99-12316. Multi-Species Conservation Program (MSCP) for the Lower Colorado River, Arizona, Nevada, and California  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 95 (Tuesday, May 18, 1999)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 27000-27002]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-12316]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
    
    Bureau of Reclamation
    Fish and Wildlife Service
    
    
    Multi-Species Conservation Program (MSCP) for the Lower Colorado 
    River, Arizona, Nevada, and California
    
    ACTION: Notice of Intent to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement 
    (EIS)/Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and notice of public scoping 
    meetings.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: Pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and 
    the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Bureau of Reclamation 
    (Reclamation), Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), and the 
    Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, intend to prepare 
    an EIS/EIR to evaluate the impacts associated with implementing the 
    MSCP for the Lower Colorado River in the states of Arizona, Nevada, and 
    California.
    
    DATES AND ADDRESSES: Written comments on conservation alternatives and 
    issues to be addressed in the EIS/EIR are requested by July 27, 1999, 
    and should be sent to Mr. Tom Shrader, Attention: LC-2500, Bureau of 
    Reclamation, PO Box 61470, Boulder City, NV 89006-1470, or FAX'd to Mr. 
    Shrader at (702) 293-8146. Oral and written comments will be accepted 
    at the open house format public scoping meetings to be held at the 
    following locations:
    
    June 15, 1999, 5:00 p.m., Bureau of Land Management Havasu Field 
    Office, 2610 Sweetwater Drive, Lake Havasu City, Arizona.
    June 16, 1999, 5:00 p.m., Avi Hotel and Casino, 10000 Aha Macav 
    Parkway, Laughlin, Nevada.
    June 17, 1999, 5:00 p.m., Henderson Convention Center, 200 South Water 
    Street, Henderson, Nevada.
    June 22, 1999, 5:00 p.m., Yuma Desalting Plant, Bureau of Reclamation, 
    7301 Calle Agua Salada, Yuma, Arizona.
    June 23, 1999, 5:00 p.m., Arizona Department of Water Resources, 
    conference rooms A and B, third floor, 500 North 3rd Street, Phoenix, 
    Arizona.
    
    [[Page 27001]]
    
    June 30, 1999, 5:00 p.m., Veterans of Foreign Wars Hall Post 2987, 148 
    North 1st Street, Blythe, California.
    July 1, 1999, 5:00 p.m., Ontario Airport Marriott, 2200 East Holt 
    Boulevard, Ontario, California.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Tom Shrader, Manager, 
    Environmental Compliance, Bureau of Reclamation at (702) 293-8703 or 
    Mr. Gilbert D. Metz, Supervisory Coordinator for Federal Projects, Fish 
    and Wildlife Service at (602) 640-2720, ext. 217. Questions regarding 
    the CEQA process should be directed to Dr. Debbie Drezner, Metropolitan 
    Water District at (213) 217-6218. Information on the purpose, 
    membership, meeting schedules and documents associated with the MSCP 
    may be obtained on the Internet at www.lcrmscp.org., with a 
    supplemental link to Reclamation's web page at www.lc.usbr.gov.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The proposed action is a multi-species 
    conservation program that will move Federal and California Endangered 
    Species Act (ESA and CESA) listed species, and potentially listed 
    species, toward recovery while accommodating current water and power 
    operations and optimizing opportunities for future water and power 
    development. Reclamation and the Service are joint Federal leads for 
    the EIS. The EIS will be the basis for (1) Reclamation's Record of 
    Decision on implementing its portion of the MSCP and (2) the Service's 
    Record of Decision on issuing an ESA section 10 permit. The EIS/EIR 
    document will also include a biological assessment of Reclamation's 
    ongoing and future discretionary actions, which the Service will 
    utilize in preparing a biological opinion per section 7 of the ESA. The 
    Metropolitan Water District is the designated CEQA lead agency for the 
    EIR.
        The Lower Colorado River MSCP is a partnership of state, Federal, 
    tribal, and other public and private stakeholders with interest in 
    managing the water and related resources of the Lower Colorado River 
    basin. In August of 1995, the Department of the Interior and the states 
    of Arizona, Nevada, and California entered into a Memorandum of 
    Agreement and later a Memorandum of Clarification (MOA/MOC) for 
    Development of a Lower Colorado River Multi-Species Conservation 
    Program. The purpose of the MOA/MOC was to initiate development of an 
    MSCP that will: (1) conserve habitat and work toward the recovery of 
    threatened and endangered species as well as reduce the likelihood of 
    additional species listings under the ESA and the CESA, and (2) 
    accommodate current water diversions and power production and optimize 
    opportunities for future water and power development, to the extent 
    consistent with the law.
        The participants agreed to develop, implement, and fund the MSCP. 
    It was also agreed to pursue an ecosystem-based approach to developing 
    the MSCP for interim and long-term compliance with applicable 
    endangered species and environmental laws and to implement conservation 
    and protection measures for included species and habitats.
        It is proposed that the MSCP will serve as a coordinated, 
    comprehensive conservation approach for the lower Colorado River basin 
    within the 100-year floodplain from below Glen Canyon Dam to the 
    Southerly International Boundary with Mexico for a period of 50 years. 
    Potential conservation measures or alternatives currently under 
    consideration for various fish species (e.g., endangered razorback 
    sucker) and their habitats may include evaluating the use of backwaters 
    between native and nonnative species; managing to minimize conflicts 
    between native and nonnative aquatic species by constructing isolated 
    native fish refugia; restoring floodplain connections and ephemeral 
    backwaters in an effort to restore floodplain functions; augmenting 
    native fish populations through stocking and additional rearing 
    capacity; implementing a genetic management plan for native fish 
    populations; enhancing fish passage; managing to minimize take; and 
    managing discretionary flows to enhance and restore habitat. Potential 
    conservation measures or alternatives currently under consideration to 
    benefit various bird species (e.g., endangered southwestern willow 
    flycatcher) and their habitats may include protecting and restoring 
    habitat; protecting existing habitat through activities such as 
    managing access; maintaining hydrologic conditions; fire protection 
    using prescribed fires/fire planning and postfire rehabilitation; 
    converting agricultural land to habitat (acquire land and water rights 
    from willing sellers); managing large mammal problems (e.g., burro 
    grazing and trampling); controlling threats from other species such as 
    cowbird trapping; vegetation management including the need to improve 
    habitat; and manipulating discretionary flows to enhance and restore 
    habitat. Additional conservation measures or alternatives may be 
    identified during the scoping process. The needs of these and other 
    species identified in the MSCP will be integrated to maximize 
    biodiversity of the Lower Colorado River. Research and monitoring in 
    combination with adaptive management will be used to facilitate 
    accomplishment of these goals.
        Under the No Action/No Project alternative, it is assumed that some 
    or all of the current and future projects proposed for coverage under 
    the MSCP would be implemented, as long as they are in compliance with 
    the ESA. The No Action/No Project alternative would imply that the 
    impacts from these potential projects on sensitive species and habitats 
    would be evaluated and mitigated on a project-by-project basis, as is 
    presently the case. Individual ESA Section 10 permits would be required 
    for activities involving take of listed species due to nonfederal 
    projects/actions. Without a coordinated, comprehensive ecosystem-based 
    conservation approach for the region, listed species may not be 
    adequately addressed by individual project-specific mitigation 
    requirements, unlisted ``at risk'' species would not receive proactive 
    action intended to prevent their listing, and project-specific 
    mitigation would be less cost effective in helping Federal and 
    nonfederal agencies work toward recovery of listed species. Current 
    independent conservation actions would continue, although some of these 
    are not yet funded.
        A public involvement program has been initiated and will be 
    maintained throughout this EIS/EIR process. The goal is to keep the 
    public and affected parties informed and actively involved as the 
    project evolves. Given the number of entities participating (Federal, 
    State, and local governments, tribes, and private interest groups), 
    successfully providing information and soliciting feedback are critical 
    to the project's effectiveness.
        Probable Environmental Effects--Following is a preliminary list of 
    probable environmental issues and effects associated with the project. 
    Other issues may be identified during the internal MSCP and public 
    scoping process. Until a firm proposal and alternatives with specific 
    actions and locations are developed, it is difficult to predict 
    specific impacts.
        Biological Resources--Among the endangered species known to use the 
    project area are the southwestern willow flycatcher, Yuma clapper rail, 
    razorback sucker, bonytail, peregrine falcon, and bald eagle (being 
    considered for delisting). Of prime concern will be the conservation of 
    these and other species, such as the yellow billed cuckoo (under review 
    for listing under the ESA), and associated habitat within the 100-year 
    floodplain. Overall impacts on
    
    [[Page 27002]]
    
    biological resources are expected to be positive.
        Hydrology and Water Quality--Certain conservation measures and flow 
    regimes may alter onsite water resources, including waters of the 
    United States [as defined in 40 CFR 230.3(s)], which are under the U.S. 
    Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) jurisdiction. Under Section 404 of the 
    Clean Water Act, the Corps is responsible for issuing a permit if a 
    project may result in the placement of material into water of the 
    United States. Until specific alternatives are developed, the effects 
    on hydrology and water quality are unknown.
        Floodplains and Wetlands--Implementation of the MSCP will have 
    overall beneficial impacts on floodplains and wetlands, especially in 
    maintaining or creating backwaters (wetlands) and reestablishing native 
    riparian habitat which is essential to the recovery of species.
        Municipal and Industrial Uses--Municipal and industrial water uses 
    may be affected by various conservation measures that require 
    additional water. However, it is the intent of the MSCP to accommodate 
    these uses and optimize future opportunities while protecting 
    threatened and endangered species and their habitat within the project 
    area.
        Cultural Resources--The program could disturb or affect 
    archaeological resources, traditional cultural properties, Indian 
    sacred sites, and Indian Trust Assets. However, it is the intent of the 
    MSCP to avoid such effects.
        Socioeconomics--The program may have overall beneficial 
    socioeconomics effects on the Lower Colorado River. However, the extent 
    of such effects will not be known until specific conservation 
    alternatives are identified.
        Recreation--In addressing species needs, there may be adverse 
    impacts to localized recreational uses such as motorized boating, off-
    highway vehicle use, and angling.
        Water and Hydroelectric Power Uses--Water and hydroelectric power 
    uses may be affected by various conservation measures that involve 
    discretionary release patterns. However, it is the intent of the MSCP 
    to accommodate these uses while protecting threatened and endangered 
    species and their habitat within the project area.
        Agricultural and Other Land Uses--Current agricultural resources or 
    operations and land uses may be impacted. Land use and cropping 
    patterns would change with the voluntary conversion of agricultural 
    lands to native riparian habitat or the transfer of water rights for 
    habitat maintenance and restoration.
        International Impacts--Potential trans-boundary impacts to Mexico 
    will be identified and analyzed. The project will not affect the 
    delivery of water pursuant to the Mexico Water Treaty.
        Environmental Justice--It is anticipated that the MSCP will not 
    result in disproportionately high and adverse human health or 
    environmental effects on minorities and/or low income populations.
        Related Project Documentation--It is anticipated that the EIS/EIR 
    process will make full use (including incorporation by reference, as 
    appropriate, pursuant to NEPA and CEQA) of the following project 
    documents, copies of which are available for inspection at the 
    Metropolitan Water District, Reclamation, and Service offices:
        Bureau of Reclamation, Description and Assessment of Operations, 
    Maintenance, and Sensitive Species of the Lower Colorado River--Final 
    Biological Assessment, August 1996.
        Fish and Wildlife Service, Biological and Conference Opinion on 
    Lower Colorado River Operations and Maintenance--Lake Mead to Southerly 
    International Boundary, April 1997.
        Starting in June 1999, these documents may also be accessed through 
    Reclamation's web site at www.lc.usbr.gov.
        The draft EIS/EIR is expected to be completed by June 2000.
    
        Dated: May 5, 1999.
    LeGrand Neilson,
    Assistant Regional Director, Lower Colorado Region, Bureau of 
    Reclamation.
    Geoffrey L. Haskett,
    Acting Regional Director, Fish and Wildlife Service.
    [FR Doc. 99-12316 Filed 5-17-99; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4310-94-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
05/18/1999
Department:
Fish and Wildlife Service
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Notice of Intent to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)/Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and notice of public scoping meetings.
Document Number:
99-12316
Pages:
27000-27002 (3 pages)
PDF File:
99-12316.pdf