96-11895. Drawbridge Operation Regulations; Saginaw River, MI  

  • [Federal Register Volume 61, Number 94 (Tuesday, May 14, 1996)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 24235-24236]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 96-11895]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    Coast Guard
    
    33 CFR Part 117
    
    [CGD09-96-003]
    RIN 2115-AE47
    
    
    Drawbridge Operation Regulations; Saginaw River, MI
    
    AGENCY: Coast Guard, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Direct final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: By this direct final rule, the Coast Guard is revising the 
    regulations governing the operations of the CSX (formerly the Chessie 
    System) railroad bridge at mile 18.0 over the Saginaw River in Saginaw, 
    Michigan. The owners have made a request to the Coast Guard to maintain 
    the bridge as a fixed structure with the stipulation and understanding 
    that the bridge may be placed back into operation within six months 
    upon notification of the Coast Guard.
    
    DATES: This rule is effective on August 12, 1996, unless the Coast 
    Guard receives written adverse comments or written notice of intent to 
    submit adverse comments on or before July 15, 1996. If such comments or 
    notice are received, the Coast Guard will withdraw this direct final 
    rule, and a timely notice of withdrawal will be published in the 
    Federal Register.
    
    ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed to Commander (obr), Ninth Coast Guard 
    District, 1240 E. Ninth St., Cleveland, OH 44199-2060, or may be 
    delivered to room 2083 at the same address between 7 a.m. and 3 p.m., 
    Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The telephone number is 
    (216) 522-3993.
        The District Commander maintains the public docket for this 
    rulemaking. Comments will become part of this docket and will be 
    available for inspection or copying at the above address during the 
    same time.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
    Mr. Scott M. Striffler, Project Manager, at (216) 522-3993.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    
    Request for Comments
    
        Any comments must identify the name and address of the person 
    submitting the comment, specify the rulemaking docket (CGD09-96-003) 
    and the specific section of this rule to which each comment applies, 
    and give the reason for each specific comment. Please submit two copies 
    of all comments and attachments in an unbound format, no larger than 
    8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for copying and electronic filing. 
    Persons wanting acknowledgment of receipt of comments should enclose 
    stamped, self-addressed postcards or envelopes.
    
    Regulatory Information
    
        The Coast Guard is publishing a direct final rule, the procedures 
    of which are outlined in 33 CFR 1.05-55, because no adverse comments 
    are anticipated. If no adverse comments or any written notices of 
    intent to submit adverse comment are received within the specified 
    comment period, this rule will become effective as stated in the DATES 
    section. In that case, approximately 30 days prior to the effective 
    date, the Coast Guard will publish a notice in the Federal Register 
    stating that no adverse comment was received and confirming that this 
    rule will become effective as scheduled. However, if the Coast Guard 
    receives written adverse comment or written notice of intent to submit 
    adverse comment, the Coast Guard will publish a notice in the final 
    rule section of the Federal Register to announce withdrawal of all or 
    part of this direct final rule. If adverse comments apply to only part 
    of this rule, and it is possible to remove that part without defeating 
    the purpose of this rule, the Coast Guard may adopt as final those 
    parts of this rule on which no adverse comments were received. The part 
    of this rule that was the subject of adverse comment will be withdrawn. 
    If the Coast Guard decides to proceed with a rulemaking following 
    receipt of adverse comments, a separate Notice of Proposed Rulemaking 
    (NPRM) will be published and a new opportunity for comment provided.
        A comment is considered ``adverse'' if the comment explains why 
    this rule would be inappropriate, including a challenge to the rule's 
    underlying premise or approach, or would be ineffective or unacceptable 
    without a change.
    
    Background and Purpose
    
        The placement of a movable bridge in a ``fixed status'' means that 
    the bridge is essentially locked in the closed position and all the 
    operating gear removed. This rule will allow the owners (CSX Railroad 
    Corp.) of the CSX (formerly the Chessie System) railroad bridge, at 
    mile 18.0 over the Saginaw River in Saginaw, Michigan, to maintain the 
    bascule bridge in a ``fixed status''. The owners initiated this action 
    due to the absence of any requests to open the bridge for commercial 
    traffic since 1988. Furthermore, the bridge is unattended and subject 
    to high maintenance costs from recurring vandalism. As part of the 
    background for this rulemaking, the Coast Guard requested bridgetender 
    logs for the previous five years, but CSX stated that it did not 
    maintain records for this bridge during the period because no requests 
    for openings were made. The Coast Guard asked for confirmation of the 
    owner's claims from the local Coast Guard Station in Saginaw, Michigan. 
    The Station verified that the bridge had not opened within the 
    experience of the personnel assigned there. The Station also noted that 
    they are not aware of any commercial traffic that has, or will have, a 
    need to pass
    
    [[Page 24236]]
    
    through the bridge. Additionally, there are currently no loading or 
    unloading facilities for commercial vessels above the bridge. The Coast 
    Guard queried the Lake Carriers Association (LCA), representatives of 
    Great Lakes commercial shipping companies, to determine what the impact 
    of allowing the bridge to be maintained as a fixed structure may have 
    on current and anticipated commercial marine traffic. The LCA indicated 
    that their members would not be adversely impacted by the conversion of 
    the bridge from a bascule to a fixed span. The owners pointed out that 
    the Grand Trunk and Western railroad bridge, further upriver at mile 
    19.2, was converted from a movable to a fixed span in previous years 
    and does not impact marine traffic in this area of the river. The CSX 
    bridge has a vertical clearance of 13 feet, which is one foot higher 
    than the Grand Trunk and Western bridge. The Coast Guard has 
    stipulated, and the owners have agreed, to restore this bridge to an 
    operable status within six months of notification by the Coast Guard if 
    there is future commercial marine activity in the area. The Coast Guard 
    concludes that the placement of this bridge in a fixed status would not 
    impact commercial marine interests and does not anticipate any adverse 
    comments to this Direct Final Rule.
    
    Regulatory Evaluation
    
        This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f) 
    of Executive Order 12866 and does not require an assessment of 
    potential costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that order. It 
    has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget under that 
    order. It is not significant under the regulatory policies and 
    procedures of the Department of Transportation (DOT) (44 FR 11040; 
    February 26, 1979). The Coast Guard expects the economic impact of this 
    rule to be so minimal that a full Regulatory Evaluation under paragraph 
    10e of the regulatory policies and procedures of DOT is unnecessary. 
    This conclusion is based on the fact that there has been no active 
    commerce upriver from this bridge for many years and this situation is 
    not expected to change in the future. Additionally, no vessel has 
    requested that the bridge be opened since 1988. While there is some 
    recreational marine traffic active above this bridge, the placement of 
    a similar railroad bridge in a fixed status 1.2 miles further upriver 
    has not caused any adverse effects for any business, recreational, or 
    commercial vessel.
    
    Small Entities
    
        Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), the 
    Coast Guard must consider the economic impact on small entities of a 
    rule for which a general notice of proposed rulemaking is required. 
    ``Small entities'' may include (1) Small businesses and not-for-profit 
    organizations that are independently owned and operated and are not 
    dominant in their fields and (2) governmental jurisdictions with 
    populations of less than 50,000.
        Therefore, for the reasons discussed above, the Coast Guard finds 
    that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a 
    substantial number of small entities. Any comments submitted in 
    response to this finding will be evaluated under the criteria described 
    earlier in the preamble for comments.
    
    Collection of Information
    
        This rule contains no collection-of-information requirements under 
    the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
    
    Federalism
    
        The Coast Guard has analyzed this rule under the principles and 
    criteria contained in Executive Order 12612 and has determined that 
    this rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant 
    the preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
    
    Environment
    
        The Coast Guard considered the environmental impact of this rule 
    and concluded that, under paragraph 2.B.2 of Commandant Instruction 
    M16475.1B, (as revised by 59 FR 38654, July 29, 1994), this rule is 
    categorically excluded from further environmental documentation. A 
    ``Categorical Exclusion Determination'' is available in the docket for 
    inspection or copying where indicated under ADDRESSES.
    
    List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
    
        Bridges.
    
        For reasons set out in the preamble, 33 CFR part 117 is revised as 
    follows:
    
    PART 117--DRAWBRIDGE OPERATION REGULATIONS
    
        1. The authority citation for Part 117 continues to read as 
    follows:
    
        Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 49 CFR 1.46; 33 CFR 1.05(g); section 
    117.255 also issued under the authority of Pub. L. 102-587, 106 
    Stat. 5039.
    
        2. Section Sec. 117.647 is amended by revising paragraphs (a) and 
    (d) to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 117.647  Saginaw River.
    
        (a) The draws of the Detroit and Mackinac railroad bridge, mile 2.5 
    at Bay City, and the Conrail railroad bridge, mile 4.4 at Bay City, 
    shall open on signal; except that, from December 16 through March 15, 
    the draws shall open on signal if at least 12 hours notice is given.
    * * * * *
        (d) The draw of the CSX railroad bridge, mile 18.0, need not be 
    opened for the passage of vessels. The owner shall return the draw to 
    an operable condition within a reasonable time when directed by the 
    District Commander to do so.
    * * * * *
        Dated: April 26, 1996.
    G.F. Woolever,
    Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard Commander, Ninth Coast Guard District.
    [FR Doc. 96-11895 Filed 5-13-96; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-14-M
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
8/12/1996
Published:
05/14/1996
Department:
Coast Guard
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Direct final rule.
Document Number:
96-11895
Dates:
This rule is effective on August 12, 1996, unless the Coast Guard receives written adverse comments or written notice of intent to submit adverse comments on or before July 15, 1996. If such comments or notice are received, the Coast Guard will withdraw this direct final rule, and a timely notice of withdrawal will be published in the Federal Register.
Pages:
24235-24236 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
CGD09-96-003
RINs:
2115-AE47: Drawbridge Regulations
RIN Links:
https://www.federalregister.gov/regulations/2115-AE47/drawbridge-regulations
PDF File:
96-11895.pdf
CFR: (1)
33 CFR 117.647