95-10986. Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Industrie Model A300, A300-600, and A310 Series Airplanes  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 92 (Friday, May 12, 1995)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 25604-25606]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-10986]
    
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    
    Federal Aviation Administration
    
    14 CFR Part 39
    
    [Docket No. 93-NM-56-AD; Amendment 39-9220; AD 95-10-03]
    
    
    Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Industrie Model A300, A300-600, 
    and A310 Series Airplanes
    
    AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), 
    applicable to certain Airbus Industrie Model A300, A300-600, and A310 
    series airplanes, that requires inspections to detect cracks in the 
    lower spar axis of the pylon between ribs 9 and 10, and repair, if 
    necessary. This amendment is prompted by a report indicating that 
    fatigue cracks have been found on the lower spar of the pylon. The 
    actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent such fatigue 
    cracking, which could result in reduced structural integrity of the 
    lower spar of the pylon.
    
    DATES: Effective June 12, 1995.
        The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in 
    the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as 
    of June 12, 1995.
    
    ADDRESSES: The service information referenced in this AD may be 
    obtained from Airbus Industrie, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 
    Blagnac Cedex, France. This information may be examined at the Federal 
    Aviation Administration (FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, Rules 
    Docket, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the Office of 
    the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, 
    Washington, DC.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephen Slotte, Aerospace Engineer, 
    Standardization Branch, ANM-113, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 
    1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98055-4056; telephone (206) 
    227-2797; fax (206) 227-1320.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal 
    Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to include an airworthiness 
    directive (AD) that is applicable to certain Airbus Industrie Model 
    A300, A300-600, and A310 series airplanes was published in the Federal 
    Register on December 6, 1993 (58 FR 64200). That action proposed to 
    require repetitive internal eddy current inspections to detect cracks 
    in the lower spar axis of the pylon between ribs 9 and 10, and repair, 
    if necessary.
        Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate 
    in the making of this amendment. Due consideration has been given to 
    the comments received.
        Both commenters support the proposed rule.
        Since the issuance of the proposed rule, Airbus Industrie issued 
    Revision 1, dated October 15, 1993, of the service bulletins cited in 
    the proposal: Service Bulletin No.'s A300-54-071 (for Model A300 series 
    airplanes), A300-54-6011 (for Model A300-600 series airplanes), and 
    A310-54-2016 (for Model A310 series airplanes). Revision 1 of these 
    service bulletins incorporates certain kit and technical information 
    and revises the work hour estimate associated with repair of the lower 
    spar. The FAA has revised the final rule to reference these latest 
    service bulletin revisions as additional sources of service information 
    for accomplishment of certain actions required by this AD. In addition, 
    the FAA has revised the applicability of the final rule to specify that 
    the AD applies to those airplanes listed in Revision 1 of the service 
    bulletins. (This change adds no new airplanes to those specified 
    originally in the applicability of the proposed rule.)
        The service bulletin citation contained in paragraph (b) of the 
    final rule has been revised to correct a typographical error. The 
    correct date of the original issue of Airbus Industrie Service Bulletin 
    No. A300-54-6011 is November 12, 1991 (rather than November 12, 1992, 
    as indicated in the proposal).
        Since the issuance of the proposed rule, Airbus Industrie also has 
    issued Service Bulletins A300-54-0079 (for Model A300 series 
    airplanes); A300-54-6019 (for Model A300-600 series airplanes); and 
    A310-54-2022 (for Model A310 series airplanes); all dated October 15, 
    1993. These service bulletins describe procedures for modification of 
    the lower spar between ribs 9 and 10. This modification involves 
    installation of an outer doubler on the undamaged structure of the 
    lower spars between ribs 9 and 10. For Model A300 and A310 series 
    airplanes, accomplishment of the modification eliminates the need for 
    the internal eddy current inspections specified in the Airbus service 
    bulletins previously described (and proposed in the notice). For Model 
    A300-600 series airplanes, accomplishment of the modification reduces 
    the probability of cracking in the lower spar of the pylon and, 
    thereby, allows an extension of the initial inspection threshold and 
    interval for accomplishing the internal eddy current inspections. The 
    Direction Generale de l'Aviation Civile (DGAC), which is the 
    airworthiness authority for France, issued French airworthiness 
    directive 92-049-130(B)R2, dated March 2, 1994, to reference these 
    service bulletins.
        Accordingly, the FAA has revised this final rule to provide 
    operators with the option of accomplishing the modification of the 
    lower spar as terminating action for the repetitive eddy current 
    inspections of Model A300 and A310 series airplanes. The FAA also has 
    revised this final rule to extend the inspection threshold and 
    repetitive inspection intervals of Model A300-600 series airplanes on 
    which the modification of the lower spar is accomplished.
        Additionally, the FAA revised the economic impact information, 
    below, to specify the costs associated with modifying the lower spar, 
    should an operator elect to do so. Further, the FAA has recently 
    reviewed the figures it has used over the past several years in 
    calculating the economic impact of AD activity. In order to account for 
    various inflationary costs in the airline industry, the FAA has 
    determined that it is necessary to increase the labor rate used in 
    these calculations from $55 per work hour to $60 per work hour. The 
    economic impact information, below, has been revised to reflect this 
    increase in the specified hourly labor rate.
        Subsequent to the issuance of the notice, the FAA discovered that 
    reference to Model A300 B2-203 series airplanes was omitted 
    inadvertently from paragraph (a) of the proposed rule. This airplane 
    model is not operated [[Page 25605]] currently by U.S. operators and, 
    therefore, is not affected directly by this AD action. However, the FAA 
    considers that revising paragraph (a) of the rule to include Model A300 
    B2-203 series airplanes is necessary to ensure that the unsafe 
    condition is addressed in the event that any of these subject airplanes 
    are imported and placed on the U.S. Register in the future.
        As a result of recent communications with the Air Transport 
    Association (ATA) of America, the FAA has learned that, in general, 
    some operators may misunderstand the legal effect of AD's on airplanes 
    that are identified in the applicability provision of the AD, but that 
    have been altered or repaired in the area addressed by the AD. The FAA 
    points out that all airplanes identified in the applicability provision 
    of an AD are legally subject to the AD. If an airplane has been altered 
    or repaired in the affected area in such a way as to affect compliance 
    with the AD, the owner or operator is required to obtain FAA approval 
    for an alternative method of compliance with the AD, in accordance with 
    the paragraph of each AD that provides for such approvals. A note has 
    been added to this final rule to clarify this long-standing 
    requirement.
        After careful review of the available data, including the comments 
    noted above, the FAA has determined that air safety and the public 
    interest require the adoption of the rule with the changes previously 
    described. The FAA has determined that these changes will neither 
    increase the economic burden on any operator nor increase the scope of 
    the AD.
        The FAA estimates that 57 airplanes of U.S. registry will be 
    affected by this AD, that it will take approximately 4 work hours per 
    airplane to accomplish the required actions, and that the average labor 
    rate is $60 per work hour. Based on these figures, the total cost 
    impact of the AD on U.S. operators is estimated to be $13,680, or $240 
    per airplane.
        The total cost impact figure discussed above is based on 
    assumptions that no operator has yet accomplished any of the 
    requirements of this AD action, and that no operator would accomplish 
    those actions in the future if this AD were not adopted.
        Should an operator elect to accomplish the optional terminating 
    action that would be provided by this AD action, it will take 
    approximately 104 work hours to accomplish it, at an average labor rate 
    of $60 per work hour. The cost of required parts will be approximately 
    $1,500 per airplane. Based on these figures, the total cost impact of 
    the optional terminating action is estimated to be $7,740 per airplane.
        The regulations adopted herein will not have substantial direct 
    effects on the States, on the relationship between the national 
    government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
    responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in 
    accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this final 
    rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the 
    preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
        For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is 
    not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866; 
    (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and 
    Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a 
    significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial 
    number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory 
    Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has been prepared for this action 
    and it is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained 
    from the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption 
    ADDRESSES.
    
    List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
    
        Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by 
    reference, Safety.
    
    Adoption of the Amendment
    
        Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the 
    Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of 
    the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
    
    PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
    
        1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 49 U.S.C. App. 1354(a), 1421 and 1423; 49 U.S.C. 
    106(g); and 14 CFR 11.89.
    
    
    Sec. 39.13  [Amended]
    
        2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new 
    airworthiness directive:
    
    95-10-03  Airbus Industrie: Amendment 39-9220. Docket 93-NM-56-AD.
    
        Applicability: Model A300, A300-600, and A310 series airplanes; 
    as listed in Revision 1 of Airbus Industrie Service Bulletin No.'s 
    A300-54-071, A300-54-6011, and A310-54-2016, all dated October 15, 
    1993; certificated in any category.
    
        Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the 
    preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been 
    modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the 
    requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified, 
    altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of 
    this AD is affected, the owner/operator must use the authority 
    provided in paragraph (d) to request approval from the FAA. This 
    approval may address either no action, if the current configuration 
    eliminates the unsafe condition; or different actions necessary to 
    address the unsafe condition described in this AD. Such a request 
    should include an assessment of the effect of the changed 
    configuration on the unsafe condition addressed by this AD. In no 
    case does the presence of any modification, alteration, or repair 
    remove any airplane from the applicability of this AD.
    
        Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished 
    previously.
        To prevent reduced structural integrity of the lower spar of the 
    pylon, accomplish the following:
        (a) For Model A300 B4-2C, B2K-3C, B2-203, B4-103, and B4-203 
    series airplanes: Prior to the accumulation of 9,000 total landings, 
    or within 500 landings after the effective date of this AD, 
    whichever occurs later, perform an internal eddy current inspection 
    to detect cracks in the lower spar axis of the pylon between ribs 9 
    and 10, in accordance with Airbus Industrie Service Bulletin No. 
    A300-54-071, dated November 12, 1991; or Revision 1, dated October 
    15, 1993.
        (1) If no crack is found, repeat the inspection thereafter at 
    intervals not to exceed 2,500 landings.
        (2) If any crack is found that is less than or equal to 30 mm: 
    Perform subsequent inspections and repair in accordance with the 
    methods and times specified in the service bulletin.
        (3) If any crack is found that is greater than 30 mm, but less 
    than 100 mm: Prior to the accumulation of 250 landings after crack 
    discovery, repair in accordance with a method approved by the 
    Manager, Standardization Branch, ANM-113, FAA, Transport Airplane 
    Directorate.
        (4) If any crack is found that is greater than or equal to 100 
    mm: Prior to further flight, repair in accordance with a method 
    approved by the Manager, Standardization Branch, ANM-113.
        (5) Accomplishment of the modification specified in Airbus 
    Industrie Service Bulletin No. A300-54-0079, dated October 15, 1993, 
    constitutes terminating action for the inspections required by 
    paragraph (a) of this AD.
        (b) For Model A300-600 B4-620, C4-620, -622R, and -622 series 
    airplanes: Except as provided by paragraph (b)(5) of this AD, prior 
    to the accumulation of 4,000 total landings, or within 500 landings 
    after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later, perform 
    an internal eddy current inspection to detect cracks in the lower 
    spar axis of the pylon between ribs 9 and 10, in accordance with 
    Airbus Industrie Service Bulletin No. A300-54-6011, dated November 
    12, 1991, as amended by Service Bulletin Change Notice O.A., dated 
    July 10, 1992; or Revision 1, dated October 15, 1993.
        (1) If no crack is found, repeat the inspection thereafter at 
    intervals not to exceed 2,500 landings. [[Page 25606]] 
        (2) If any crack is found that is less than or equal to 30 mm: 
    Perform subsequent inspections and repair in accordance with the 
    methods and times specified in the service bulletin.
        (3) If any crack is found that is greater than 30 mm, but less 
    than 100 mm: Prior to the accumulation of 250 landings after crack 
    discovery, repair in accordance with a method approved by the 
    Manager, Standardization Branch, ANM-113.
        (4) If any crack is found that is greater than or equal to 100 
    mm: Prior to further flight, repair in accordance with a method 
    approved by the Manager, Standardization Branch, ANM-113.
        (5) Accomplishment of the modification specified in Airbus 
    Industrie Service Bulletin No. A300-54-6019, dated October 15, 1993, 
    increases the threshold and repetitive interval of the inspections 
    required by paragraph (b) of this AD to the threshold and interval 
    specified in paragraph 2.D. of the Accomplishment Instructions of 
    Airbus Industrie Service Bulletin No. A300-54-6011, Revision 1, 
    dated October 15, 1993.
        (c) For Model A310-221, -222, -322, -324, and -325 series 
    airplanes: Prior to the accumulation of 25,000 total landings, or 
    within 500 landings after the effective date of this AD, whichever 
    occurs later, perform an internal eddy current inspection to detect 
    cracks in the lower spar axis of the pylon between ribs 9 and 10, in 
    accordance with Airbus Industrie Service Bulletin No. A310-54-2016, 
    dated November 12, 1991; or Revision 1, dated October 15, 1993.
        (1) If no crack is found, repeat the inspection thereafter at 
    intervals not to exceed 2,500 landings.
        (2) If any crack is found that is less than or equal to 30 mm: 
    Perform subsequent inspections and repair in accordance with the 
    methods and times specified in the service bulletin.
        (3) If any crack is found that is greater than 30 mm, but less 
    than 100 mm: Prior to the accumulation of 250 landings after crack 
    discovery, repair in a accordance with a method approved by the 
    Manager, Standardization Branch, ANM-113.
        (4) If any crack is found that is greater than or equal to 100 
    mm: Prior to further flight, repair in accordance with a method 
    approved by the Manager, Standardization Branch, ANM-113.
        (5) Accomplishment of the modification specified in Airbus 
    Industrie Service Bulletin No. A310-54-2022, dated October 15, 1993, 
    constitutes terminating action for the inspections required by 
    paragraph (c) of this AD.
        (d) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the 
    compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be 
    used if approved by the Manager, Standardization Branch, ANM-113. 
    Operators shall submit their requests through an appropriate FAA 
    Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send 
    it to the Manager, Standardization Branch, ANM-113.
    
        Note 2: Information concerning the existence of approved 
    alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be 
    obtained from the Standardization Branch, ANM-113.
    
        (e) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with 
    Secs. 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 
    21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where the 
    requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
        (f) The actions shall be done in accordance with the following 
    Airbus Industrie service bulletins, as applicable, which contain the 
    specified effective pages:
    
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                     Revision level shown on                        
     Service bulletin referenced and date           Page No.                   page             Date shown on page  
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    A300-54-071, November 12, 1991........  1-19...................  Original...............  November 12, 1991.    
    A300-54-071, Revision 1, October 15,    1-20...................  1......................  October 15, 1993.     
     1993.                                                                                                          
    A300-54-0079, October 15, 1993........  1-16...................  Original...............  October 15, 1993.     
    A300-54-6011, November 12, 1991.......  1-17...................  Original...............  November 12, 1991.    
    Service Bulletin Change Notice O.A.,    (This document is not    Original...............  July 10, 1992.        
     A300-54-6011, July 10, 1992.            numbered).                                                             
    A300-54-6011, Revision 1, October 15,   1-10, 12-19............  1......................  October 15, 1993.     
     1993.                                                                                                          
                                            11.....................  Original...............  November 12, 1991.    
    A300-54-6019, October 15, 1993........  1-11...................  Original...............  October 15, 1993.     
    A310-54-2016, November 12, 1991.......  1-17...................  Original...............  November 12, 1991.    
    A310-54-2016, Revision 1, October 15,   1-10, 12, 17...........  1......................  October 15, 1993.     
     1993.                                                                                                          
                                            11, 13-16..............  Original...............  November 12, 1991.    
    A310-54-2022, October 15, 1993........  1-11...................  Original...............  October 15, 1993.     
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        This incorporation by reference was approved by the Director of the 
    Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. 
    Copies may be obtained from Airbus Industrie, 1 Rond Point Maurice 
    Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France. Copies may be inspected at the 
    FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, 
    Washington; or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol 
    Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.
        (g) This amendment becomes effective on June 12, 1995.
    
        Issued in Renton, Washington, on April 28, 1995.
    James V. Devany,
    Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
    Service.
    [FR Doc. 95-10986 Filed 5-11-95; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-13-U
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
6/12/1995
Published:
05/12/1995
Department:
Federal Aviation Administration
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
95-10986
Dates:
Effective June 12, 1995.
Pages:
25604-25606 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 93-NM-56-AD, Amendment 39-9220, AD 95-10-03
PDF File:
95-10986.pdf
CFR: (1)
14 CFR 39.13