[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 91 (Monday, May 12, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25954-25955]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-12270]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics: Meetings
Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, the Department of
Health and Human Services announces the following advisory committee
meeting.
Name: National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics (NCVHS),
Executive Committee.
Times and Dates: 9:00 a.m.-5:30 p.m., June 3, 1997; 9:00 a.m.-
5:30 p.m., June 4, 1997.
Place: Federal Building, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco,
CA.
Status: Open.
Purpose: Under the Administrative Simplification provisions of
the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996
(HIPAA), the Secretary of Health and Human Services is required to
adopt standards for specified administrative health care
transactions to enable information to be exchanged electronically.
The law requires that, within 24 months of adoption, all health
plans, health care clearinghouses and health care providers who
choose to conduct these transactions electronically must comply with
these standards. Further, the law requires DHHS to submit a report
to Congress containing detailed recommendations on standards with
respect to the privacy of individually identifiable health
information. In preparing these reports and recommendations, the
Secretary is required to consult with the NCVHS, the statutory
public advisory body to HHS on health data, privacy and health
information policy. The Committee is planning to submit
recommendations to the Secretary during 1997.
To assist in formulating its recommendations, the NCVHS has
convened a number of public meetings relating to health data
standards and health information privacy and confidentiality. These
meetings were held in the Washington, D.C. area and involved a broad
range of representatives from the health sector, including
providers, plans, insurers, electronic clearinghouses, third party
administrators, health researches, representatives from public
health agencies, social welfare agencies, law enforcement agencies,
public and private organizations with health system oversight
responsibilities, and privacy and patient interest groups.
[[Page 25955]]
To provide an additional opportunity for public input and to
solicit additional views and advice on implementation of the
administrative simplification provisions of Public Law 104-191, the
Executive Subcommittee of the NCVHS, with support from the
California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development, is
sponsoring a public meeting on June 3-4, 1997 in San Francisco. The
meeting is open to the public and will take place from 9:00 to 5:30
p.m. at the Federal Building, 450 Golden Gate Avenue.
For the meeting, the Committee is inviting specific
organizations representing consumer groups, plans, providers,
insurers, researchers and the public health community, as well as
other interested parties to describe their perspectives and offer
advice on the implementation of the law. Presenters are being asked
to respond to the questions outlined below in writing, to make a
brief oral presentation, and to respond to additional questions from
the Committee.
Questions To Be Addressed
1. What does your organization expect to be the impact of the
administrative simplification requirements in the Health Insurance
Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA)? These standards
include: Administrative transactions, coding sets and medical
classifications, privacy, confidentiality, security and unique
personal health identification numbers for providers, plans,
employers, and individuals for use in the health care system. Please
describe how each of these issues could affect the members of your
organization or the persons you represent.
2. Are any of these standards currently priority areas for your
organization or members of your organization? How are you addressing
or planning to address these standards?
3. Do members of your organization have any concerns about the
type of transactions specified under HIPAA? For producers of the
data, how available is the information that you need to report in
the transactions? For organizations and individuals that use these
data, is the information useful for bill payment, managing the care
process, and health policy analysis and assessments? Do you have
comments regarding the quality of these data?
4. How can administrative simplification best be achieved while
balancing clinical and payment needs with maintaining privacy
protection for individuals?
5. Recognizing the intent of the administrative simplification
provisions of P.L. 104-191, what coding approach would best meet
your needs? Please suggest how administrative simplification could
be achieved while reducing administrative burden and obtaining
clinically useful information.
6. What medical and clinical codes and classifications do you
use in administrative transactions now? What do you perceive as the
main strengths and weaknesses of the current methods for coding and
classification of encounter and enrollment data?
7. What medical procedure classification system would you
recommend as the initial standard for outpatient transactions? Is it
practical to move to a single procedure classification on the
schedule required for the implementation of administrative
standards? Should the standards continue the current practice of
requiring different procedure coding systems for the ambulatory and
inpatient sectors?
8. Before the passage of HIPAA, the National Center for Health
Statistics initiated the development of a clinical modification of
the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Edition (ICD-10-
CM) to replace ICD-9-CM. In addition, the Health Care Financing
Administration undertook the development of a new procedure coding
system for inpatient services, entitled ICD-10-PCS (Procedure
Classification System). A plan exists to implement these systems
simultaneously in the year 2000. On the pre-HIPAA schedule, they
will be released to the field for evaluation and testing by 1998.
Should ICD be used for administrative transactions? If so, which
version do you advocate and why?
9. Do you have any advice or recommendations for NCVHS or the
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services related to the
implementation of the standards and privacy provisions of the HIPAA?
Do you have any concerns?
Contact Person for More Information: Substantive program
information as well as summaries of the meeting and a roster of
committee members may be obtained from James Scanlon, NCVHS Executive
Staff Director, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and
Evaluation, DHHS, Room 440-D, Humphrey Building, 200 Independence
Avenue S.W., Washington, D.C. 20201, telephone (202) 690-7100, or
Marjorie S. Greenberg, Acting Executive Secretary, NCVHS, NCHS, CDC,
Room 1100, Presidential Building, 6525 Belcrest Road, Hyattsville,
Maryland 20782, telephone (301) 436-7050. Information also is available
on the NCVHS home page of the HHS website: http://aspe.os.dhhs.gov/
ncvhs.
Dated: May 5, 1997.
James Scanlon,
Director, Division of Data Policy, Office of the Assistant Secretary
for Planning and Evaluation.
[FR Doc. 97-12270 Filed 5-9-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4151-04-M