96-11785. Notice of Receipt of Petition for Decision That Nonconforming 1992 Jeep Cherokee Multi-Purpose Passenger Vehicles Are Eligible for Importation  

  • [Federal Register Volume 61, Number 92 (Friday, May 10, 1996)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 21530-21531]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 96-11785]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    [Docket No. 96-045; Notice 1]
    
    
    Notice of Receipt of Petition for Decision That Nonconforming 
    1992 Jeep Cherokee Multi-Purpose Passenger Vehicles Are Eligible for 
    Importation
    
    AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Notice of receipt of petition for decision that nonconforming 
    1992 Jeep Cherokee multipurpose passenger vehicles (MPVs) manufactured 
    for the Venezuelan market are eligible for importation.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This notice announces receipt by the National Highway Traffic 
    Safety Administration (NHTSA) of a petition for a decision that a 1992 
    Jeep Cherokee that was manufactured for the Venezuelan market and not 
    originally manufactured to comply with all applicable Federal motor 
    vehicle safety standards is eligible for importation into the United 
    States because (1) it is substantially similar to a vehicle that was 
    originally manufactured for sale in the United States and that was 
    certified by its manufacturer as complying with the safety standards, 
    and (2) it is capable of being readily altered to conform to the 
    standards.
    
    DATES: The closing date for comments on the petition is June 10, 1996.
    
    ADDRESSES: Comments should refer to the docket number and notice 
    number, and be submitted to: Docket Section, Room 5109, National 
    Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 400 Seventh St., SW, Washington, 
    DC 20590. [Docket hours are from 9:30 am to 4 pm]
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: George Entwistle, Office of Vehicle 
    Safety Compliance, NHTSA (202-366-5306).
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Background
    
        Under 49 U.S.C. Sec. 30141(a)(1)(A) (formerly section 
    108(c)(3)(A)(i)(I) of the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act 
    (the Act)), a motor vehicle that was not originally manufactured to 
    conform to all applicable Federal motor vehicle safety standards shall 
    be refused admission into the United States unless NHTSA has decided 
    that the motor vehicle is substantially similar to a motor vehicle 
    originally manufactured for importation into and sale in the United 
    States, certified under 49 U.S.C. Sec. 30115 (formerly section 114 of 
    the Act), and of the same model year as the model of the motor vehicle 
    to be compared, and is capable of being readily altered to conform to 
    all applicable Federal motor vehicle safety standards.
        Petitions for eligibility decisions may be submitted by either 
    manufacturers or importers who have registered with NHTSA pursuant to 
    49 CFR Part 592. As specified in 49 CFR 593.7, NHTSA publishes notice 
    in the Federal Register of each petition that it receives, and affords 
    interested persons an opportunity to comment on the petition. At the 
    close of the comment period, NHTSA decides, on the basis of the 
    petition and any comments that it has received, whether the vehicle is 
    eligible for importation. The agency then publishes this decision in 
    the Federal Register.
        Champagne Imports, Inc. of Lansdale, Pennsylvania (``Champagne'') 
    (Registered Importer 90-009) has petitioned NHTSA to decide whether 
    1992 Jeep Cherokee MPVs manufactured for the Venezuelan market are 
    eligible for importation into the United States. The vehicle which 
    Champagne believes is substantially similar is the 1992 Jeep Cherokee 
    that was manufactured for sale in the United States and certified by 
    its manufacturer as conforming to all applicable Federal motor vehicle 
    safety standards.
        The petitioner claims that it carefully compared the non-U.S. 
    certified 1992 Jeep Cherokee to its U.S. certified counterpart, and 
    found the two vehicles to be substantially similar with respect to 
    compliance with most Federal motor vehicle safety standards.
        Champagne submitted information with its petition intended to 
    demonstrate that the non-U.S. certified 1992 Jeep Cherokee, as 
    originally manufactured, conforms to many Federal motor vehicle safety 
    standards in the same manner as its U.S. certified counterpart, or is 
    capable of being readily altered to conform to those standards.
        Specifically, the petitioner claims that the non-U.S. certified 
    1992 Jeep Cherokee is identical to its U.S. certified counterpart with 
    respect to compliance with Standards Nos. 102 Transmission Shift Lever 
    Sequence * * * ., 103 Defrosting and Defogging Systems, 104 Windshield 
    Wiping and Washing
    
    [[Page 21531]]
    
    Systems, 105 Hydraulic Brake Systems, 106 Brake Hoses, 107 Reflecting 
    Surfaces, 109 New Pneumatic Tires, 113 Hood Latch Systems, 116 Brake 
    Fluid, 124 Accelerator Control Systems, 201 Occupant Protection in 
    Interior Impact, 202 Head Restraints, 203 Impact Protection for the 
    Driver From the Steering Control System, 204 Steering Control Rearward 
    Displacement, 205 Glazing Materials, 206 Door Locks and Door Retention 
    Components, 207 Seating Systems, 209 Seat Belt Assemblies, 210 Seat 
    Belt Assembly Anchorages, 211 Wheel Nuts, Wheel Discs and Hubcaps, 212 
    Windshield Retention, 216 Roof Crush Resistance, 219 Windshield Zone 
    Intrusion, and 302 Flammability of Interior Materials.
        Additionally, the petitioner states that the non-U.S. certified 
    1992 Jeep Cherokee complies with the Bumper Standard found in 49 CFR 
    Part 581.
        Petitioner also contends that the vehicle is capable of being 
    readily altered to meet the following standards, in the manner 
    indicated:
        Standard No. 101 Controls and Displays: (a) substitution of a lens 
    marked ``Brake'' for a lens with a noncomplying symbol on the brake 
    failure indicator lamp; (b) installation of a seat belt warning lamp; 
    (c) recalibration of the speedometer/odometer from kilometers to miles 
    per hour.
        Standard No. 108 Lamps, Reflective Devices and Associated 
    Equipment: (a) installation of U.S.-model headlamp assemblies; (b) 
    installation of U.S.-model front and rear sidemarker/reflector 
    assemblies; (c) installation of U.S.-model taillamp assemblies.
        Standard No. 110 Tire Selection and Rims: installation of a tire 
    information placard.
        Standard No. 111 Rearview Mirror: replacement of the convex 
    passenger side rearview mirror.
        Standard No. 114 Theft Protection: installation of a warning buzzer 
    microswitch and a warning buzzer in the steering lock assembly.
        Standard No. 115 Vehicle Identification Number: installation of a 
    VIN plate that can be read from outside the left windshield pillar, and 
    a VIN reference label on the edge of the door or latch post nearest the 
    driver.
        Standard No. 118 Power Window Systems: rewiring of the power window 
    system so that the window transport is inoperative when the ignition is 
    switched off.
        Standard No. 208 Occupant Crash Protection: (a) installation of a 
    U.S.- model seat belt in the driver's position, or a belt webbing 
    actuated microswitch inside the driver's seat belt retractor; (b) 
    installation of an ignition switch actuated seat belt warning lamp and 
    buzzer. The petitioner states that the vehicle is equipped with a lap 
    and shoulder restraint that adjusts by means of an automatic retractor 
    and releases by means of a single push button at each front designated 
    seating position, and with a lap and shoulder restraint that releases 
    by means of a single push button at each rear outboard seating 
    positions.
        Standard No. 301 Fuel System Integrity: installation of a rollover 
    valve in the fuel tank vent line between the fuel tank and the 
    evaporative emissions collection canister.
        Interested persons are invited to submit comments on the petition 
    described above. Comments should refer to the docket number and be 
    submitted to: Docket Section, National Highway Traffic Safety 
    Administration, Room 5109, 400 Seventh Street, S.W., Washington, DC 
    20590. It is requested but not required that 10 copies be submitted.
        All comments received before the close of business on the closing 
    date indicated above will be considered, and will be available for 
    examination in the docket at the above address both before and after 
    that date. To the extent possible, comments filed after the closing 
    date will also be considered. Notice of final action on the petition 
    will be published in the Federal Register pursuant to the authority 
    indicated below.
    
        Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(A) and (b)(1); 49 CFR 593.8; 
    delegations of authority at 49 CFR 1.50 and 501.8.
    
        Issued on: May 7, 1996.
    Marilynne Jacobs,
    Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
    [FR Doc. 96-11785 Filed 5-9-96; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-59-P
    
    

Document Information

Published:
05/10/1996
Department:
Transportation Department
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Notice of receipt of petition for decision that nonconforming 1992 Jeep Cherokee multipurpose passenger vehicles (MPVs) manufactured for the Venezuelan market are eligible for importation.
Document Number:
96-11785
Dates:
The closing date for comments on the petition is June 10, 1996.
Pages:
21530-21531 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 96-045, Notice 1
PDF File:
96-11785.pdf