03-10785. Self-Regulatory Organizations; Philadelphia Stock Exchange, Inc.; Order Granting Approval to Proposed Rule Change Relating to Who Allocates Options Trades  

  • Start Preamble April 25, 2003.

    On March 9, 2001, the Philadelphia Stock Exchange, Inc. (“Phlx”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Act”)[1] and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,[2] a proposed rule change relating to who allocates options trades.

    On January 31, 2002, May 17, 2002, July 8, 2002, and March 12, 2003, Phlx submitted Amendment Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 4 to the proposed rule change, respectively.[3] The proposed rule change, as amended, was published for comment in the Federal Register on March 25, 2003.[4] The Commission received no comments on the proposal.

    The proposal would amend the Exchange's Option Floor Procedure Advice F-2 (“Advice F-2”), governing who is responsible for allocating, matching, and time stamping an options trade in specific situations, and for reporting the trade upon its execution. The proposal would also codify paragraph (a) of Advice F-2, as amended, in the Exchange's rules as new paragraph (vi) of Phlx Rule 1014(g).

    The proposal specifies that, in trades involving a floor broker, the floor broker would be assigned the responsibility for allocating, matching, time stamping, and reporting, but provides that the floor broker would be permitted to delegate this responsibility to the specialist or an assistant under the specialist's supervision. The proposed rule change would also specify that, in all other cases where the specialist is a participant, the specialist or an assistant under the specialist's supervision would be required to allocate the trade. The responsibility for allocating trades in which neither the floor broker nor the specialist is a participant would remain the same under the proposed rule change. The proposal would also increase the fines for violation of the Exchange's rules on allocation and reporting of trades.

    The Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to a national securities exchange [5] and, in particular, the requirements of Section 6 of the Act [6] and the rules and regulations thereunder. The Commission believes Start Printed Page 23354that the proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,[7] because it assigns the responsibility for trade allocation and reporting in an appropriate and reasonable manner. The Phlx seeks in addition to permit a floor broker to delegate his or her responsibility to the specialist in view of the different set of burdens that floor brokers face due to changed economic and technological realities on the Exchange floor. The Commission believes it is reasonable to allow the specialist, who is always in the trading crowd, to assume the responsibility if he or she is willing to do so. The Commission further notes that the proposed rule change would add a provision requiring the allocating party in each trade to record his or her role in a manner that would facilitate investigation of any allocation after the fact should questions arise. The Commission believes that the proposed increases to the fine schedule associated with the trade allocation function and reporting responsibility are reasonable to help ensure compliance with these rules.

    It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,[8] that the proposed rule change (File No. SR-Phlx-2001-28) be, and it hereby is, approved.

    Start Signature

    For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated authority.[9]

    Margaret H. McFarland,

    Deputy Secretary.

    End Signature End Preamble

    Footnotes

    3.  See letter from Edith Hallahan, First Vice President and Deputy General Counsel, Phlx, to Nancy J. Sanow, Assistant Director, Division of Market Regulation (“Division”), Commission, dated January 30, 2002 (“Amendment No. 1”); and letters from Richard S. Rudolph, Director and Counsel, to Nancy J. Sanow, Assistant Director, Division, Commission, dated May 16, 2002, July 5, 2002, and March 12, 2003 (“Amendment Nos. 2, 3, and 4”).

    The proposed rule change was submitted by Phlx pursuant to subparagraph IV.B.j. of the Commission's Order of September 11, 2000, which requires the Exchange (among other respondent options exchanges) to adopt new, or amend existing, rules to make express any practice or procedure “whereby Market-Makers trading any particular option class determine by agreement the spreads or option prices at which they will trade any option class, or the allocation of orders in that option class.” Order Instituting Public Administrative Proceedings Pursuant to Section 19(h)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Making Findings and Imposing Remedial Sanctions, Securities Exchange Act Release No. 43268 (September 11, 2000).

    Back to Citation

    4.  See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 47500 (March 13, 2003), 68 FR 14456.

    Back to Citation

    5.  In approving this proposed rule change, the Commission notes that it has considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).

    Back to Citation

    [FR Doc. 03-10785 Filed 4-30-03; 8:45 am]

    BILLING CODE 8010-01-P

Document Information

Published:
05/01/2003
Department:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
03-10785
Pages:
23353-23354 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Release No. 34-47738, File No. SR-Phlx-2001-28
EOCitation:
of 2003-04-25
PDF File:
03-10785.pdf