decision in 
    the Federal Register.
        G&K Automotive Conversion, Inc. of Santa Ana, California (``G&K'') 
    (Registered Importer 90-007) has petitioned NHTSA to decide whether 
    1984 and 1985 Rolls Royce Camargue passenger cars are eligible for 
    importation into the United States. The vehicles which G&K believes are 
    substantially similar are the 1984 and 1985 Rolls Royce Camargues that 
    were manufactured for importation into, and sale in, the United States 
    and certified by its manufacturer, Rolls Royce Motors, Ltd., as 
    conforming to all applicable Federal motor vehicle safety standards.
        The petitioner claims that it carefully compared the non-U.S. 
    certified 1984 and 1985 Rolls Royce Camargues to their U.S. certified 
    counterparts, and found the vehicles to be substantially similar with 
    respect to compliance with most Federal motor vehicle safety standards.
        G&K submitted information with its petition intended to demonstrate 
    that the non-U.S. certified 1984 and 1985 Rolls Royce Camargues, as 
    originally manufactured, conform to many Federal motor vehicle safety 
    standards in the same manner as their U.S. certified counterparts, or 
    are capable of being readily altered to conform to those standards.
        Specifically, the petitioner claims that the non-U.S. certified 
    1984 and 1985 Rolls Royce Camargues are identical to their U.S. 
    certified counterparts with respect to compliance with Standard Nos. 
    102 Transmission Shift Lever Sequence * * *., 103 Defrosting and 
    Defogging Systems, 104 Windshield Wiping and Washing Systems, 105 
    Hydraulic Brake Systems, 106 Brake Hoses, 107 Reflecting Surfaces, 109 
    New Pneumatic Tires, 113 Hood Latch Systems, 124 Accelerator Control 
    Systems, 201 Occupant Protection in Interior Impact, 202 Head 
    Restraints, 203 Impact Protection for the Driver From the Steering 
    Control System, 204 Steering Control Rearward Displacement, 205 Glazing 
    Materials, 206 Door Locks and Door Retention Components, 207 Seating 
    Systems, 209 Seat Belt Assemblies, 210 Seat Belt Assembly Anchorages, 
    211 Wheel Nuts, Wheel Discs and Hubcaps, 212 Windshield Retention, 216 
    Roof Crush Resistance, 219 Windshield Zone Intrusion, and 302 
    Flammability of Interior Materials.
        Petitioner also contends that the vehicle is capable of being 
    readily altered to meet the following standards, in the manner 
    indicated:
        Standard No. 101 Controls and Displays: (a) Substitution of a lens 
    marked ``Brake'' for a lens with an ECE symbol on the brake failure 
    indicator lamp; (b) installation of a seat belt warning lamp; (c) 
    recalibration of the speedometer/odometer from kilometers to miles per 
    hour.
        Standard No. 108 Lamps, Reflective Devices and Associated 
    Equipment: (a) Installation of U.S.- model headlamps and yellow 
    illuminated sidemarkers; (b) installation of U.S.- model taillamp 
    lenses which incorporate sidemarkers.
        Standard No. 110 Tire Selection and Rims: installation of a tire 
    information placard.
        Standard No. 111 Rearview Mirror: Replacement of the passenger side 
    rearview mirror with a U.S.-model component.
        Standard No. 114 Theft Protection: Installation of a warning buzzer 
    microswitch and a warning buzzer in the steering assembly.
        Standard No. 115 Vehicle Identification Number: Installation of a 
    VIN plate that can be read from outside the left windshield pillar, and 
    a VIN reference label on the edge of the door or latch post nearest the 
    driver.
        Standard No. 116 Brake Fluid: Molding the required statement into 
    the brake fluid reservoir cap.
        Standard No. 118 Power Window Systems: Rewiring of the power window 
    system so that the window transport is inoperative when the ignition is 
    switched off.
        Standard No. 208 Occupant Crash Protection: Installation of a seat 
    belt warning buzzer. The petitioner states that Type 2 seat belts are 
    installed in the vehicle's front and rear outboard seating positions, 
    and that a Type 1 seat belt is installed in the vehicles rear center 
    seating position.
        Standard No. 214 Side Impact Protection: Installation of 
    reinforcing beams.
        Standard No. 301 Fuel System Integrity: Installation of a rollover 
    valve in the fuel tank vent line between the fuel tank and the 
    evaporative emissions collection canister.
        Additionally, the petitioner states that the bumpers on the non-
    U.S. certified 1984 and 1985 Rolls Royce Camargues must be reinforced 
    to comply with the Bumper Standard found in 49 CFR part 581.
        Interested persons are invited to submit comments on the petition 
    described above. Comments should refer to the docket number and be 
    submitted to: Docket Section, National Highway Traffic Safety 
    Administration, Room 5109, 400 Seventh Street SW., Washington, DC 
    20590. It is requested but not required that 10 copies be submitted.
        All comments received before the close of business on the closing 
    date indicated above will be considered, and will be available for 
    examination in the docket at the above address both before and after 
    that date. To the extent possible, comments filed after the closing 
    date will also be considered. Notice of final action on the petition 
    will be published in the Federal Register pursuant to the authority 
    indicated below.
    
        Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(A) and (b)(1); 49 CFR 593.8; 
    delegations of authority at 49 CFR 1.50 and 501.8.
    
        [[Page 21238]] Issued on: April 26, 1995.
    Marilynne E. Jacobs,
    Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
    [FR Doc. 95-10641 Filed 4-28-95; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-59-P
    
    

Document Information

Published:
05/01/1995
Department:
Transportation Department
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Notice of receipt of petition for decision that nonconforming 1984 and 1985 Rolls Royce Camargue passenger cars are eligible for importation.
Document Number:
95-10641
Dates:
The closing date for comments on the petition is May 31, 1995.
Pages:
21236-21238 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 95-29, Notice 1
PDF File:
95-10641.pdf