96-12471. Self-Regulatory Organizations; National Securities Clearing Corporation; Order Temporarily Approving a Proposed Rule Change to Establish Additional Procedures for Placing Settling Members on Class A Surveillance and Collecting Clearing ...  

  • [Federal Register Volume 61, Number 97 (Friday, May 17, 1996)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 24993-24995]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 96-12471]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
    [Release No. 34-37202; File No. SR-NSCC-95-17]
    
    
    Self-Regulatory Organizations; National Securities Clearing 
    Corporation; Order Temporarily Approving a Proposed Rule Change to 
    Establish Additional Procedures for Placing Settling Members on Class A 
    Surveillance and Collecting Clearing Fund and Other Collateral Deposits 
    From Settling Members
    
    May 10, 1996.
        On December 20, 1995, the National Securities Clearing Corporation 
    (``NSCC'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission 
    (``Commission'') a proposed rule change (File No. SR-NSCC-95-17) 
    pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
    (``Act'') to establish additional procedures for placing settling 
    members on Class A Surveillance and collecting clearing fund and other 
    collateral deposits from settling members.\1\ Notice of the proposal 
    was published in the Federal Register on March 12, 1996.\2\ No comment 
    letter were received. For the reasons discussed below, the Commission 
    is temporarily approving the proposed rule change through May 31, 1997.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1) (1988).
        \2\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 36930 (March 6, 1996), 
    61 FR 10051.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    I. Description of the Proposal
    
        NSCC's Board of Directors has determined that under certain 
    circumstances settling members who clear securities transactions for 
    over-the-counter (``OTC'') market makers or who themselves engage in 
    OTC market making can have their financial viability materially 
    impacted by such business.\3\ Furthermore, if these settling members 
    dominate one side of the market in their street-side trading positions, 
    either directly by participating in OTC market making or indirectly by 
    clearing transactions for OTC market makers, NSCC believes that the 
    risk of default by the settling member increases.\4\ In turn, this 
    could potentially increase NSCC's exposure because NSCC is obligated to 
    complete defaulting settling members' unsettled trades once NSCC's 
    trade guarantee attaches.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \3\ When a market maker, either alone or acting in concert with 
    other market makers, takes net street-side trading positions (i.e., 
    non-retail trading with other broker-dealers) that constitute a 
    disproportionately large percentage of the total net street-side 
    buys or net street-side sells in any issue (i.e., the market maker 
    dominates one side of the market in the issue), the risk of default 
    by that market maker can increase.
        \4\ However, to the extent that market makers' net street-side 
    trading positions in dominated issues result from legitimate 
    customer orders, the potential adverse impact on the financial 
    viability of a settling member and the potential for increased 
    exposure to NSCC could be mitigated. So long as the customer orders 
    are legitimate, the risks associated with such positions are borne 
    among the individual accounts of the market maker's customers and 
    not concentrated solely in the proprietary accounts of the market 
    maker.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        The problem is magnified if one or more additional risk factors are 
    present. These additional risk factors can include, without limitation:
        (1) Concentrated short selling in dominated issues;
        (2) Undue concentration of securities held in inventory by market 
    maker(s) for dominated issues;
        (3) Dominated issues also being IPOs less than six months past 
    initial issuance particularly when the current value of the issue is 
    significantly different from its initial sales price or there is undue 
    concentration of inventory in the managing underwriter(s); and
        (4) Clearing positions of market makers in dominated issues away 
    from their primary clearing brokers.
        Rule 15, Section 3 of NSCC's rules currently provides that any 
    settling member \5\ shall furnish to NSCC such adequate assurances of 
    its financial responsibility and operational capability as NSCC may at 
    any time or from time to time deem necessary or advisable in order to 
    protect NSCC. Section 4 of Rule 15 states that such adequate assurances 
    may include, but are not be limited to, increased clearing fund 
    deposits of settling members. Furthermore, Section III.B.1.o. of 
    Addendum B to NSCC's rules sets forth the guidelines for determining 
    when NSCC may place a broker-dealer settling member on Class A 
    surveillance status.\6\ Pursuant to these guidelines, NSCC may place a 
    broker-dealer settling member on Class A surveillance if there is any 
    condition which could materially impact the operational or financial 
    viability of the settling member which increases or potentially may 
    increase exposure to NSCC.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \5\ NSCC Rule 1 defines a ``settling member'' to include any 
    NSCC member, non-clearing member and, except where a contrary intent 
    is expressed in NSCC's rules, a special representative.
        \6\ Class A Surveillance permits NSCC, among other things, to 
    increase a settling members clearing fund requirement by an amount 
    equal to (i) up to 5% of the settling member's CNS long fail 
    positions, plus (ii) up to 5% of the settling member's short fail 
    positions, plus (iii) 2.5% or at NSCC's discretion up to 5% of the 
    settling member's average non-CNS and non-mutual fund services 
    debits, plus (iv) 2.5% of the settling member's average non-CNS and 
    non-mutual fund services credits. NSCC Rules and Procedures, 
    Addendum B, IV(C).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        In order for NSCC to reduce its potential exposure from the OTC 
    market making activity described above, NSCC is adding Addendum O to 
    its rules and procedures. Addendum O will permit NSCC to place settling 
    members on Class A surveillance if they clear for or are themselves OTC 
    market makers and (i) they do not have sufficient capital or access to 
    capital to support either potential increases in market making activity 
    in dominated OTC issues or (ii) there is the presence of the additional 
    risk factors described above. At its discretion, NSCC may elect not to 
    place settling members on Class A surveillance if it has obtained 
    sufficient assurances that a high degree of mitigating circumstances 
    exist.\7\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \7\ However, the mere fact that a market maker has a large 
    customer base may not necessarily constitute the necessary 
    mitigating circumstances especially if the customers are retail and/
    or the market maker has a history of customer complaints or other 
    adverse regulatory or disciplinary actions. Refer also to note 4.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        Furthermore, NSCC is adopting an interim collateralization policy 
    which will allow NSCC in its discretion to
    
    [[Page 24994]]
    
    require settling members placed on Class A surveillance that clear for 
    or are themselves OTC market makers to meet the following special 
    collateralization requirements:
        (1) To the extent that the sum of the absolute dollar values of any 
    such settling members' net unsettled trading positions in all 
    securities dominated \8\ by a market maker exceeds such market maker's 
    excess net capital, NSCC can require the settling member to deposit 
    with NSCC at such times and in such manner as NSCC may designate, 
    including an immediate deposit of same-day funds the amount by which 
    the value of the net unsettled trading positions exceed the market 
    maker's excess net capital.\9\ In determining the size of net unsettled 
    trading positions, NSCC may take into account offsetting pending (i.e., 
    non-fail) institutional delivery (``ID'') transactions that have been 
    confirmed and when NSCC deems appropriate, affirmed,\10\ through the ID 
    system of a clearing agency registered under Section 17A of the Act 
    (``registered clearing agency'').\11\ In addition, if a market maker's 
    net unsettled trading positions in dominated issues are cleared by one 
    or more other settling members, including any settling member on Class 
    A surveillance, NSCC will have the discretion for purposes of 
    calculating the special collateral deposit of treating those positions 
    as if they were all cleared by a settling member on Class A 
    surveillance.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \8\ Domination will be determined according to criteria 
    specified by NSCC from time to time.
        \9\ The term ``same-day funds'' refers to payment in funds that 
    are immediately available and generally are transferred by 
    electronic means.
        \10\ In determining net unsettled trading positions, NSCC in its 
    discretion under certain circumstances may elect to take into 
    account offsetting pending confirmed ID transactions only if such 
    transactions also have been affirmed. Moreover, NSCC may decline to 
    consider any ID transaction if it has reason to believe that the 
    institutional counterparty may not or cannot settle such 
    transaction.
        \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1 (1988).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        (2) To the extent that the unsettled positions referred to in 
    paragraph (1) above are short (i.e., net sells), NSCC in its discretion 
    may collect more than 100 percent of the amount by which the sum of the 
    absolute dollar values of the net unsettled trading positions of any 
    such settling member in all the securities dominated by a market maker 
    exceeds the market maker's excess net capital.\12\ In lieu of cash 
    collateral, NSCC may require or accept a book-entry delivery of 
    securities to NSCC sufficient to cover such short position.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \12\ For example, if a clearing member's excess net capital is 
    $100,000 and the value of its OTC market making activities is 
    $125,000, the rule change permits NSCC to require the clearing 
    member to deposit an additional $25,000. However, if the clearing 
    member's OTC market making activity includes short positions, the 
    rule change will permit NSCC to collect more than $25,000.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        (3) NSCC will reserve the right at all times to accept alternative 
    arrangements for its protection in any of the above situations. NSCC 
    may require special collateral deposits with respect to trading 
    positions in issues dominated by a market maker even when the value of 
    those positions do not exceed the market maker's excess net capital. 
    NSCC also may choose to forego collecting such special collateral even 
    when the value of those positions exceed the market maker's excess net 
    capital but do not exceed some higher threshold.\13\ NSCC will make 
    these determinations based on the specific situation and depending 
    upon, among other things, the presence or absence of additional risk 
    factors or mitigating circumstances.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \13\ From time to time, NSCC will determine in its discretion 
    what such higher threshold shall be.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        The special collateralization requirements described above are 
    interim measures for settling members on Class A surveillance which 
    will be in effect until NSCC has gained enough experience in 
    surveillance of OTC market maker trading activities to impose permanent 
    special collateralization requirements. Additionally, if there is 
    concentrated short selling in dominated issues, NSCC will maintain its 
    right to collect special collateral deposits from the settling members 
    clearing the short sales without regard to their surveillance status. 
    Special collateral collected from any settling member pursuant to the 
    above procedures will be in addition to the settling member's clearing 
    fund deposit computed in accordance with the formulae set forth in NSCC 
    Procedure XV or in accordance with the alternative method set forth 
    below.
        Because NSCC believes that its settling members on Class A 
    surveillance present a higher than normal risk of default and 
    insolvency, NSCC is proposing that such settling members' clearing fund 
    deposits be based on the close-out risk presented by their unsettled 
    positions in NSCC's systems. Therefore, pursuant to Rule 15 as 
    expressed under Addendum O, NSCC will have the discretion to compute 
    the continuous net settlement (``CNS'') component of the clearing fund 
    requirement for any settling member on Class A surveillance in 
    accordance with the following alternative method rather than the 
    formulae to calculate clearing fund set forth in NSCC Procedure XV.\14\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \14\ NSCC Procedure XV contains the formulae usually employed to 
    calculated clearing members' clearing fund requirements.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        (1) NSCC may calculate on a daily or periodic basis the volatility 
    of any such settling member's net unsettled trading positions in CNS 
    eligible issues (``net CNS trading positions''). Such positions shall 
    be determined after taking into account offsetting pending (i.e., non-
    fail) ID transactions that have been confirmed and, when NSCC deems 
    appropriate, affirmed \15\ through the ID system of a registered 
    clearing agency. Such calculation will be made in accordance with the 
    Capital Asset Pricing Model or any other generally accepted portfolio 
    volatility model, including without limitation, any margining formula 
    employed by any other registered clearing agency provided, however, 
    that not less than two standard deviations' volatility shall be 
    calculated under any model chosen. Such calculation will be made 
    utilizing such assumptions and based on such historical data as NSCC 
    deems reasonable and shall cover such range of historical volatility as 
    NSCC from time to time deems appropriate. If such volatility is 
    calculated on a periodic basis, it may be expressed as a percentage of 
    the sum of the absolute values of the firm's net CNS trading positions. 
    Any such calculations, whether expressed as a dollar value or 
    percentage, may be rounded as NSCC deems appropriate.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \15\ Supra note 10.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        (2) NSCC shall have the discretion to exclude from the above 
    calculations net CNS trading positions in classes of securities whose 
    volatility is (i) less amenable to statistical analysis such as OTC 
    bulletin board or pink sheet issues or issues trading below a 
    designated dollar threshold (e.g., five dollars) or (ii) amenable to 
    generally accepted statistical analysis only in a complex manner (e.g., 
    municipal or corporate bonds). The amount of clearing fund required 
    with respect to net CNS trading positions in such issues shall be 
    determined by multiplying the absolute value of such positions by a 
    percentage designated by NSCC, which percentage may vary depending on 
    such factors as NSCC deems relevant.
        (3) The amounts calculated in accordance with the immediately 
    preceding two numbered paragraphs will be substituted for the amount 
    calculated in accordance with paragraph (1)(c) of Sections A.I.(a), 
    A.II.(a) and A.II.(b) of NSCC's Procedure XV.\16\ In addition, NSCC may 
    in its discretion reduce or eliminate the amount calculated in 
    accordance with paragraph (1)(a) of Procedure XV.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \16\ Supra note 14.
    
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    [[Page 24995]]
    
        (4) NSCC in its discretion also may calculate the total clearing 
    fund requirement of any settling member on a daily basis instead of a 
    twenty-day rolling average basis and may collect deficiencies at such 
    times and in such manner as specified by NSCC from time to time, 
    including immediate collection of same-day funds.
        Nothing in the foregoing rule change will limit NSCC's discretion 
    with respect to placing settling members on Class A surveillance or 
    requiring settling members to furnish adequate assurance of financial 
    responsibility or operational capability as set forth in NSCC's rules 
    and procedures.
    
    II. Discussion
    
        Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act \17\ requires that the rules of a 
    clearing agency be designed to assure the safeguarding of securities 
    and funds which are in the custody or control of the clearing agency 
    and generally to protect investors and the public interest. The 
    Commission believes the proposed rule change is consistent with NSCC's 
    obligations under the Act because it will allow NSCC to take particular 
    action to protect itself, its members, and investors in situations 
    where settling members pose an increased risk because of their 
    involvement in OTC market making.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \17\ 15 U.S.C. Sec. 78q-1(b)(3)(F) (1988).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        Under the proposal, NSCC will have the authority with respect to 
    settling members who participate in OTC market making activities or 
    clear for correspondents that engage in such activity (1) to place such 
    members on Class A surveillance, (2) to require such members to post 
    additional collateral with NSCC, and (3) to calculate an alternative 
    clearing fund requirement for such members when additional risk factors 
    are present. Collectively, the higher level of surveillance, the 
    additional level of collateralization, and the alternative clearing 
    fund requirements should help to ameliorate NSCC's exposure which in 
    turn should assist NSCC in fulfilling its obligations under the Act to 
    safeguard securities and funds for which it has control of, is 
    responsible for and, generally, to protect investors and the public 
    interest.
        The Commission is temporarily approving the proposed rule change 
    through May 31, 1997, so that NSCC can gain additional experience in 
    the surveillance of OTC market makers and the risks posed by clearing 
    such activity. NSCC also will be able to gain experience with the 
    additional collateralization requirements and alternative clearing 
    formula requirements for settling members subject to Class A 
    surveillance prior to permanent imposition of these requirements. 
    Temporary approval also will afford both the Commission and NSCC an 
    opportunity to observe whether the additional collateralization and 
    alternative clearing fund requirements adequately protect NSCC, its 
    members, and investors from the expected risks of participating in and 
    clearing OTC market maker activity and whether adjustments to the 
    procedures are necessary. Prior to filing a proposed rule change 
    seeking permanent approval of the procedures set forth in this 
    temporary approval order, NSCC shall present to the Commission a more 
    detailed report of its findings regarding the adequacy of the controls 
    and discussing any changes to be made to the procedures. During the 
    temporary approval period, NSCC will from time to time apprise the 
    Commission on the operation of the additional collateralization 
    requirements to enable the Commission to monitor the implementation of 
    such requirements.
    
    III. Conclusion
    
        On the basis of the foregoing, the Commission finds that the 
    proposal is consistent with the requirements of the Act and in 
    particular with the requirements of Section 17A of the Act and the 
    rules and regulations thereunder.
        It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act, 
    that the proposed rule change (File No. SR-NSCC-95-17) be, and hereby 
    is, approved on a temporary basis through May 31, 1997.
    
        For the Commission by the Division of Market Regulation, 
    pursuant to delegated authority.\18\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \18\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12) (1995).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Margaret H. McFarland,
    Deputy Secretary.
    [FR Doc. 96-12471 Filed 5-16-96; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
    
    

Document Information

Published:
05/17/1996
Department:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
96-12471
Pages:
24993-24995 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Release No. 34-37202, File No. SR-NSCC-95-17
PDF File:
96-12471.pdf