96-10165. 37.0-38.6 GHz and 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands and Implementation of Section 309(j) of the Communications ActCompetitive Bidding  

  • [Federal Register Volume 61, Number 85 (Wednesday, May 1, 1996)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Page 19236]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 96-10165]
    
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
    
    47 CFR Parts 1, 2, 21 and 94
    
    [ET Docket No. 95-183; PP Docket No. 93-253; DA 96-455]
    
    
    37.0-38.6 GHz and 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands and Implementation of 
    Section 309(j) of the Communications Act--Competitive Bidding
    
    AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.
    
    ACTION: Proposed rule; denial of request for extension of time.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The Commission denies an extension of time for filing reply 
    comments in this proceeding on licensing and technical rules for fixed 
    point-to-point microwave operations in the 37.0-38.6 GHz and 38.6-40.0 
    GHz bands. This action is taken because the filing dates were 
    previously extended and it is the Commission's policy that extensions 
    of time not be routinely granted. The intended effect of this action is 
    to expedite the resolution of the issues raised in this proceeding.
    
    DATES: Reply comments were due on April 1, 1996.
    
    ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, 1919 M Street N.W., 
    Washington, D.C. 20554.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Freda Lippert Thyden, Wireless 
    Telecommunications Bureau, (202) 418-0627.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission's Order, 
    DA 96-455, adopted March 28, 1996 and released March 28, 1996. The 
    complete text of this document is available for inspection and copying 
    during normal business hours in the FCC Reference Center (Room 239), 
    1919 M Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20554, and may be purchased from 
    the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, 
    (202) 857-3800, 2100 M Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20037.
        By this action, we deny a third extension of time in which to file 
    reply comments in this proceeding. (61 FR 2465, January 26, 1996). 
    Bachow and Associates, Inc. (``Bachow''), requested that the time for 
    filing reply comments in this proceeding be extended from April 1, 1996 
    to April 22, 1996.
        By way of background, on January 16, 1996, the Commission's Office 
    of Engineering Technology, on its own motion, extended the initial 
    comment and reply comment period in the above-captioned proceeding from 
    January 16, 1996, and January 31, 1996, respectively, to February 12, 
    1996, and February 27, 1996, respectively. On February 9, 1996, the 
    Private Wireless Division further extended the deadline for filing 
    comments and replies to March 4, 1996, and April 1, 1996, respectively, 
    at the request of Winstar Wireless Fiber Corporation, GHz Equipment 
    Company, Inc., and the Fixed Point-to-Point Communications Section, 
    Network Equipment Division of the Telecommunications Industry 
    Association (61 FR 6809, February 22, 1996).
        Bachow contends that the volume of comments, the number and 
    complexity of the issues involved and the initial delay in availability 
    of filed comments necessitate an extension of three weeks for the 
    filing of replies. We disagree. The facts of this case do not warrant 
    what, in essence, would be a third extension of the filing period. It 
    is the policy of the Commission that extensions of time not be 
    routinely granted. Upon granting the last extension, the public was 
    fully apprised of our increasing concern over the delay in this 
    proceeding. In requesting additional time, Bachow has failed to cite 
    any convincing reason for again postponing the deadline for filing 
    reply comments.
    
    Ordering Clauses
    
        Accordingly, it is hereby ordered that the Motion for Extension of 
    Time to File Reply Comments filed by Bachow and Associates, Inc., on 
    March 25, 1996 is denied.
        This action is taken pursuant to the authority provided in Section 
    1.46 of the Commission's Rules.
    
    Federal Communications Commission.
    Robert H. McNamara,
    Chief, Private Wireless Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau.
    [FR Doc. 96-10165 Filed 4-30-96; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
    
    

Document Information

Published:
05/01/1996
Department:
Federal Communications Commission
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Proposed rule; denial of request for extension of time.
Document Number:
96-10165
Dates:
Reply comments were due on April 1, 1996.
Pages:
19236-19236 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
ET Docket No. 95-183, PP Docket No. 93-253, DA 96-455
PDF File:
96-10165.pdf
CFR: (4)
47 CFR 1
47 CFR 2
47 CFR 21
47 CFR 94