99-11885. Small Disadvantaged Business Participation Evaluation and Incentives  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 90 (Tuesday, May 11, 1999)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 25214-25216]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-11885]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
    
    48 CFR Parts 1815, 1816, 1819, and 1852
    
    
    Small Disadvantaged Business Participation Evaluation and 
    Incentives
    
    AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This final rule conforms the NASA FAR Supplement (NFS) to 
    recent changes made to the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 
    regarding the evaluation and incentive for small disadvantaged business 
    (SDB) participation in competitive negotiated acquisitions. 
    Specifically, this rule requires that evaluation of SDB participation 
    be limited to SDBs in the Major SIC Groups designated by the Department 
    of Commerce, and that it be accomplished normally as a subfactor under 
    the NASA Mission Suitability evaluation factor. This rule also limits 
    incentives for use of SDB firms to an award fee provision or the 
    designated FAR incentive clause provision. Moreover, both incentives 
    are limited to use of SDBs in the designated Major SIC Groups. This 
    rule also makes editorial revisions to reflect recent FAR terminology 
    and clause title changes associated with implementation of the 
    Historically Underutilized Business Zone (HUBZone) Empowerment 
    Contracting Program. Finally, editorial changes are made to correct a 
    NASA official's title and to eliminate an erroneous designation of the 
    NASA Mentor-Protege program as a pilot program.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: May 11, 1999.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom O'Toole, NASA Headquarters, Code 
    HK, Washington, DC 20546, telephone: (202) 358-0478; email: 
    thomas.otoole@hq.nasa.gov.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Background
    
        Federal Acquisition Circular 97-07 revised the FAR to prescribe 
    procedures for the evaluation and incentive of SDB participation in 
    Government contracts. With respect to evaluation, it required that the 
    proposed participation of SDBs in the Department of Commerce designated 
    Major SIC Groups be evaluated in unrestricted competitive negotiations 
    expected to exceed $500,000 ($1,000,000 for construction). In addition, 
    two forms of post-award incentives for use of SDBs in the designated 
    SIC Major Groups were prescribed: the clause at 52.219-26, Small 
    Disadvantaged Business Participation Program--Incentive Subcontracting, 
    or an award fee provision. NASA procedures for award fee already 
    required evaluation of SDB utilization, but needed revision to limit 
    evaluation to SDBs in the designated Major SIC Groups.
    
    Impact
    
    Regulatory Flexibility Act
    
        This final rule does not constitute a significant revision within 
    the meaning of FAR 1.501 and Pub. L. 98-577, and publication for 
    comments is not required. However, comments from small business 
    entities concerning the affected NFS coverage will be considered in 
    accordance with 5 U.S.C. 610. Such comments may be submitted separately 
    and should cite 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq.
    
    Paperwork Reduction Act
    
        The Paperwork Reduction Act does not apply because the changes to 
    the NFS do not impose any recordkeeping or information collection 
    requirements, or collections of information from offerors, contractors, 
    or members of the public that require the approval of the Office of 
    Management and Budget under 44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.
    
    List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 1815, 1816, 1819, and 1852
    
        Government procurement.
    Tom Luedtke,
    Acting Associate Administrator for Procurement.
    
        Accordingly, 48 CFR Parts 1815, 1816, 1819, and 1852 are amended as 
    follows:
    
    PART 1815--CONTRACTING BY NEGOTIATION
    
        1. The authority citation for 48 CFR Parts 1815, 1816, 1819, and 
    1852 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 42 U.S.C. 2473(c)(1).
    
        2. In section 1815.304, the section heading is revised and 
    paragraph (c) is added to read as follows:
    
    
    1815.304  Evaluation factors and significant subfactors. (NASA 
    supplements paragraph (c))
    
        (c)(4)(A) The extent of participation of small disadvantaged 
    business (SDB) concerns shall be evaluated as a subfactor under the 
    Mission Suitability factor. If a Mission Suitability factor is not 
    used, the SDB participation shall be evaluated as a separate factor or 
    subfactor, as appropriate.
        (B) SDB concerns that choose the FAR 19.11 price evaluation 
    adjustment shall receive the lowest possible score/rating under the FAR 
    15.304(c)(4) evaluation.
    
    [[Page 25215]]
    
        3. In section 1815.304-70, paragraph (b)(2) is revised to read as 
    follows:
    
    
    1815.304-70  NASA evaluation factors.
    
    * * * * *
        (b) * * *
        (2) The Mission Suitability factor may identify evaluation 
    subfactors to further define the content of the factor. Each Mission 
    Suitability subfactor shall be weighted and scored. The adjectival 
    rating percentages in 1815.305(a)(3)(A) shall be applied to the 
    subfactor weight to determine the point score. The number of Mission 
    Suitability subfactors is limited to five. The Mission Suitability 
    evaluation subfactors and their weights shall be identified in the RFP.
    * * * * *
        4. In section 1815.404-470, paragraph (c)(5) is revised to read as 
    follows:
    
    
    1815.404-470  NASA structured approach for profit or fee objective.
    
    * * * * *
        (c) * * *
        (5) Federal socioeconomic programs. In addition to rewarding 
    contractors for unusual initiative in supporting Government 
    socioeconomic programs, failure or unwillingness on the part of the 
    contractor to support these programs should be viewed as evidence of 
    poor performance for the purpose of establishing this profit/fee 
    objective factor. However, this factor does not apply to utilization of 
    small disadvantaged businesses. Incentives for use of these firms may 
    only be structured according to FAR 19.1203 and 19.1204(c).
    * * * * *
    
    PART 1816--TYPES OF CONTRACTS
    
        5. In section 1816.405-274, paragraph (f) is revised to read as 
    follows:
    
    
    1816.405-274  Award fee evaluation factors.
    
    * * * * *
        (f)(1) The contractor's performance against the subcontracting plan 
    incorporated in the contract shall be evaluated. Emphasis may be placed 
    on the contractor's accomplishment of its goals for subcontracting with 
    small business, HUBZone small business, and women-owned small business 
    concerns.
        (2) The contractor's performance against the contract target for 
    participation as subcontractors by small disadvantaged business 
    concerns in the SIC Major Groups designated by the Department of 
    Commerce (see FAR 19.201(c)) shall also be evaluated if the clause at 
    FAR 52.219-26, Small Disadvantaged Business Participation--Incentive 
    Subcontracting, is not included in the contract (see FAR 19.1204(c)).
        (3) The contractor's achievements in subcontracting high technology 
    efforts as well as the contractor's performance under the Mentor-
    Protege Program, if applicable, may also be evaluated.
        (4) The evaluation weight given to the contractor's performance 
    against the considerations in paragraphs (f)(1) through (f)(3) of this 
    section should be significant (up to 15 percent of available award 
    fee). The weight should motivate the contractor to focus management 
    attention to subcontracting with small, HUBZone, and women-owned small 
    business concerns, and with small disadvantaged business concerns in 
    designated SIC Major Groups to the maximum extent practicable, 
    consistent with efficient contract performance.
    * * * * *
    
    PART 1819--SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAMS
    
        6. In section 1819.201, the section heading and paragraph (a) are 
    revised and paragraph (f)(1) is added to read as follows:
    
    
    1819.201  General Policy. (NASA supplements paragraphs (a), (c), (d), 
    and (f))
    
        (a)(i) NASA is committed to providing to small, HUBZone, small 
    disadvantaged, and women-owned small business concerns, maximum 
    practicable opportunities to participate in Agency acquisitions at the 
    prime contract level. The participation of NASA prime contractors in 
    providing subcontracting opportunities to such entities is also an 
    essential part of the Agency's commitment. The participation of these 
    entities is particularly emphasized in high-technology areas where they 
    have not traditionally dominated.
        (ii) NASA annually negotiates Agency small, HUBZone, small 
    disadvantaged, and women-owned small business prime and subcontracting 
    goals with the Small Business Administration pursuant to section 15(g) 
    of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 644). In addition, NASA has the 
    following statutory goals based on the total value of prime and 
    subcontract awards:
        (A) Under Public Laws 101-144, 101-507, and 102-389, an annual goal 
    of at least 8 percent for prime and subcontract awards to small 
    disadvantaged business (SDB) concerns, Historically Black Colleges and 
    Universities (HBCUs), minority institutions (MIs), and women-owned 
    small businesses (WOSBs) (see 1819.7000); and
        (B) Under 10 U.S.C. 2323, an annual goal of 5 percent for prime and 
    subcontract awards to SDBs, HBCUs, and WOSBs.
    * * * * *
        (f)(1) The NASA Ombudsman, the Deputy Associate Administrator for 
    Procurement (Code H), is the designated official for determining 
    whether the use of the SDB mechanism in FAR subpart 19.11 has resulted 
    in an undue burden on non-SDB firms in the Department of Commerce 
    designated SIC Major Groups, or is otherwise inappropriate.
    
    
    1819.202-170  [Amended]
    
        7. In the last sentence to section 1819.202-170, the word 
    ``(Technical)'' is removed.
    
    
    1819.705-470  [Amended]
    
        8. In the last sentence to section 1819.705-470, the word ``, 
    HUBZone,'' is added before the phrase ``and women-owned small business 
    concerns''.
        9. Section 1819.708-70 is revised to read as follows:
    
    
    1819.708-70  NASA solicitation provision and contract clause.
    
        (a) The contracting officer shall insert the provision at 1852.219-
    73, Small Business Subcontracting Plan, in invitations for bids 
    containing the clause at FAR 52.219-9 with its Alternate I. Insert in 
    the last sentence the number of calendar days after request that the 
    offeror must submit a complete plan.
        (b) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 1852.21975, 
    Small Business Subcontracting Reporting, in solicitations and contracts 
    containing the clause at FAR 52.219-9, except for contracts covered by 
    an approved commercial plan.
    
    PART 1852--SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES
    
        10. In section 1852.219-73, the section title, date, and paragraph 
    (b) are revised to read as follows:
    
    
    1852.219-73  Small Business Subcontracting Plan.
    
        As prescribed in 1819.708-70(a), insert the following provision:
    
    Small Business Subcontracting Plan
    
    May 1999
    
    * * * * *
        (b) The contract expected to result from this solicitation will 
    contain FAR clause 52.219-9, ``Small Business Subcontracting Plan.'' 
    The apparent low bidder must submit the complete plan within [Insert 
    number of days] calendar days after request by the Contracting 
    Officer.
    
    (End of provision)
    
    
    [[Page 25216]]
    
    
        11. In section 1852.219-75, the section title and date are revised 
    to read as follows:
    
    
    1852.219-75  Small Business Subcontracting Reporting.
    
    * * * * *
    
    Small Business Subcontracting Reporting
    
    May 1999
    
    * * * * *
    
    
    1852.219-77  [Amended]
    
        12. In section 1852.219-77, the date is revised to read ``May 
    1999'' and in paragraph (d), the word ``pilot'' is removed.
    
    [FR Doc. 99-11885 Filed 5-10-99; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 7510-01-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
5/11/1999
Published:
05/11/1999
Department:
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
99-11885
Dates:
May 11, 1999.
Pages:
25214-25216 (3 pages)
PDF File:
99-11885.pdf
CFR: (4)
48 CFR 1815
48 CFR 1816
48 CFR 1819
48 CFR 1852