99-11670. In the Matter of Sheila N. Burns; Order Prohibiting Involvement in NRC-Licensed Activities (Effective Immediately)  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 89 (Monday, May 10, 1999)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 25083-25085]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-11670]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
    
    [IA 98-067]
    
    
    In the Matter of Sheila N. Burns; Order Prohibiting Involvement 
    in NRC-Licensed Activities (Effective Immediately)
    
    I
    
        Sheila N. Burns was employed as a radiographer's assistant by 
    International Radiography and Inspection Services, Inc. (IRIS or 
    Licensee), Tulsa, Oklahoma. IRIS holds License No. 35-30246-01 issued 
    by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or Commission) pursuant to 10 
    CFR Part 34. The license authorizes IRIS to possess and utilize sealed 
    radiation sources in the performance of industrial radiography in 
    accordance with the conditions specified in the license.
    
    [[Page 25084]]
    
    II
    
        On November 7, 1998, Ms. Burns and another IRIS employee were 
    performing radiography at Sagebrush Pipeline Equipment Company in 
    Sapulpa, Oklahoma, using a radiographic exposure device (camera) 
    containing approximately 87 curies of iridium-192. Ms. Burns was the 
    radiographer's assistant on this job; the other IRIS employee was a 
    radiographer. In accordance with 10 CFR 34.46, the radiographer's 
    assistant was required to be under the personal supervision of the 
    radiographer when using the radiographic exposure device or performing 
    radiation surveys.
        On November 9, 1998, the radiation safety officer for IRIS notified 
    the NRC Operations Center in Rockville, Maryland, of an incident that 
    occurred on November 7, 1998, involving Ms. Burns and the radiographer. 
    The incident resulted in a radiation exposure to Ms. Burns in excess of 
    the annual limit in 10 CFR 20.1201.
        The NRC conducted an inspection and investigation to review the 
    circumstances surrounding this incident, and identified numerous 
    apparent violations of radiation safety requirements associated with 
    this incident, many of which were committed deliberately. The results 
    of the NRC investigation were described in an investigation report 
    issued on January 5, 1999. The results of the inspection were described 
    in an inspection report issued on March 3, 1999. On January 25, 
    February 4, and March 18, 1999, respectively, the NRC conducted 
    separate predecisional enforcement conferences with Ms. Burns, the 
    radiographer, and IRIS representatives. The conferences were conducted 
    to discuss the apparent violations and to assist the NRC in reaching 
    enforcement decisions in this matter.
        With respect to Ms. Burns, the NRC has determined that she engaged 
    in the following acts of deliberate misconduct prohibited by 10 CFR 
    30.10(a)(i) that caused IRIS to be in willful violation of regulatory 
    requirements by: (1) Knowingly conducting radiography at a site at 
    which there was no radiation survey instrument, contrary to the 
    requirements of 10 CFR 34.25(a); (2) knowingly conducting radiography 
    without performing radiation surveys each time the radiographic source 
    was returned to its shielded position following an exposure, contrary 
    to the requirements of 10 CFR 34.49(b); and (3) knowingly conducting 
    radiography without wearing all required personal radiation monitoring 
    equipment, contrary to the requirements of 10 CFR 34.47(a). In 
    addition, Ms. Burns knowingly provided false and misleading information 
    to IRIS's radiation safety officer following the incident, contrary to 
    the requirements of 10 CFR 30.10(a)(2). With regard to the latter 
    violation, Ms. Burns knowingly provided IRIS officials with false 
    information which was intended to cause them to believe that the 
    radiographer was in the restroom at the time of the exposure incident, 
    that she and the radiographer had followed radiation safety 
    requirements regarding the use of radiation survey instruments and 
    personal dosimetry, that she had inadvertently used a faulty alarm 
    ratemeter that night, and that she and the radiographer had halted 
    radiography work following her pocket dosimeter going off-scale.
    
    III
    
        The NRC must be able to rely on the Licensee and its employees to 
    comply with NRC requirements, including the requirement to provide 
    information that is complete and accurate in all material respects. Ms. 
    Burns' deliberate misconduct, which caused IRIS to violate the 
    Commission's regulations and resulted in a radiation exposure in excess 
    of the annual limit in 10 CFR 20.1201, and her misrepresentations to 
    IRIS officials, have raised serious doubt as to whether she can be 
    relied upon to comply with NRC requirements, and to provide complete 
    and accurate information to the NRC and its licensees.
        Consequently, I lack the requisite reasonable assurance that 
    licensed activities will be conducted in compliance with the 
    Commission's requirements and that the health and safety of the public 
    will be protected if Sheila N. Burns were permitted at this time to be 
    involved in NRC-licensed activities. Therefore, the public health, 
    safety and interest require that Sheila N. Burns be prohibited from any 
    involvement in NRC-licensed activities for a period of 3 years from the 
    date of this Order. Additionally, Sheila N. Burns is required to notify 
    the NRC of her first employment in NRC-licensed activities following 
    the prohibition period. Furthermore, pursuant to 10 CFR 2.202, I find 
    that the significance of Sheila N. Burns's conduct described above is 
    such that the public health, safety and interest require that this 
    Order be immediately effective.
    
    IV
    
        Accordingly, pursuant to sections 81, 161b, 161i, 161o, 182 and 186 
    of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, and the Commission's 
    regulations in 10 CFR 2.202, 10 CFR 30.10, and 10 CFR 150.20, It is 
    Hereby Ordered, Effective Immediately, That:
        1. Sheila N. Burns is prohibited for 3 years from the date of this 
    Order from engaging in NRC-licensed activities. NRC-licensed activities 
    are those activities that are conducted pursuant to a specific or 
    general license issued by the NRC, including, but not limited to, those 
    activities of Agreement State licensees conducted pursuant to the 
    authority granted by 10 CFR 150.20.
        2. If Sheila N. Burns is currently involved with another licensee 
    in NRC-licensed activities, she must immediately cease those 
    activities, and inform the NRC of the name, address and telephone 
    number of the employer, and provide a copy of this order to the 
    employer.
        3. For a period of 3 years after the 3-year period of prohibition 
    has expired, Sheila N. Burns shall, within 20 days of her acceptance of 
    each employment offer involving NRC-licensed activities or her becoming 
    involved in NRC-licensed activities, as defined in Paragraph IV.1 
    above, provide notice to the Director, Office of Enforcement, U.S. 
    Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555, of the name, 
    address, and telephone number of the employer or the entity where she 
    is, or will be, involved in NRC-licensed activities. In the first 
    notification Ms. Burns shall include a statement of her commitment to 
    compliance with regulatory requirements and the basis why the 
    Commission should have confidence that she will now comply with 
    applicable NRC requirements.
        The Director, Office of Enforcement, may, in writing, relax or 
    rescind any of the above conditions upon demonstration by Sheila N. 
    Burns of good cause.
    
    V
    
        In accordance with 10 CFR 2.202, Ms. Burns must, and any other 
    person adversely affected by this Order may, submit an answer to this 
    Order, and may request a hearing on this Order, within 20 days of the 
    date of this Order. Where good cause is shown, consideration will be 
    given to extending the time to request a hearing. A request for 
    extension of time must be made in writing to the Director, Office of 
    Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555, 
    and include a statement of good cause for the extension. The answer may 
    consent to this Order. Unless the answer consents to this Order, the 
    answer shall, in writing and under oath or affirmation, specifically 
    admit or deny
    
    [[Page 25085]]
    
    each allegation or charge made in this Order and shall set forth the 
    matters of fact and law on which Ms. Burns or other person adversely 
    affected relies and the reasons as to why the Order should not have 
    been issued. Any answer or request for a hearing shall be submitted to 
    the Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Attn: Rulemakings 
    and Adjudications Staff, Washington, DC 20555. Copies also shall be 
    sent to the Director, Office of Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 
    Commission, Washington, DC 20555, to the Assistant General Counsel for 
    Materials Litigation and Enforcement at the same address, to the 
    Regional Administrator, NRC Region IV, 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 400, 
    Arlington, Texas 76011, and to Ms. Burns if the answer or hearing 
    request is by a person other than Ms. Burns. If a person other than Ms. 
    Burns requests a hearing, that person shall set forth with 
    particularity the manner in which his or her interest is adversely 
    affected by this Order and shall address the criteria set forth in 10 
    CFR 2.714(d).
        If a hearing is requested by Ms. Burns or a person whose interest 
    is adversely affected, the Commission will issue an Order designating 
    the time and place of any hearing. If a hearing is held, the issue to 
    be considered at such hearing shall be whether this Order should be 
    sustained.
        Pursuant to 10 CFR 2.202(c)(2)(i), Ms. Burns may, in addition to 
    demanding a hearing, at the time the answer is filed or sooner, move 
    the presiding officer to set aside the immediate effectiveness of the 
    Order on the ground that the Order, including the need for immediate 
    effectiveness, is not based on adequate evidence but on mere suspicion, 
    unfounded allegations, or error.
        In the absence of any request for hearing, or written approval of 
    an extension of time in which to request a hearing, the provisions 
    specified in section IV above shall be final 20 days from the date of 
    this Order without further order or proceedings. If an extension of 
    time for requesting a hearing has been approved, the provisions 
    specified in section IV shall be final when the extension expires if a 
    hearing request has not been received. An answer or a request for 
    hearing shall not stay the immediate effectiveness of this order.
    
        Dated this 29th day of April 1999.
    
        For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
    Malcolm R. Knapp,
    Deputy Executive Director for Regulatory Effectiveness.
    [FR Doc. 99-11670 Filed 5-7-99; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
05/10/1999
Department:
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
99-11670
Pages:
25083-25085 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
IA 98-067
PDF File:
99-11670.pdf