[Federal Register Volume 59, Number 92 (Friday, May 13, 1994)]
[Unknown Section]
[Page 0]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 94-11603]
[[Page Unknown]]
[Federal Register: May 13, 1994]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[ER-FRL-4711-3]
Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of
EPA Comments
Availability of EPA comments prepared April 25, 1994 through April
29, 1994 pursuant to the Environmental Review Process (ERP), under
section 309 of the Clean Air Act and section 102(2)(C) of the National
Environmental Policy Act as amended. Requests for copies of EPA
comments can be directed to the Office of Federal Activities at (202)
260-5076.
An explanation of the ratings assigned to draft environmental
impact statements (EISs) was published in the Federal Register dated
April 8, 1994 (59 FR 16807).
Draft EISs
ERP No. D-AFS-J65215-MT Rating EC2, Elk Creek Land Exchange and
Granting an Easement to Plum Creek, Implementation, Flathead National
Forest, Swan Lake Ranger District, MT.
Summary: EPA expressed environmental concerns about adverse impacts
which may occur on the Forest Service land to be given to the Plum
Creek Timber Company (i.e., wildlife habitat, old growth, visual,
fisheries impacts). EPA also expressed concerns about the uncertainty
of future activities (i.e., subdivision development, oil and gas
leasing, and mining) on the exchanged parcels. EPA recommended that the
Forest Service require a conservation easement prohibiting future
subdivision development on the Forest Service land to be given to Plum
Creek Timber Company.
ERP No. D-AFS-J65216-UT Rating LO1, Pacer Timber Harvest and Timber
Sale, Implementation, Dixie National Forest, Escalante Ranger District,
Garfield County, UT.
Summary: EPA had no objections to the proposed action.
ERP No. D-BIA-J39020-SD Rating EC1, Crow Creek Dam Project, Crow
Creek Dam and Reservoir (Lake Bedashosha) Improvements, Crow Creek
Indian Reservation, near Fort Thompson, Buffalo County, SD.
Summary: EPA expressed environmental concerns with sediment impacts
which should be avoided to fully protect the environment and which may
require changes to alternatives or mitigation measures.
ERP No. D-BLM-J02029-WY Rating EC2, Enron Burly Field Oil and Gas
Leasing, Permit to Drill, Temporary Use Permits, COE Section 404 Permit
and Right-of-Way Grants, Pinedale Resource Area, Sublette County, WY.
Summary: EPA had environmental concerns based on potential impacts
to groundwater quality, which should be avoided in order to fully
protect its high quality.
ERP No. D-BLM-L60100-ID Rating EC2, Twin Falls County Solid Waste
Landfill Facility Construction and Operation, Land Acquisition, Twin
Falls County, ID.
Summary: EPA had environmental concerns that BLM had not
demonstrated that the land transfer and subsequent solid waste facility
will result in no adverse consequences to ground water, surface water,
and air quality. EPA requested additional information about how
hazardous waste in the waste stream will be handled, how leachate and
surface runoff will be disposed, the liner system and how it will be
installed, the landfill gas collection and disposal system, and future
implementation and operation of the facility.
Final EISs
ERP No. F-AFS-J65205-MT, Upper Sunday Timber Sales, Harvest
Timber, Implementation, Kootenai National Forest, Fortine Ranger
District, Flathead County, MT.
Summary: EPA had no concerns but recommended that the sediment
regime model be tested.
Regulations
ERP No. R-NRC-A09818-00, 10 CFR part 71, Petition for Regulations
Governing Packaging and Transportation of Radioactive Materials, Docket
No. PRM-71-11, FR 59.8143.
Summary: Review of the Regulation has been completed and the
project found to be satisfactory. No formal comment letter was sent to
the preparing agency.
Dated: May 9, 1994.
Marshall Cain,
Senior Legal Advisor, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. 94-11603 Filed 5-12-94; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-U
