94-11192. Pesticide Tolerance for 3-Dichloroacetyl-5-(2-Furanyl)-2,2- Dimethyl-Oxazolidine (Mon 13900)  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 89 (Tuesday, May 10, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page 0]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-11192]
    
    
    [[Page Unknown]]
    
    [Federal Register: May 10, 1994]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    40 CFR Part 180
    
    [PP 1E4031/R2058; FRL-4777-2]
    RIN 2070-AB78
    
     
    
    Pesticide Tolerance for 3-Dichloroacetyl-5-(2-Furanyl)-2,2-
    Dimethyl-Oxazolidine (Mon 13900)
    
    AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This document establishes time-limited tolerances for residues 
    of MON 13900, 3-dichloroacetyl-5-(2-furanyl)-2,2-dimethyloxazolidine 
    (CAS Reg. No. 121776-33-8), when used as an inert ingredient (safener) 
    in or on field corn, grain and field corn, fodder and forage at 0.01 
    part per million (ppm). Monsanto Co. submitted a request to establish a 
    maximum permissible level for residues of the inert ingredient in or on 
    the commodities. These time-limited tolerances expire June 30, 1996.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: This regulation becomes effective May 10, 1994.
    
    ADDRESSES: Written objections and hearing requests, identified by the 
    document control number, [PP 1E4031/R2058], may be submitted to: 
    Hearing Clerk (1900), Environmental Protection Agency, Rm. M3708, 401 M 
    St., SW., Washington, DC 20460. A copy of any objections and hearing 
    requests filed with the Hearing Clerk should be identified by the 
    document control number and submitted to: Public Response and Program 
    Resources Branch, Field Operations Division (7506C), Office of 
    Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M St., SW., 
    Washington, DC 20460. In person, bring copy of objections and hearing 
    requests to: Rm. 1132, CM #2, 1921 Jefferson Davis Hwy., Arlington, VA 
    22202. Fees accompanying objections shall be labeled ``Tolerance 
    Petition Fees'' and forwarded to: EPA Headquarters Accounting 
    Operations Branch, OPP (Tolerance Fees), P.O. Box 360277M, Pittsburgh, 
    PA 15251.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: By mail: Tina Levine, Registration 
    Support Branch, Registration Division (7505W), Environmental Protection 
    Agency, 401 M St., SW., Washington, DC 20460. Office location and 
    telephone number: Westfield Building North, 6th floor, 2800 Crystal 
    Drive, Arlington, VA 22202, (703)-308-8393.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    I. Background
    
        EPA is charged with administration of section 408 of the Federal 
    Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), 21 U.S.C. 346. Section 408 
    authorizes EPA to establish tolerance levels and exemptions from the 
    requirements of a tolerance for residues of pesticide chemicals in or 
    on raw agricultural commodities.
        Inert ingredients of pesticide chemicals are all ingredients that 
    are not active ingredients as defined in 40 CFR 162.3(c), and include, 
    but are not limited to, the following types of ingredients (except when 
    they have a pesticidal efficacy of their own): solvents such as 
    alcohols and hydrocarbons; surfactants such as polyoxyethylene polymers 
    and fatty acids; carriers such as clay and diatomaceous earth; 
    thickeners such as carrageenan and modified cellulose; wetting and 
    spreading agents; propellants in aerosol dispensers; and emulsifiers. 
    The term ``inert'' is not intended to imply nontoxicity; the ingredient 
    may or may not be chemically active.
        A policy statement on inert ingredients published in the Federal 
    Register of April 22, 1987 (52 FR 13305), included data requirements 
    which were to be used to evaluate the risks posed by the presence of an 
    inert ingredient in a pesticide formulation. The minimal (``base set'') 
    data requirements for inert ingredients were listed in that policy 
    statement. It was also noted that, based upon the results of the ``base 
    set'' studies, the Agency may elect to require additional data such as 
    would be required under 40 CFR part 158 for an active ingredient. 
    Included among these additional requirements are residue chemistry data 
    which would support the establishment of a finite tolerance for the 
    residues of an inert ingredient in raw agricultural commodities and/or 
    processed foods.
        In those cases where the toxicity of an inert ingredient is such 
    that exposure to the inert ingredient must be restricted to assure that 
    the use of the inert ingredient in a pesticide formulation does protect 
    the public health, EPA will propose to establish a tolerance for 
    residues of the inert ingredient on raw agricultural commodities.
    
    II. Provisions of Rule
    
        Monsanto Co., Suite 1100, 700 14th St., NW., Washington, DC 20005, 
    submitted pesticide petition (PP) 1E4031 proposing to amend 40 CFR part 
    180 by establishing a regulation to establish negligible (N) residue 
    tolerances for the safener MON 13900, 3-dichloroacetyl-5-(2-furanyl)-
    2,2-dimethyloxazolidine, in or on field corn, grain at 0.01 ppm (N) and 
    field corn, fodder and forage at 0.01 ppm (N). A safener is a 
    herbicidal antidote that protects desirous crops while allowing the 
    herbicide to act on the intended weed targets. EPA issued a notice, 
    published in the Federal Register of November 24, 1993 (58 FR 62123), 
    announcing receipt of this petition. No comments were received in 
    response to the notice.
        The data submitted in the petitions and other relevant material 
    have been evaluated. This inert ingredient is considered useful for the 
    purpose for which the tolerance is sought. Toxicological, ecological, 
    and environmental fate data were considered in evaluating this inert 
    ingredient for use in pesticides. The data considered in support of the 
    proposed tolerance include:
        1. An acute rat oral toxicity study with an acute oral LD50 of 
    869 milligrams (mg)/kilogram (kg).
        2. An acute rabbit dermal toxicity study with an acute dermal 
    LD50 estimated to be >5,000 mg/kg.
        3. A rabbit eye irritation study in which MON 13900 is determined 
    to be a mild irritant to the ocular tissue of the rabbit.
        4. An acute rat inhalation toxicity study with a 4-hour inhalation 
    LC50 of >2.3 mg/L, the highest attainable concentration.
        5. A rabbit primary dermal irritation study indicating that MON 
    13900 is a negligible dermal irritant.
        6. A dermal sensitization study in guinea pigs indicating the MON 
    13900 does not produce delayed contact hypersensitivity.
        7. A 21-day repeated-dose dermal toxicity study in rats with a no-
    observed effect level (NOEL) >1,000 mg/kg.
        8. A 90-day rat oral toxicity study with a NOEL of 100 parts per 
    million (ppm) or 7 mg/kg/day.
        9. A 90-day dog oral toxicity study with a NOEL of 5 mg/kg/day.
        10. A rat developmental effects study with a NOEL for maternal 
    toxicity of 10 mg/kg/day and developmental toxicity of 10 mg/kg/day.
        11. Mutagenicity studies including in vivo/in vitro unscheduled DNA 
    synthesis in rat hepatocytes, Gene Mutation in Cultured Chinese Hamster 
    Ovary Cells (CHO/HGPRT), In Vivo Micronucleus Assay in Mice were 
    negative. Salmonella typhimurium/mammalian microsome mutagenicity assay 
    with and without metabolic activation indicated that MON 13900 induced 
    a reproducible mutagenic response, but only at a high and precipitating 
    dose.
        A reference dose (RfD) has been established for this chemical at 
    0.005 mg/kg/day. This is based on the 90-day feeding study in dogs with 
    a NOEL of 5.0 mg/kg/day, an uncertainty factor of 100 to account for 
    inter-species and intra-species extrapolation, and an additional 
    uncertainty factor of 10 to account for the extrapolation from 
    subchronic to chronic exposure. The theoretical worst-case maximum 
    residue contribution (TMRC) from the proposed tolerance is estimated to 
    be 0.0000034 mg/kg-bwt (bodyweight)/day for the overall U.S. 
    population, representing 0.07% of the RfD for MON 13900. The TMRC for 
    the most highly exposed subgroup, nonnursing infants less than 1 year, 
    is 0.0000009 mg/kg-bwt/day, or approximately 0.02% of the RfD.
        This tolerance is being established as a time-limited tolerance 
    because the Agency does not have final data from two chronic feeding/
    oncogenicity studies which are part of the toxicology data typically 
    required to be submitted in support of a tolerance request. These 
    studies will be required to be submitted to the Agency by June 30, 
    1995. When the Agency receives these chronic feeding/oncogenicity 
    studies it will reassess the tolerance.
        Preliminary information from the registrant has indicated that Mon 
    13900 can cause an increase in liver tumors in both sexes of rats and 
    mice and an increase in lung tumors in female mice. The data are not 
    available for a complete risk assessment but, nevertheless, certain 
    conclusions can be reached. Based on the estimated exposure of 
    0.0000034 mg/kg/day, a rough estimate of the cancer potency from the 
    preliminary data, and the limited duration of this tolerance, any 
    potential cancer risk from this use would be negligible. Therefore, the 
    Agency does not believe that this time-limited tolerance poses 
    significant risks.
        This tolerance will expire June 30, 1996. Residues not in excess of 
    these tolerances will not be considered actionable if a pesticide 
    containing this inert ingredient is legally applied during the term of 
    a conditional registration under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, 
    and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) as amended and in accordance with the 
    acceptable labeling under a conditional registration. This tolerance 
    will be revoked if any data indicate such revocation is necessary to 
    protect the public health.
        An analytical method for determination of the nature of the 
    residue, gas-liquid chromatography using an electron-capture detector, 
    has been reviewed by the Agency, and will be made available in the 
    Pesticide Analytical Manual, Vol. II (PAM II), for enforcement 
    purposes. In the interim, the method will be available at the address 
    given below. By mail: Calvin Furlow, Public Response and Program 
    Resources Branch, Field Operations Division (7506C), Office of 
    Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M St. SW., 
    Washington, DC 20460. Office location and telephone number: Rm. 1130A, 
    CM #2, 1921 Jefferson Davis Hwy., Arlington, VA 22202, (703)-305-5937.
        Based upon the above information considered by the Agency, the 
    amendment to 40 CFR part 180 to establish the tolerance would protect 
    the public health. Therefore, the tolerance is established as set forth 
    below.
        Any person adversely affected by this regulation may, within 30 
    days after publication of this document in the Federal Register, file 
    written objections and/or request a hearing with the Hearing Clerk, at 
    the address given above (40 CFR 178.20). A copy of the objections and/
    or hearing requests filed with the Hearing Clerk should be submitted to 
    the OPP docket for this rulemaking. The objections submitted must 
    specify the provisions of the regulation deemed objectionable and the 
    grounds for the objections (40 CFR 178.25). Each objection must be 
    accompanied by the fee prescribed by 40 CFR 180.33(i). If a hearing is 
    requested, the objections must include a statement of the factual 
    issue(s) on which a hearing is requested, the requestor's contentions 
    on such issues, and a summary of any evidence relied upon by the 
    objector (40 CFR 178.27). A request for a hearing will be granted if 
    the Administrator determines that the material submitted shows the 
    following: There is a genuine and substantial issue of fact; there is a 
    reasonable possibility that available evidence identified by the 
    requestor would, if established, resolve one or more of such issues in 
    favor of the requestor, taking into account uncontested claims or facts 
    to the contrary; and resolution of the factual issue(s) in the manner 
    sought by the requestor would be adequate to justify the action 
    requested (40 CFR 178.32).
        Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, Oct. 4, 1993) the Agency 
    must determine whether the regulatory action is ``significant'' and 
    therefore subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget 
    (OMB) and the requirements of the Executive Order. Under section 3(f), 
    the order defines a ``significant regulatory action'' as an action that 
    is likely to result in a rule (1) having an annual effect on the 
    economy of $100 million or more, or adversely and materially affecting 
    a sector of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the 
    environment, public health or safety, or State, local, or tribal 
    governments or communities (also referred to as ``economically 
    significant''); (2) creating serious inconsistency or otherwise 
    interfering with an action taken or planned by another agency; (3) 
    materially altering the budgetary impacts of entitlement, grants, user 
    fees, or loan programs or the rights and obligations of recipients 
    thereof; or (4) raising novel legal or policy issues arising out of 
    legal mandates, the President's priorities, or the principles set forth 
    in this Executive order.
        Pursuant to the terms of the Executive Order, EPA has determined 
    that this rule is not ``significant'' and is therefore not subject to 
    OMB review. Pursuant to the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility 
    Act (Pub. L. 96-354, 94 Stat. 1164, 5 U.S.C. 601-612), the 
    Administrator has determined that regulations establishing new 
    tolerances or raising tolerance levels or establishing exemptions from 
    tolerance requirements do not have a significant economic impact on a 
    substantial number of small entities. A certification statement to this 
    effect was published in the Federal Register of May 4, 1981 (46 FR 
    24950).
    
    List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
    
        Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, 
    Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Recording and 
    recordkeeping requirements.
    
        Dated: April 29, 1994.
    
    Douglas D. Campt,
    Director, Office of Pesticide Programs.
    
        Therefore, it is proposed that 40 CFR part 180 be amended as 
    follows:
    
    PART 180--[AMENDED]
    
        1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as 
    follows:
    
        Authority: 21 U.S.C. 346a and 371.
    
        2. By adding new Sec. 180.471 to subpart C, to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 180.471 3-Dichloroacetyl-5-(2-furanyl)-2,2-dimethyloxazolidine; 
    tolerances for residues.
    
        Tolerances, to expire June 30, 1996, are established for residues 
    of 3-dichloroacetyl-5-(2-furanyl)-2,2-dimethyloxazolidine (CAS Reg. No. 
    121776-33-8) when used as an inert ingredient (safener) in pesticide 
    formulations in or on the following raw agricultural commodities: 
    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                             Parts per                      
                   Commodity                  million      Expiration date  
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Corn, fodder (field)...................       0.01  June 30, 1996.      
    Corn, forage (field)...................       0.01  June 30, 1996.      
    Corn, grain (field)....................       0.01  June 30, 1996.      
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    [FR Doc. 94-11192 Filed 5-9-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6560-50-F
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
5/10/1994
Published:
05/10/1994
Department:
Environmental Protection Agency
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
94-11192
Dates:
This regulation becomes effective May 10, 1994.
Pages:
0-0 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: May 10, 1994, PP 1E4031/R2058, FRL-4777-2
RINs:
2070-AB78
CFR: (1)
40 CFR 180.471