98-12661. Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection; Comment Request; Extension  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 92 (Wednesday, May 13, 1998)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 26607-26610]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-12661]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
    
    
    Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection; 
    Comment Request; Extension
    
    AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission.
    
    ACTION: Notice.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The FTC is soliciting public comments on proposed extensions 
    of Paperwork Reduction Act clearances for information collection 
    requirements for a regulation that the Commission issues and enforces 
    and for a study to assess the effectiveness of Commission divestiture 
    orders in merger cases. These Office of Management and Budget (OMB) 
    clearances expire on July 31, 1998. The FTC proposes that OMB extend 
    its approval for the regulation an additional three years from 
    clearance expiration and that approval for the divestiture order study 
    be extended through December 31, 1999. The proposed information 
    collection requirements described below will be submitted to OMB for 
    review, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act.
    
    DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before July 13, 1998.
    
    ADDRESSES: Send written comments to Gary M. Greenfield, Office of the 
    General Counsel, Federal Trade Commission, Washington, D.C. 20580, 
    (202) 326-2753. All comments should be identified as responding to this 
    notice.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
    Requests for additional information or copies of the proposed 
    information requirements should be addressed to Gary M. Greenfield, 
    Attorney, Office of the General Counsel, 202-326-2753.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The purpose of this Notice is to solicit 
    comments from members of the public
    
    [[Page 26608]]
    
    and affected agencies concerning the proposed collections of 
    information to: (1) Evaluate whether the proposed collection of 
    information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of 
    the agency, including whether the information will have practical 
    utility; (2) Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the 
    burden of the proposed collection of information, including the 
    validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (3) Enhance the 
    quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and 
    (4) Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who 
    are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, 
    electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or 
    other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic 
    submission of responses. The FTC will submit the proposed information 
    collection requirements to OMB for review, as required by the Paperwork 
    Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35, as amended).
        The relevant information collection requirements are as follows:
    
    1. The Telemarketing Sales Rule, 16 CFR Part 310 (OMB Control 
    Number 3084-0097)
    
        Description of the collection of information and proposed use: The 
    Telemarketing Sales Rule implements the Telemarketing and Consumer 
    Fraud and Abuse Prevention Act, 15 U.S.C. 6101-6108 (``Telemarketing 
    Act'' or ``the Act''). The Act seeks to prevent deceptive or abusive 
    telemarketing practices. The Act mandates certain disclosures by 
    telemarketers, and directs the Commission to consider recordkeeping 
    requirements in its promulgation of a telemarketing rule to address 
    such practices. As required by the Act, the Telemarketing Rule mandates 
    certain disclosures regarding telephone sales and requires 
    telemarketers to retain certain records regarding advertising, sales, 
    and employees. The disclosures provide consumers with information 
    necessary to make informed purchasing decisions. The records are 
    available for inspection by the Commission and other law enforcement 
    personnel to determine compliance with the Rule.
        Estimate of information collection annual hourly burden: 9,053,000 
    hours. The estimated recordkeeping burden hours are 50,000. The 
    estimated combined burden hours related to the required disclosures 
    under the Rule are 9,003,000, for an estimated total of 9,053,000 
    burden hours.
        Recordkeeping: At the time the Commission issued the Rule, it 
    estimated that during the initial and subsequent years after the Rule 
    took effect, only 100 entities a year would find it necessary to revise 
    their practices to conform with the Rule and that it would take each 
    such entity approximately 100 hours to assemble information or develop 
    a compliant recordkeeping system, for a total of 10,000 burden hours a 
    year. The Commission received no comments of any kind in connection 
    with this estimate when it was issued and this estimate continues to be 
    appropriate. There is no reason to believe that the number of new 
    entrants into the telemarketing field who find it necessary to create a 
    different recordkeeping system as a result of the Rule's recordkeeping 
    requirements has increased. Of the estimated 39,900 industry members 
    who have already assembled or maintained the required records and 
    recordkeeping system, staff estimates that each member requires only 
    one hour a year to comply with the Rule's recordkeeping requirements 
    (39,900 hours). Therefore, the total yearly burden hours associated 
    with the Rule's recordkeeping requirements is 49,900. The Commission 
    requests this figure be rounded to 50,000 hours.
        Disclosure: In connection with issuing the Rule and obtaining MOB 
    clearance, staff previously estimated that the 39,900 (rounded to 
    40,000) industry members make approximately 9 billion calls per year, 
    or 225,000 calls per year per company. The Telemarketing Sale Rule 
    provides that if an industry member chooses to solicit inbound calls 
    from consumers by advertising media other than direct mail or by using 
    direct mail solicitations that make certain required disclosures, that 
    member is exempted from complying with other disclosures required by 
    the Rule. Because the burden of complying with written disclosures is 
    less than the burden of complying with the Rule's oral disclosure 
    requirements, staff estimated that at least 9,000 firms will choose to 
    adopt marketing methods that exempt them from the oral disclosure 
    requirements.
        In connection with issuing the Rule, staff estimated that it takes 
    7 seconds for telemarketers to disclose the required outbound call 
    information described above. Staff also estimated that at least 60% of 
    calls result in ``hang-ups'' before the seller or telemarketer can make 
    all the required disclosures. Staff estimated that ``hang-up'' calls 
    last for only 2 seconds. Accordingly, staff estimates that the total 
    disclosure burden associated with these initial disclosure requirements 
    is approximately 250 hours per firm (90,000 non-hang up calls (40% of 
    225,000)  x  7 seconds per call + 135,000 hang-up calls (60% of 
    225,000)  x  2 seconds per call). Thus, the total burden for the 31,000 
    firms choosing marketing methods that require these oral disclosures is 
    7.75 million hours. When the Commission initially published this 
    estimate, it received no comments and staff believes such estimates 
    remain appropriate.
        The Rule also requires additional disclosures before the customer 
    pays for goods or services. Specifically, the sellers or telemarketers 
    must disclose the total costs to purchase, receive, or use the offered 
    goods or services; all material restrictions; and all material terms 
    and conditions of the seller's refund, cancellation, exchange, or 
    repurchase policies if a representation about the policy is a part of 
    the sales offer. If a prize promotion is involved, the telemarketer 
    must also disclose information about the non-purchase entry method for 
    the prize promotion. Staff estimates that approximately 10 seconds is 
    necessary to make these required disclosures. However, these 
    disclosures need only be made where a call results in an actual sale or 
    before the consumer pays. Staff estimates that sales occur in 
    approximately 6 percent of telemarketing calls. Accordingly, the 
    estimated burden for the disclosures is 37.5 hours per firm (13,500 
    calls--6% of 225,000--resulting in a sale  x  10 seconds) or 1.163 
    million hours for the 31,000 firms choosing marketing methods that 
    require oral disclosures. When the Commission initially published this 
    estimate, it received no comments and staff believes such estimates 
    remain appropriate.
        Alternatively, the disclosures required before the customer pays 
    for goods or services may be in writing. Usually, this would occur 
    during a solicitation or mass mailing. Staff estimates that 
    approximately 9,000 firms will choose to comply with this optional 
    written disclosure requirement. Those firms are likely to be the same 
    firms that would choose to advertise through written materials, and the 
    burden of adding the disclosures required by the Rule is probably 
    minimal. However, staff has no reliable data from which to conclude 
    that there is no separately identifiable burden associated with this 
    provision. Therefore, staff estimates that a typical firm will spend 
    approximately 10 hours per year engaged in activities ensuring 
    compliance with this provision of the Rule, for an estimated burden of 
    90,000 hours. When the Commission initially published this estimate, it 
    received no
    
    [[Page 26609]]
    
    comments and staff believes such estimates remain appropriate.
        Estimate of information collection and cost burden: $34,411,000.
        (a) Total capital and start up costs: Staff estimates that the 
    capital and start up costs associated with the Telemarketing Sales 
    Rule's information collection requirements are de minimis. The Rule's 
    recordkeeping requirements do not mandate that records be kept in any 
    particular form. While the recordkeeping requirements necessitate that 
    the affected entity have some storage device, virtually every entity is 
    likely to already possess the means to store the required records. Most 
    entities keep the type of records required by the Rule in the ordinary 
    course of business. Even assuming that an entity found it necessary to 
    purchase a storage device, which could be as inexpensive as a cardboard 
    box, when the cost of the device is annualized over its useful life, 
    the annual expenditure is likely to be very small.
        The Rule's disclosure requirements require no capital expenditures.
        (b) Total operation/maintenance/purchase of services costs: The 
    Rule's recordkeeping requirements necessitate that companies maintain 
    records. Accordingly, affected entities have to expend some capital on 
    office supplies such as file folders, computer diskettes, or paper in 
    order to comply with the Rule's recordkeeping requirements. Although 
    staff believes that most affected entities would maintain the required 
    records in the ordinary course of business, staff estimates that the 
    approximately 40,000 industry members affected by the Rule spend an 
    annual amount of $50 each on office supplies as a result of the Rule's 
    recordkeeping requirements, for a total recordkeeping cost burden of 
    $2,000,000.
        In connection with the Rule's disclosure requirements, 
    telemarketing firms may incur additional costs for telephone service, 
    assuming that the firms spend more time on the telephone with customers 
    as a result of the required disclosures. As indicated above, staff 
    believes that the hour burdens relating to the required disclosures 
    amount to 9,003,000 hours. Assuming all calls to customers are long 
    distance and a commercial calling rate of 6 cents per minute ($3.60 an 
    hour), affected entities as a whole may incur up to $32,410,800 in 
    telecommunications costs as a result of the Rule's disclosure 
    requirements.
        As indicated previously, staff estimates that approximately 9,000 
    entities will choose to comply with the Rule through written 
    disclosures. However, staff estimated that those companies incur no 
    additional capital expenses as a result of the Rule's requirements 
    because they are likely to provide written information to prospective 
    customers in the ordinary course of business and adding the required 
    disclosures to that written information does not require any 
    supplemental expenditures. Thus, the total estimated cost burdens 
    associated with the Rule's information collection is $34,411,000 
    (rounded to nearest thousand).
    
    2. Study of the Effectiveness of Commission Divestiture Orders in 
    Merger Cases (OMB Control Number 3084-0115)
    
        Description of the collection of information and proposed use: The 
    Commission is directed to prevent ``unfair methods of competition'' 
    under Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act (``FTC Act''), 15 
    U.S.C. 45, and is authorized to enforce the Clayton Act's proscriptions 
    against anticompetitive mergers. 15 U.S.C. 18, 21. Under these general 
    authorities, the Commission examines transactions to determine whether 
    anticompetitive effects are likely and then fashions remedies that it 
    believes are necessary to alleviate the likely anticompetivie effects.
        In 1978, the Commission began a divestiture remedy similar to what 
    appears in current orders. Generally, respondents are asked to divest a 
    package of assets (deemed to be commercially viable based on the 
    investigative staff's knowledge of the relevant market) within a 
    specified time to a buyer to be approved by the Commission.
        In 1995, the FTC's Bureau of Competition and Bureau of Economics 
    undertook a pilot study to determine whether a more comprehensive study 
    of Commission divestiture orders would be feasible and productive. The 
    staff concluded that further study is necessary to draw more general 
    conclusions about the effectiveness of the Commission's divestiture 
    process as the circumstances surrounding the orders vary widely. OMB 
    subsequently granted clearance for such an expanded study. Pursuant to 
    that authority, FTC staff have interviewed numerous buyers of assets or 
    businesses and respondents in the study. As with the pilot study, the 
    information that staff have obtained continues to offer important 
    insights into the effectiveness of the divestiture process.
        Accordingly, the Commission's Bureau of Competition and Bureau of 
    Economics staff will continue to conduct interviews with buyers and 
    respondents in order to complete its review of the 36 sample orders 
    comprising its study. Thereafter, staff will interview third-parties 
    and solicit sales data from buyers and respondents. The objectives of 
    the study continue to be to determine: (1) The effectiveness of 
    Commission orders that seek to preserve or reestablish competition 
    where the Commission has permitted a merger but required divestiture of 
    certain assets; (2) The influence of certain provisions in Commission 
    orders (e.g., length of time permitted for divestiture of ``crown 
    jewel'' provisions) on the timeliness of divestitures and on the 
    success of the business or assets divested; (3) The influence of 
    divestiture procedures used by respondent to find a buyer on the 
    timeliness of the divestitures and on the success of the business or 
    assets divested; (4) The influence of the divestiture contract on the 
    success of the divested business or assets; (5) The influence of the 
    type of assets divested on the success of the divested business; (6) 
    The influence of the type of buyer on the success of the divested 
    business; and (7) Whether respondents have fully complied with the 
    requirements under the order.
        Securing information about the success of divested businesses (or 
    businesses that have acquired divested assets) would provide a better 
    understanding of the kind of order provisions most likely to lead to 
    successful divestitures. The survey is designed to expand the 
    Commission's knowledge by eliciting, across a broad spectrum of 
    industries, information to evaluate the success of divestitures. Such 
    information is likely to enhance the Commission's law enforcement 
    mission.
        Estimate of information collection annual hourly burden: 1,000 
    hours (rounded). The information to be collected will be obtained by 
    telephone interviews, document requests, and a questionnaire. Staff 
    will conduct telephone interviews with respondents, buyers of divested 
    assets or businesses, and third parties (such as competitors, 
    customers, and suppliers). The divestiture study includes a total of 51 
    divestitures arising out of 36 orders. Staff have already interviewed 
    32 buyers and 6 respondents; thus it will contact another 19 buyers and 
    30 respondents. It will also contact 153 third-parties (on average, 
    three per divestiture) for a total of 202 remaining telephone 
    interviews. All of the remaining interviews, like those already 
    conducted, should take about 1.5 hours to complete, for a total burden 
    estimate of approximately 303 hours.
    
    [[Page 26610]]
    
        After interviewing buyers and respondents, staff will ask them to 
    submit financial documents for a five-year period beginning the year 
    before the divestiture occurred. To the extent that no such financial 
    documents exist, staff will not request that such documents be 
    prepared. Because only documents already in existence will be 
    requested, the anticipated burden of producing these documents will be 
    minimal, approximately two hours per participant, for a total of 174 
    hours (51 buyers + 36 respondents=87, 87 x 2=174).
        Staff is also asking respondents and buyers to complete a two-
    question chart that requests sales in dollars and units of the product 
    that was the subject of the Commission's concern in the case over a 
    five-year period beginning the year before the divestiture. Staff 
    estimates that the burden on each participant to provide this 
    information will be 4 hours, for a total of 348 hours (51 buyers + 36 
    respondents =87, 87 x 4=348). The total cumulative burden of the 
    document production will be 522 hours (174+348). The estimated total 
    burden for the entire study is therefore calculated to be 825 hours 
    (303+522), which has been rounded to 1,000 hours to allow for small 
    additions such as subsequent buyers of divested assets.
        Estimate of Information Collection Annual Cost Burden: none.
        Capital equipment/start-up/operation and maintenance/other non-
    labor costs: Not applicable. The date for the study are being collected 
    in two principal ways. Staff is conducting telephone interviews and 
    asking respondents to respond to a brief questionnaire. Neither the 
    telephone interviews nor respondents' responses to questionnaires 
    require any capital expenditure by respondents. Interviews solely 
    involve respondents making available one or more company officials for 
    approximately 1\1/2\ hours. The questionnaires ask respondents to 
    provide only information that they maintain within the ordinary and 
    usual course of their business. No additional cost burden is imposed on 
    respondents.
    Debra A. Valentine,
    General Counsel.
    [FR Doc. 98-12661 Filed 5-12-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6750-01-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
05/13/1998
Department:
Federal Trade Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Notice.
Document Number:
98-12661
Dates:
Comments must be submitted on or before July 13, 1998.
Pages:
26607-26610 (4 pages)
PDF File:
98-12661.pdf