99-11600. Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change by the Pacific Exchange, Inc. Relating to Differential Index Options  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 89 (Monday, May 10, 1999)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 25093-25096]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-11600]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
    
    [Release No. 34-41353; File No. SR-PCX-98-62]
    
    
    Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule 
    Change by the Pacific Exchange, Inc. Relating to Differential Index 
    Options
    
    April 30, 1999.
        Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
    (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that 
    on December 18, 1998, the Pacific Exchange, Inc. (``PCX'' or 
    ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission 
    (``Commission'' or ``SEC'') the proposed rule change as described in 
    Items I, II and III below, which Items have been prepared by the self-
    regulatory organization. The Exchange filed with the Commission 
    Amendments No. 1 \3\ and 2 \4\ to the proposed rule change on April 8, 
    1999. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on 
    the proposed rule change as amended from interested persons.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
        \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
        \3\ See Letter to Michael A. Walinskas, Division of Market 
    Regulation, Commission, from Robert P. Pacileo, PCX, dated April 7, 
    1999 (``Amendment No. 1''). Amendment No. 1 makes certain technical 
    changes to the proposed rule change. Amendment No. 1 also specifies 
    the procedures the Exchange will follow if an underlying 
    differential index previously approved for options trading does not 
    meet the Exchange's requirements for continued approval. In 
    addition, Amendment No. 1 clarifies the conditions under which 
    Exchange Rule 6.11, relating to restrictions on Exchange options 
    transactions and exercises, will be applicable to Differential Index 
    Options.
        \4\ See Letter to Michael A. Walinskas, Division of Market 
    Regulation, Commission, from Robert P. Pacileo, PCX, dated April 7, 
    1999 (``Amendment No. 2''). Amendment No. 2 provides information as 
    to what the Exchange will do to make adjustments in value for 
    differential index options contracts when certain corporate events 
    take place in the case of Equity Differential and Paired Stock 
    Differential options, or when significant action has been taken by 
    the publisher of an index in the case of Index Differential options. 
    Amendment No. 2 also specifies that if the Exchange chooses as 
    either a designated or benchmark index an index that has been 
    approved for index warrant trading only, to establish the 
    appropriate position limit the Exchange will (i) use the procedures 
    set forth in its narrow-based index options rules with respect to 
    differential options using a narrow-based index warrant and (ii) 
    consult with the Commission with respect to differential options 
    using a broad-based index warrant. Furthermore, Amendment No. 2 
    indicates the Exchange's intent to trade flexible exchange-traded 
    options on Differential index options and provides the proposed rule 
    language governing these options.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of 
    Substance of the Proposed Rule Change
    
        The Exchange is proposing to trade a standardized index option, the 
    Differential Index Option, whose value at expiration will be based on 
    the relative performance of either a designated index versus a 
    benchmark index, a designated stock versus a benchmark index, or a 
    designated stock versus a benchmark stock.
    
    II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
    Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
    
        In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization 
    included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the 
    proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the 
    proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at 
    the places specified in Item IV below. The self-regulatory organization 
    has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the 
    most significant aspects of such statements.
    
    A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
    Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
    
    1. Purpose
        Proposal. The Exchange is proposing to trade a new type of 
    standardized index option, the Differential Index Option, that will 
    offer new investment and hedging opportunities.\5\ Differential Index 
    Options will have a value at expiration based on an index, called the 
    ``differential index,'' that measures the relative performance of (1) A 
    designated index versus a benchmark index over a specific time period 
    (``Index Differential Option''); (2) a designated stock versus a 
    benchmark index over a specific time period (``Equity Differential 
    Option''); or (3) a designated stock versus a benchmark stock over a 
    specific period of time (``Paired Stock Differential Option''). If the 
    percent gain in the level
    
    [[Page 25094]]
    
    of the designated index or stock during the period is greater than the 
    percent gain in the underlying benchmark index or stock, then a 
    Differential Call Option originally struck at the money will have a 
    positive value at expiration and a Differential Put Option originally 
    struck at the money will expire worthless. If the percentage gain in 
    the level of the designated index or stock during the period is less 
    than the percent gain in the underlying benchmark, then a Differential 
    Put Option originally struck at the money will have a positive value at 
    expiration and a Differential Call Option originally struck at the 
    money will expire worthless. Thus, a Differential Index Option affords 
    an investor the opportunity, through a single investment, to 
    participate in the relative out-performance of a designated index or 
    stock versus a benchmark index or stock (a Differential Call Option) or 
    the relative under-performance of a designated index or stock versus a 
    benchmark index or stock (a Differential Put Option) over the life of 
    the option, regardless of the absolute performance of the designated 
    index or stock.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \5\ The proposal is similar to filings of the American Stock 
    Exchange and the Chicago Board Options Exchange, Inc. See Exchange 
    Act Release No. 40537 (October 8, 1998), 63 FR 56052 (October 20, 
    1998); SR-CBOE-98-50.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        For example, an investor may feel that Microsoft will out-perform 
    the technology sector for the next few months, but is unsure whether 
    the overall technology sector will move higher or lower. If the 
    investor were to buy an at-the-money standardized Microsoft call 
    option, and the stock declined, the option would expire worthless, even 
    if the stock declined by a much smaller percentage than the technology 
    sector. On the other hand, if the investor were to purchase an at-the-
    money Equity Differential Call Option on the relative performance of 
    Microsoft versus the PSE Technology 100 Index (``Tech 100''), a 
    benchmark measure of the technology sector, and Microsoft declined by a 
    smaller percentage than the Tech 100, the Equity Differential Call 
    Option would have a positive value at expiration. Conversely, an 
    investor who believes that Microsoft will under-perform the Tech 100 
    may purchase at-the-money Equity Differential Put Options. If Microsoft 
    under-performs the Tech 100, the Differential Put Options will have a 
    positive value at expiration, regardless of whether Microsoft itself 
    has increased or decreased on an absolute basis. This example can be 
    applied to the other types of Differential Options; the different in 
    the relative performance of a designated stock versus a benchmark 
    stock, such as Microsoft versus Compaq (``Paired Differential Stock 
    Option''), or the relative performance between two indexes, such as the 
    PSE Technology 100 and the Wilshire Small Cap Index (``Differential 
    Index Option'').
        a. Differential Calculation. The underlying security for a 
    Differential Index Option is an index (called the ``differential 
    index'') of the performance of the designated stock or index relative 
    to the benchmark stock or index. The differential index is calculated 
    as follows: on December 31 of each year, prior to the listing of a 
    Differential Index Option series, base reference prices are established 
    for the designated index or stock and the benchmark index or stock 
    (typically, the closing levels on a designated business day). 
    Thereafter, percent changes from the base values of both the designated 
    index or stock and the benchmark index or stock are continuously 
    calculated and the percent change in the benchmark is subtracted from 
    the percent change in the designated index or stock, providing a 
    positive number if the designated index or stock has either out-gained 
    or suffered a lesser percentage decline than the benchmark, and a 
    negative number if the benchmark has out-gained the designated index or 
    stock or suffered a lesser percent loss.
        The percentage differential in the relative gain or loss is then 
    multiplied by 100 and added to a fixed base index value (typically 100) 
    to yield the differential index that will underlie the Differential 
    Index Options:
    
    Dt=((It/I0)-(Bt/
    B0)) x 100+f
    
    Where:
    
    D=differential index;
    I=designated index or security;
    B=benchmark index or security;
    t=current or settlement value of index or security;
    0=base reference value of index or security;
    f=a fixed base index value, typically 100.
    
        Thus, if the designated index or security has out-performed the 
    benchmark by 7%, and the fixed value, f, is set at 100, the 
    differential index value would be 107; if it has under-performed by 7%, 
    the differential index value would be 93. The base reference values 
    will remain in effect for a predetermined, fixed period (expected to be 
    between six months and two years). Similar to other index values 
    published by the Exchange, the value of each differential index will be 
    calculated continuously and disseminated under a separate symbol every 
    15 seconds over the Consolidated Tape Association's Network B.
        b. Designated Indexes, Designated stocks, Benchmark Indexes and 
    Benchmark Stocks. Only stocks that meet the current Exchange Rules for 
    listing standardized equity options will be eligible designated stocks 
    in Equity Differential Options. Only stocks that meet the current 
    Exchange Rules for listing standardized equity options will be eligible 
    designated stocks or benchmark stocks in Paired Stock Differential 
    Options. In this way, only the most liquid, actively traded stocks will 
    be considered.
        Similarly, only indexes that meet the current Exchange Rules for 
    listing standardized index options and have been approved for options 
    or warrant trading by the Commission will be eligible for designation 
    either as designated indexes or benchmark indexes in Equity and Index 
    Differential Options. In this way, only those indexes already deemed by 
    the Commission to be suitable for options trading will be considered.
        c. Expiration and Settlement. The proposed Differential Index 
    Options will be European style (i.e., exercises permitted at expiration 
    only) and cash settled. Index Differential Options in which both the 
    designated or benchmark indexes are broad-based will trade between the 
    hours of 7:00 a.m. and 1:15 p.m., Pacific Time. All other Differential 
    Index Options will trade between 7:00 a.m. and 1:02 p.m., Pacific Time. 
    Differential Index Options will expire on the Saturday following the 
    third Friday of the expiration month (``Expiration Friday''). The last 
    trading day in an expiring option series will normally be the second to 
    last business day preceding the Saturday following the third Friday of 
    the expiration month (normally a Thursday). Trading in expiring options 
    will cease at the close of trading on the last trading day.
        While the Exchange seeks approval to list series of Differential 
    Index Options as set forth in proposed PCX Rules 7.20 through 7.31 and 
    Rule 8.102, the Exchange anticipates that it will initially list only 
    five series with expirations corresponding to the four calendar months 
    in the March cycle in the current calendar year, and a fifth series 
    expiring in March of the following calendar year.
        The exercise settlement value for Differential Index Options will 
    be calculated based on the respective exercise settlement values for 
    standardized options on each of the designated and benchmark indexes 
    expiring on the same day. The exercise settlement value for Equity 
    Differential Options will be calculated based on the primary exchange 
    regular-way opening sale price of the designated stock, or, if the 
    stock is traded through the Nasdaq system, the first reported regular-
    way
    
    [[Page 25095]]
    
    sale that occurs after the best bid and best offer for that security 
    are unlocked and uncrossed and is greater than or equal to the best bid 
    and less than or equal to the best offer at the time of the reported 
    sale and the exercise settlement value for standardized options on the 
    benchmark index expiring on the same day. The exercise settlement value 
    for Paired Stock Differential Options will be calculated based on the 
    primary exchange regular-way opening sale prices of the designated and 
    benchmark stocks, or, if the stock is traded through the Nasdaq system, 
    the first reported regular-way sale that occurs after the best bid and 
    best offer for that security are unlocked and uncrossed and is greater 
    than or equal to the best bid and less than or equal to the best offer 
    at the time of the reported sale.
        d. Applicable Exchange Rules. Proposed PCX Rules 7.20 through 7.31 
    and Rule 8.102 will apply to Differential Index Options contracts. 
    These Rules cover issues such as surveillance, exercise price and 
    position limits. Differential Index Options will also be subject to (1) 
    the PCX's surveillance procedures currently used to monitor trading in 
    each of the Exchange's index and equity options, and (2) sales practice 
    and suitability rules applicable to standardized options. The Exchange 
    currently intends to create Differential Index Options using the 
    indexes and options currently traded on the PCX.
        Differential Index Options are ``securities'' under section 
    3(a)(10) of the Act, and therefore are exempt pursuant to section 28(a) 
    of the Act from any state law that prohibits or regulates the making or 
    promoting of wagering or gaming contracts, or the operation of ``bucket 
    shops'' or other similar or related activities. Differential Index 
    Options will be traded pursuant to the Exchange's rules and rule 
    amendments discussed herein, subject to prior approval by the 
    Commission.
        e. Position Limits. The Exchange proposes that the position limits 
    for Differential Index Options be set at the lower of the separate 
    position limits for standardized index options trading on the 
    designated index or the benchmark index. In the event that one or both 
    of the indexes is not currently the subject of standardized index 
    options trading, but rather has been approved for index warrant trading 
    only, then the Exchange will establish position limits as the lesser of 
    those that would be in effect for standardized options on the indexes 
    if such options were trading.\6\ For Equity Differential Options, the 
    Exchange proposes that the limits be set at the position limit of 
    standardized options trading on the designated stock. In the event that 
    standardized options currently do not trade on the designated stock, 
    the Exchange will establish a position limit at the level that would be 
    in effect if standardized options did trade on such stock. For Paired 
    Stock Differential Options, the Exchange proposes that the position 
    limits be set at the lower of the separate position limits of 
    standardized equity options trading on the designated or benchmark 
    stocks. In the event that one or both of the stocks is not currently 
    the subject of standardized options trading, then the Exchange will 
    establish position limits as the lesser of those that would be in 
    effect for standardized options on the stocks if such options were 
    trading.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \6\ In the event that one or both of the indexes is the subject 
    of index warrant trading only, the position limit for a differential 
    option using a narrow-based index warrant will be established using 
    PCX's narrow-based index options rules. See PCX Rule 7.3. The 
    Exchange will consult with the Commission to establish a position 
    limit for a differential option using a broad-based index warrant. 
    See Amendment No. 2, supra note 4.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        The Exchange also proposes, for position and exercise limit 
    purposes, to require that positions in Differentials with the same 
    designated or benchmark stock or narrow-based index be aggregated. For 
    example, if a Paired Stock Differential Option has been created using 
    Microsoft Corporation stock as the benchmark and Compaq, Inc. as the 
    designated stock, positions in that Differential Option will be 
    aggregated for position and exercise limit compliance purposes with 
    positions in other Paired Stock Differentials that use one of these two 
    stocks. Furthermore, Equity Differential Options using narrow-based 
    indexes versus either Microsoft or Compaq as the benchmark or 
    designated stock also will be aggregated for position and exercise 
    limit compliance purposes with positions in Paired Stock Differential 
    Options using one of those two stocks. However, with respect to the use 
    of broad-based indexes as either the benchmark or designated index in 
    an Equity or Index Differential, no aggregation of positions will be 
    required. For example, if Equity Differentials are created using the 
    PSE Tech 100 Index as the benchmark index and Apple Computer, Inc., 
    Philip Morris Companies, Inc. and Telecommunications, Inc. as 
    designated stocks, members will not be required to aggregate positions 
    in those differentials to determine whether an account is in compliance 
    with position and exercise limit rules.
        The Exchange further proposes that Differential Index Options not 
    be aggregated with other standardized options on the underlying 
    designated stock or index nor on the underlying benchmark stock or 
    index for purposes of determining whether an account is in compliance 
    with position and exercise limit rules. The Exchange believes this 
    policy is appropriate for the following reasons. First and foremost, 
    the value of Differential Index Options will be calculated in a 
    different manner from the value of other currently trading standardized 
    equity and index options. In fact, because of the subtraction of the 
    benchmark from the designated stock or index, the value of a 
    Differential Index Option may appreciate (depreciate) even as the value 
    of the corresponding standardized option on the designated stock or 
    index decreases (increases). Further, the value of a Differential Index 
    Option is in part a function of the correlation between the designated 
    stock or index and the benchmark (i.e., the tendency of the designated 
    stock or index and the benchmark to move concurrently). This 
    correlation component of the Differential Index Option price is not 
    considered in determining the value of other standardized options on 
    either the designated or benchmark stock or index. As a result, the 
    Differential index Option is likely to be more or less sensitive to 
    movements in the designated stock or index than the other standardized 
    options on that stock or index, and changes in Differential Index 
    Option may be in the opposite direction from changes in other 
    standardized options prices. Therefore, any attempt to aggregate 
    Differential Index Options with other standardized options for 
    determination of position limits would be combining contracts that, by 
    nature, can change in value quite differently.
        Differential Index Options also have certain terms not found in 
    many other standard equity and index options. Differential Index 
    Options are cash settled, based on opening prices of the designated 
    stock or index and the benchmark and feature European exercise. Each 
    Differential Index Option contract changes in value as a function of 
    the differential performance of a $10,000 long position in the 
    designated stock or index and a $10,000 short position in the 
    benchmark. May standardized equity options are settled by physical 
    delivery of 100 shares of the underlying stock, worth $5,000 per 
    contract for a $50 stock, and feature American exercise. Standardized 
    index options typically feature European exercise, cash settlement and 
    represent
    
    [[Page 25096]]
    
    approximately $25,000 worth of a basket of stocks (with the index at 
    the 250 level). Any meaningful aggregation of positions in contracts 
    with different terms would be difficult to establish as a simple rule, 
    and would require a case-by-case analysis of the terms for each 
    Differential Index Option contract compared to other standardized 
    contracts on the designated and/or benchmark stock or index.
        The Exchange also believes that the aggregation of position limits 
    hinders the probability of success of any new product. The aggregation 
    of positions in Differential Options with positions in standardized 
    options will result in the new product competing with the established 
    product for a limited amount of potential volume. Thus, in the 
    Exchange's view, with aggregated position limits, new products cannot 
    ``grow the pie'' and increase overall liquidity in all the products; 
    they start at a disadvantage which may be impossible to overcome.
        f. Customer Margin. Since Differential Index Options are similar to 
    other index options, the Exchange proposes to apply standard index 
    options margin treatment to Differential Index Options.\7\ Differential 
    Index Options on the relative performance of one broad-based index 
    versus another will be margined as broad-based index options and short 
    positions therein will require margin equal to the current market value 
    of the option plus an amount equal to 15% of the market value of the 
    Differential Index reduced by any out of the money amount to a minimum 
    of the current market value of the option plus 10% of the Differential 
    Index. All other Index Differential Options, Equity Differential 
    Options, and Paired Stock Differential Options will be margined as 
    narrow-based index options and short positions therein will require an 
    amount equal to the current market value of the Differential Index 
    Option plus an amount equal to 20% of the market value of the 
    Differential Index reduced by any out of the money amount to a minimum 
    of the current market price of the options plus 10% of the Index. The 
    Exchange believes that this method of determining customer margin is 
    appropriate because the range of volatities expected for Differential 
    Indexes should not be significantly different than the expected rage 
    for other indexes and equities. The volatility of a Differential Index 
    is based upon the volatilities of the designated and benchmark indexes 
    or stock and the correlation of these components.\8\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \7\ See PCX Rule 2.16(c) for margin requirements for standard 
    index options.
        \8\ See Amendment No. 1, supra, note 3.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    2. Basis
        The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with 
    Section 6(b) of the Act,\9\ in general, and furthers the objectives of 
    section 6(b)(5),\10\ in particular, because it is designed to promote 
    just and equitable principles of trade, to facilitate transactions in 
    securities, and to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanisms of 
    a free and open market and a national market system, and to protect 
    investors and the public interest.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
        \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
    
        The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will 
    impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate 
    in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
    
    C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
    Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
    
        The Exchange did not solicit or receive written comments on the 
    proposed rule change.
    
    II. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing 
    for Commission Action
    
        Within 35 days of the date of publication of this notice in the 
    Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may 
    designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to 
    be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to 
    which the self-regulatory organization consents, the Commission will:
        (A) by order approve such proposed rule change, or
        (B) institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule 
    change should be disapproved.
    
    IV. Solicitation of Comments
    
        Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and 
    arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
    change is consistent with the Act. Persons making written submissions 
    should file six copies thereof with the Secretary, Securities and 
    Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, NW, Washington, DC 20549-0609. 
    Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written 
    statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with 
    the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed 
    rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those 
    that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions 
    of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and copying in the 
    Commission's Public Reference Room. Copies of the filing will also be 
    available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the 
    PCX. All submissions should refer to File No. SR-PCX-98-62 and should 
    be submitted by June 1, 1999.
    
        For the Commission by the Division of Market Regulation, 
    pursuant to delegated authority.\11\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \11\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Margaret H. McFarland,
    Deputy Secretary.
    [FR Doc. 99-11600 Filed 5-7-99; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
05/10/1999
Department:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
99-11600
Pages:
25093-25096 (4 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Release No. 34-41353, File No. SR-PCX-98-62
PDF File:
99-11600.pdf