98-13285. Grazing Permit Reissuance, Sheep Grazing on the Ash Mountain and Iron Mountain Allotments, Absaroka-Beartooth Wilderness, Gallatin National Forest, Park County, MT  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 96 (Tuesday, May 19, 1998)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 27555-27557]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-13285]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
    
    Forest Service
    
    
    Grazing Permit Reissuance, Sheep Grazing on the Ash Mountain and 
    Iron Mountain Allotments, Absaroka-Beartooth Wilderness, Gallatin 
    National Forest, Park County, MT
    
    AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.
    
    ACTION: Notice; intent to prepare environmental impact statement.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The USDA, Forest Service, will prepare an environmental impact 
    statement (EIS) to disclose the environmental effects of reissuing a 
    10-year term grazing permit to continue authorizing sheep grazing in 
    the Ash Mountain and Iron Mountain Allotments, located in the 
    Hellroaring Creek and Buffalo Creek drainages in the southwest corner 
    of the Absaroka-Beartooth Wilderness, Gallatin National Forest, 
    Gardiner Ranger District, Park County, Montana. The permit reissuance 
    would authorize the continued use of a three-unit rest-rotation grazing 
    system for grazing 1200 ewe/lamb pairs for a 60-day grazing season. 
    Also, the proposed action includes incorporation grizzly bear and 
    riparian habitat protection standards into the new grazing permit, 
    where they had only been implemented via the Annual Operating Plan in 
    the past. The purpose of the proposed action is (1) to continue 
    achieving Gallatin National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan 
    (Forest Plan) objectives for domestic livestock production on the Ash 
    Mountain and Iron Mountain Allotments, and in a manner that protects 
    other resources including vegetation, wildlife, and riparian habitat.
        The Forest Plan provides overall guidance for land management 
    activities, including livestock grazing, within the area. This EIS will 
    tier to the Gallatin Forest Plan Final EIS (September, 1987).
    
    DATES: Written comments and suggestions should be received on or before 
    July 6, 1998.
    
    
    [[Page 27556]]
    
    
    ADDRESSES: Submit written comments and suggestions on the proposed 
    management activities or a request to be placed on the project mailing 
    list to John R. Logan, District Ranger, Gardiner Ranger District, 
    Gallatin National Forest, P.O. Box 5, Gardiner, Montana, 59030.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pat Hoppe, EIS Team Leader, Gardiner 
    Ranger District, Gallatin National Forest, Phone (406) 848-7375.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Reissuance of a 10-year term grazing permit 
    is proposed on the Ash Mountain and Iron Mountain Allotments. These 
    allotments would be combined and managed as one allotment called the 
    Ash/Iron Mountain Allotment. It would consist of approximately 74,000 
    acres, of which about 14,000 acres are classified as suitable for 
    livestock grazing. The proposed action includes continuing the use of a 
    three-unit rest-rotation grazing system for 2400 sheep months (1200 
    ewe/lamb pairs would be grazed July 15 through September 15 each year). 
    This system allows the sheep to graze one unit (pasture) one summer 
    every three years. The other two units would not be grazed two out of 
    the three years. Also, the proposed action includes incorporating 
    grizzly bear and riparian habitat protection standards into the new 
    grazing permit, where they had only been implemented via the Annual 
    Operating Plan in the past.
        The Gallatin National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan 
    (Forest Plan) provides the overall guidance for management activities 
    in the potentially affected area through its goals, objectives, 
    standards and guidelines, and management area direction. The purposes 
    of the proposed action are to: (1) continue achieving Gallatin Forest 
    Plan objectives for domestic livestock production on the Ash Mountain 
    and Iron Mountain Allotments, (2) continue providing flexibility in the 
    grazing schedule and better protect vegetation and wildlife habitat by 
    continuing the three-unit rest-rotation system for 2400 sheep months of 
    grazing, and (3) provide stronger administrative control over permitted 
    grazing activities to better assure protection of riparian areas and 
    grizzly bears and to bring the permit into compliance with the Forest 
    Plan. The decision to be made is ``should sheep grazing be allowed to 
    continue in the Ash Mountain and Iron Mountain Allotments, and under 
    what conditions.''
        The project area consists of approximately 74,000 acres of National 
    Forest land located in T7S, R10-12E; T8S, R10-12E; and T9S, R10-11E, 
    P.M. MT. This area is located entirely within the Absaroka-Beartooth 
    Wilderness.
        The area of the proposed continuation of grazing would occur within 
    Management Areas 4 and 7. Grazing would occur only on suitable grazing 
    land. Below is a brief description of the applicable management area 
    direction.
        Management Area 4--This area includes the Gallatin National Forest 
    portions of the Absaroka-Beartooth Wilderness and Lee Metcalf 
    Wilderness. Occupied grizzly bear habitat is present in much of the 
    area. Livestock grazing is allowed within this management area so long 
    as it is conducted in accordance with wilderness values and grizzly 
    bear standards and guidelines.
        Management Area 7--These are riparian zones or areas where 
    vegetation is present that requires either free or unbounded water or 
    soil moistures in excess of what is normally found in the area. Lands 
    within this management area are suitable for livestock grazing as long 
    as soil, water, vegetation, fish, and dependent wildlife species are 
    protected.
        The Forest Service will consider a range of alternatives. One of 
    these will be the ``no action'' alternative, in which none of the 
    proposed activities would be implemented. Additional grazing 
    alternatives will be considered in response to issues and other 
    resource values.
        The EIS will analyze the direct, indirect, and cumulative 
    environmental effects of the alternatives. Past, present, and projected 
    activities on both private and National Forest lands will be 
    considered. The EIS will disclose the analysis of site-specific 
    mitigation measures and their effectiveness.
        Public participation is an important part of the analysis, 
    commencing with the initial scoping process (40 CFR 1501.7), which 
    began in October, 1997. In addition to this scoping, the public may 
    visit Forest Service officials at any time during the analysis and 
    prior to the decision. The Forest Service is seeking information, 
    comments, and assistance from Federal, State, and local agencies and 
    other individuals or organizations who may be interested in or affected 
    by the proposed action. No public meeting are scheduled at this time.
        Comments from the public and other agencies will be used in 
    preparation of the Draft EIS. The scoping process will be used to:
        1. Identify potential issues.
        2. Identify issues to be analyzed in depth.
        3. Eliminate insignificant issues or those which have been covered 
    by a relevant previous environmental analysis, such as the Gallatin 
    Forest Plan EIS.
        4. Identify alternatives to the proposed action.
        5. Identify potential environmental effects of the proposed action 
    and alternatives (i.e., direct, indirect, and cumulative effects).
        6. Determine potential cooperating agencies and task assignments.
        Some public comments have already been received in conjunction with 
    earlier scoping efforts on this project. The following principle issues 
    have been identified so far:
        1. Livestock grazing may affect sensitive plants.
        2. Livestock grazing may adversely increase competition for forage 
    between big game and domestic livestock.
        3. Domestic sheep may affect the population of bighorn sheep by 
    transmitting diseases.
        4. Livestock grazing may cause conflicts with grizzly bears and 
    indirectly increase bear mortalities.
    
    Other issues commonly associated with livestock grazing include: 
    effects on water quality, riparian habitat, and soils. This list will 
    be verified, expanded, or modified based on public scoping for this 
    proposal.
        The Draft EIS is expected to be filed with the Environmental 
    Protection Agency (EPA) and available for public review in July of 
    1998. At that time, the EPA will publish a Notice of Availability of 
    the Draft EIS in the Federal Register. The comment period on the Draft 
    EIS will be 45 days from the date the EPA's notice of availability 
    appears in the Federal Register. It is very important that those 
    interested in management of the Ash Mountain and Iron Mountain 
    Allotments participate at that time. To be most helpful, comments on 
    the Draft EIS should be as site-specific as possible. The Final EIS is 
    scheduled to be completed by October, 1998.
        The Forest Service believes, at this early stage, it is important 
    to give reviewers notice of several court rulings related to public 
    participation in the environmental review process. First, reviewers of 
    draft environmental impact statements must structure their 
    participation in the environmental review of the proposal so that it is 
    meaningful and alerts an agency to the reviewer's position and 
    contentions. Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519, 
    553 (1978). Also, environmental objections that could be raised at the 
    draft environmental impact statement stage but that are not raised 
    until after completion of the final environmental impact statement may 
    be
    
    [[Page 27557]]
    
    waived or dismissed by the courts. City of Angoon v. Hodel, 803 F.2d 
    1016, 1022 (9th Cir. 1986) and Wisconsin Heritages, Inc. v. Harris, 490 
    F. Supp. 1334, 1338 (E.D. Wis. 1980). Because of these court rulings, 
    it is very important that those interested in this proposed action 
    participate by the close of the 45-day scoping comment period so that 
    substantive comments and objections are made available to the Forest 
    Service at a time when it can meaningfully consider them and respond to 
    them in developing issues and alternatives. To assist the Forest 
    Service in identifying and considering issues on the proposed action, 
    comments should be as specific as possible. Reviewers may wish to refer 
    to the Council on Environmental Quality Regulations for implementing 
    the procedural provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act at 
    40 CFR 1503.3 in addressing these points.
        John R. Logan, District Ranger, is the responsible official for 
    this environmental impact statement. His address is U.S. Forest 
    Service, Gardiner Ranger District, P.O. Box 5, Gardiner, MT 59030.
    
        Dated: May 4, 1998.
    David P. Garber,
    Forest Supervisor, Gallatin National Forest.
    [FR Doc. 98-13285 Filed 5-18-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
05/19/1998
Department:
Forest Service
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Notice; intent to prepare environmental impact statement.
Document Number:
98-13285
Dates:
Written comments and suggestions should be received on or before July 6, 1998.
Pages:
27555-27557 (3 pages)
PDF File:
98-13285.pdf