96-11983. Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation; Notice of Application  

  • [Federal Register Volume 61, Number 94 (Tuesday, May 14, 1996)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 24298-24299]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 96-11983]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
    Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
    [Docket No. CP96-386-000]
    
    
    Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation; Notice of Application
    
    May 8, 1996.
        Take notice that on April 29, 1996, Columbia Gas Transmission 
    Corporation (Columbia), 1700 MacCorkle Avenue, SE., Charleston, West 
    Virginia 25325-1273, filed in Docket No. CP96-386-000 an application 
    pursuant to Section 7(b) of the Natural Gas Act for permission and 
    approval to abandon certain certificated gathering facilities by 
    spindown to Columbia Natural Resources, Inc. (CNR), a non-
    jurisdictional affiliate,\1\ all as more fully set forth in the 
    application on file with the Commission and open to public inspection.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \1\ CNR has filed a companion petition for declaratory order in 
    Docket No. CP96-385-000 for a determination that the facilities will 
    be non-jurisdictional gathering facilities upon transfer to CNR.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        Columbia proposes to transfer to CNR certain certificated and 
    uncertificated gathering facilities at net book value estimated to be 
    $28 million as of December 31, 1996, pursuant to a purchase and sale 
    agreement dated April 25, 1996. Columbia explains that it intends to 
    credit the net sales proceeds to the Stranded Facilities Charge in 
    accordance with the tariff provisions placed into effect in its current 
    Section 4 general rate case in Docket No. RP95-408-000.\2\ Columbia 
    states that the facilities are located in Fayette and Somerset 
    Counties, Pennsylvania; Dickenson, Tazewell and Buchanan Counties, 
    Virginia; Pike, Knott, Breathitt, Magoffin, Floyd, Johnson, Lawrence, 
    Letcher and Martin Counties, Kentucky; and Kanawha, Boone, Cabell, 
    Logan, Putnam, Wyoming, Raleigh, Fayette, Mercer, McDowell, Mingo, 
    Wayne and Lincoln Counties, West Virginia. It is further stated that 
    the facilities involve eighteen gathering systems that contain 2,729 
    miles of low pressure, predominately small diameter pipeline, 4,475 
    horsepower of compression, meters, etc, (see the attached appendix). 
    Columbia states that only twelve of the lines (totaling 51.4 miles of 
    2-12 inch pipeline) and one compressor station (900 horsepower),\3\ and 
    associated points of delivery and receipt and various appurtenant 
    facilities,\4\ have been certificated; and certain certificated 
    facilities are currently functionalized as transmission facilities and 
    others are recorded as gathering facilities.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \2\ See General Terms and Conditions Section 46, Stranded 
    Facilities Charge, of Columbia's tariff. The sale of gathering 
    facilities proposed by this filing is a significant first step in 
    Columbia's exit from the gathering business and the mitigation of 
    the associated stranded costs.
        \3\ The Conaway Compressor Station is certificated and 
    functionalized as a gathering facility.
        \4\ Columbia identifies Columbia Gas of Kentucky, Inc., and 
    Mountaineer Gas Company, as local distribution companies, and 
    Columbia Gas of Pennsylvania, Inc., as being involved as mainline 
    tap customers with certificated points of delivery located on the 
    gathering facilities to be spundown to CNR.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        Columbia states that its proposal is the result of unbundling under 
    Order No. 636 and the subsequent elimination of its merchant function. 
    Furthermore, the proposal is part of the transfer and sale of a larger 
    group of gathering facilities to CNR, which will operate the facilities 
    on an open access, nonjurisdictional basis. Columbia advises that CNR 
    owns an interest in over 6,500 oil and gas wells; has total acreage 
    holdings of more than 2.3 million acres; and approximately two-thirds 
    of CNR's natural gas production flows through the gathering facilities 
    proposed to be transferred to CNR.
        Columbia advises that it would file to refunctionalize to 
    transmission any of its gathering facilities located between the 
    facilities sold to CNR and Columbia's transmission facilities. Such 
    refunctionalization would eliminate the possibility that a shipper 
    would pay gathering charges to both CNR and Columbia if, prior to the 
    proposed abandonment, only one such gathering charge would have been 
    paid.
        As more fully set forth in its application, Columbia requests:
        (1) Authorization to abandon by sale to CNR the certificated 
    facilities as further identified in Exhibits T, Z, and Z1.
        (2) Approval of the accounting treatment specified in Exhibit Y.
        (3) Such other authorizations as the Commission deems necessary 
    including, without limitation, authority to abandon, conditioned upon 
    the receipt by Columbia of Section 4 authorization to abandon service, 
    the Points of Delivery as identified in Exhibit T which are served from 
    the certificated facilities and the non-certificated gathering 
    facilities to be sold to CNR.
        Any person desiring to be heard or to make any protest with 
    reference to said application should on or before May 20, 1996, file 
    with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20426, 
    a motion to intervene or a protest in accordance with the requirements 
    of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or 
    385.211) and the Regulations
    
    [[Page 24299]]
    
    under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.10). All protests filed with the 
    Commission will be considered by it in determining the appropriate 
    action to be taken but will not serve to make the protestants parties 
    to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party to a proceeding 
    or to participate as a party in any hearing therein must file a motion 
    to intervene in accordance with the Commission's Rules.
        Take further notice that, pursuant to the authority contained in 
    and subject to the jurisdiction conferred upon Federal Energy 
    Regulatory Commission by Sections 7 and 15 of the Natural Gas Act and 
    the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, a hearing will be 
    held without further notice before the Commission or its designee on 
    this application if no motion to intervene is filed within the time 
    required herein, if the Commission on its own review of the matter 
    finds that permission and approval for the proposed abandonment are 
    required by the public convenience and necessity. If a motion for leave 
    to intervene is timely filed, or if the Commission on its own motion 
    believes that a formal hearing is required, further notice of such 
    hearing will be duly given.
        Under the procedure herein provided for, unless otherwise advised, 
    it will be unnecessary for Columbia to appear or be represented at the 
    hearing.
    Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
    Acting Secretary.
    
    
       Appendix--Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation Summary of Certificated and Uncertificated Facilities To Be  
                                          Spundown by Transfer and Sale to CNR                                      
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                         Pipeline                                                   
                                         ----------------------------------------    System                         
              Gathering system               Length      Diameter                   pressure       Compressor (HP)  
                                            (miles)      (inches)     Total No.      (psig)                         
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
     1 Summit...........................            9        2-6               8    90-200      0                   
     2 Ohiopyle.........................           17       2-12               5  ............  0                   
     3 Walbridge........................          143        2-8             267     40-80      0                   
     4 Hubball-Horse Creek-Nye..........  ...........       2-20           1,322     40-80      820                 
     5 Buff Lick........................          212      (\1\)             286     2-100      Yes                 
     6 Inez-Kermit......................          635       1-18             984     40-80      959                 
     7 Beaver Creek.....................           93       1-12             133     10-70      0                   
     8 Boldman..........................          288       1-18             364    50-180      0                   
     9 Johns Creek......................           21        2-8              26     35-60      300                 
    10 Canada (P-74)....................           95       2-10             151   100-120      300                 
    11 Canada (P-28)....................           13        2-8               9    40-100      0                   
    12 Conaway..........................          121       2-20             149    70-120      900                 
                                                                                   250-400                          
    13 Majestic Thacker.................          152       1-10             184     30-70      950                 
    14 Briar Mountain...................           16        2-6              19     20-60      300                 
    15 Stafford.........................           32        1-6              49     45-75      Yes                 
    16 Huff Creek (V-38)................  ...........       2-10              17    75-125      Yes                 
    17 McDowell-Tazewell................           41        2-6              46     30-50      0                   
    18 Egeria...........................           20        2-6              37     30-50      Yes                 
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    \1\ Various.                                                                                                    
    
    [FR Doc. 96-11983 Filed 5-13-96; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
    
    

Document Information

Published:
05/14/1996
Department:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
96-11983
Pages:
24298-24299 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. CP96-386-000
PDF File:
96-11983.pdf