98-12672. Omaha Public Power District, Fort Calhoun Station, Unit No. 1; Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 92 (Wednesday, May 13, 1998)]
    [Notices]
    [Page 26653]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-12672]
    
    
    
    [[Page 26653]]
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
    
    [Docket No. 50-285]
    
    
    Omaha Public Power District, Fort Calhoun Station, Unit No. 1; 
    Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact
    
        The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) is 
    considering issuance of an exemption from certain requirements of its 
    regulations to Omaha Public Power District, holder of Facility 
    Operating License No. DPR-40 for operation of the Fort Calhoun Station, 
    Unit No. 1 located in Washington County, Nebraska.
    
    Environmental Assessment Action
    
    Identification of Proposed Action
    
        The proposed action would exempt Omaha Public Power District from 
    the requirements of 10 CFR part 50, appendix R, Section III.O, with 
    respect to certain unpressurized components. Section III.0 requires 
    reactor coolant pumps be equipped with an oil collection system if the 
    containment is not inerted during normal operation. The collection 
    systems shall be capable of collecting lube oil from all potential 
    pressurized and unpressurized leakage sites in the reactor coolant pump 
    lube oil systems. Leakage shall be collected and drained to a vented 
    closed container that can hold the entire lube oil system inventory.
        The proposed action is in accordance with the licensee's 
    application for exemption dated September 30, 1997, as supplemented by 
    letter dated January 29, 1998.
    
    The Need for the Proposed Action
    
        The proposed action is needed because it would be extremely 
    difficult for the licensee to design, install, and maintain the 
    specified portions of the collection system due to location, 
    arrangement, equipment interferences, and radiation dose as low as 
    reasonably achievable (ALARA) considerations.
    
    Environmental Impacts of the Proposed Action
    
        The Commission has completed its evaluation of the proposed action 
    and concludes that there is no significant environmental impact 
    associated with the proposed exemption. The unpressurized components at 
    issue do not present a significant risk of oil leakage that could lead 
    to fire in containment during normal or design basis accident 
    conditions. The proposed action, therefore, will not increase the 
    probability or consequences of accidents, no changes are being made in 
    the types of any effluents that may be released offsite, and there is 
    no significant increase in the allowable individual or cumulative 
    occupational radiation exposure. Accordingly, the Commission concludes 
    that there are no significant radiological environmental impacts 
    associated with the proposed action.
        With regard to potential nonradiological impacts, the proposed 
    action does involve features located entirely within the restricted 
    area as defined in 10 CFR part 20. It does not affect nonradiological 
    plant effluents and has no other environmental impact. Accordingly, the 
    Commission concludes that there are no significant nonradiological 
    environmental impacts associated with the proposed action.
    
    Alternatives to the Proposed Action
    
        Since the Commission has concluded there is no measurable 
    environmental impact associated with the proposed action, any 
    alternatives with equal or greater environmental impact need not be 
    evaluated. As an alternative to the proposed action, the staff 
    considered denial of the proposed action. Denial of the application 
    would result in no change in current environmental impacts. The 
    environmental impacts of the proposed action and the alternative action 
    are similar.
    
    Alternative Use of Resources
    
        This action does not involve the use of any resources not 
    previously considered in the Final Environmental Statement (FES) for 
    the Fort Calhoun Station, Unit No. 1, dated August 1972.
    
    Agencies and Persons Consulted
    
        In accordance with its stated policy, on April 27, 1998, the staff 
    consulted with the Nebraska State official, Ms. Cheryl Rodgers of the 
    Department of Health, regarding the environmental impact of the 
    proposed action. The State official had no comments.
    
    Finding of No Significant Impact
    
        Based upon the environmental assessment, the Commission concludes 
    that the proposed action will not have a significant effect on the 
    quality of the human environment, Accordingly, the Commission has 
    determined not to prepare an environmental impact statement for the 
    proposed action.
        For further details with respect to the proposed action, see the 
    licensee's letter dated September 30, 1997, and supplemental letter 
    dated January 29, 1998, which are available for public inspection at 
    the Commission's Public Document Room, which is located at The Gelman 
    Building, 2120 L Street, NW., Washington, DC, and at the local public 
    document room located at the W. Dale Clark Library, 215 South 15th 
    Street, Omaha, Nebraska 68102.
    
        Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 7th day of May 1998.
    
        For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
    Raynard Wharton,
    Project Manager Project Directorate IV-2, Division of Reactor Projects 
    III/IV Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
    [FR Doc. 98-12672 Filed 5-12-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
05/13/1998
Department:
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
98-12672
Pages:
26653-26653 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 50-285
PDF File:
98-12672.pdf