95-11983. Receipt of Petition for Decision That Nonconforming 1992 Mercedes-Benz 300SEL Passenger Cars Are Eligible for Importation  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 94 (Tuesday, May 16, 1995)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 26072-26073]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-11983]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    [Docket No. 95-37; Notice 1]
    
    
    Receipt of Petition for Decision That Nonconforming 1992 
    Mercedes-Benz 300SEL Passenger Cars Are Eligible for Importation
    
    AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Notice of receipt of petition for decision that nonconforming 
    1992 Mercedes-Benz 300SEL passenger cars are eligible for importation.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This notice announces receipt by the National Highway Traffic 
    Safety Administration (NHTSA) of a petition for a decision that a 1992 
    Mercedes-Benz 300SEL that was not originally manufactured to comply 
    with all applicable Federal motor vehicle safety standards is eligible 
    for importation into the United States because (1) It is substantially 
    similar to a vehicle that was originally manufactured for importation 
    into and sale in the United States and that was certified by its 
    manufacturer as complying with the safety standards, and (2) it is 
    capable of being readily altered to conform to the standards.
    
    DATES: The closing date for comments on the petition is June 15, 1995.
    
    ADDRESSES: Comments should refer to the docket number and notice 
    number, and be submitted to: Docket Section, Room 5109, National 
    Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 400 Seventh St., SW., 
    Washington, DC 20590. [Docket hours are from 9:30 am to 4 pm]
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
    George Entwistle, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance, NHTSA (202-366-
    5306).
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Background
    
        Under 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(A) (formerly section 108(c)(3)(A)(i)(I) 
    of the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act (the Act)), a 
    motor vehicle that was not originally manufactured to conform to all 
    applicable Federal motor vehicle safety standards shall be refused 
    admission into the United States unless NHTSA has decided that the 
    motor vehicle is substantially similar to a motor vehicle originally 
    manufactured for importation into and sale in the United States, 
    certified under 49 U.S.C. 30115 (formerly section 114 of the Act), and 
    of the same model year as the model of the motor vehicle to be 
    compared, and is capable of being readily altered to conform to all 
    applicable Federal motor vehicle safety standards.
        Petitions for eligibility decisions may be submitted by either 
    manufacturers or importers who have registered with NHTSA pursuant to 
    49 CFR part 592. As specified in 49 CFR 593.7, NHTSA publishes notice 
    in the Federal Register of each petition that it receives, and affords 
    interested persons an opportunity to comment on the petition. At the 
    close of the comment period, NHTSA decides, on the basis of the 
    petition and any comments that it has received, whether the vehicle is 
    eligible for importation. The agency then publishes this decision in 
    the Federal Register.
        J.K. Motors of Kingsville, Maryland (``J.K.'') (Registered Importer 
    No. R-90-006) has petitioned NHTSA to decide whether 1992 Mercedes-Benz 
    300SEL (Model ID 140.033) passenger cars are eligible for importation 
    into the United States. The vehicle which J.K. believes is 
    substantially similar is the 1992 Mercedes-Benz 500SEL. J.K. has 
    submitted information indicating that Daimler Benz A.G., the company 
    that manufactured the 1992 Mercedes-Benz 500SEL, certified that vehicle 
    as conforming to all applicable Federal motor vehicle safety standards 
    and offered it for sale in the United States.
        The petitioner contends that it carefully compared the 1992 
    Mercedes-Benz 300SEL to the 1992 Mercedes-Benz 500SEL, and found the 
    two models to be substantially similar with respect to compliance with 
    most applicable Federal motor vehicle safety standards.
        J.K. submitted information with its petition intended to 
    demonstrate that the 1992 Mercedes-Benz 300SEL, as originally 
    manufactured, conforms to many Federal motor vehicle safety standards 
    in the same manner as the 1992 Mercedes-Benz 500SEL that was offered 
    for sale in the United States, or is capable of being readily altered 
    to conform to those standards.
        Specifically, the petitioner claims that the 1992 Mercedes-Benz 
    300SEL is identical to the certified 1992 Mercedes-Benz 500SEL with 
    respect to compliance with Standard Nos. 102 Transmission Shift Lever 
    Sequence * * *., 103 Defrosting and Defogging Systems, 104 Windshield 
    Wiping and Washing Systems, 105 Hydraulic Brake Systems, 106 Brake 
    Hoses, 107 Reflecting Surfaces, 109 New Pneumatic Tires, 113 Hood Latch 
    Systems, 116 [[Page 26073]] Brake Fluid, 124 Accelerator Control 
    Systems, 201 Occupant Protection in Interior Impact, 202 Head 
    Restraints, 204 Steering Control Rearward Displacement, 205 Glazing 
    Materials, 206 Door Locks and Door Retention Components, 207 Seating 
    Systems, 209 Seat Belt Assemblies, 210 Seat Belt Assembly Anchorages, 
    211 Wheel Nuts, Wheel Discs and Hubcaps, 212 Windshield Retention, 216 
    Roof Crush Resistance, 219 Windshield Zone Intrusion, 301 Fuel System 
    Integrity, and 302 Flammability of Interior Materials.
        Additionally, the petitioner states that the 1992 Mercedes-Benz 
    300SEL complies with the Bumper Standard found in 49 CFR part 581.
        Petitioner also contends that the vehicle is capable of being 
    readily altered to meet the following standards, in the manner 
    indicated:
        Standard No. 101 Controls and Displays: (a) Substitution of a lens 
    marked ``Brake'' for a lens with an ECE symbol on the brake failure 
    indicator lamp; (b) recalibration of the speedometer/odometer from 
    kilometers to miles per hour.
        Standard No. 108 Lamps, Reflective Devices and Associated 
    Equipment: (a) Installation of U.S.-model headlamps and front 
    sidemarkers; (b) installation of U.S.-model taillamp assemblies which 
    incorporate rear sidemarkers; (c) installation of a high mounted stop 
    lamp.
        Standard No. 110 Tire Selection and Rims: Installation of a tire 
    information placard.
        Standard No. 111 Rearview Mirrors: Replacement of the passenger 
    side rear view mirror with a U.S.-model component.
        Standard No. 114 Theft Protection: Installation of a buzzer 
    microswitch in the steering lock assembly, and a warning buzzer.
        Standard No. 115 Vehicle Identification Number: Installation of a 
    VIN plate that can be read from outside the left windshield pillar, and 
    a VIN reference label on the edge of the door or latch post nearest the 
    driver.
        Standard No. 118 Power Window Systems: Rewiring of the power window 
    system so that the window transport is inoperative when the ignition is 
    switched off.
        Standard No. 208 Occupant Crash Protection: (a) Installation of a 
    seat belt warning buzzer, wired to the seat belt latch; (b) 
    installation of a U.S.-model driver's and passenger's side air bags and 
    knee bolsters. The petitioner states that the vehicle has shoulder 
    harnesses in all outboard seating positions, both front and rear, and a 
    lap belt in the middle rear seating position.
        Standard No. 214 Side Impact Protection: Installation of 
    reinforcing beams.
        Interested persons are invited to submit comments on the petition 
    described above. Comments should refer to the docket number and be 
    submitted to: Docket Section, National Highway Traffic Safety 
    Administration, Room 5109, 400 Seventh Street SW, Washington, DC 20590. 
    It is requested but not required that 10 copies be submitted.
        All comments received before the close of business on the closing 
    date indicated above will be considered, and will be available for 
    examination in the docket at the above address both before and after 
    that date. To the extent possible, comments filed after the closing 
    date will also be considered. Notice of final action on the petition 
    will be published in the Federal Register pursuant to the authority 
    indicated below.
    
        Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(A) and (b)(1); 49 CFR 593.8; 
    delegations of authority at 49 CFR 1.50 and 501.8.
    
        Issued on: May 11, 1995.
    Marilynne Jacobs,
    Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
    [FR Doc. 95-11983 Filed 5-15-95; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-59-M
    
    

Document Information

Published:
05/16/1995
Department:
Transportation Department
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Notice of receipt of petition for decision that nonconforming 1992 Mercedes-Benz 300SEL passenger cars are eligible for importation.
Document Number:
95-11983
Dates:
The closing date for comments on the petition is June 15, 1995.
Pages:
26072-26073 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 95-37, Notice 1
PDF File:
95-11983.pdf