98-12456. Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change by National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.; Relating to Cancellations and Suspensions for Failure To Comply with Arbitration Award  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 91 (Tuesday, May 12, 1998)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 26238-26240]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-12456]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
    
    [Release No. 34-39957; File No. SR-NASD-98-34]
    
    
    Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule 
    Change by National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.; Relating to 
    Cancellations and Suspensions for Failure To Comply with Arbitration 
    Award
    
    May 5, 1998.
        Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
    (``Act''),\1\ notice is hereby given that on May 1, 1998, the National 
    Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. (``NASD'' or ``Association'') 
    filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the 
    proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which 
    Items have been prepared by NASD Regulation, Inc. (``NASD 
    Regulation''). The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit 
    comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of 
    Substance of the Proposed Rule Change
    
        The Association proposes to amend that portion of Rule 9514 of the 
    Rules of the Association relating to review of non-compliance with 
    arbitration awards and settlements. The Association proposes to change 
    the composition of the hearing panels used in such proceedings. Below 
    is the text of the proposed rule change. Proposed new language is 
    italicized; proposed deletions are in brackets.
    9514. Hearing and Decision.
    * * * * *
        (b) Designation of Party for the Association and Appointment of 
    Hearing Panel
        If a member, association person, or other person subject to a 
    notice under Rule 9512 or 9513 files a written request for a hearing, 
    an appropriate department or office of the Association shall be
    
    [[Page 26239]]
    
    designated as a Party in the proceeding, and a Hearing Panel shall be 
    appointed.
        (1) If the President of NASD Regulation or NASD Regulation staff 
    issued the notice initiating the proceeding under Rule 9512(a) or 
    9513(a), the President of NASD Regulation shall designate an 
    appropriate NASD Regulation department or office as a Party[, and the 
    NASD Regulation Board shall appoint a Hearing Panel. The Hearing Panel 
    shall be composed of two or more members]. For proceedings initiated 
    under Rule 9513(a) concerning failure to comply with an arbitration 
    award or a settlement agreement related to an NASD arbitration or 
    mediation, the Chief Hearing Officer shall appoint a Hearing Panel 
    composed of a Hearing Officer. For any other proceedings initiated 
    under Rule 9512(a) or 9513(a) by the President of NASD Regulation or 
    NASD Regulation staff, the NASD Regulation Board shall appoint a 
    Hearing Panel composed of two or more members: [One] one member shall 
    be a Director of NASD Regulation, and the remaining member or members 
    shall be current or former Directors of NASD Regulation or Governors. 
    The President of NASD Regulation may not serve on [the] a Hearing 
    Panel.
     * * * * *
    
    II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
    Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
    
        In its filing with the Commission, NASD Regulation included 
    statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule 
    change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule 
    change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places 
    specified in Item IV below. NASD Regulation has prepared summaries, set 
    forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of 
    such statements.
    
    A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
    Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
    
    1. Purpose
        The purpose of the proposed rule change is to change the 
    composition of the Hearing Panel used for proceedings under the Rule 
    9510 Series in which NASD Regulation seeks to suspend or cancel the 
    membership of a member or the registration of a person for failure to 
    comply with an arbitration award or a settlement agreement related to 
    an NASD arbitration or mediation. Currently, Rule 9514(b) requires that 
    the Hearing Panel for such proceedings be composed of two or more 
    members, one of whom must be a Director of NASD Regulation, and the 
    remaining member or members must be a current or former Director of 
    NASD Regulation or Governor of the NASD. NASD Regulation has determined 
    that board-level panelists are not necessary for such hearings because 
    the issues to be resolved are narrow and largely administrative. 
    Generally, the only issues to be addressed are whether: (1) the member 
    or person paid the award in full or fully complied with the settlement 
    agreement; (2) the claimant agreed to installment payments or has 
    otherwise settled the matter; (3) the member or person has filed a 
    timely motion to vacate or modify the arbitration award and such motion 
    has not been denied; (4) the member or person has filed a petition in 
    bankruptcy and the bankruptcy proceeding is pending, or the award or 
    payment owed under the settlement agreement has been discharged by the 
    bankruptcy court; and (5) the member or person is unable to pay the 
    award. The Commission has stated that a bona fide inability to pay an 
    arbitration award is an important consideration determining whether any 
    sanction for failure to pay an arbitration award is excessive or 
    oppressive.\2\ NASD Regulation has determined that it would be more 
    efficient to have one Hearing Officer conduct the hearing on these 
    issues and render a decision. Hearing Officers are well-suited to 
    resolve the issues presented in these types of hearings due to their 
    training and experience in the NASD's disciplinary proceedings under 
    the Rule 9200 Series.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \2\ See In the Matter of the Application of Bruce M. Zipper, 
    Securities Exchange Act Release 33376, Admin. Proc. File No. 3-7908. 
    (Dec. 23, 1993).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    2. Statutory Basis
        NASD Regulation believes that the proposed rule change is 
    consistent with the provisions of Section 15A(b)(6) of the Act, which 
    requires, among other things, that the Association's rules must be 
    designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to 
    promote just and equitable principles of trade, and, in general, to 
    protect investors and the public interest. The NASD believes that the 
    proposed rule change will result in a fair and efficient procedure for 
    suspending or canceling the membership of a member or the registration 
    of a person for failure to comply with an arbitration award or a 
    settlement agreement related to an NASD arbitration or mediation so 
    that where appropriate, such members or persons are not permitted to 
    continue to do business with investors.
    
    B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
    
        NASD Regulation does not believe the proposed rule change would 
    result in any burden on competition that is not necessary or 
    appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act, as amended.
    
    C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
    Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
    
        Written comments were neither solicited nor received.
    
    III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing 
    for Commission Action
    
        Within thirty-five days of the date of publication of this notice 
    in the Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the 
    Commission may designate up to ninety days of such date if it finds 
    such longer period to be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so 
    finding or (ii) as to which the self-regulatory organization consents, 
    the Commission will: (A) by order approve such proposed rule change, or 
    (B) institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule change 
    should be disapproved.
    
    IV. Solicitation of Comments
    
        Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and 
    arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposal is 
    consistent with the Act. Persons making written submissions should file 
    six copies thereof with the Secretary, Securities and Exchange 
    Commission, 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549. Copies of 
    the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with 
    respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, 
    and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change 
    between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be 
    withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 
    552, will be available for inspection and copying in the Commission's 
    Public Reference Room. Copies of such filing will also be available for 
    inspection and copying at the principal office of NASD Regulation. Al 
    submissions should refer to the file number in the caption above and 
    should be submitted by May 27, 1998.
    
    
    [[Page 26240]]
    
    
        For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, 
    pursuant to delegated authority.\3\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \3\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Margaret H. McFarland,
    Deputy Secretary.
    [FR Doc. 98-12456 Filed 5-11-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
05/12/1998
Department:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
98-12456
Pages:
26238-26240 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Release No. 34-39957, File No. SR-NASD-98-34
PDF File:
98-12456.pdf