96-11670. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health; Occupational Radiation and Energy-Related Health Research Grants; Notice of Availability of Funds for Fiscal Year 1996  

  • [Federal Register Volume 61, Number 92 (Friday, May 10, 1996)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 21470-21473]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 96-11670]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
    [Announcement Number 617]
    
    
    National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health; 
    Occupational Radiation and Energy-Related Health Research Grants; 
    Notice of Availability of Funds for Fiscal Year 1996
    
    Introduction
    
        The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), National 
    Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), announces that 
    applications are being accepted for research projects relating to 
    occupational safety and health concerns associated with occupational 
    exposures to radiation and other hazardous agents at nuclear facilities 
    and in other energy-related industries. Studies in the nuclear power 
    industry and deliberate exposure of human subjects in radiation 
    experiments are outside the scope of this announcement.
        CDC is committed to achieving the health promotion and disease 
    prevention objectives of ``Healthy People 2000,'' a national activity 
    to reduce morbidity and mortality and improve the quality of life. This 
    announcement is related to the priority area of Occupational Safety and 
    Health. (For ordering a copy of ``Healthy People 2000,'' see the 
    section ``Where to Obtain Additional Information.'')
    
    Authority
    
        This program is authorized under the Public Health Service Act, as 
    amended, Section 301(a) (42 U.S.C. 241(a)); the Occupational Safety and 
    Health Act of 1970, Section 20 (a) (29 U.S.C. 669(a)). The applicable 
    program regulations include 42 CFR Parts 52 and 74.
    
    Eligible Applicants
    
        Eligible applicants include domestic and foreign non-profit and 
    for-profit organizations, universities, colleges, research 
    institutions, and other public and private organizations, including 
    State and local governments and small, minority and/or woman-owned 
    businesses.
    
    Smoke-Free Workplace
    
        CDC strongly encourages all grant recipients to provide a smoke-
    free workplace and promote the nonuse of all tobacco products, and 
    Public Law 103-227, the Pro-Children Act of 1994, prohibits smoking in 
    certain facilities that receive Federal funds in which education, 
    library, day care, health care, and early childhood development 
    services are provided to children.
    
    Availability of Funds
    
        Approximately $500,000 is available in fiscal year (FY) 1996 to 
    fund approximately 3 to 5 research project grants. The amount of 
    funding available may vary and is subject to change. Awards will range 
    from $25,000 to $200,000 in total costs (direct and indirect) per year. 
    Awards are expected to begin on or about September 1, 1996. Awards will 
    be made for a 12-month budget period within a project period not to 
    exceed 3 years. Continuation awards within the project period will be 
    made on the basis of satisfactory progress and availability of funds.
    
    Purpose
    
        NIOSH will support hypothesis-testing research projects to identify 
    and
    
    [[Page 21471]]
    
    investigate the relationships between health outcomes and occupational 
    exposure to radiation and other hazardous agents, epidemiologic methods 
    research relevant to energy-related occupational health research, and 
    research related to assessing occupational exposures.
    
    Programmatic Interest
    
        The focus of grants should emphasize field research in the 
    following topical areas: (1) Retrospective exposure assessment, (2) 
    radiation measurement issues, (3) non-cancer morbidity and mortality 
    outcomes, (4) meta-analysis and combined analysis methodologies, (5) 
    uncertainty analysis, and (6) studies of current workers.
    
    (1) Retrospective Exposure Assessment
    
        Epidemiologic studies of occupational cohorts frequently involve, 
    and can generally benefit from, retrospective exposure assessment to 
    provide estimates of exposure or categorize groups of workers by common 
    exposure. Exposure assessment in energy-related occupational 
    epidemiology requires evaluating exposures to various hazards including 
    ionizing and non-ionizing radiation, metals, acids, and solvents. Grant 
    opportunities encompass the fields of industrial hygiene and 
    retrospective exposure assessment of health physics dosimetry. Research 
    areas of general interest include investigations of: Methods to use 
    limited data to best advantage, how to treat censored data in 
    retrospective exposure assessment, uncertainty analysis techniques for 
    industrial hygiene exposure data and health physics dosimetry, sampling 
    strategy design to yield a representative understanding of exposed 
    groups, decision logic to select and use the most appropriate exposure 
    metric for epidemiologic and risk assessment use, and, development 
    approaches of ``Homogeneous Exposed Groupings'' and the advantages and 
    limitations for epidemiologic use. Research opportunities of specific 
    interest include: reconstruction and dose adjustment of historic film 
    badges; exposure assessment for acid mists, carcinogenic solvents, 
    exotic metals, and leukemogens; assessment of electromagnetic field 
    exposure; and evaluation of biomarkers of exposure.
    
    (2) Radiation Measurement Issues
    
        This topic will focus on the applicability and utility of both 
    internal and external radiation dose data in epidemiologic research. 
    Examples of such issues include how to use nondetectable values, 
    missing dose data in historical radiation exposure measurements, and 
    the accuracy of historical external dosimetry techniques (film and 
    pocket dosimeters). Additional issues of interest include the use, 
    utility and limitations of internal dosimetry data (historical bioassay 
    and radiochemistry techniques) in epidemiologic studies.
    
    (3) Non-Cancer Morbidity and Mortality Outcomes
    
        The majority of analytical epidemiologic research of health effects 
    of energy-related occupational and environmental exposures has focused 
    historically on the assessment of the association between cancer 
    mortality and exposure to ionizing radiation. Although the importance 
    of this research should not be underestimated, it is essential that 
    other potential adverse health effects, as well as other possible 
    energy-related exposures, be thoroughly evaluated as well. Among these 
    are the possible effects of radiation on the reproductive, neurologic, 
    and immune systems. Chemical exposures highly prevalent in Department 
    of Energy facilities, such as exposures to beryllium and mercury, have 
    also been associated with a variety of disease outcomes, particularly 
    respiratory and neurologic in nature.
    
    (4) Meta-Analysis and Combined Analysis Methodologies
    
        Many of the cohorts at nuclear facilities are not individually 
    large enough to detect statistically significant increases in mortality 
    or incidence for rare cancer types. Methods and analyses for combining 
    data across studies, whether in summary form or as individual data, are 
    valuable to the NIOSH research effort involving energy-related health 
    research.
    
    (5) Uncertainty Analysis
    
        Measures of occupational exposure are inherently uncertain. Even 
    when measures of external radiation exposure are generally available, 
    the models used to estimate organ dose, shallow versus deep dose, 
    neutron dose, etc., are subject to error. Measures of dose derived from 
    biological monitoring of urine, feces, blood, etc., are even less 
    precise. Methods for assessing the degree of error in various estimates 
    of exposure to both ionizing radiation as well as other toxic agents 
    (chemicals, EMF, etc.) are desirable.
    
    (6) Studies of Current Workers
    
        Much of the epidemiologic research on nuclear workers conducted at 
    nuclear facilities and other sites has emphasized retrospective 
    studies. More recently new activities involve environmental 
    restoration, waste management and other work that is not related to the 
    design and production of nuclear weapons. Workers are being exposed to 
    radiation and other hazardous agents under conditions and in processes 
    not previously encountered. Hypothesis-testing research in the areas of 
    exposure assessment, epidemiologic and related studies are needed to 
    evaluate these new conditions and processes and the impact on worker 
    health.
    
    Women and Minority Inclusion Policy
    
        It is the policy of the CDC to ensure that women and racial and 
    ethnic groups will be included in CDC supported research projects 
    involving human subjects, whenever feasible and appropriate. Racial and 
    ethnic groups are those defined in OMB Directive No. 15 and include 
    American Indian, Alaskan Native, Asian, Pacific Islander, Black and 
    Hispanic. Applicants shall ensure that women and racial and ethnic 
    minority populations are appropriately represented in applications for 
    research involving human subjects. Where clear and compelling rationale 
    exist that inclusion is not feasible, this situation must be explained 
    as part of the application. In conducting the review of applications 
    for scientific merit, review groups will evaluate proposed plans for 
    inclusion of minorities and both sexes as part of the scientific 
    assessment and assigned score. This policy does not apply to research 
    studies when the investigator cannot control the race, ethnicity and/or 
    sex of subjects. Further guidance to this policy is contained in the 
    Federal Register, Vol. 60, No. 179, Friday, September 15, 1995, pages 
    47947-47951.
    
    Evaluation Criteria
    
        Upon receipt, applications will be reviewed by CDC for completeness 
    and responsiveness. Applications determined to be incomplete or 
    unresponsive to this announcement will be returned to the applicant 
    without further consideration. If the proposed project involves 
    organizations or persons other than those affiliated with the applicant 
    organization, letters of support and/or cooperation must be included.
        Applications that are complete and responsive to the announcement 
    will be evaluated for scientific and technical merit by an appropriate 
    peer review group convened by CDC in accordance with the review 
    criteria stated below. As part of the initial merit review, a process 
    may be used by the initial review group
    
    [[Page 21472]]
    
    in which applications will be determined to be competitive or non-
    competitive based on their scientific merit relative to other 
    applications received in response to this announcement. Applications 
    judged to be competitive will be discussed and assigned a priority 
    score. Applications determined to be non-competitive will be withdrawn 
    from further consideration and the principal investigator/program 
    director and the official signing for the applicant organization will 
    be promptly notified.
        Review criteria for this announcement are as follows:
    
    --Scientific, technical, or medical significance and originality of 
    proposed research;
    --Appropriateness and adequacy of the experimental approach and 
    methodology proposed to carry out the research;
    --Qualifications and research experience of the Principal Investigator 
    and staff, particularly but not exclusively in the area of the proposed 
    research;
    --Availability of resources necessary to perform the research;
    --Adequacy of plans to include both sexes and minorities and their 
    subgroups as appropriate for the scientific goals of the research. 
    Plans for the recruitment and retention of subjects will also be 
    evaluated.
    
        The review group will critically examine the submitted budget and 
    will recommend an appropriate budget and period of support for each 
    scored application.
        In the secondary (programmatic importance) review, the following 
    factors will be considered:
        1. Results of the initial review;
        2. Magnitude of the problem in terms of numbers of workers 
    affected;
        3. Severity of the disease or injury in the worker population; and
        4. Usefulness to applied technical knowledge in the identification, 
    evaluation, and/or control of occupational safety and health hazards.
        Applicants will compete for available funds with all other approved 
    applications. The following will be considered in making funding 
    decisions:
        1. Quality of the proposed project as determined by peer review;
        2. Availability of funds; and
        3. Program balance among research areas of the announcement.
    
    Executive Order 12372 Review
    
        Applications are not subject to the review requirements of 
    Executive Order 12372, entitled Intergovernmental Review of Federal 
    Programs.
    
    Public Health System Reporting Requirement
    
        This program is not subject to the Public Health System Reporting 
    Requirements.
    
    Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number
    
        The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance number is 93.262.
    
    Other Requirements
    
    Human Subjects
    
        If the proposed project involves research on human subjects, the 
    applicant must comply with the Department of Health and Human Services 
    Regulations (45 CFR Part 46) regarding the protection of human 
    subjects. Assurance must be provided to demonstrate that the project 
    will be subject to initial and continuing review by an appropriate 
    institutional review committee. The applicant will be responsible for 
    providing assurance in accordance with the appropriate guidelines and 
    form provided in the application kit.
    
    Confidentiality Agreement
    
        To comply with the routine uses allowing access to Department of 
    Energy (DOE) Privacy Act systems of records, grantees who will be 
    accessing DOE records to conduct epidemiologic studies and/or other 
    public health activities on behalf of NIOSH will be asked to sign a 
    written statement that documents data security procedures to be 
    maintained by the grantee and an agreement to comply with the privacy 
    and confidentiality requirements of the Privacy Act routine uses and 
    the Memorandum of Understanding between the Department of Energy and 
    the Department of Health and Human Services.
    
    Application Submission and Deadlines
    
    A. Preapplication Letter of Intent
        Although not a prerequisite of application, a non-binding letter of 
    intent-to-apply is requested from potential applicants. The letter 
    should be submitted to the Grants Management Officer (whose address is 
    reflected in section B, ``Applications''). It should be postmarked no 
    later than June 10, 1996. The letter should identify the announcement 
    number, name of principal investigator, and specify the priority area 
    to be addressed by the proposed project. The letter of intent does not 
    influence review or funding decisions, but it will enable CDC to plan 
    the review more efficiently, and will ensure that each applicant 
    receives timely and relevant information prior to application 
    submission.
    B. Applications
        Applicants should use Form PHS-398 (OMB Number 0925-0001) and 
    adhere to the ERRATA Instruction Sheet for Form PHS-398 contained in 
    the Grant Application Kit. Please submit an original and five copies on 
    or before July 10, 1996 to: Ron Van Duyne, Grants Management Officer, 
    Grants Management Branch, Procurement and Grants Office, Centers for 
    Disease Control and Prevention, (CDC), 255 East Paces Ferry Road, NE., 
    Room 300, MS-E13, Atlanta, GA 30305.
    C. Deadlines
        1. Applications shall be considered as meeting a deadline if they 
    are either:
        A. Received at the above address on or before the deadline date, or
        B. Sent on or before the deadline date to the above address, and 
    received in time for the review process. Applicants should request a 
    legibly dated U.S. Postal Service postmark or obtain a legibly dated 
    receipt from a commercial carrier or the U.S. Postal Service. Private 
    metered postmarks shall not be accepted as proof of timely mailings.
        2. Applications which do not meet the criteria above are considered 
    late applications and will be returned to the applicant.
    
    Where To Obtain Additional Information
    
        To receive additional written information call (404) 332-4561. You 
    will be asked your name, address, and phone number and will need to 
    refer to Announcement 617. In addition, this announcement is also 
    available through the CDC Home Page on the Internet. The address for 
    the CDC Home Page is http://www.cdc.gov. You will receive a complete 
    program description, information on application procedures, and 
    application forms. If you have questions after reviewing the contents 
    of all the documents, business management technical assistance may be 
    obtained from Georgia Jang, Grants Management Specialist, Grants 
    Management Branch, Procurement and Grants Office, Centers for Disease 
    Control and Prevention (CDC), 255 East Paces Ferry Road, NE., MS-E13, 
    Atlanta, GA 30305, telephone (404) 842-6796; fax: 404-842-6513; 
    internet: glj2@opspgo1.em.cdc.gov. Programmatic technical assistance 
    may be obtained from Roy M. Fleming, Sc.D., Associate Director for 
    Grants, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Centers 
    for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 1600 Clifton Road,
    
    [[Page 21473]]
    
    NE., Building 1, Room 3053, MS-D30, Atlanta, GA 30333, telephone: 404-
    639-3343; fax: 404-639-4616; internet: rmf2@niood1.em.cdc.gov.
    
    Please Refer to Announcement Number 617 When Requesting Information and 
    Submitting an Application
    
        Potential applicants may obtain a copy of ``Healthy People 2000'' 
    (Full Report, Stock No. 017-001-00474-0) or ``Healthy People 2000'' 
    (Summary Report, Stock No. 017-001-00473-1) through the Superintendent 
    of Documents, Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402-9325, 
    telephone (202) 512-1800.
    
        Dated: May 2, 1996.
    Donald L. Holderman,
    Acting Director, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
    [FR Doc. 96-11670 Filed 5-9-96; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4163-19-P
    
    

Document Information

Published:
05/10/1996
Department:
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
96-11670
Pages:
21470-21473 (4 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Announcement Number 617
PDF File:
96-11670.pdf