97-11294. Southern California Edison Company; Notice of Consideration of Issuance of Amendment to Facility Operating Licenses, Proposed No Significant Hazards Consideration Determination, and Opportunity for a Hearing  

  • [Federal Register Volume 62, Number 84 (Thursday, May 1, 1997)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 23811-23812]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 97-11294]
    
    
    
    [[Page 23811]]
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
    
    [Docket Nos. 50-361 and 50-362]
    
    
    Southern California Edison Company; Notice of Consideration of 
    Issuance of Amendment to Facility Operating Licenses, Proposed No 
    Significant Hazards Consideration Determination, and Opportunity for a 
    Hearing
    
        The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) is 
    considering issuance of an amendment to Facility Operating License Nos. 
    NPF-10 and NPF-15, issued to Southern California Edison Company (the 
    licensee) for operation of the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 
    (SONGS), Unit Nos. 2 and 3, located in San Diego County, California.
        The proposed amendment would revise Surveillance Requirement (SR) 
    3.8.1.8 and applicable Bases to Technical Specification (TS) 3.8.1, 
    ``AC Sources--Operating.'' This change will allow credit for overlap 
    testing for performance of SR 3.8.1.8.
        The exigent circumstances for this TS amendment request exists 
    because it is needed by mid-May 1997 to avoid an unnecessary challenge 
    to safety systems by performing an actual transfer of the safety-
    related buses of the operating unit to the unit auxiliary transformer 
    of the shutdown unit. This TS amendment will permit preventive 
    maintenance on the SONGS Unit 3 reserve auxiliary transformers and 
    associated hardware during this unit's ongoing refueling outage. 
    Performance of preventive maintenance on these transformers during the 
    current outage will maintain these components in optimum operational 
    condition.
        Before issuance of the proposed license amendment, the Commission 
    will have made findings required by the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as 
    amended (the Act) and the Commission's regulations.
        Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.91(a)(6) for amendments to be granted under 
    exigent circumstances, the NRC staff must determine that the amendment 
    request involves no significant hazards consideration. Under the 
    Commission's regulations in 10 CFR 50.92, this means that operation of 
    the facility in accordance with the proposed amendment would not (1) 
    involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an 
    accident previously evaluated; or (2) create the possibility of a new 
    or different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated; 
    or (3) involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety. As 
    required by 10 CFR 50.91(a), the licensee has provided its analysis of 
    the issue of no significant hazards consideration, which is presented 
    below:
    
        1. The proposed change does not involve a significant increase 
    in the probability or consequences of any accident previously 
    evaluated.
        The proposed change has no impact on any previously evaluated 
    accident. It allows overlapping testing to assure operation of 
    different AC power source alignments which have been previously 
    evaluated.
        Therefore, the proposed change will not involve a significant 
    increase in the probability or consequences of any accident 
    previously evaluated.
        2. The proposed change does not create the possibility of a new 
    or different kind of accident from any accident previously 
    evaluated.
        The proposed change does not affect facility operation. It only 
    changes the method of testing of AC power sources.
        Therefore, the proposed change will not create the possibility 
    of a new or different kind of accident from any accident previously 
    evaluated.
        3. The proposed change does not involve a significant reduction 
    in a margin of safety.
        The proposed change allows overlapping testing to assure 
    operation of different AC power source alignments. Overlap testing 
    provides an equally valid test of the capability of the alternate 
    offsite power source.
        Therefore, the proposed change will not involve a significant 
    reduction in a margin of safety.
    
        The NRC staff has reviewed the licensee's analysis and, based on 
    this review, it appears that the three standards of 10 CFR 50.92(c) are 
    satisfied. Therefore, the NRC staff proposes to determine that the 
    amendment request involves no significant hazards consideration.
        The Commission is seeking public comments on this proposed 
    determination. Any comments received within 14 days after the date of 
    publication of this notice will be considered in making any final 
    determination.
        Normally, the Commission will not issue the amendment until the 
    expiration of the 14-day notice period. However, should circumstances 
    change during the notice period, such that failure to act in a timely 
    way would result, for example, in derating or shutdown of the facility, 
    the Commission may issue the license amendment before the expiration of 
    the 14-day notice period, provided that its final determination is that 
    the amendment involves no significant hazards consideration. The final 
    determination will consider all public and State comments received. 
    Should the Commission take this action, it will publish in the Federal 
    Register a notice of issuance. The Commission expects that the need to 
    take this action will occur very infrequently.
        Written comments may be submitted by mail to the Chief, Rules 
    Review and Directives Branch, Division of Freedom of Information and 
    Publications Services, Office of Administration, U.S. Nuclear 
    Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, and should cite the 
    publication date and page number of this Federal Register notice. 
    Written comments may also be delivered to Room 6D22, Two White Flint 
    North, 11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland, from 7:30 a.m. to 
    4:15 p.m. Federal workdays. Copies of written comments received may be 
    examined at the NRC Public Document Room, the Gelman Building, 2120 L 
    Street, NW., Washington, DC.
        The filing of requests for hearing and petitions for leave to 
    intervene is discussed below.
        By June 2, 1997, the licensee may file a request for a hearing with 
    respect to issuance of the amendment to the subject facility operating 
    license and any person whose interest may be affected by this 
    proceeding and who wishes to participate as a party in the proceeding 
    must file a written request for a hearing and a petition for leave to 
    intervene. Requests for a hearing and a petition for leave to intervene 
    shall be filed in accordance with the Commission's ``Rules of Practice 
    for Domestic Licensing Proceedings'' in 10 CFR Part 2. Interested 
    persons should consult a current copy of 10 CFR 2.714 which is 
    available at the Commission's Public Document Room, the Gelman 
    Building, 2120 L Street, NW., Washington, DC, and at the local public 
    document room located at the Main Library, University of California, PO 
    Box 19557, Irvine, California 92713. If a request for a hearing or 
    petition for leave to intervene is filed by the above date, the 
    Commission or an Atomic Safety and Licensing Board, designated by the 
    Commission or by the Chairman of the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board 
    Panel, will rule on the request and/or petition; and the Secretary or 
    the designated Atomic Safety and Licensing Board will issue a notice of 
    hearing or an appropriate order.
        As required by 10 CFR 2.714, a petition for leave to intervene 
    shall set forth with particularity the interest of the petitioner in 
    the proceeding, and how that interest may be affected by the results of 
    the proceeding. The petition should specifically explain the reasons 
    why intervention should be permitted with particular reference to the 
    following factors: (1) The nature of the petitioner's right under the 
    Act to be
    
    [[Page 23812]]
    
    made a party to the proceeding; (2) the nature and extent of the 
    petitioner's property, financial, or other interest in the proceeding; 
    and (3) the possible effect of any order which may be entered in the 
    proceeding on the petitioner's interest. The petition should also 
    identify the specific aspect(s) of the subject matter of the proceeding 
    as to which petitioner wishes to intervene. Any person who has filed a 
    petition for leave to intervene or who has been admitted as a party may 
    amend the petition without requesting leave of the Board up to 15 days 
    prior to the first prehearing conference scheduled in the proceeding, 
    but such an amended petition must satisfy the specificity requirements 
    described above.
        Not later than 15 days prior to the first prehearing conference 
    scheduled in the proceeding, a petitioner shall file a supplement to 
    the petition to intervene which must include a list of the contentions 
    which are sought to be litigated in the matter. Each contention must 
    consist of a specific statement of the issue of law or fact to be 
    raised or controverted. In addition, the petitioner shall provide a 
    brief explanation of the bases of the contention and a concise 
    statement of the alleged facts or expert opinion which support the 
    contention and on which the petitioner intends to rely in proving the 
    contention at the hearing. The petitioner must also provide references 
    to those specific sources and documents of which the petitioner is 
    aware and on which the petitioner intends to rely to establish those 
    facts or expert opinion. Petitioner must provide sufficient information 
    to show that a genuine dispute exists with the applicant on a material 
    issue of law or fact. Contentions shall be limited to matters within 
    the scope of the amendment under consideration. The contention must be 
    one which, if proven, would entitle the petitioner to relief. A 
    petitioner who fails to file such a supplement which satisfies these 
    requirements with respect to at least one contention will not be 
    permitted to participate as a party.
        Those permitted to intervene become parties to the proceeding, 
    subject to any limitations in the order granting leave to intervene, 
    and have the opportunity to participate fully in the conduct of the 
    hearing, including the opportunity to present evidence and cross-
    examine witnesses.
        If the amendment is issued before the expiration of the 30-day 
    hearing period, the Commission will make a final determination on the 
    issue of no significant hazards consideration. If a hearing is 
    requested, the final determination will serve to decide when the 
    hearing is held.
        If the final determination is that the amendment request involves 
    no significant hazards consideration, the Commission may issue the 
    amendment and make it immediately effective, notwithstanding the 
    request for a hearing. Any hearing held would take place after issuance 
    of the amendment.
        If the final determination is that the amendment request involves a 
    significant hazards consideration, any hearing held would take place 
    before the issuance of any amendment.
        A request for a hearing or a petition for leave to intervene must 
    be filed with the Secretary of the Commission, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 
    Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, Attention: Docketing and 
    Services Branch, or may be delivered to the Commission's Public 
    Document Room, the Gelman Building, 2120 L Street, NW., Washington, DC, 
    by the above date. Where petitions are filed during the last 10 days of 
    the notice period, it is requested that the petitioner promptly so 
    inform the Commission by a toll-free telephone call to Western Union at 
    1-(800) 248-5100 (in Missouri 1-(800) 342-6700). The Western Union 
    operator should be given Datagram Identification Number N1023 and the 
    following message addressed to William H. Bateman, Director, Project 
    Directorate IV-2: petitioner's name and telephone number, date petition 
    was mailed, plant name, and publication date and page number of this 
    Federal Register notice. A copy of the petition should also be sent to 
    the Office of the General Counsel, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 
    Washington, DC 20555-0001, and to T. E. Oubre, Esquire, Southern 
    California Edison Company, P.O. Box 800, Rosemead, California 91770, 
    attorney for the licensee.
        Nontimely filings of petitions for leave to intervene, amended 
    petitions, supplemental petitions and/or requests for hearing will not 
    be entertained absent a determination by the Commission, the presiding 
    officer or the presiding Atomic Safety and Licensing Board that the 
    petition and/or request should be granted based upon a balancing of the 
    factors specified in 10 CFR 2.714(a)(1) (i)-(v) and 2.714(d).
        For further details with respect to this action, see the 
    application for amendments dated April 15, 1997, which is available for 
    public inspection at the Commission's Public Document Room, the Gelman 
    Building, 2120 L Street, NW., Washington, DC, and at the local public 
    document room, located at the Main Library, University of California, 
    P.O. Box 19557, Irvine, California 92713.
    
        Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 25th day of April 1997.
    
        For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
    Mel B. Fields,
    Project Manager, Project Directorate IV-2, Division of Reactor Projects 
    III/IV, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
    [FR Doc. 97-11294 Filed 4-30-97; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
05/01/1997
Department:
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
97-11294
Pages:
23811-23812 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket Nos. 50-361 and 50-362
PDF File:
97-11294.pdf