98-12625. Airworthiness Directives; REVO, Incorporated Models Colonial C-2, Lake LA-4, Lake LA-4A, Lake LA-4P, and Lake LA-4-200 Airplanes  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 94 (Friday, May 15, 1998)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 26964-26965]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-12625]
    
    
    
    [[Page 26964]]
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    
    Federal Aviation Administration
    
    14 CFR Part 39
    
    [Docket No. 98-CE-48-AD; Amendment 39-10524; AD 98-10-12]
    RIN 2120-AA64
    
    
    Airworthiness Directives; REVO, Incorporated Models Colonial C-2, 
    Lake LA-4, Lake LA-4A, Lake LA-4P, and Lake LA-4-200 Airplanes
    
    AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Final rule; request for comments.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD) that 
    applies to all REVO, Incorporated (REVO) Models Colonial C-2, Lake LA-
    4, Lake LA-4A, Lake LA-4P, and Lake LA-4-200 airplanes. This action 
    requires measuring for a clearance of \5/32\ of an inch between the 
    attachment fitting and the horizontal stabilizer rear beam, and a 
    clearance of \1/16\ of an inch between the attachment fitting and the 
    stabilizer skin. If either area does not meet these minimum 
    measurements, this AD requires removing the affected horizontal tail 
    half from the airplane and inspecting the attachment fitting for any 
    evidence of fretting, cracking, or corrosion. If cracks, fretting, or 
    corrosion are present, the attachment fitting must be replaced with a 
    new fitting, and the stabilizer skin must be trimmed to provide a 
    positive clearance for the fitting. This action is prompted by an 
    incident report of an airplane losing control during flight after the 
    attachment fitting to the horizontal stabilizer fractured. The actions 
    specified by this AD are intended to prevent fatigue cracks to the 
    horizontal and vertical stabilizer attachment fitting, which could 
    result in loss of control of the airplane.
    
    DATES: Effective June 8, 1998.
        The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in 
    the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as 
    of June 8, 1998.
        Comments for inclusion in the Rules Docket must be received on or 
    before July 8, 1998.
    
    ADDRESSES: Submit comments in triplicate to the Federal Aviation 
    Administration (FAA), Central Region, Office of the Regional Counsel, 
    Attention: Rules Docket No. 98-CE-48-AD, Room 1558, 601 E. 12th Street, 
    Kansas City, Missouri 64106.
        Service information that applies to this AD may be obtained from 
    REVO, Incorporated, 50 Airport Road, Laconia Airport, Laconia, New 
    Hampshire, 03246. This information may also be examined at the Federal 
    Aviation Administration (FAA), Central Region, Office of the Regional 
    Counsel, Attention: Rules Docket No. 98-CE-48-AD, Room 1558, 601 E. 
    12th Street, Kansas City, Missouri 64106; or at the Office of the 
    Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW, suite 700, Washington, 
    DC.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Richard B. Noll, Aerospace 
    Engineer, FAA, Aircraft Certification Office, 12 New England Executive 
    Park, Burlington, Massachusetts 01803, telephone: (781) 238-7160; 
    facsimile: (781) 238-7199.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Discussion
    
        The FAA recently received a report of loss of control on a REVO, 
    Incorporated Lake LA-4 series airplane during flight. The report 
    indicated that during climb-out following take-off, the pilot heard a 
    loud bang, and the airplane pitched over into a vertical dive, with 
    loss of elevator control. During the pilot's efforts to regain control, 
    another loud bang was heard and sufficient control was regained to 
    manage a safe landing. Further investigation of the incident and 
    inspection of the subject airplane revealed interference between the 
    horizontal stabilizer skin and the attachment fitting. This 
    interference caused fretting, which led to fatigue cracking and 
    associated corrosion of the attachment fitting. The fracture of the 
    attachment fitting resulted in loss of directional control of the 
    airplane.
    
    Relevant Service Information
    
        REVO has issued Service Bulletin B-78, dated April 3, 1998, 
    applicable to Models Colonial C-2, Lake LA-4, Lake LA-4A, Lake LA-4P, 
    and Lake LA-4-200 airplanes, which specifies procedures for:
    
    --Measuring the gap between the horizontal stabilizer rear beam and the 
    attachment fitting for a clearance of \5/32\ of an inch,
    --If the gap between the stabilizer rear beam and the attachment 
    fitting is less than \5/32\-inch, removing the fitting and visually 
    inspect for cracks, fretting, or corrosion,
    --If cracks, fretting, or corrosion is present, replacing the 
    attachment fitting with a new fitting,
    --Measuring the gap between the attachment fitting and the horizontal 
    stabilizer skin for a clearance of \1/16\ of an inch, and
    --If the clearance between the horizontal stabilizer skin and the 
    attachment fitting is less than \1/16\ of an inch, but the other 
    measurement is at or greater than \5/32\ of an inch, trimming the 
    stabilizer skin to provide at least \1/16\ of an inch clearance.
    
    The FAA's Determination
    
        After examining the circumstances and reviewing all available 
    information related to the incidents described above, including the 
    relevant service information, the FAA has determined that AD action 
    should be taken to prevent fatigue cracks in the horizontal stabilizer 
    attachment fitting, which if not detected and corrected, could result 
    in loss of control of the airplane.
    
    Explanation of the Provisions of the AD
    
        Since an unsafe condition has been identified that is likely to 
    exist or develop in other REVO Colonial C-2, Lake LA-4, Lake LA-4A, 
    Lake LA-4P, Lake LA-4-200 airplanes of the same type design, this AD 
    requires measuring the gap between the horizontal stabilizer rear beam 
    and the attachment fitting for correct clearance, and measuring the gap 
    between the attachment fitting and the horizontal stabilizer skin for 
    correct clearance. If the gap between the stabilizer rear beam and the 
    attachment fitting is not the correct clearance, the action requires 
    removing the horizontal tail half to gain access to the fitting, and 
    visually inspecting for cracks, fretting, or corrosion. If cracks, 
    fretting, or corrosion are present, the action requires replacing the 
    attachment fitting with a new fitting. If the clearance between the 
    horizontal stabilizer skin and the attachment fitting is not the 
    correct clearance, but the other measurement is correct, the action 
    requires trimming the stabilizer skin to provide acceptable clearance. 
    The actions are to be done in accordance with the instructions in REVO 
    Service Bulletin B-78, dated April 3, 1998.
    
    Determination of the Effective Date of the AD
    
        Since a situation exists (loss of directional control of the 
    airplane) that requires the immediate adoption of this regulation, it 
    is found that notice and opportunity for public prior comment hereon 
    are impracticable, and that good cause exists for making this amendment 
    effective in less than 30 days.
    
    Comments Invited
    
        Although this action is in the form of a final rule that involves 
    requirements affecting immediate flight safety and, thus, was not 
    preceded by notice and opportunity to comment, comments are invited on 
    this rule. Interested persons
    
    [[Page 26965]]
    
    are invited to comment on this rule by submitting such written data, 
    views, or arguments as they may desire. Communications should identify 
    the Rules Docket number and be submitted in triplicate to the address 
    specified above. All communications received on or before the closing 
    date for comments will be considered, and this rule may be amended in 
    light of the comments received. Factual information that supports the 
    commenter's ideas and suggestions is extremely helpful in evaluating 
    the effectiveness of the AD action and determining whether additional 
    rulemaking action would be needed.
        Comments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory, 
    economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the rule that might 
    suggest a need to modify the rule. All comments submitted will be 
    available, both before and after the closing date for comments, in the 
    Rules Docket for examination by interested persons. A report that 
    summarizes each FAA-public contact concerned with the substance of this 
    AD will be filed in the Rules Docket.
        Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments 
    submitted in response to this rule must submit a self-addressed, 
    stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments 
    to Docket No. 98-CE-48-AD.'' The postcard will be date stamped and 
    returned to the commenter.
    
    Regulatory Impact
    
        The regulations adopted herein will not have substantial direct 
    effects on the States, on the relationship between the national 
    government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
    responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in 
    accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this final 
    rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the 
    preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
        The FAA has determined that this regulation is an emergency 
    regulation that must be issued immediately to correct an unsafe 
    condition in aircraft, and is not a significant regulatory action under 
    Executive Order 12866. It has been determined further that this action 
    involves an emergency regulation under DOT Regulatory Policies and 
    Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979). If it is determined that 
    this emergency regulation otherwise would be significant under DOT 
    Regulatory Policies and Procedures, a final regulatory evaluation will 
    be prepared and placed in the Rules Docket (otherwise, an evaluation is 
    not required). A copy of it, if filed, may be obtained from the Rules 
    Docket.
    
    List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
    
        Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by 
    reference, Safety.
    
    Adoption of the Amendment
    
        Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the 
    Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of 
    the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
    
    PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
    
        1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
    
    
    Sec. 39.13  [Amended]
    
        2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding a new airworthiness directive 
    (AD) to read as follows:
    
    98-10-12  Revo, Incorporated: Amendment 39-10524; Docket No. 98-CE-
    48-AD.
    
        Applicability: Models Colonial C-2, Lake LA-4, Lake LA-4A, Lake 
    LA-4P, and Lake LA-4-200 airplanes, all serial numbers, certificated 
    in any category.
    
        Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the 
    preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been 
    modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the 
    requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified, 
    altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of 
    this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an 
    alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (e) of 
    this AD.
    
        The request should include an assessment of the effect of the 
    modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition 
    addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been 
    eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to 
    address it.
        Compliance: Required within the next 25 hours time-in-service 
    (TIS) after the effective date of this AD, unless already 
    accomplished.
        To prevent fatigue cracks in the horizontal and vertical 
    stabilizer attachment fitting, which could result in loss of control 
    of the airplane, accomplish the following:
        (a) Measure the gap between the horizontal stabilizer rear beam 
    and the attachment fitting for a clearance of \5/32\ of an inch in 
    accordance with the PROCEDURE section in REVO Service Bulletin B-78, 
    dated April 3, 1998.
        (1) If the gap between the stabilizer rear beam and the 
    attachment fitting is less than \5/32\-inch, prior to further 
    flight, remove the fitting and visually inspect or inspect using a 
    dye penetrant method for cracks, fretting, or corrosion in 
    accordance with the INSPECTION AND REPAIR section in REVO Service 
    Bulletin B-78, dated April 3, 1998.
        (2) If any crack, fretting, or corrosion is present, prior to 
    further flight, replace the attachment fitting with a new fitting in 
    accordance with the INSPECTION AND REPAIR section in REVO Service 
    Bulletin B-78, dated April 3, 1998.
        (b) Measure the gap between the attachment fitting and the 
    horizontal stabilizer skin for a clearance of \1/16\ of an inch in 
    accordance with the PROCEDURE section in REVO Service Bulletin B-78, 
    dated April 3, 1998.
        (c) If the clearance between the horizontal stabilizer skin and 
    the attachment fitting is less than \1/16\ of an inch, but the 
    measurement required in paragraph (a) of this AD is at or greater 
    than \5/32\ of an inch, prior to further flight, trim the stabilizer 
    skin to provide at least \1/16\-inch clearance in accordance with 
    the PROCEDURE section in REVO Service Bulletin B-78, dated April 3, 
    1998.
        (d) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with 
    sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 
    CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where 
    the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
        (e) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the 
    compliance time that provides an equivalent level of safety may be 
    approved by the Manager, Boston Aircraft Certification Office, 12 
    New England Executive Park, Burlington, Massachusetts 01803. The 
    request shall be forwarded through an appropriate FAA Maintenance 
    Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the Manager, 
    Boston ACO.
    
        Note 2: Information concerning the existence of approved 
    alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be 
    obtained from the Boston ACO.
    
        (f) The inspection, modification, and replacement required by 
    this AD shall be done in accordance with REVO Service Bulletin B-78, 
    dated April 3, 1998. This incorporation by reference was approved by 
    the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 
    552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Copies may be obtained from REVO, 
    Incorporated, 50 Airport Road, Laconia Airport, Laconia, New 
    Hampshire, 03246. Copies may be inspected at the FAA, Central 
    Region, Office of the Regional Counsel, Room 1558, 601 E. 12th 
    Street, Kansas City, Missouri, or at the Office of the Federal 
    Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW, suite 700, Washington, DC.
        (g) This amendment becomes effective on June 8, 1998.
    
        Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on May 1, 1998.
    Michael Gallagher,
    Manager, Small Aircraft Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
    [FR Doc. 98-12625 Filed 5-14-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-13-U
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
6/8/1998
Published:
05/15/1998
Department:
Federal Aviation Administration
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule; request for comments.
Document Number:
98-12625
Dates:
Effective June 8, 1998.
Pages:
26964-26965 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 98-CE-48-AD, Amendment 39-10524, AD 98-10-12
RINs:
2120-AA64: Airworthiness Directives
RIN Links:
https://www.federalregister.gov/regulations/2120-AA64/airworthiness-directives
PDF File:
98-12625.pdf
CFR: (1)
14 CFR 39.13