99-11974. Secondary School Civic Education Curriculum Development Project for Azerbaijan; Request for Proposals.  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 92 (Thursday, May 13, 1999)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 25956-25958]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-11974]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    UNITED STATES INFORMATION AGENCY
    
    
    Secondary School Civic Education Curriculum Development Project 
    for Azerbaijan; Request for Proposals.
    
    SUMMARY: The Advising, Teaching, and Specialized Programs Division of 
    the Office of Academic Programs of the United States Information 
    Agency's Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs announces an open 
    competition for a Secondary School Civic Education Curriculum 
    Development Project for Azerbaijan. Public and private non-profit 
    organizations meeting the provisions described in IRS regulation 26 CFR 
    1.501(c) may submit proposals to cooperate with USIA in the 
    administration of a two-year project to support the development and 
    utilization of new curriculum units for a civic education course 
    entitled ``Man and Society'' for students in the tenth and eleventh 
    grades in Azerbaijan. The grant will award up to $250,000 to facilitate 
    the project.
        The grantee will work with the Azerbaijani Ministry of Education, 
    Department of Curriculum Development and Educational Reform, which is 
    the office of the Government of Azerbaijan directly responsible for 
    national education and teacher training issues. The program will 
    comprise three phases: (1) Preliminary consultations in Baku with a 
    curriculum development team of Azerbaijani educators; (2) a three-month 
    U.S.-based curriculum development workshop in which the team will 
    produce draft curriculum units; (3) follow-up consultations in 
    Azerbaijan to assist with the training of a larger group of Azerbaijani 
    practitioners in the review and field-testing of the draft curriculum 
    units. Upon the successful completion of Phases I-III, additional funds 
    may be available to the grantee organization for a fourth phase of 
    activity to cooperate with the Ministry of Education of Azerbaijan, 
    Department of Curriculum Development and Educational Reform, and the 
    Azerbaijani curriculum development team to further review and revise 
    the draft materials as needed and to provide broader training of 
    Azerbaijani teachers and administrators for utilization of the revised 
    curriculum units in Azerbaijani classrooms.
        USIA solicits detailed proposals from U.S. educational institutions 
    and public and private non-profit organizations to develop and 
    administer this project. Grantee organizations will consult regularly 
    with USIA and with USIA's office in Azerbaijan (the U.S. Information 
    Service in Baku) with regard to participant selection, program 
    implementation, direction, and assessment. Proposals should demonstrate 
    an understanding of the issues confronting education in Azerbaijan as 
    well as expertise in civic education and curriculum development.
        The funding authority for the program cited above is provided 
    through the Freedom Support Act as well as USIA's base budget. Programs 
    and projects must conform with Agency requirements and guidelines 
    outlined in the Solicitation Package. USIA projects and programs are 
    subject to the availability of funds.
    
    Program Information
    
        Overview: The goal of the project is to assist the Ministry of 
    Education, Department of Curriculum Development and Educational Reform 
    in Baku, Azerbaijan, to develop up-to-date curriculum units to be 
    taught at the tenth and eleventh grade levels and to assist in training 
    teachers for the utilization of these units. The rationale for this 
    project is that improving citizenship education at the secondary school 
    level will better prepare Azerbaijani students to participate actively 
    in building a pluralistic, democratic society, and will promote 
    democratic relations among members of the school community, including 
    students, teachers, school administrators, and parents. Applicants may 
    suggest topics to be developed by the Azerbaijani curriculum team in 
    their proposals; however, final determination of appropriate topics 
    will be made by the curriculum development team and the Ministry in 
    cooperation with the grantee organization during the first phase of the 
    project.
    
    Guidelines
    
    Program Planning and Implementation
    
        Grants should begin on or around September 1, 1999, with Phase I of 
    the project, in which a curriculum development team of six 
    practitioners (e.g., classroom teachers, curriculum specialists, and a 
    Ministry official who will serve as the project director) will be 
    selected by a Ministry-led selection committee in Azerbaijan in 
    consultation with the U.S. grantee organization and the U.S. 
    Information Service (USIS) in Baku. In Phase I, the team will undertake 
    preliminary work in Baku over a period of 3-6 months. Members of the 
    curriculum development team, in consultation with a specialist from the 
    grantee organization and the Azerbaijani Project Director, will 
    familiarize themselves with civics curricula and teaching materials 
    used in the U.S. and will select the topics to be explored in the draft 
    curriculum units.
        In Phase II, members of the curriculum development team will spend 
    approximately three months in a highly structured U.S.-based workshop 
    to be sponsored and organized by the U.S. grantee organization, and 
    will attend focused curriculum seminars, observe relevant aspects of 
    the U.S. educational system, and draft teacher and student materials 
    for the curriculum units in consultation with U.S. specialists. The 
    grantee organization will be responsible for introducing the 
    Azerbaijani team to leading U.S. civic educators with expertise that is 
    pertinent to the topics to be explored, and to a broad range of 
    relevant resources. The workshop schedule should incorporate time for 
    both individual and group work on materials as well as intensive 
    training on specific approaches to the teaching of civic education 
    topics. In addition, the workshop should include field experiences 
    which are relevant to the materials being produced (such as visits to 
    schools and professional association meetings).
        In Phase III, the curriculum development team will work in 
    Azerbaijan with Azerbaijani teacher trainers, Ministry of Education 
    officials and U.S. specialists from the grantee organization and other 
    U.S. organizations to provide introductory training for a larger group 
    of practitioners in methods for testing and
    
    [[Page 25957]]
    
    utilizing the draft curriculum units in the civics classroom. During 
    this phase the Ministry of Education (MOE) will provide the following 
    assistance to the U.S. grantee:
        (1) Facilitate the logistics of in-service training sessions for 
    teachers by providing appropriate space;
        (2) Assist in the selection of pilot schools and teachers;
        (3) provide leave time/leaves of absence for the curriculum 
    development team and Project Director during their stays in the U.S. 
    and the subsequent in-service training work;
        (4) Provide appropriate office space and facilities to house both 
    the civic education reference collection and the materials produced by 
    the curriculum development team.
    
    Visa/Insurance/Tax Requirements
    
        U.S. lecturers and consultants participating in the project must be 
    U.S. citizens. Programs must comply with
    J-1 visa regulations. Please refer to Program Specific Guidelines 
    (POGI) in the Solicitation Package for further information. 
    Administration of the program must be in compliance with reporting and 
    withhold regulations for federal, state, and local taxes as applicable. 
    Recipient organizations should demonstrate tax regulation adherence in 
    the proposal narrative and budget.
    
    Budget Guidelines
    
        Grants awarded to eligible organizations with less than four years 
    of experience in conducting international exchange programs will be 
    limited to $60,000.
        Applicants must submit a comprehensive budget for the entire 
    program. Awards may not exceed $250,000. There must be a summary budget 
    as well as breakdowns reflecting both administrative and program 
    budgets. Applicants may provide separate sub-budgets for each program 
    year, component, phase, location, or activity to provide clarification. 
    The total administrative costs funded by USIA must be limited and 
    reasonable
        Alllowable costs for the program include the following:
        (1) Administrative Costs, including salaries and benefits, of 
    grantee organization.
        (2) Program Costs, including general program costs and program 
    costs for each Azerbaijani participant in the U.S.-based curriculum 
    development seminar. Also included are program costs associated with 
    the field-testing of materials in Azerbaijan and with the initial 
    training of Azerbaijani teachers.
        Please refer to the Solicitation Package (POGI and PSI) for 
    complete budget guidelines and formatting instructions.
    
    ANNOUNCEMENT TITLE AND NUMBER: All correspondence with USIA concerning 
    this RFP should reference the above title and number E/ASU-99-16.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT: The Office of Academic Programs, 
    Advising, Teaching and Specialized Programs Division, Specialized 
    Programs Branch, E/ASU, Room 349, U.S. Information Agency, 301 4th 
    Street, SW., Washington, DC 20547, telephone number 202-619-4568 and 
    fax number 202-401-1433, e-mail address jceriale@usia.gov to request a 
    Solicitation Package. The Solicitation Package contains detailed award 
    criteria, required application forms, specific budget instructions, and 
    standard guidelines for proposal preparation. Please specify USIA 
    Program Officer Jennifer K. Ceriale on all other inquiries and 
    correspondence.
        Please read the complete Federal Register announcement before 
    sending inquiries or submitting proposals. Once the RFP deadline has 
    passed, Agency staff may not discuss this competition with applicants 
    until the proposal review process has been completed.
    
    To Download a Solicitation Package Via Internet
    
        The entire Solicitation Package may be downloaded from USIA's 
    website at http://e.usia.gov/education/rfps. Please read all 
    information before downloading.
    
    To Receive a Solicitation Package Via Fax on Demand
    
        The entire Solicitation Package may be requested from the Bureau's 
    Grants Information Fax on Demand System, which is accessed by calling 
    202/401-7616. The Table of Contents listing available documents and 
    order numbers should be the first order when entering the system.
    
    Deadline for Proposals
    
        All proposal copies must be received at the U.S. Information Agency 
    by 5 p.m. Washington, DC time on Monday, July 19, 1999. Faxed documents 
    will not be accepted at any time. Documents postmarked the due date but 
    received on a later date will not be accepted. Each applicant must 
    ensure that the proposals are received by the above deadline.
        Applicants must follow all instructions in the Solicitation 
    Package. The original and 10 copies of the application should be sent 
    to: U.S. Information Agency, Ref.: E/ASU-99-16, Office of Grants 
    Management, E/X., Room 326, 301 4th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20547.
        Applicants must also submit the ``Executive Summary'' and 
    ``Proposal Narrative'' sections of the proposal on a 3.5'' diskette, 
    formatted for DOS. These documents must be provided in ASCII text (DOS) 
    format with a maximum line length of 65 characters. USIA will transmit 
    these file electronically to USIS posts overseas for their review, with 
    the goal of reducing the time it takes to get posts' comments for the 
    Agency's grants review process.
    
    Diversity, Freedom and Democracy Guidelines
    
        Pursuant to the Bureau's authorizing legislation, programs must 
    maintain a non-political character and should be balanced and 
    representative of the diversity of American political, social, and 
    cultural life. ``Diversity'' should be interpreted in the broadest 
    sense and encompass differences including, but not limited to 
    ethnicity, race, gender, religion, geographic location, socio-economic 
    status, and physical challenges. Applicants are strongly encouraged to 
    adhere to the advancement of this principle both in program 
    administration and in program content. Please refer to the review 
    criteria under the ``Support for Diversity'' section for specific 
    suggestions on incorporating diversity into the total proposal. Public 
    Law 104-319 provides that ``in carrying out programs of educational and 
    cultural exchange in countries whose people do not fully enjoy freedom 
    and democracy,'' USIA ``shall take appropriate steps to provide 
    opportunities for participation in such programs to human rights and 
    democracy leaders of such countries.'' Proposals should reflect 
    advancement of this goal in their program contents, to the full extent 
    deemed feasible.
    
    Year 2000 Compliance Requirement (Y2K Requirement)
    
        The Year 2000 (Y2K) issue is a broad operational and accounting 
    problem that could potentially prohibit organizations from processing 
    information in accordance with Federal management and program specific 
    requirements including data exchange with USIA. The inability to 
    process information in accordance with Federal requirements could 
    result in grantees' being required to return funds that have not been 
    accounted for properly.
        USIA therefore requires all organizations use Y2K compliant systems 
    including hardware, software, and firmware. Systems must accurately
    
    [[Page 25958]]
    
    process data and dates (calculating, comparing and sequency) both 
    before and after the beginning of the year 2000 and correctly adjust 
    for leap years.
        Additional information addressing the Y2K issue may be found at the 
    General Services Administration's Office of Information Technology 
    website at http://www.itpolicy.gsa.gov.
    
    Review Process
    
        USIA will acknowledge receipt of all proposals and will review them 
    for technical eligibility. Proposals will be deemed ineligible if they 
    do not fully adhere to the guidelines stated herein and in the 
    Solicitation Package. All eligible proposals will be reviewed by the 
    program office, as well as by the USIA Office of East European and NIS 
    Affairs and the USIA post overseas. Eligible proposals will be 
    forwarded to panels of USIA officers for advisory review. Proposals may 
    also be reviewed by the Office of the General Counsel or by other 
    Agency elements. Final funding decisions are at the discretion of 
    USIA's Associate Director for Educational and Cultural Affairs. Final 
    technical authority for assistance awards (grants or cooperative 
    agreements) resides with the USIA Grants Officer.
    
    Review Criteria
    
        Technically eligible applications will be competitively reviewed 
    according to the criteria stated below. These criteria are not rank 
    ordered and all carry equal weight in the proposal evaluation:
        1. Quality of the program idea: Proposals should exhibit 
    originality, substance, precision, relevance to the Agency's mission, 
    and responsiveness to the objectives and guidelines states in this 
    solicitation. Proposals should demonstrate substantive expertise in 
    civic education.
        2. Program planning: Detailed agenda and relevant work plan should 
    demonstrate substantive undertakings and logistical capacity. Agenda 
    and plan should adhere to the program overview described above.
        3. Ability to achieve program objectives: Objectives should be 
    reasonable, feasible, and flexible. Proposals should clearly 
    demonstrate how the institution will meet the program's objectives and 
    plan.
        4. Multiplier effect/impact: Proposed programs should strengthen 
    long-term mutual understanding, including maximum sharing of 
    information and establishment of long-term institutional and individual 
    linkages.
        5. Support of Diversity: Proposals should demonstrate substantive 
    support of the Bureau's policy on diversity. Achievable and relevant 
    features should be cited in both program administration (selection of 
    participants, program venue and program evaluation) and program content 
    (orientation and wrap-up sessions, program meetings, resource materials 
    and follow-up activities).
        6. Institutional Capacity and Record/Ability: Proposed personnel 
    and institutional resources should be adequate and appropriate to 
    achieve the program or project's goals. Proposals should demonstrate an 
    institutional record of successful exchange programs, including 
    responsible fiscal management and full compliance with all reporting 
    requirements for past Agency grants as determined by USIA's Office of 
    Contracts. The Agency will consider the past performance of prior 
    recipients and the demonstrated potential of new applicants.
        7. Follow-on Activities: Proposals should provide a plan for 
    continued follow-on activity (without USIA support) to ensure ongoing 
    involvement with Azerbaijani curriculum development projects.
        8. Project Evaluation: Proposals should include a plan to evaluate 
    the activity's success, both as the activities unfold and at the end of 
    the program. The progress is the grant should be monitored closely. The 
    USIA Program Officer should be kept informed of the implementation of 
    each phase of the program. A draft survey questionnaire or other 
    technique plus description of a methodology to use to link outcomes to 
    original project objectives is recommended. Successful applicants will 
    be expected to submit intermediate reports after each project component 
    is concluded or quarterly, whichever is less frequent.
        9. Cost-effectiveness/Cost-sharing: The overhead and administrative 
    components of the proposals, including salaries and honoraria, should 
    be kept as low as possible. All other items should be necessary and 
    appropriate. Proposals should minimize cost-sharing through other 
    private sector support as well as institutional direct funding 
    contributions.
        10. Value to U.S.-Partner Country Relations: Proposed projects 
    should demonstrate the need, potential impact, and significance of the 
    project in the partner country.
    
    Authority
    
        Overall grant making authority for this program is contained in the 
    Mutual Educational and Cultural Exchange Act of 1961, Pub. L. 87-256, 
    as amended, also known as the Fulbright-Hays Act. The purpose of the 
    Act is ``to enable the Government of the United States to increase 
    mutual understanding between the people of the United States and the 
    people of other countries * * *; to strengthen the ties which unite us 
    with other nations by demonstrating the educational and cultural 
    interests, developments, and achievements of the people of the United 
    States and other nations * * * and thus to assist in the development of 
    friendly, sympathetic and peaceful relations between the United States 
    and the other countries of the world.'' The funding authority for the 
    program above is provided through the Freedom for Russia and Emerging 
    Eurasian Democracies and Open Markets Support Act of 1993 (Freedom 
    Support Act). Programs and projects must conform with Agency 
    requirements and guidelines outlined in the Solicitation Package. USIA 
    projects and programs are subject to the availability of funds.
    
    Notice
    
        The terms and conditions published in this RFP are binding and may 
    not be modified by any USIA representative. Explanatory information 
    provided by the Agency that contradicts published language will not be 
    binding. Issuance of the RFP does not constitute an award commitment on 
    the part of the Government. The Agency reserves the right to reduce, 
    revise, or increase proposal budgets in accordance with the needs of 
    the program and the availability of funds. Awards made will be subject 
    to periodic reporting and evaluation requirements.
    
    Notification
    
        Final awards cannot be made until funds have been appropriated by 
    Congress, allocated and committed through internal USIA procedures.
    
        Dated: May 5, 1999.
    Judith Siegel,
    Deputy Associate Director for Educational and Cultural Affairs.
    [FR Doc. 99-11974 Filed 5-12-99; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 8230-01-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
05/13/1999
Department:
United States Information Agency
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
99-11974
Pages:
25956-25958 (3 pages)
PDF File:
99-11974.pdf