[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 84 (Thursday, May 1, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 23800]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-11243]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD
Opportunity To File Amicus Briefs in Swentek v. Office of
Personnel Management, MSPB Docket No. DC-831E-94-0584-A-1
AGENCY: Merit Systems Protection Board.
ACTION: The Merit Systems Protection Board is providing interested
parties with an opportunity to submit amicus briefs on whether the
Board may grant attorney fees to prevailing appellants under two new
criteria proposed by the appellant in Swentek v. Office of Personnel
Management, MSPB Docket No. DC-831E-94-0584-A-1.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The appellant in Swentek v. Office of Personnel Management,
MSPB Docket No. DC-831E-94-0584-A-1, filed a Board appeal of the
reconsideration decision of the Office of Personnel Management (OPM)
dismissing his application for a disability retirement annuity as
untimely filed. The apparently mentally incompetent appellant was
represented by pro bono counsel obtained for him under French v. Office
of Personnel Management, 810 F.2d 1118, 1120 (Fed. Cir. 1987), reh'g
denied, 823 F.2d 489 (Fed. Cir. 1987). The Board reversed OPM's
reconsideration decision, finding that the filing deadline should be
waived because of the appellant's mental incompetence during the filing
period.
In his pending attorney fees motion, the appellant has argued that
attorney fees are warranted in the interest of justice under 5 U.S.C.
Sec. 7701(g)(1). He has proposed two criteria for awarding fees in
addition to those set forth in Allen v. U.S. Postal Service, 2 M.S.P.R.
420, 434-35 (1980). He describes those two criteria as follows:
1. Where the appellant presented to OPM some evidence of mental
incompetence and OPM failed to pursue the matter by undertaking
prehearing discovery and did not actively contest the claim of mental
incompetence at the Board hearing; and
2. Where the evidence of current mental incompetence persuaded the
Board to seek counsel for the appellant. See French, 810 F.2d at 1120;
French v. Office of Personnel Management, 37 M.S.P.R. 496, 499 (1988).
The Board is inviting interested parties to submit amicus briefs
addressing whether the Board may grant fees under these criteria.
DATES: All briefs in response to this notice shall be filed with the
Clerk of the Board on or before May 30, 1997.
ADDRESSES: All briefs shall include the case name and docket number
noted above (Swentek v. Office of Personnel Management, MSPB Docket No.
DC-831E-94-0584-A-1) and be entitled ``Amicus Brief.'' Briefs should be
filed with the Office of the Clerk, Merit Systems Protection Board,
1120 Vermont Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20419.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Shannon McCarthy, Deputy Clerk of the Board, or Matthew Shannon,
Counsel to the Clerk, (202) 653-7200.
Dated: April 25, 1997.
Robert E. Taylor,
Clerk of the Board.
[FR Doc. 97-11243 Filed 4-30-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7400-01-M