97-11297. Specialty Metals; Agreements with Qualifying Countries  

  • [Federal Register Volume 62, Number 84 (Thursday, May 1, 1997)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Pages 23741-23742]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 97-11297]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
    
    48 CFR Part 252
    
    [DFARS Case 97-D007]
    
    
    Specialty Metals; Agreements with Qualifying Countries
    
    AGENCY: Department of Defense (DoD).
    
    ACTION: Proposed rule with request for comments.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The Director of Defense Procurement is proposing to amend the 
    Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to revise the 
    Preference for Domestic Speciality Metals clause for consistency with 
    the provisions of the Berry Amendment.
    
    DATES: Comments on the proposed rule should be submitted in writing to 
    the address shown below on or before June 30, 1997.
    
    ADDRESSES: Interested parties should submit written comments to: 
    Defense Acquisition Regulations Council, ATTN: Ms. Amy Williams, 
    PDUSD(A&T)DP(DAR), 3062 Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-3062. 
    Telefax number (703) 602-0305. Please cite DFARS Case 97-D007 in all 
    correspondence related to this issue.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Amy Williams, (703) 602-0131.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    
    A. Background
    
        This proposed rule amends the contract clause at DFARS 252.225-
    7014, Preference for Domestic Specialty Metals. The clause requires 
    that, with certain exceptions, any specialty metals incorporated in 
    articles delivered under the contract will be melted in the United 
    States, its possessions, or Puerto Rico. Paragraph(c)(2) of the clause 
    presently provides for an exception to this requirement when the 
    acquisition is for an end product of a qualifying country listed in 
    DFARS 225.872-1. This proposed rule revises paragraph (c)(2) of the 
    clause to provide an exception for speciality metals melted in a 
    qualifying country or incorporated in an article manufactured in a 
    qualifying country, rather than only providing an exception for the 
    acquisition of end products of a qualifying country. This proposed 
    revision is consistent with the Berry Amendment (10 U.S.C. 2241 note) 
    (as implemented at DFARS 225.7002-2(i)), which provides an exception 
    from domestic source restrictions for the procurement of specialty 
    metals where such procurement is necessary in furtherance of agreements 
    with foreign governments in which both governments agree to remove 
    barriers to purchase of supplies produced in the other country.
    
    B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
    
        The proposed rule may have a significant economic impact on a 
    substantial number of small entities within the meaning of the 
    Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq., because the rule 
    increases the opportunity for foreign competition by firms providing 
    speciality metals melted in qualifying countries or qualifying country 
    components containing specialty metals. An Initial Regulatory 
    Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) has, therefore, been performed, and is 
    summarized as follows: This proposed rule amends the clause at DFARS 
    252.225-7014 to make the exception in the clause consistent with the 
    Berry Amendment (10 U.S.C. 2241 note) and with the existing DFARS text 
    at 225.7002-2(i). The clause at DFARS 252.225-7014 is prescribed for 
    use in all solicitations and contracts over the simplified acquisition 
    threshold that require delivery of an article containing specialty 
    metals. The clause is prescribed for use with its Alternate I if the 
    article containing specialty metals is for one of certain major 
    programs. The basic clause only restricts the direct acquisition of 
    specialty metals by the prime contractor, whereas Alternate I flows 
    down the restriction to subcontractors at any tier. The proposed rule 
    does not affect the already unrestricted sources of speciality metals 
    when acquiring qualifying country end products or when acquiring 
    components including speciality metals for use in an end product for 
    other than a major program. The proposed rule does loosen the 
    restriction on domestic specialty metals for prime contractors 
    providing domestic nonqualifying country end products, permitting them 
    to incorporate speciality metals melted in a qualifying country (for 
    both major and non-major programs), or qualifying country components 
    containing specialty metals of unrestricted source for use in end 
    products for major programs. Because the components subject to 
    increased foreign competition are at a subcontract level, it is not 
    possible to more specifically identify the items or whether they are 
    produced by small business firms. The proposed rule does not require 
    any new reporting or recordkeeping, and does not duplicate, overlap, or 
    conflict with other relevant Federal rules. An alternative approach 
    would be to require that the specialty metals incorporated in articles 
    manufactured in a qualifying country also be melted in a qualifying 
    country.
    
    [[Page 23742]]
    
    This approach could slightly reduce the extent of foreign competition 
    facing domestic entities. However, this approach appeared to go beyond 
    the requirements of the statute being implemented.
        A copy of the IRFA has been submitted to the Chief Counsel for 
    Advocacy of the Small Business Administration. Interested parties may 
    obtain a copy of the IRFA from the address specified herein. Comments 
    are invited. Comments from small entities concerning the affected DFARS 
    subpart also will be considered in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 610. Such 
    comments should be submitted separately and should cite DFARS Case 97-
    D007 in correspondence.
    
    C. Paperwork Reduction Act
    
        The Paperwork Reduction Act does not apply because the proposed 
    rule contains no information collection requirements that require the 
    approval of the Office of Management and Budget under 44 U.S.C. 3501, 
    et seq.
    
    List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 252
    
        Government procurement.
    Michele P. Peterson
    Executive Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations Council.
    
        Therefore, 48 CFR Part 252 is proposed to be amended as follows:
        1. The authority citation for 48 CFR part 252 continues to read as 
    follows:
    
        Authority: 41 U.S.C. 421 and 48 CFR Chapter 1.
    
    PART 252--SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES
    
        2. Section 252.225-7014 is amended by revising the date of the 
    clause, paragraph (c)(2) of Alternate I to read as follows:
    
    
    252.225-7014  Preference for domestic specialty metals.
    
    * * * * *
    
    Preference for Domestic Specialty Metals (Date)
    
    * * * * *
        (c) * * *
        (2) The specialty metal is melted in a qualifying country, or is 
    incorporated in an article manufactured in a qualifying country. 
    (Qualifying countries are those countries listed in subsection 225-872-
    1 of the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement);
    * * * * *
    
    Alternate I (Date)
    
    * * * * *
        (c) * * *
        (2) The specialty metal is melted in a qualifying country, or is 
    incorporated in an article manufactured in a qualifying country. 
    (Qualifying countries are those countries listed in subsection 225.872-
    1 of the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement); or
    * * * * *
    [FR Doc. 97-11297 Filed 4-30-97; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
05/01/1997
Department:
Defense Department
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Proposed rule with request for comments.
Document Number:
97-11297
Dates:
Comments on the proposed rule should be submitted in writing to
Pages:
23741-23742 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
DFARS Case 97-D007
PDF File:
97-11297.pdf
CFR: (1)
48 CFR 252